Objective: The development of aesthetic medicine is highly diversified. This study constructed a competitiveness indicator system suited for aesthetic medicine that can serve as a key reference for business managers and health authorities in formulating medical service policies. Methods: This study was primarily based on the "diamond model" theory of national competitive advantage. A three-round Delphi questionnaire was completed by a panel of 10 experts. After using the analytic hierarchy process to organize the responses, Expert Choice and Excel 2013 were employed as decision support software to analyze the consistency and indicator weights and construct a competitiveness indicator system for aesthetic medicine. Results: The consistency ratio of the six dimensions of aesthetic medicine competitiveness was 0.007, which met the study requirements. Regarding the relationships between the sequence of weights, demand conditions was ranked first in affecting the importance between the indicators (0.214) and production factors was ranked second (0.185), followed by relevant and supporting supply industries (0.180); corporate strategy, structure, and horizontal competition (0.161); opportunity (0.145); and government (0.116). Conclusion: In summary, "demand conditions" was considered by the experts as the key dimension for the development of aesthetic medicine, followed by "production factors." Satisfying the customers' preferences and achieving their material, spiritual, environmental, safety, and technical satisfaction were indicators of the two aforementioned key dimensions. Because these indicators can help improve the profitability of an aesthetic medicine center or clinic, they are crucial for developing competitiveness in aesthetic medicine.