:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:範例引導學習與問題導向學習之教學策略對國小學生機器人程式學習的影響
書刊名:數位學習科技期刊
作者:李隆盛 引用關係楊秀全
作者(外文):Lee, Lung-shengYang, Hsiu-chuan
出版日期:2019
卷期:11:4
頁次:頁77-104
主題關鍵詞:STEM跨領域教育問題導向學習程式設計教學策略範例引導學習機器人教育STEM interdisciplinary educationProblem-oriented learningPOLInstructional strategy for programmingExample-led learningELLRobot education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:43
  • 點閱點閱:6
程式設計學習有助提升學習者的運算思維與關鍵能力,但是不同教學策略對學習者的這些能力有何影響?本研究旨在探究「範例引導學習」及「問題導向學習」兩種不同但常用之教學策略,對於國小學生機器人程式學習之影響。針對115名(範例引導學習組57名、問題導向學習組58名)國小五年級學生進行為期14週的機器人程式設計教學實驗,以自訂之關鍵學習能力量表進行前、後測,在課程結束後,同時進行國際運算思維能力測驗。研究結果顯示:問題導向學習組學生學習後的運算思維能力顯著優於範例引導學習組學生-問題導向學習組學生對於問題解決有較多的投入,也相對願意進行主動練習、反覆嘗試與思考;範例引導學習組學生在學習過程中記錄心得並進行分析歸納,加上透過討論,同樣符合十二年國民基本教育新課綱中培養學生實踐「做、用、想」導向的主張。在關鍵能力方面,兩組學生學習後,批判思考能力及創造創新能力方面並無顯著差異;但範例引導學習的教學策略較能提升學習者自主學習、溝通應用、協同合作和問題解決四項關鍵能力。因此,在進行機器人程式設計教學時,可因應學生需求,就兩種策略做適切的選採或混成。
Programming learning helps to improve the computation thinking and other key competences of learners such as critical thinking, but how do different instructional strategies affect these skills/competences of learners? This study aimed to explore the impact of two different but widely-used instructional strategies, "example-led learning" (ELL) and "problem-oriented learning" (POL), on the robot programming learning of elementary students. There were 115 5th graders (57 in the ELL group and 58 in the POL group) were selected to participate in a 14-week robot programming learning unit. Using a self-developed key competences scale, both pre- and post-tests were conducted on the students. In addition, the International Bebras Contest was also conducted at the end of the teaching unit. The research results show that the students in POL group have significantly better computational thinking skill than the students in EEL group-the students in POL group have more engagement in problem solving, and are more willing to actively learn and repeatedly try and think. However, with the EEL instructional strategy, the students record, analyze, summarize and discuss their experiences in the learning process; thus, it also conforms to the proposition to enhance student's skills of "doing, using and thinking" in the new national curriculum guideline for graders 1-12. In terms of key competencies, there is no significant difference between the two groups of students in post-learning critical thinking and creative skills; however, the ELL strategy has superior effect to enhance the following four skills of the learners: independent learning, communication application, collaboration and problem solving. Therefore, when teaching robot programming, teachers can appropriately choose either one or mix the two strategies according to student's needs.
期刊論文
1.Nilsson, B.、Folkestad, G.(2005)。Children's practice of computer-based composition。Music Education Research,7(1),21-37。  new window
2.Yáñez-Aldecoa, C.、Okada, A.、Palau, R.(2015)。New learning scenarios for the 21st century related to Education, Culture and Technology。RUSC: Universities and Knowledge Society Journal,12(2),87-102。  new window
3.Hadjerrouit, S.(2008)。Towards a blended learning model for teaching and learning computer programming: A case study。Informatics in Education,7(2),181-210。  new window
4.陳明溥(20071000)。程式語言課程之教學模式與學習工具對初學者學習成效與學習態度之影響。師大學報. 科學教育類,52(1/2),1-21。  延伸查詢new window
5.凃金堂(20110900)。運用「範例(worked-out example)」在國小數學問題解決的教學實驗研究。教育心理學報,43(1),25-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Collins, A.、Halversont, R.(2010)。The second educational revolution: Rethinking education in the age of technology。Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,26(1),18-27。  new window
7.王秀鶯(20130300)。導入Scratch程式教學對國中生自我效能與學習成就之探究--以程式設計課程為例。人文社會學報,9(1),1-15。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.潘培鈞、賴阿福(20141200)。應用多元學習策略於Scratch程式設計課程對於五年級學童問題解決能力之影響。國教新知,61(4),46-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Cooper, Graham、Sweller, John(1987)。Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer。Journal of Educational Psychology,79(4),347-362。  new window
10.Deek, F. P.、Kimmel, H.、McHugh, J. A.(1998)。Pedagogical changes in the delivery of the first-course in computer science: Problem solving, then programming。Journal of Engineering Education,87(3),313-320。  new window
11.Grover, S.、Pea, R.(2013)。Computational thinking in K-12: A review of the state of the field。Educational Researcher,42(1),38-43。  new window
12.劉蔚之、彭森明(20080400)。歐盟「關鍵能力」教育方案及其社會文化意涵分析。課程與教學,11(2),51-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Wing, Jeannette M.(2006)。Computational Thinking。Communications of the ACM,49(3),33-35。  new window
14.趙嘉浩、梁至中、蔡孟蓉(20170700)。機器人課程教材鷹架對高中生未來關鍵學習能力的影響。數位學習科技期刊,9(3),95-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.吳正己、林凱胤(1997)。問題解決導向的程式語言教學。資訊與教育雜誌,1997(特刊),75-83。  延伸查詢new window
16.何品萱、王麗君、陳明溥(20170900)。互動式擴增實境在國中生機器人程式設計學習之探討。中等教育,68(3),16-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.施又瑀(20180900)。臺灣程式教育的困境與展望。臺灣教育評論月刊,7(9),1-8。  延伸查詢new window
18.賴信豪(20180600)。淺談程式設計實習課程對於學生培養問題解決能力之障礙與改善策略。臺灣教育評論月刊,7(6),104-108。  延伸查詢new window
19.Blanchard, S.、Freiman, V.、Lirrete-Pitre, N.(2010)。Strategies used by elementary schoolchildren solving robotics-based complex tasks: Innovative potential of technology。Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2(2),2851-2857。  new window
20.Chai, C.-S.、Deng, F.、Tsai, P.-S.、Koh, J. H. L.、Tsai, C.-C.(2015)。Assessing multidimensional students 9 perceptions of twenty-first-century learning practices。Asia Pacific Education Review,16(3),389-398。  new window
21.Chambers, J.、Carbonaro, M.、Rex, M.(2007)。Scaffolding knowledge construction through robotic technology: A middle school case study。Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education,6,55-70。  new window
22.Hohn, R. L.、Moraes, I.(1998)。Use of rule-based elaboration of worked examples to promote the acquisition of programming plans。The Journal of Computer Information Systems,38(2),35-40。  new window
23.Kalelioğlu, F.(2015)。A new way of teaching programming skills to K-12 students: Code. org。Computers in Human Behavior,52,200-210。  new window
24.Kobsiripat, W.(2015)。Effects of the media to promote the scratch programming capabilities creativity of elementary school students。Social and Behavioral Sciences,174,227-232。  new window
25.Román-González, M.、Pérez-González, J.-C.、Jiménez-Fernández, C.(2017)。Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the computational thinking test。Computers in Human Behavior,72,678-691。  new window
26.Sáez-López, J. M.、Román-González, M.、Vázquez-Cano, E.(2016)。Visual programming languages integrated across the curriculum in elementary school: A two year case study using "Scratch" in five schools。Computers & Education,97,129-141。  new window
27.Swaid, S. I.(2015)。Bringing computational thinking to STEM education。Procedia Manufacturing,3,3657-3662。  new window
28.Sweller, John(2004)。Instructional design consequences of an analogy between evolution by natural selection and human cognitive architecture。Instructional Science,32(1/2),9-31。  new window
會議論文
1.謝建全、施能木、鄭承昌(2004)。機械人組合教學輔具在國小創意學習與問題解決歷程教學上之應用。2004年資優教育學術研討會。臺南市。  延伸查詢new window
2.Darabi, A.、Nelson, D. W.(2004)。Training and transfer of complex cognitive skills: Effects of worked examples and conventional problem-solving。The 27th Association for Educational Communications and Technology Conference。Chicago, IL。  new window
3.de Kereki, I. F.(2008)。Scratch: Applications in computer science 1。The 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference,IEEE 。  new window
4.Femaeus, Y.、Kindborg, M.、Scholz, R.(2006)。Programming and tools: Rethinking children's programming with contextual signs。The Conference on Interaction Design and Children。Tampere。  new window
學位論文
1.吳偉元(2018)。運用問題導向學習教學策略提升國小學童運算思維能力之研究--以程式設計課程為例(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.梁耀東(2010)。樂高機器人在國小數學教學的應用--以Kolb的學習理論為基礎(碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Smith, P. L.、Ragan, T. J.(1999)。Instructional design。John Wiley & Sons。  new window
2.Howland, J. L.、Jonassen, D. H.、Marra, R. M.(2012)。Meaningful Learning with Technology。Pearson。  new window
3.Adams Becker, S.、Cummins, M.、Davis, A.、Freeman, A.、Hall Giesinger, C.、Ananthanarayanan, V.(2017)。NMC horizon report: 2017 higher education edition。The New Media Consortium。  new window
4.Commission of the European Communities(2005)。Progress towards the Lisbon objectives in education and training, 2005 report。Brussels:Commission of the European Communities。  new window
其他
1.教育部(2016)。2016-2020資訊教育總藍圖,https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/3/relfile/6315/46563/65ebb64a-683c-4f7a-bcf0-325113ddb436.pdf。  new window
2.International Society for Technology in Education(2016)。ISTE standards for students,http://www.iste.org/standards/standards/for-students-2016, 。  new window
3.黃子瓔(20101115)。從3R到4C:淺談21世紀能力的發展與趨勢,http://newsletter.teldap.tw/news/NewsContent.php?lid=466&nid=4112, 。  延伸查詢new window
4.United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization(2003)。Nurturing the treasure: Vision and strategy 2002-2007,http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001311/131145e.pdf。  new window
5.中華學習體驗分享協會。何謂心智圖?,https://www.lensverynuich.com/product.php?lang:=tw&tb=1。  延伸查詢new window
6.李文恩(2015)。給小朋友學程式的機器人自走車mBot:如積木般易組裝,價格約台幣1600元,http://www.techbang.com/posts/23261-low-cost-educationalrobotics-mBot-let-each- child-has-their-own-robots。  延伸查詢new window
7.徐凡鈞(2018)。不問學歷跟背景!法國École 42打破傳統教育屏障,培育世界級人才,https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/48885/school-42-is-located-in-paris。  延伸查詢new window
8.Fisch, K.(2006)。Did you know?,http://thefischbowl.blogspot.tw/2006/08/did-you-know.html。  new window
圖書論文
1.Renkl, A.(2014)。Learning from worked examples: How to prepare students for meaningful problem solving。Applying the science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into curriculum。Washington, DC:American Psychological Association。  new window
2.Román-González, M.、Moreno-León, J.、Robles, G.(2019)。Combining assessment tools for a comprehensive evaluation of computational thinking interventions。Computational thinking education。Springer。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE