:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:試論王夫之對莊子「逍遙義」之詮解--以「神凝」概念為體而發「兩行」之用為命題展衍
書刊名:國立虎尾科技大學學報
作者:鄭柏彰
作者(外文):Zheng, Bo-zhang
出版日期:2008
卷期:27:1
頁次:頁53-68
主題關鍵詞:王夫之莊子解逍遙義神凝兩行Fu-Zhi WangAnnotation of Zhuang ZiThe acceptation of Xiao-YaoShen-NingLiang-Xing
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:470
  • 點閱點閱:35
王夫之曾貶抑老子而服膺莊子,因莊子有「逍遙說」以顯「兩行」之用。值得一提的,是他在闡釋莊子「逍遙義」時,並不從表象的鯤鵬與鷃鳩之逍遙,來評斷優劣所得,而是透過一種返體開用的工夫,拈出「神凝」的概念,以詮釋莊子的「逍遙義」。此「神凝」工夫,類似莊子所倡的「坐忘」、「心齋」,亦即必須透過精神的修養工夫,達到一種無目的性的爲出乎無爲之返「體」心境,方有開出逍遙之「用」的可能。因此,若能以「神凝」返體,則「有爲之用」可稱逍遙,「無爲之用」亦可稱逍遙。而所謂的「有爲之用」,即在現實出仕時,能德澤萬物而無所用心,此「用」王夫之其實是滲入了孟子「過化存神」的思維,來讓應世濟民合理化。不過,當出仕之途受阻時,亦不刻意強求,如果過度強求,則不免遭到環境所限,而使心靈無法活轉,如此一來雖有壯志於胸,然其患卻反倍於小也。故而此時若能自適其性遊於江湖,以著書立說傳世,則反能得其自在無礙,如此便是所謂「無爲之用」。此論雖融攝了郭象的「適性逍遙」之說,卻也融入了王夫之所增益的「習」之成分,來讓「無爲逍遙」不致被誤解爲任性而行。總之,王夫之之所以要架構出「返體開用」的思維詮解「逍遙」,與其說他是以辯證法來解讀莊子,倒不如說他是融攝了儒道思維,在其報效朝廷無門之際,爲自身的出處進退作一協調來得恰當。
Owing to Zhuang Zi's "Xiao-Yao-shuo", which emphasized "Liang-Xing", Wang Fu-Zhi belittled Lao-Zi and followed to Zhuang Zi. One thing worth to note, while he explained Zhuang Zi's "The acceptation of "Xiao-Yao", he did not judge the concepts of "Xiao-Yao" from Kun-Peng and Yan-Jiu, but illustrated the ideas of "Shen-Ning", which was derived from the means of "returned noumenon to amount purpose" to introduce Zhuang Zi's "Xiao-Yao". "Shen-Ning", which is similar to the concept of Zhuang Zi's "Zuo-Wang" and "Xin-Zhai", emphasized spiritually practice for reaching the level of endless mindset "Ti" and liberate the possibility of "Yong". As such, if one can return to "Shen-Ning", both of "You-Wei-Zhi-Yong" and "Wu-Wei-Zhi-Yong" can be accepted as "Xiao-Yao". "You-Wei-Zhi-Yong" is a thought of endless mindset to love every thing in all without any purposes. And Wang Fu-Zhi used Meng Zi's theory of "Guo-Hua-Cun-Shen" to make endless mindset more practical. On the other hand, when one is in the society, the endless mindset needs to be reminded. Or, one who has enthusiastic mind will also be trapped by the surroundings and troublesome comes there after. "Wu-Wei-Zhi-Yong" can come true via the practice of endless mindset anywhere and footnoted. Combined with Kuo Xian's "Shi-Xing-Xiao-Ya" and Wang Fu-Zhi's "Xi", "Wu-Wei-Xiao-Yao" will not be misunderstand as crankiness like. All in all, not only Wang Fu-zhi structures the concept of "returned noumenon to amount purpose" to introduce "Xiao-Tao" but also he verdicts Zhung Zi as comparisons. The truth is that he has used Confucianism to balance himself when no chance found to work in the imperial government.
期刊論文
1.陳重文(19680300)。王船山的莊子通研究。國魂,268,18-19。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾瓊瑤(19991000)。莊子「逍遙遊」中的生命轉化觀。中國文化月刊,235,60-88。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉光義(19901100)。莊學中所凸顯的形上義。中國國學,18,51-79。  延伸查詢new window
4.鍾竹連(19901100)。莊子與郭象逍遙思想之比較。中國國學,18,237-258。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳重文(19680200)。王船山的莊子通研究。國魂,267,20-22。  延伸查詢new window
6.鍾竹連(19891100)。莊子與郭象逍遙思想之比較。中國國學,17,299-319。  延伸查詢new window
7.李美燕(19950600)。郭象注莊子逍遙遊的詭辭辯證。屏東師院學報,8,277-300。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.林文彬(20040600)。王船山援莊入儒論。興大人文學報,34(上),223-246。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.唐亦男(20050300)。王夫之通解莊子「兩行」說及其現代意義。鵝湖,30(9)=357,22-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.楊儒賓(19850100)。向郭莊子注的適性說與向郭支道林對於消遙義的爭辯。史學評論,9,93-127。  延伸查詢new window
11.謝大寧(19870600)。論郭象與支遁之逍遙義及支遁義之淵源。中國學術年刊,9,97-109。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.廖明活(19831100)。莊子、郭象與支遁之逍遙觀試析。鵝湖,9(5)=101,8-13。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.沈維華(19980300)。莊子、向郭與支遁之逍遙觀試析。中國學術年刊,19,145-160+677-678。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.魏元珪(19860900)。莊子逍遙遊篇的生命境界觀。中國文化月刊,83,23-47。  延伸查詢new window
15.陳贇(20010700)。通幽明之道:王船山哲學的精神及其基本問題。世界中國哲學學報,4,183+185-217。  延伸查詢new window
16.蔡振豐(20011200)。支道林莊子逍遙義新詮及其般若學。中央大學人文學報,24,185-212。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林文彬(1986)。王船山莊子解研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張載、王夫之(1980)。張子正蒙注。台北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.羅檢秋(1998)。近代諸子學與文化思潮。北京:中國社會科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.李耳、王弼(1966)。老子。臺北:臺灣中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.沙門慧皎(1986)。高僧傳。台北:廣文書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.瞿汝稷(1991)。指月錄。台北:老古文化事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.王夫之(1981)。薑齋文集。台北:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.王夫之(1988)。老子衍。台北:廣文書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.湖南湖北哲學社科會(1965)。王船山學術討論集。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.嚴壽澄(1999)。莊子、重玄與相天。中國文哲硏究集刊。  延伸查詢new window
10.許冠三(1981)。王船山的致知論。中文大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.謝明陽(2001)。明遺民的莊子定位論題。臺北市:國立臺灣大學出版委員會。  延伸查詢new window
12.蕭篷父(1993)。船山哲學引論。江西人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.王夫之(1974)。讀四書大全說。臺北:河洛圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
14.朱熹(1984)。四書集註。學海出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.莊周、郭象(1983)。莊子。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
16.莊周、郭象、成玄英、陸德明、郭慶藩(1991)。莊子集釋。貫雅文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
17.曾昭旭(1996)。王船山哲學。臺北:遠景。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.嵇文甫(1987)。王船山學術論叢。臺北:谷風。  延伸查詢new window
19.唐端正(1981)。先秦諸子論叢。臺北:東大圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.林安梧(1991)。王船山人性史哲學之研究。臺北:東大圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.唐君毅(1986)。中國哲學原論‧原道篇。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
22.林聰舜(1981)。向郭莊學之研究。文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
23.王邦雄(1983)。中國哲學論集。臺北:臺灣學生書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.王夫之、王孝魚(1984)。莊子通・莊子解。里仁。  延伸查詢new window
25.錢穆(1997)。中國近三百年學術史。商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.王夫之(1999)。尙書引義。船山遺書。北京:北京出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.王夫之(1999)。周易外傳。船山遺書。北京:北京出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE