參考文獻
1.王美玉、黃美玉 (2003),「以顧客關係管理的觀點探討電子圖書館的讀者服務」,國家圖書館館刊,九十二年第一期,第155-168頁。2.王珮玲 (2001),「公共圖書館績效評估之研究﹘以台北市立圖書館為例」, 國家圖書館館刊,第二期,第35-65頁。3.汪冰 (1997),「美國電子圖書館的建設與發展」,圖書與資訊學刊,第二十二期,第71-87頁。4.李宏文 (2002),「結合層級分析法、模糊理論與灰色系統理論建構供應商評選模式之研究」,台北科技大學生產系統工程與管理研究所碩士論文。5.周欣鶯 (2002),「農學院學生使用實體圖書館與圖書館網站服務比較研究」,中興大學圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文。
6.吳政叡 (1997),「電子圖書館時代的大學圖書館」,大學圖書館,第一卷,第二期,第111-122頁。7.林振春 (1992),「德菲法(Delphi Technic)」,民意月刊,第一百六十九期, 第82頁。
8.林雅智 (2002),「大學圖書館評比模式之建構與實證研究」,成功大學工業管理研究所博士論文。
9.洪世昌 (2001),「標竿分析與ISO 11620於圖書館績效評估之運用」, 國立臺灣師範大學圖書館通訊,第四十八期,第2-6頁。
10.胡述兆 (1995),「圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典」,漢美書局。
11.胡述兆 (2001),「為圖書館建構一個新的定義」,中國圖書館學會會報,第六十六期,第1-4頁。12.柯皓仁 (2001),「電子圖書館實施經驗談﹘以交通大學圖書館為例」,書苑季刊,第四十七期,第10-33頁。
13.高強 (1997),「大學圖書館績效評估模式之建構與應用」,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃。
14.教育部高等教育司 (2003),「大學校院一覽表」,教育部。
15.張保隆、陳澤義 (1995),「臺灣各縣市文化中心相對績效之評估」, 中國行政,第五十七期,第31-45頁。
16.陳昭珍 (2000),「電子圖書館整合檢索之理論與實作」,文華書局。17.陳昭珍 (2000),「二十一世紀電子圖書館的發展趨勢」,國家圖書館館刊,八十九年第二期,第87-99頁。18.陳柔君 (2002),「連鎖咖啡業經營績效評估模式之研究﹘AHP與DEA之應用」,中華大學工業管理學系專題報告。
19.陳亞寧 (1999),「另類圖書館:電子圖書館綜觀」,資訊傳播與圖書館學,第五卷,第三期,第141-150頁。20.張淑惠 (1994),「圖書館績效評估之研究」,臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文。
21.張嘉彬 (2001),「臺大電子圖書館與博物館系統之評估研究﹘以查詢過程記錄分析法為例」,中國圖書館學會會報,第六十六期,第103-125頁。22.張嘉彬 (2002),「運用深度訪談法評估臺大電子圖書館與博物館系統」,大學圖書館,第六卷,第一期,第94-118頁。23.傅雅秀 (2001),「大學圖書館的中心地位:一個老隱喻與新概念」,圖書與資訊學刊,第三十七期,第51-57頁。24.楊詠凱 (2003),「台灣地區主要航空站營運與財務之績效評估」,交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士論文。
25.詹麗萍 (1996),「從傳統圖書館到電子圖書館」,資訊傳播與圖書館學,第三卷,第一期,第39-54頁。26.鄧振源、曾國雄 (1989),「層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(上)」,中國統計學報,第二十七卷,第六期,第5-22頁。27.鄧振源、曾國雄 (1989),「層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(下)」,中國統計學報,第二十七卷,第七期,第1-20頁。28.盧秀菊 (1988),「圖書館規劃之研究」,台灣學生書局。29.盧秀菊 (2003),「圖書館之績效評估」,中國圖書館學會會報,第七十一期,第1-19頁。30.謝玲芬、陳佩雯 (2004),「運用效率與效能評估圖書館服務績效」,2004產業管理創新研討會論文集,第770-778頁,修平技術學院,台中。
31.謝玲芬、靳炯彬、吳牧臻 (2003),「我國大學校院電子圖書館績效評估指標之構建」,2003中華決策科學研討會論文摘要集,第81頁,元培科學技術學院,新竹。32.謝寶煖 (1998),「從顧客觀點來談圖書館的績效評估」,國立成功大學圖書館館刊,第一期,第10頁。33.薛理桂 (1994),「電子圖書館:新近發展及對圖書館事業的影響」,圖書與資訊學刊,第十期,第1-5頁。34.薛理桂 (1997),「美英兩國電子圖書館之發展:兼論我國發展之途徑」,資訊傳播與圖書館學,第三卷,第三期,第23-33頁。35.羅思嘉、梁伶君 (1998),「大學圖書館績效評估模式之研究」, 國立成功大學圖書館館刊,第一期,第23-35頁。36.羅思嘉 (1999),「電子圖書館時代圖書館員的角色扮演」, 國立成功大學圖書館館刊,第三期,第40-51頁。37.蘇倫伸 (2004),「論我國大學圖書館之營運受資訊技術引進之影響」,交通大學經營管理研究所博士論文。
38.Abbott, C. (1994), Performance Measurement in Library and Information Services, London: Aslib.
39.Baker, S. L. and F. W. Lancaster (1991), The Measurement and Evaluation of Library Services, VA: Information Resources Press.
40.Banker, R. D., A. Charnes and W. W. Cooper (1984), “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Efficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Management Science, Vol. 33, pp.1078-1092.
41.Brophy & Peter (2002), “EQUINOX: Library Performance Measurement and Quality Management System, Performance Indicators for Electronic Library Services”.
42.Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes (1978), “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.2, pp. 429-444.
43.Chen, T. Y. (1997), “A Measurement of the Resource Utilization Efficiency of University Libraries,” International Journal of Production Economics, Vol.63, pp. 71-80.
44.Colborne, D., R. Summers, and J. Desjardins (1999), “Client Satisfaction and Utilization of Electronic and Traditional Library Services,” Bibliotheca Media Canadiana, Vol. 20, No. 4, p.174.
45.Cronin, M. J. (1985), Performance Measurement for Public Services in Academic and Research Libraries, Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries.
46.Crowford, J. (1996), Evaluation of Library and Information Services, London: Aslib.
47.Dougherty, R. M. (1991), “Research Libraries Must Abandon the Idea that ‘Bigger is Better’,” Chronicle of Higher Education, June, A32.
48.Dowler, L. (1997), Gateways to Knowledge: the Role of Academic Libraries in Teaching, Learning and Research, MA: MIT Press., pp. xxii, 240.
49.DuMont, R. R. (1980), “A Conceptual Basis for Library Effectiveness,” College and Research Libraries, Vol. 41, pp. 103-111.
50.Easun, M. S. (1992), “Identifying Efficiencies in Resource Management: an Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Selected School Libraries in California,” PH.D. Thesis, CA:University of California, Berkerly.
51.Evans, G. E., H. Borko and P. Ferguson (1972), ”Review of Criteria Used to Measure Library Effectiveness,” Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, Vol. 60, pp.102-110.
52.Hammond, C. J. (2002), “Efficiency in the Provision of Public Service: A Data Envelopment Analysis of UK Public Library Systems,” Applied Economic, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 649-657.
53.Hendrickson, K. (1989), “Standards for University Libraries: Evaluation of Performance,” Collage & Research Libraries News, September, pp.679-691.
54.Hernon, P. and E. Altman (1996), Service Quality in Academic Libraries, NJ: Ablex.
55.Hsieh, L. F., J. B. Chin, and M. C. Wu (2004), “The Performance Indicators of University E-library in Taiwan”, The Electronic Library, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 325-330.
56.Hwang, C. L. and K. Yoon (1981), Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
57.Hwang, C. L. and M. J. Lin (1987), Group Decision Making under Multiple Criteria: Methods and Applications, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
58.ISO 11620 (1998), Information and Documentation﹘Library Performance Indicators.
59.Kania, A. M. (1988), “Academic Library Standards Performance Measures,” College & Research Libraries, Vol. 49, pp. 16-23.
60.Kantor, P. B. (1984), Objective Performance Measures for Academic and Research Libraries, Association of Research Libraries, Washington, D.C.
61.Lancaster, F. W. (1977), The Measurement and Evaluation of Library Services, Washington, D.C.: Information Resources Press.
62.Lynch, B. P. (1979), “Standards for University Libraries,” College & Research Libraries News, Vol. 40, pp.101-110.
63.Lynch, B. P. (1987), “Standards for University Libraries,” IFLA Journal, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp.120-125.
64.Miller, G. A. (1965), “The Magic Number Seven, Plus or Minus Seven?,” Psychological Review, Vol. 63, No. 1, pp.91-97.
65.Opricovic, S. (1998), Multi-criteria Optimization of Civil Engineering Systems, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade.
66.Poll, R. and P. T. Boekhorst (1996), Measuring Quality: International Guidelines for Performance Measurement in Academic Libraries, Munchen: K. G. Saur.
67.Poll, R. (2001), “Performance, Processes and Costs: Managing Service Quality with the Balanced Scorecard, “ Library Trends, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp.709-717.
68.Saaty, T. L. (1980), The Analytical Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, NY: McGraw-Hill.
69.Shaughnessy, T. W. (1990), “Assessing Library Effectiveness, “ Journal of Library Administration, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 1-8.
70.Shim, W. (2003), “Applying DEA Technique to Library Evaluation in Academic Research Libraries,” Library Trends, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 312-332.
71.“Standards for College Libraries (2000),” The Final Version, Approved January 2000, College and Research Libraries News, pp.175-182.
72.Van House, N. A., B. T. Weil and C. R. McClure (1990), Measuring Academic Library Performance: A Practical Approach, American Library Association, IL: Chicago.
73.Wilson, L. A. (1999), “The Gateway Library: Rethinking Undergraduate Services,” People Come First: User-Centered, Academic Library Service, IL: Chicago, pp. 24-25.