:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣都市原住民的族群通婚:社會界線的世代差異
書刊名:人口學刊
作者:劉千嘉
作者(外文):Liu, Chien-chia
出版日期:2011
卷期:42
頁次:頁115-153
主題關鍵詞:都市原住民第二代都市原住民社會界線社會距離族群通婚Urban indigenousSecond migrant generationSocial boundarySocial distanceEthnic intermarriage
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(12) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:354
  • 點閱點閱:107
遷徙係許多臺灣原住民共同的生命歷程,都市原住民與原鄉原住民所面臨的社會處境截然不同,本文擺脫以往對都市原住民問題化的關切,關注這群移徙族群所經歷的族群社會界線的改變。本研究運用「臺灣原住民社會變遷與政策評估」調查資料,自空間與婚姻上的同化行為,檢視原住民在經歷四十餘年的移徙後,自世代的觀點比較原漢族群距離與社會界線的改變。研究發現如下:(1)二代都原較年輕、人力品質結構較佳、職業發展較佳、通婚比例亦較高;(2)社會接觸有助於縮減族群社會距離,社會接觸的效應對一代都原較二代都原更重要;(3)二代都原較一代都原更易跨越族群社會界線;(4)社會接觸越頻繁、社會距離越小,通婚機率越高。
Migration is the common trajectory for most of the indigenous in Taiwan, but the social situations they encounter are totally different between the urban indigenous and those who stay in traditional areas. Instead of concentrating on the social problems urban indigenous might encounter, this paper focuses on the effect of social distance that migrants might experience and whether they can overcome the so-called ethnic boundaries. The research uses the data of the Taiwan Indigenous People Survey (TIPS) both to reveal those aspects of space distribution, employment status and social distance among urban indigenous and to elaborate the difference between the first and second migrant generations. The main findings are as follows: (1) the second migrant generation are much younger, better educated and have a higher probability of ethnic intermarriage and better job opportunities than the first generation; (2) the social contact with other ethnic groups has a positive effect on decreasing social distance between the indigenous and Han people; moreover the effect is more significant among the first generation than the second one; (3) the second generation is more likely to cross the social boundary than the first one; (4) for both generations, the effects of social contact and social distance on predicting the probability of ethnic intermarriage are both significant.
期刊論文
1.謝若蘭、彭尉榕(20070300)。族群通婚的身份認定與認同問題之研究--以花蓮地區原客通婚為例。思與言,45(1),157-196。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Ganzeboom, H. B. G.、Treiman, D. J.(1996)。Internationally comparable measures of occupational status for the 1988 international standard classification of occupations。Social Science Research,25(3),201-239。  new window
3.伊慶春、章英華(20061200)。對娶外籍與大陸媳婦的態度:社會接觸的重要性。臺灣社會學,12,191-232。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.王甫昌(20021200)。族群接觸機會?還是族群競爭?:本省閩南人族群意識內涵與地區差異模式之解釋。臺灣社會學,4,11-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.王甫昌(19940400)。光復後臺灣漢人族群通婚的原因與形式初探。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,76,43-96。  延伸查詢new window
6.謝雨生、陳怡情(2009)。跨族群婚之代問影響與變遷。臺灣社會學刊,42,1-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Charles, C. Z.(2003)。The Dynamics of Racial Residential Segregation。Annual Review of Sociology,29,167-207。  new window
8.Peach, C.(1980)。Ethnic Segregation and Intermarriage。Annals of the Association of American Geographers,70(3),371-381。  new window
學位論文
1.劉千嘉(2009)。臺灣原住民的遷徙:鵬飛抑或蓬飛(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳宇嘉(1990)。遷移與職業流動:臺灣山地原住民遷移與代間、代內流動之研究。東海大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Alba, R. D.、Nee, V.(2003)。Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration。Cambridge:Harvard University Press。  new window
2.Wilson, William Julius(1996)。When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor。New York, NY:Alfred A. Knopf。  new window
3.林修澈、王雅萍、黃季平(1999)。原住民身分認定的研究。臺北:行政院原住民委員會。  延伸查詢new window
4.Park, Robert E.、Burgess, Ernest W.(1969)。Introduction to the Science of Sociology。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。  new window
5.Wilson, W. J.(1987)。The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass and Public Policy。Chicago:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
6.Blau, Peter M.(1977)。Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure。Free Press。  new window
7.Massey, Douglas S.、Denton, Nancy A.(1993)。American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
8.謝世忠(19940000)。山胞觀光:當代山地文化展現的人類學詮釋。臺北:自立晚報社文化出版部。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.王人英(19670000)。臺灣高山族的人口變遷。臺北:中研院民族所。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Gordon, Milton Myron(1964)。Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins。Oxford University Press。  new window
11.楊士範(2006)。阿美族都市新家園:近五十年的臺北縣原住民都市社區打造史研究。臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Jargowsky, P. A.(1996)。Poverty and Place: Ghettos, Barrios, and the American City。NewYork。  new window
13.Meyer, S. G.(2000)。As Long as They Don't Live Next Door: Segregation and Racial Conflict in American Neighborhoods。New York。  new window
14.Wilson, G.(2001)。Support for Redistributive Policies among the African AmericanMiddle Class, Race and Class Effects。Research in Social Stratification and Mobility。Stamford, CT。  new window
圖書論文
1.章英華、林季平、劉千嘉(2010)。臺灣原住民社會變遷與政策評估研究:問卷調查之抽樣與執行。臺灣原住民政策變遷與社會發展。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.朱柔若(2001)。都市原住民勞動史。臺灣原住民史:都市原住民史篇。臺灣省文獻委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.章英華、林季平、劉千嘉(2010)。臺灣原住民的遷徙及社會經濟地位之變遷與現況。臺灣原住民政策變遷與社會發展。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.傅仰止(2001)。都市原住民與原漢關係的歷史新頁。臺灣原住民史:都市原住民史篇。南投:臺灣省文獻委員會。  延伸查詢new window
5.葉光輝、劉長萱(2002)。問題的潛在類別分析。社會調查與分析:社會科學研究方法檢討與前瞻之一。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
6.傅仰止(2001)。都市原住民概說。台灣原住民史:都市原住民史篇。南投:臺灣省文獻委員會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE