:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:大學音樂領域評比指標建構之初探
書刊名:音樂研究
作者:陳曉雰 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Hsiao-fen
出版日期:2016
卷期:25
頁次:頁1-38
主題關鍵詞:評比指標音樂大學排名高等教育Ranking indicatorsMusicUniversity rankingsHigher education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:268
  • 點閱點閱:21
近年來國際間各大學排名系統之評比結果漸受重視,成為高等教育重要的參考,然而部分領域卻因學科特性,至今仍欠缺具公信力之評比機制。國立臺灣師範大學有鑑於校內多元之特色領域,乃進行指標建置計畫,以結合音樂、藝術、運動與休閒三個學院在教學、研究、展演及比賽等方面之特點,建構特色領域之共同指標。本研究係計畫子項研究之一,首先探討國際評比系統,並從東亞教師教育國際聯盟及亞洲音樂校系中取樣,進行音樂校系特色分析,並初擬大學音樂領域評比指標。在初版指標形成後,遂以德懷術法向11位校外專家施以問卷調查,並透過多次校內會議完成指標訂定。研究結果獲致特色領域在聲譽20%、教學35%、研究/展演/比賽35%、國際化10%之共同構面與權重,及其對應之主指標及次指標,音樂領域之次指標則因學術與專業特色而與其他兩個學院有所不同。最後,本研究對評比指標後續之研究與實施提出建議。
University rankings have been gaining international attention in recent years, and have become an important reference for higher education. Some fields, however, lack a reliable system of indicators due to disciplinary peculiarities. National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU) endeavored to establish ranking system with appropriate indicators that are representative of the attributes specific to teaching, research, performance and competition within the colleges of music, arts, and sports and recreation. This study, as part of the university's overall project, aimed to establish ranking indicators for the field of music. In order to form a basis for the proposed indicators, the author first examined the current international ranking systems, analyzed the characteristics of music departments with selected samples from the International Consortium for Universities of Education in East Asia and selected conservatories in Asia, and proposed a tentative list of key indicators for the ranking of music departments and schools. The proposed indicators were tested by a survey conducted in the Delphi technique with 11 experts outside of NTNU. Further, numerous internal meetings were also held at NTNU for ongoing revisions. These results were used to create university-ranking indicators, which are comprised of four aspects weighted as: Reputation (20%), Teaching (35%), Research/Performances/Competitions (35%) and Internationalization (10%). Whereas each aspect has its own set of indicators and sub-indicators, those for the field of music should also differ slightly from the other two colleges due to the academic and professional features unique to the discipline. Lastly, this research offered suggestions for future research and implementation for a more well-rounded ranking system.
期刊論文
1.古雅瑄(20080700)。美日大學分類與大學排名系統對我國高等教育發展之啟示。學校行政,56,1-13。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊朝祥(20091200)。臺灣高等教育的挑戰、超越與卓越。教育資料集刊,44,1-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.李政翰(20061000)。教育指標建構對教育發展重要性之探討。研習資訊,23(5),107-110。  延伸查詢new window
4.Clarke, M.(2002)。Quantifying quality: What can the U.S. News and World Report rankings tell us about the quality of higher education?。Education Policy Analysis Archives,10(16)。  new window
5.Clarke, M.(2002)。Some guidelines for academic quality rankings。Higher Education in Europe,17(4)。  new window
6.吳清山、林天佑(1999)。教育名詞:教育指標。教育資料與研究,29。  延伸查詢new window
7.教育部(2008)。OECD將以學習成效進行高等教育評比。評鑑雙月刊,11,62。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳曼玲(2007)。學界觀點:正視社會科學及人文學領域評比的必要性。評鑑雙月刊,5。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃琡雅、白亦方(20120600)。大學藝術相關系所評鑑結果之分析。教育研究,218,51-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.游家政(1996)。得懐術及其在課程研究上的應用。花蓮師院學報,6,1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.張鈿富(19960500)。臺灣地區教育指標建構之研究。教育研究資訊,4(3),18-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.王保進(19960500)。教育指標基本概念之分析。教育研究資訊,4(3),1-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.林適湖(20111200)。臺灣高等教育之發展與省思。教育資料集刊,52,1-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.王保進、黃耀農(2004)。從標準到標竿:主要國家高等教育教育評鑑標準對我國的啟示。教育評鑑回顧與展望學術研討會。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學教育研究中心。95-115。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.周敦懿(2007)。我國高等教育餐旅學門評鑑指標建構之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王保進(1993)。高等教育表現指標之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林振春(1994)。社會調查。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.侯永琪(2009)。全球與各國大學排名研究。臺北市:財團法人高等教育評鑑中心基金會。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Altbach, P. G.(2006)。The dilemmas of ranking,http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/soe/cihe/newsletter/Number42/p2_Altbach.htm, 2006/02/22。  new window
2.楊朝祥,徐明珠(2008)。臺灣高等教育指標國際化之比較研究,臺北市:國家政策研究基金會。,http://www.npf.org.tw/2/4602。  延伸查詢new window
3.Art School Digital(2013)。Art school digital,http://www.artschoolsdigital.com/。  new window
4.Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas(2013)。Ranking web of universities,http://www.webometrics.info/。  new window
5.Hazelkorn, E.(2012)。Striving for world class excellence: Rankings and emerging societies,http://arrow.dit.ie/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1021&context=cserbk。  new window
6.Institute for Higher Education Policy(2004)。International expert group created to improve higher education rankings,http://www.ireg-observatory.org/pdf/iregbriefhistory/IREG-1.pdf。  new window
7.Institute for Higher Education Policy(2006)。Berlin principles on ranking of higher education institutions,http://www.ihep.org/research/publications/berlin-principles-ranking-higher-education-institutions。  new window
8.Oden, R.(2007)。President's letters on college rankings,http://apps.carleton.edu/trustees/assets/President_s_Ranking_Letters.pdf。  new window
9.PhDs. org(2013)。Ranking of music graduate schools,http://graduate-school.phds.org/rankings/music。  new window
10.Quacquarelli Symonds(2013)。Top universities,http://www.topuniversities.com。  new window
11.Shanghai Jiao Tong University(2013)。Academic ranking of world universities,http://www.shanghairanking.com/。  new window
12.Startclass(2013)。Compare music schools,http://music-schools.startclass.com/。  new window
13.Steiner, J. E.(2006)。World university rankings--A principal component analysis,https://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0605/0605252.pdf。  new window
14.Students Review(2013)。Students review,http://www.studentsreview.com/。  new window
15.The Complete University Guide(2013)。University subject tables,http://www.thecompleteuniversityguide.co.uk/league-tables/rankings?s=Music。  new window
16.The Eduers.com(2013)。Music department rankings,http://www.eduers.com/Graduate/Graduate_School_Rankings_Music.html。  new window
17.The Guardian University Guide(2013)。University guide 2013: League table for music,http://www.theguardian.com/education。  new window
18.Times Higher Education(2013)。The world university rankings,http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk。  new window
19.東亞教師教育國際聯盟(2013)。關於東亞教師教育聯盟,http://www.u-gakugei.ac.jp/〜icue2009/cn/index.html。  延伸查詢new window
20.財團法人高等教育評鑑中心基金會(2010)。世界各大高等教育排名系統比較,http://www.heeact.edu.tw/public/Attachment/111110152523.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.吳清山、林天祐(2010)。從認可評鑑走向品質保證。高等教育評鑑議題研究。臺北市:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
2.陸偉明(1996)。簡介QS-THES大學排名系統。大學國際化--我國高等教育論壇。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE