:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:藝術中之精神性及精神性取向全人藝術教育之價值觀
書刊名:視覺藝術論壇
作者:劉豐榮 引用關係
作者(外文):Liu, Feng-jung
出版日期:2012
卷期:7
頁次:頁48-68
主題關鍵詞:藝術教育之精神性全人藝術教育藝術價值藝術中之精神性The spirituality in art educationHolistic art educationThe value of artThe spirituality in art
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:152
  • 點閱點閱:83
藝術與藝術教育之價值議題探討可謂是處理藝術創作或批評以及藝術教育方向問題之基礎,亦即藝術與當前藝術教育之價值觀之澄清往往為解決藝術與藝術教育相關問題之根本要圖。在藝術與精神發展之終極價值方面,筆者(2007a)闡述了藝術不僅提供精神發展與終極價值探討之途徑,而且藝術可成為精神發展之理想與終極價值之實現。然而,若欲使這些價值在當前藝術教育中落實,則須重新省思當前藝術教育之價值觀,包括探討精神性與全人教育相關理論,以及以後「後現代」之立場、或超越現代及後現代派典之觀點,闡釋不同時、地之藝術對人生之意義與價值。本文主要探討精神性之特性及其與全人教育之關係;進而闡釋精神性取向全人藝術教育價值觀在於:增進吾人對自我、藝術、文化、生態與其關聯之覺知、省思、與改善;最後提出「藝術即道(art as Tao, the Way):藝術活動即道之追尋與實現」之藝術教育理念,此包括三個層面之概念架構:(一)藝術活動(artistic activities),(二)概念學習與經驗學習活動(conceptual learning and experiential learning activities),以及(三)精神性與生命之提昇(the enhancement of spirituality and life)。
The study of value issue in art and art education can be regarded as the basis for dealing with the problems concerning art production and criticism as well as direction of art education. In other words, clarifying the values of art and art education is crucial to the solution of problems pertaining to art and art education. In the ultimate value of art and spiritual development, the author (2007a)has illuminated that art not only serves as a vehicle for spiritual development and ultimate value exploration, but also reveals the ideal of sound spiritual development and the accomplishment of ultimate value. However, to realize such value in current art education necessitates re-examining the values for art education today, including exploring the theories about spirituality and holistic education, and interpreting the meanings and values in art of various times and places for life, from the perspectives of post-postmodern or beyond modern and postmodern paradigms. This article is to deal with the features of spirituality and its relationship with holistic education; and hence to interpret the values of spirituality oriented holistic art education in terms of the capacity of art to enhance our awareness of, reflection on, and improvement of self, art, culture, ecology, and their relationships; and finally to propose a conception of art education, the idea of ”art as Tao, the Way: Art activity as pursuing and realizing Tao,” which includes a conceptual framework with three dimensions: (a) artistic activities, (b) conceptual learning and experiential learning activities, and (c) the enhancement of spirituality and life.
期刊論文
1.劉豐榮(20090700)。現代與後現代藝術觀點對臺灣藝術理論與創作研究之意涵。視覺藝術論壇,4,1-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.劉豐榮(20111200)。藝術中精神性智能與全人發展之觀點及學院藝術教學概念架構。藝術研究期刊,7,1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.劉豐榮(20100700)。精神性取向全人藝術創作教學之理由與內容層面:後現代以後之學院藝術教育。視覺藝術論壇,5,2-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.劉豐榮(20051200)。人文主義與反人文主義美學:現代到後現代藝術教育理論基礎之變遷。藝術研究期刊,1,83-103。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.劉豐榮(20041200)。視覺藝術創作研究方法之理論基礎探析:以質化研究觀點為基礎。藝術教育研究,8,73-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.劉豐榮(2006)。現代藝術之純粹性與精神性及其在當代之意涵。台灣藝術與文化學術研討會。嘉義縣:國立嘉義大學人文藝術學院美術系暨視覺藝術研究所。1-10。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉豐榮(2001)。後現代主義對當前藝術批評教學之啟示。國際藝術教育學會(InSEA)亞洲地區學術研討會,國際藝術教育學會、國立彰化師大美術系、中華民國藝術教育研究發展學會主辦 。彰化市:國立彰化師大美術系。177-185。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉豐榮(1996)。質的個案研究方法學在藝術教育研究之意義與應用。海峽兩岸小學教育學術研討會。嘉義市:國立嘉義師範學院。93-109。  延伸查詢new window
4.Scott, H. H.(1996)。Values in holistic education。The third annual conference on education,the Roehampton Institute 。San Diego, California.。  new window
5.劉豐榮(2007)。視覺文化藝術教育理念與實務及其對台灣之學校與學院藝術教育意涵之分析。第二屆美感與文化學術研討會。嘉義縣:國立嘉義大學人文藝術學院/人文藝術中心。9-26。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Storr, R.、Sollins, S.、Golden, T.、Herbert, L. M.、Siegel K.(2001)。Art: 21 --Art in the twenty-first century。New York:Harry N. Abrams。  new window
2.Baas, Jacquelynn(2005)。Smile of the Buddha: Eastern philosophy and western art from Monet to today。CA:University of California Press。  new window
3.Sadler, M.T.H.、Kandinsky, W.(1914)。Concerning the spiritual in art。New York:Dover。  new window
4.Tisdell, E. J.(2003)。Exploring spirituality and culture in adult and higher education。Jossey- Bass。  new window
5.Miller, J. P.(2000)。Education and the soul。New York:State University of New York Press。  new window
6.Jagodzinski, Jan(1997)。Postmodern dilemmas: Outrageous essays in art & art education。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
7.楊深坑(1983)。柏拉圖美育思想研究。臺北:水牛出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.劉豐榮(1997)。幼兒藝術表現模式之理論建構及其教育義涵之研究。台北市:文景。  延伸查詢new window
9.劉豐榮(1991)。艾斯納藝術教育思想之研究。台北市:水牛。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Anderson, T.、Milbrandt, M. K.(2002)。Art for life: Authentic instruction in art。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
11.Cheetham, M. A.(1991)。The rhetoric of purity: Essentialist theory and the advent of abstract painting。New York:Cambridge University Press。  new window
12.Fromm, E.(1998)。The essential Fromm: Life between having and being。New York:Continuum。  new window
13.Miller, R.(2000)。Caring for a new life: Essays on holistic education。Brandon, VT:Foundation for Educational Renewal。  new window
14.Moore, T.(1992)。The care of the soul: A guide for cultivating depth and sacredness in everyday life。New York:Walker。  new window
15.Moore, T.(1994)。SoulMates: Honoring the mysteries of love and relationship。New York:Harper。  new window
16.Wilber, K.(2000)。Integral psychology: Consciousness, spirit, psychology, therapy。Boston:Shambhla。  new window
圖書論文
1.Lemkow, A. F.(2005)。Reflections on our common lifelong learning journey。Holistic learning and spirituality in education。Albany, NY:State University of New York Press。  new window
2.劉豐榮(2007)。藝術價值與其對後現代文化中全人發展之功能。真善美全人生命發展研究論文集。嘉義縣:國立嘉義大學人文藝術中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.Tacey, D.(2009)。Spiritually and mental health: The mystery of healing。International handbooks of education for spirituality, care, and wellbeing, International handbooks of religion and education3。Springer Science+Business Media B. V.。  new window
4.Miller, J. P.(2005)。Introduction: Holistic learning。Holistic learning and spirituality in education。NY:State University of New York Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE