臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：運用情境訪談法評量幼兒教師的實用智能
書刊名：中華心理學刊
作者：李新民 引用關係／陳密桃
作者(外文)：Lee, Hsing-ming／Chen, Mi-tao
出版日期：2007
卷期：49:2
頁次：頁159-183
主題關鍵詞：視訊化情境訪談；結構方程模式；實用智能；驗證性因素分析；Confirmatory factor analysis；Practical intelligence；Structural equation modeling；Video-based situational interview
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:62
  • 點閱點閱:77
本研究旨在發展評量幼兒教師實用智能的視訊化情境訪談評量工具，透過主題專家研擬情境訪談的評量題目與計分標準。在全台進行實地施測的過程中，以兩階段抽樣的1200名幼兒教師構成本研究的正式分析樣本。研究者以預試實證資料，進行視訊化情境訪談的題目分析，刪除專家組和生手組差異考驗未達顯著水準，以及評分者信度不佳的題目。接著研究者以第一次施測200名樣本實證資料，進行視訊化情境訪談的探索性分析，產生12個情境訪談題目。最後研究者以第二次施測取得1000名樣本實證資料，進行驗證性因素分析與結構方程模式分析。巢狀模式因素結構驗證性因素分析結果顯示，視訊化情境訪談的評量內涵包含「適應情勢」、「塑造情勢」、「選擇情勢」三個特殊因素，以及「實用智能」一般因素，特殊因素的解釋變異量大於一般因素的變異量。以「適應情勢」、「塑造情勢」、「選擇情勢」三種特質，視訊化情境訪談與情境判斷量表兩種方法為多項特質多項方法基礎，積差相關矩陣和驗證性因素分析結果顯示聚斂效度、區別效度存在。結構方程模式分析顯示視訊化情境訪談得分顯著影響幼兒教師的工作表現。根據主要研究發現，研究者針對視訊化情境訪談的應用，以及未來研究努力方向研提相關建議。
The main purpose of the present study was to video-based situational interview approach to measure preschool teacher's practical intelligence. Face to face questionnaire survey was conducted with preschool teachers from Taiwain aera. 1200 preschool teachers was sampled by the way of two-stage sampling. According to the item analysis, exploratory analyses, video-based situational interview for preschool teacher's practical intelligence is reduced to 12 items. Confirmatory factor analysis of nested factor structure show that measurement of video-based situational interview for preschool teachers' practical intelligence include general and specific factors. Specific factors are adaptive, shaping, and selective situation, general factor is practical intelligence (GP). And the amount of specific variance is more than GP. The validity of evaluating indicators for preschool teacher's practical intelligence is investigated through the construction of a multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrix. The three sections of the indicators, including adaptive, shaping, and selective situation, are treated as distinct traits. While, video-based situational interview and situational judgment inventory are treated as distinct methods. Results from MTMM matrix provide support for the convergent validity, discriminant validity of the indicators. The result of structural equation modeling indicate that job performance of preschool teachers can be captured by video-based situational interview. Those findings will give helpful information to apply video-based situational interview and future study.
期刊論文
1.Sternberg, R. J.、Hedlund, J.(2002)。Practical intelligence, g, and work psychology。Human Performance，15(1/2)，143-160。  new window
2.Sternberg, R. J.(2005)。A model of educational leadership: Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity, synthesized。International Journal of Leadership in Education，8(4)，347-364。  new window
3.McDaniel, Michael A.、Whetzel, Deborah L.、Schmidt, Frank L.、Maurer, Steven D.(1994)。The Validity of Employment Interviews: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-analysis。Journal of Applied Psychology，79(4)，599-616。  new window
4.Taylor, P. J.、Small, B.(2002)。Asking Applicants What They Would Do versus What They Did Do: A Meta-analytic Comparison of Situational and Past Behaviour Employment Interview Questions。Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology，75，277-294。  new window
5.Wagner, Richard K.(1987)。Tacit Knowledge in Everyday Intelligent Behavior。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，52，1236-1247。  new window
6.Latham, G. P.、Sarri, L. M.、Pursell, E. D.、Compion, M. A.(1980)。The situational interview。Journal of Applied Psychology，65，422-427。  new window
7.Schmidt, F. L.、Hunter, J. E.、Outerbridge, A. N.(1986)。Impact of Job Experience and Ability on Job Knowledge, Work Sample Performance, and Supervisory Ratings of Job Performance。Journal of Applied Psychology，71(3)，432-439。  new window
8.李新民、陳密桃、陳鳳玉(20051200)。評量幼兒實用智能的視訊化情境判斷量表之建構。測驗學刊，52(2)，61-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.李新民、陳密桃(20060600)。實用智能、緣分信念與心理健康、工作表現之相關：以幼兒教師為例。中華心理學刊，48(2)，183-202。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Van Rooy, D. L.、Viswesvaran, C.(2004)。Emotional intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation of predictive validity and nomological net。Journal of Vocational Behavior，65(1)，71-95。  new window
11.李新民、陳密桃、莊鳳茹(20041200)。國民小學教師實用智能評量研究。高雄師大學報：教育與社會科學類，17，75-96。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Wagner, R. K.、Sternberg, R. J.(1985)。Practical intelligence in real world pursuits: The role of tacit knowledge。Journal of Personality and Social Psycholgy，49，436-458。  new window
13.Nestor-Baker, N. S.、Hoy, W. K.(2001)。Tacit knowledge of school superintendents: Its nature, meaning, and content。Educational Administration Quarterly，37(1)，86-129。  new window
14.Quinones, M. A.、Ford, J. K.、Teachout, M. S.(1995)。The Relationship between Work Experience and Job Performance: A Conceptual and Meta-Analytic Review。Personnel Psychology，48，887-910。  new window
15.Campbell, Donald T.、Fiske, Donald W.(1959)。Convergent and Discriminant Validation by Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix。Psychological Bulletin，56(2)，81-105。  new window
16.Mayer, J. D.、Salovey, P.(1993)。The intelligence of emotional intelligence。Intelligence，17(4)，433-442。  new window
17.Hunter, J. E.、Hunter, R. F.(1984)。Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance。Psychological Bulletin，96(1)，72-98。  new window
18.Noar, S. M.(2003)。The role of structural equation modeling in scale development。Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal，10(4)，622-647。  new window
19.Podsakoff, Philip M.、MacKenzie, Scott B.、Lee, Jeong-Yeon、Podsakoff, Nathan P.(2003)。Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies。Journal of Applied Psychology，88(5)，879-903。  new window
20.Latham, G. P.、Sue-Chan, C.(1999)。A Meta-analysis of the Situational Interview: An Enumerative Review of Reasons for its Validity。Canadian Psychology，40，56-67。  new window
21.Huffcutt, A. I.、Roth, P.、McDaniel, M. A.(1996)。A Meta-analytic Investigation of Cognitive Ability in Employment Interview Evaluations: Moderating Characteristics and Implications for Incremental Validity。Journal of Applied Psychology，81，459-473。  new window
22.Wiesner, W. H.、Cronshaw, S. F.(1988)。A Meta-analytic Investigation of the Impact of Interview Format and Degree of Structure on the Validity of the Employment Interview。Journal of Occupational Psychology，61，275-290。  new window
23.Maurer, S. D.(2002)。A Practitioner-based Anyalysis of Interviewer Job Expertise and Scale Format as Contextual Factors in Situational Interviews。Personnel Psychology，55，307-327。  new window
24.Whetzel, D. L.、Baranowski, E.、Petro, J. M.、Curtin, P. J.、Fisher, J. L.(2003)。A Written Structured Interview by Any Other Name is Still A Selection Instrument。Applied H.R.M. Research，8(1)，1-16。  new window
25.Kobak, K. A.、Greist, J. H.、Jefferson, J. W.、Katzelnick, D. J.(1996)。Computer-administered Clinical Rating Scales。Psychopharmacology，127(4)，291-301。  new window
26.Johns, G.(1993)。Constraints on the Adoption of Psychology-based Personnel Practices: Lessons from Organizational Innovation。Personnel Psychology，46，569-592。  new window
27.Jones, K.、Day, J. D.(1997)。Discrimination of Two Aspects of Cognitive-social Intelligence from Academic Intelligence。Journal of Educational Psychology，89，486-497。  new window
28.Gustafsson, J. E.、Balke, G.(1993)。General and Specific Abilities as Predictors of School Achievement。Multivariate Behavioral Research，28，407-434。  new window
29.Shae, W. C.、Yeung, K. C.(2001)。Gifted Education - Creating Genius or Impeding Human Growth?。Hong Kong Journal of Social Sciences，20，87-110。  new window
30.Lenert, L. A.、Morss, S.、Bergen, M. R.、Goldstein, M. K.、Garber, A. M.(1997)。Measurement of the Validity of Utility Elicitations Performed by Computerized Interview。Medical Care，35，915-920。  new window
31.Conway, J. M.、Jako, R. A.、Goodman, D. F.(1995)。Meta-analysis of Interrater and Internal Consistency Reliability of Selection Interviews。Journal of Applied Psychology，80，565-579。  new window
32.Weekley, J. A.、Jones, C.(1997)。Video-based Situational Testing。Personnel Psychology，50，25-49。  new window
會議論文
1.Baum, J. R.(2005)。The Relationship of Entrepreneur's Learning Orientations and Practical Intelligence to New Venture Performance。0。  new window
學位論文
1.戴瓊瑩(2002)。多元智能理論在國中英語教學上的應用：九年一貫課程中另類英語教學模式的探討(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.莊雯心(2001)。多元智能（MI）教學研究－光譜計畫在班級實施歷程分析，0。  延伸查詢new window
3.Klehe, U. C.(2003)。Towards an Understanding of the Constructs Underlying the Situational Interview and the Patterned Behavior Description Interview in Predicting Typical versus Maximum Performance，0。  new window
4.Huffcutt, A. I.(1992)。An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Multidimensional Degree of Structure and the Validity of the Employment Interview，College Station, TX。  new window
圖書
1.Wagner, R. K.、Sternberg, R. J.(1991)。Tacit knowledge inventory for managers: User manual。San Antonio, TX：The Psychological Corporation。  new window
2.Jensen, A. R.(1998)。The G Factor: The Science of Mental Ability。The G Factor: The Science of Mental Ability。Westport, CT：Praeger。  new window
3.Gatewood, R. D.、Feild, H. S.(2001)。Human resource selection。Mason, OH：South-Western。  new window
4.Gardner, H.(1999)。Refrmaing intelligence。NY：Basic Books。  new window
5.Sternberg, R. J.、Horvath, J. A.(1999)。Tacit knowledge in professional practice。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
6.Sternberg, R. J.、Forsythe, G. B.、Hedlund, J.、Horvath, J. A.、Wagner, R. K.、Williams, W. M.、Snook, S. A.、Grigorenko, E. L.(2000)。Practical intelligence in everyday life。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Bereiter, C.、Scardamalia, M.(1993)。Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implication of expertise。Open Court。  new window
8.Gardner, H.(1993)。Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice。New York, NY：Harper Collins。  new window
9.Goleman, D.(1995)。Emotional intelligence。Bantam Books。  new window
10.李新民(2004)。幼兒教師實用智能與工作表現之相關研究。高雄：高雄復文。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Janz, J. T.、Hellervik, L.、Gilmore, D. C.(1986)。Behavior Description Interviewing: New, Accurate and Cost Effective。Behavior Description Interviewing: New, Accurate and Cost Effective。Newton, MA。  new window
12.Jansen, P.、de Jongh, F.(1997)。Assessment Centers: A Practical Handbook。Assessment Centers: A Practical Handbook。Chichester, UK。  new window
13.Bar on, R.(1997)。Bar-on Emotional Quoient Inventor (EQ-i ): Technical Manual。Bar-on Emotional Quoient Inventor (EQ-i ): Technical Manual。Toronto, Canada。  new window
14.Handley, R.、Bar-On, R.(1999)。Optimizing People: A Practical Guide for Applying Emotional Intelligence to Improve Personal and Organizational Effectiveness。New Braunfels, TX：Pro-Philes Press。  new window
15.Latham, G. P.(1989)。The Reliability, Validity, and Practicality of the Situational Interview。The Employment Interview: Theory, Research and Practice。Newbury Park, CA。  new window
16.Mayer, J. D.、Salovey, P.、Caruso, E.(2000)。Emotional Intelligence。Handbook of Intelligence。Cambridge, UK/ New York, NY。  new window
17.Baum, J. R.、Bird, B. J.、Chardavoyne, N. A.(2004)。The Relationship of Entrepreneur's Learning Orientations and Practical Intelligence。Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 2003。Babson Park, MA。  new window
其他
1.Bruno, K.，England, E.，Chambliss, C.(2002)。Social and Emotional Learning Program for Elementary School Student: A Pilot Study，0。  new window
圖書論文
1.Wagner, R. K.、Sternberg, R. J.(1990)。Street smarts。Measures of leadership。West Orange, NJ：Leadership Library of America。  new window
2.Grotzer, T. A.、Perkins, D. N.(2000)。Teaching intelligence: A performance conception。Handbook of Intelligence。Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Gustafsson, J. E.(1989)。Broad and Narrow Abilities in Research on Learning and Instruction。Abilities, Motivation, and Methodology: The Minnesota Symposium on Learning and Individual Differences。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1025（臺灣：993，外國：32） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1586744 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67394443
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上