:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以通識教育型塑公民社會:科學新聞識讀課程為例
書刊名:課程與教學
作者:黃俊儒
作者(外文):Huang, Chun Ju
出版日期:2017
卷期:20:1
頁次:頁45-72
主題關鍵詞:通識教育公民社會科學新聞非形式推理超越內容知識General educationScience newsContent-transcending knowledgeInformal learning
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:123
  • 點閱點閱:75
隨著科技社會的急遽變化,如何提高民眾在各種社會性科學議題上的參與,以型塑更為成熟的公民社會,這是通識教育所擔負的重要責任之一。近年來,在臺灣通識教育的一連串改革中,行動與問題導向的學習是一個重要的課程設計理念,它不僅與通識教育的跨領域精神相符合,並且能夠補足專業教育的不足。本研究以「科學、新聞與生活」的通識課程為例,以非形式推理的特質作為理論基礎,透過「學生即科學記者」的教學模式設計,探討如何促進學生的科學新聞監控能力。在教學過程中,學生扮演科學記者的角色,透過個人科學新聞的建構學習科學新聞的識讀。教學過程區分成五個明確的步驟,包括:閱讀、形成議題、資料採集、反思寫作及回饋。在學習成果的評估上,分成兩種部分:首先,以「超越內容知識」的概念為基礎,透過「科學新聞解讀」測驗的前、後測,分析學生對於科學新聞背後產製過程的瞭解及非形式推理的表現;其次,透過進一步的深度訪談,瞭解學生對於科學新聞進行監控的質性歷程。研究結果顯示,透過通識課程的教學,學生可以更加複雜及豐富的向度來監控科學新聞,超越內容知識的增加確實有助於學生更加瞭解科學及媒體的互動關係,有助於進一步參與科技議題。
With a rapid changing technological society, general education plays an important role to improve the general public to participate in the socio-scientific issues and to cultivate a more mature civil society. Action learning and problem-based learning are the useful concepts that apply to the general education program, especially during the recent years of general education reform in Taiwan. These concepts match the interdisciplinary features within the general education and make the latter different from the professional education. This study took the Science, News and Life, a course in general education, as the example, exploring how to improve students monitoring on science news. Based on the theoretical assumption of informal reasoning, a teaching module, Student as a Scientific Journalist, has been conducted in the study. Students were asked to role-play as a science journalist to learn science through composing a personal version of the news on their own. A group discussion had been applied together with five stages instructed, such as reading, agenda setting, data collection, news writing, and feedback and reflection. The participants were college students enrolled in a general education program in Taiwan, and two phases of evaluation were included in this study. First, primary data were collected from the pre- and post-test questionnaire in a Science news exploration. The survey was based on the idea of content-transcending knowledge to evaluate students' understanding of production processes behind the science news. Comparing the results from the pre- and the post-test was aimed to examine if this instruction improved students' informal learning towards science and the media. Secondly, an in-depth interviews followed to explore how students have been monitoring the news. The results showed that an increase of content-transcending knowledge introduced could help students pay more attention to the interaction between science and the media, as well as more diverse dimensions during their science news monitoring.
期刊論文
1.Wellington, J.(1991)。Newspaper Science, School Science: Friends or Enemies?。International Journal of Science Education,13(4),363-372。  new window
2.沈宗瑞(20070100)。通識教育的結構性課題--下一波的通識教育改革重點。通識在線,8,38-39。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hodson, D.(2003)。Time for action: science education for an alternative future。International Journal of Science Education,25(6),645-670。  new window
4.Sadler, Troy D.(2004)。Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,41(5),513-536。  new window
5.Sadler, T. D.、Zeidler, D. L.(2005)。Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,42(1),112-138。  new window
6.Sadler, T. D.、Zeidler, D. L.(2005)。The Significance of Content Knowledge for Informal Reasoning Regarding Socioscientific Issues: Applying Genetics Knowledge to Genetic Engineering Issues。Science Education,89(1),71-93。  new window
7.Norris, S. P.、Phillips, L. M.、Korpan, C. A.(2003)。University students' interpretation of media reports of science and its relationship to background knowledge, interest, and reading difficulty。Public Understanding of Science,12(2),123-145。  new window
8.Dimopoulos, K.、Koulaidis, V.(2002)。The socio-epistemic constitution of science and technology in the Greek press: An analysis of its presentation。Public Understanding of Science,11(3),225-241。  new window
9.Korpan, C. A.、Bisanz, G. L.、Bisanz, J.、Henderson, J. M.(1997)。Assessing literacy in science: Evaluation of scientific news briefs。Science Education,81,515-532。  new window
10.Means, M. L.、Voss, J. F.(1996)。Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels。Cognition and Instruction,14(2),139-178。  new window
11.黃俊儒、簡妙如(20101000)。在科學與媒體的接壤中所開展之科學傳播研究:從科技社會公民的角色及需求出發。新聞學研究,105,127-166。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.何寄澎(19940900)。從儒家教育的「博」與「約」論今日大學通識教育之方向。通識教育,1(3),1-10。  延伸查詢new window
13.Hardwig, J.(1985)。Epistemic dependence。The Journal of Philosophy,82(7),335-349。  new window
14.Eisenhart, M.、Finkel, E.、Marion, S. F.(1996)。Creating the conditions for scientific literacy: A re-examination。American Educational Research Journal,33(2),261-295。  new window
15.Fessenden-Raden, J.、Fitchen, J.、Heath, J.(1987)。Providing risk information in communities: Factors influencing what is heard and accepted。Science, Technology & Human Values,12(3/4),94-101。  new window
16.Hardwig, J.(1991)。The role of trust in knowledge。The Journal of Philosophy,88(12),693-708。  new window
17.Holbrook, J.、Rannikmae, M.(2007)。The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy。International Journal of Science Education,29(11),1347-1362。  new window
18.Kolstø, S. D.(2001)。To trust or not to trust--Pupils' ways of judging information encountered in a socio-scientific issue。International Journal of Science Education,23(9),877-901。  new window
19.Kolstø, S. D.(2001)。Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientifie issues。Science Education,85,291-310。  new window
20.Norris, S. P.(1995)。Learning to live with scientific expertise: Toward a theory of intellectual communalism for guiding science teaching。Science Education,79(2),201-217。  new window
21.Roth, W. M.、Lee, S.(2004)。Science education as/for participation in the community。Science Education,88(2),263-291。  new window
22.Van Aalsvoort, J.(2004)。Activity theory as a tool to address the problem of chemistry's lack of relevance in secondary school chemical education。International Journal of Science Education,26(13),1635-1651。  new window
23.Yager, R. E.、Lutz, M.(1995)。STS to enhance total curriculum。School Science and Mathematics,93(3),28-35。  new window
24.DeBoer, G. E.(2000)。Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,37(6),582-601。  new window
25.黃俊儒、簡妙如(20060100)。科學新聞文本的論述層次及結構分佈:構思另個科學傳播的起點。新聞學研究,86,135-170。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.黃俊儒(20101200)。為什麼行動?解決什麼問題?--以行動與問題為導向的通識課程理念與實踐。通識教育學刊,6,9-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Nelkin, Dorothy(1995)。Selling science: How the press covers science and technology。W. H. Freeman and Company。  new window
2.Kuhn, T. S.(1962)。The structure of scientific revolutions。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。  new window
3.朱敬一(2008)。朱敬一講社會科學:法政經社的核心內容。臺北市:時報。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃俊儒(2014)。別輕易相信!你必須知道的科學偽新聞。時報文化出版企業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.鄒川雄(2006)。通識教育與經典詮釋:一個教育社會學的反省。嘉義縣:南華大學教育社會學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
6.Curd, M.、Cover, J. A.(1998)。Philosophy of science: The central issues。New York, NY:Norton。  new window
7.Driver, R.(1983)。The pupil as scientist?。Milton Keynes:Open University Press。  new window
8.Kerckhove, D. D.(1995)。The skin of culture: Investigating the new electronic reality。Toronto:Somerville House Pub。  new window
9.Lanson, J.、Fought, B. C.(1999)。News in a century-reporting in an age of converging media。Bel Air, CA:Pine Forge Press。  new window
10.Millar, R.、Osborne, J. E.(1998)。Beyond 2000: Science education for the future。London:Kings College London。  new window
11.葉啟政(20010000)。社會學和本土化。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.National Research Council(1996)。National Science Education Standards。Washington, DC:National Academy Press。  new window
13.Klee, R.(1997)。Introduction to the philosophy of science。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
其他
1.朱敬一(2008)。「未來高等教育發展中,通識教育應有之定位」專題演講稿,臺中市:東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.黃俊儒(2014)。通識課程的教學策略:以行動與問題解決導向為例。課的反身。臺南市:國立成功大學醫學、科技與社會研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃俊儒(2014)。一位通識教師應有的理念、實踐及認同。課的解析。臺南市:國立成功大學醫學、科技與社會研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃俊儒(2015)。跨科際視角下的科學傳播三階段論。界定跨科際。教育部。  延伸查詢new window
4.Aikenhead, G. S.(1990)。Scientific/technological literacy, critical reasoning, and classroom practice。Foundations of literacy policy in Canada。Calgary, Alberta:Detselig。  new window
5.Bybee, R.(1997)。Towards an understanding of scientific literacy. Scientific Literacy: science education and secondary school student。Scientific literacy: An international symposium。Kiel:IPN。  new window
6.Klainin, S.(1988)。Practical work and science education。Development and dilemmas in science education。Philadephia, PA:The Falmer Press。  new window
7.Perkins, D. N.、Farady, M.、Bushey, B.(1991)。Everyday reasoning and the roots of intelligence。Informal reasoning and education。Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum。  new window
8.Tweney, R. D.(1991)。Informal reasoning in science。Informal reasoning and education。Hillsdale, New Jersey:Erlbaum。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE