:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:永續校園實質環境評估指標之研究--以臺灣國民小學為例
書刊名:建築學報
作者:江哲銘陳星皓潘智謙
作者(外文):Chiang, Che-mingChen, Hsing-haoPan, Chih-chien
出版日期:2009
卷期:67
頁次:頁1-23
主題關鍵詞:永續校園實質環境評估指標模糊德爾菲法AHP層級分析法Sustainable campusPhysical environmentAssessment indicatorFuzzy Delphi methodAHP method
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:634
  • 點閱點閱:53
摘 要 本研究以台灣國民小學校園為對象,利用文獻回顧法找出與永續校園實質環境相關之評估指標 群後,以專家評價法之『模糊德爾菲法』篩選評估因子,並以『層級分析法』求得各評估指標群及 各評估指標之相對權重值。其中,全體專家對評估指標群之相對權重值序位為:『基地永續對應』 0.290、『健康環境』0.215、『生態循環』0.205、『能源流循環』0.142、『資源流循環』0.108 及『維 護、操作與創新』0.040。同時,經專家群體之分群分析得知:「學術研究者」專家群體最重視『健 康環境』指標群,而「校園使用者」專家群體則最重視『基地永續對應』指標群。 經以T 檢定及F 分配進行專家群體差異性判定得知:「校園使用者」之『所屬學校區位別』是 影響國民小學永續校園實質環境評估指標相對權重值的關鍵性影響因子,而『基地永續對應』及『生 態循環』兩指標群則需依區位別進行因地制宜之權重值修正,進而推導出『台灣國民小學永續校園 實質環境評估簡式』。
ABSTRACT This paper studies the elementary school campuses in Taiwan, and finds the related indicators groups by literature reviewing. It sieves out the appropriate assessment factors for sustainable campuses physical environment with Fuzzy Delphi method, and obtained the relative weight value of each indicators group and assessment indicators with AHP method. According to the experts’ opinions, the weight values are 0.290 for ‘sustainable site’, 0.215 for ‘healthy environment’, 0.205 for ‘ecological circulation’, 0.142 for ‘energy circulation’, 0.108 for ‘resource circulation’ and 0.108 for ‘maintenance, operation and innovation’ in sequence. The cluster of the academic researchers emphasizes on ‘healthy environment’, and the users of campuses think ‘sustainable site’ is the most important. By T-test and F-distribution, it shows that location of campus is the critical factor to the relative weight value of sustainable campus assessment indicators for the physical environment of elementary schools. The weight values of ‘sustainable site’ and ‘ecological circulation’ should be revised to suit the local circumstances, and this paper deduces the assessment formula of sustainable campuses for physical elementary school environment in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.鄭紹材、李浩榕(20060900)。以AHP建置河川水域生態工程管理要項之研究。建築學報,57,69-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Chiang, C. M.、Lai, C. M.(2002)。A study on the comprehensive indicator of indoor environment assessment for occupants, health in Taiwan。Building and Environment,37(4),387-392。  new window
3.黃世孟(19961200)。開放教育學習環境之國民小學建築計畫課題。建築學報,19,85-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Ishikawa, Akira、Amagasa, Michio、Shiga, Tetsuo、Tomizawa, Giichi、Tatsuta, Rumi、Mieno, Hiroshi(1993)。The max-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,55(3),241-253。  new window
5.鄧振源、曾國雄(19890700)。層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用。中國統計學報,27(7),13767-13786。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.江哲銘(2004)。永續校園中的永續環境教育契機。教育研究月刊,128,43-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.彭光輝、林淑鎂(2005)。臺灣都市化地區地震災害危險度評估基準與權重分配之研究。建築學報,53,57-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Cole, R.(1998)。Emerging Trends in Building Environmental Assessment Methods。Building Research and Information,26(1),3-16。  new window
9.Larsson, N.(1999)。Development of a Building Performance Rating and Labeling System in Canada。Building Research and Information,27(4/ 5),332-341。  new window
10.Peter, P.、Churchill, G.(1986)。Relationships among Research Design Choices and Psychometric Properties of Rating Scales: A Meta-analysis。Journal of Marketing Research,23,1-10。  new window
11.Saaty, T.、Erdener, E.(1979)。A New Approach to Performance Measurement the Analytic Hierarchy Process。Design Methods and Theories,13(2),62-68。  new window
會議論文
1.小野寬也、村上周三(2004)。AHP法による「CASBEE: 新築」の評価項目の重み係數の算定(その2)アンケート結果の回答者屬性別の分析と整合性の檢討。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Saaty, T. L.(1998)。The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation。New York:McGraw-Hill International Book Co.。  new window
2.湯志民(2002)。臺灣的學校建築。臺北市:五南圖書出版有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Klir, G. J.、Yuan, B.(1995)。Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic Theory。Boston, MA:New Jersey:Kluwer Academic Publishers:Prentice Hall PTR。  new window
4.刀根.薰(1993)。競賽式決策指定法-AHP入門。競賽式決策指定法-AHP入門。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.江哲銘(2001)。永續綠色健康學校校園環境教材建立計畫。永續綠色健康學校校園環境教材建立計畫。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.江哲銘(2002)。綠校園指定案例篩選建立計畫。綠校園指定案例篩選建立計畫。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.江哲銘(2003)。永續校園示範案輔導團計畫。永續校園示範案輔導團計畫。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.江哲銘(2003)。永續校園推廣獎勵與改造總督導團計畫。永續校園推廣獎勵與改造總督導團計畫。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.江哲銘、王文安(1999)。建築室內環境保健控制綜合指標之研究。建築室內環境保健控制綜合指標之研究。  延伸查詢new window
10.WHO(2004)。Geneva, The Physical School Environment。Geneva, The Physical School Environment。  new window
其他
1.教育部(2006)。教育部永續校園全球資訊網。  延伸查詢new window
2.Applying Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Multiattribute Decision Analysis of Investments Related to Buildings and Building Systems。  new window
3.ISO - International Organization for Standardization,(2006)。Sustainability in Building Construction - Framework for Methods of Assessment for Environmental Performance of Construction Works - Part 1: Buildings(ISO/TS 21931-1)。,http://www.iso.org/iso/。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE