:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:唐宋翠色青瓷色彩美--以越窯、龍泉窯為例
書刊名:淡江史學
作者:康才媛 引用關係
作者(外文):Kang, Tsai-yuan
出版日期:2014
卷期:26
頁次:頁85-111
主題關鍵詞:翠色青瓷越窯龍泉窯Cui SeCeladonYue celadonLongquan celadon
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:863
  • 點閱點閱:41
翠色青瓷審美觀的產生肇因於審美文化以及窯爐燒造技術進步的影響。其中審美文化源自唐代越窯青瓷,陸羽《茶經》:「青則益茶」乃最早的色彩追求,此後文人訴諸對青翠山林與青碧湖水的審美與嚮往,「翠色」遂成為青瓷核心的美感,越窯秘色青瓷便是此風影響下的產物。此外,隨著南宋瓷藝技術的精進,龍泉窯透過改善窯爐、燒造氣氛、胎成份、釉成份的改進,翠色青釉的效果更進加精進,獲得世人普遍的讚賞。然而,從美感追求的發展而言,宋代翠色青瓷的表現形式也受到宋代山水繪畫藝術理論的引導,在不斷精進歸納大自然形貌的啟發下,觀想角度擴大,從越窯青瓷補捉自然山水色彩,進而龍泉窯除山水外,更擴大表現蔥、梅等植物細膩的質感,不斷嘗試不同自然物的形貌與特質,造就豐富多樣的翠色美感。此外,從直觀的經驗而言,翠色是大自然中旺盛生命生機的展現,反映文人在生命經驗中追求奮進向上的體驗與追求,反映傳統華人民族心靈深處的審美傾向,色彩遂提昇為內在生命經驗與精神昇華的心靈層次表達。
Aesthetic appreciation of celadon porcelain derived from aesthetic culture and advancement in kiln technology. The aesthetic culture began with celadon of Yue Kiln in Tang dynasty. The earliest postulation of color was recorded in Lu Yu's The Classic of Tea in describing the color of green glaze as "surpassing the color of tea." Later on, with the literatis' love of the green colors in mountains, forests, and lakes, Cui Se or emerald green color became the core aesthetic standard for celadon porcelain. Mi-se-ci porcelain from Yue Kilns embodied this trend. Furthermore, with the advancement of porcelain technology in Southern Song dynasty, Longquan Kilns improved the kiln environment, atmosphere, and ingredients of biscuit and glaze to produce an even more advanced celadon porcelain, which was pursued by all. In terms of aesthetic pursuit, however, expressive forms of celadon porcelain of Song dynasty were also influenced by the aesthetic theory of landscape painting in Song dynasty. Inspired by artists' analysis of the forms of nature, artisans had wider spectrum of observation and tried to capture the colors of nature through celadon porcelains in the Yue Kilns. This trend expanded to capturing details of plant kingdom in the Longquan Kilns. Artisans kept trying to represent the forms, textures, and qualities of various natural objects, creating a multi-layered aesthetics of emerald green color. In terms of a more intuitive experiences, the idea of emerald green color embodies the vitality of nature. It reflects the elevating experience and pursuit in literatis' life experience. The emerald green color is essential to the aesthetic pursuit in the traditional Chinese mind, making color an experience of life and an expression of inner spirit.
期刊論文
1.陜西省文物管理委員會(1960)。介紹幾件陜西省出土的唐代瓷器。文物,1960(4),26+69+2。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.汪慶正(199611)。越窯秘色瓷。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.陝西省考古研究院、法門寺博物館、寶雞市文物局、扶風縣博物館(2007)。法門寺考古發掘報告。北京市:文物出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔣勳(2004)。美的沈思--中國藝術思想芻論。台北:雄獅圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.葉詰民(1982)。中國古陶瓷科學淺說。北京:輕工業出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.李國楨、郭演儀(1985)。中國名瓷工藝基礎。上海:科學技術出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.浙江省博物館(2009)。窯火餘韻。杭州:浙江古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.康熙(1994)。全唐詩。上海:古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.南窯筆記。台北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.劉康時(1990)。陶瓷工藝原理。廣州:華南理工大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.虞君質(1993)。藝術概論。台北:大中國圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.馮先銘(1994)。中國陶瓷。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.馮先銘(2000)。中國古陶瓷文獻集釋。台北:藝術家出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.徐定寶(200101)。越窯青瓷文化史。北京:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.慈溪市博物館(2002)。上林湖越窯。北京市:科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.財團法人出光美術館(1984)。陶磁の東西交流。東京:出光美術館。  延伸查詢new window
16.唐君毅(1982)。中國文化之精神價值。臺北:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
17.浙江省文物考古研究所、北京大學考古文博學院、慈溪市文物管理研究所(2002)。寺龍口越窯址。北京:文物出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.朱伯謙(1998)。龍泉窯青瓷。台北:藝術家出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.李澤厚(1996)。美學四講。台北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
20.徐復觀(1981)。中國藝術精神。臺北市:臺灣學生書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.呂成龍(1996)。故宮博物院收藏的三件越窯秘色瓷瓶。越窯・秘色瓷。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.藍浦、鄭廷桂(1988)。景德鎮陶錄。陶瓷譜錄。臺北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.梁同書(1988)。古窯器考。藝術叢編--陶瓷譜錄。台北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE