:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:鄰避型公共設施之環境態度與更新接受意願之研究--以臺北市為例
書刊名:都市與計劃
作者:李永展林啟賢
作者(外文):Lee, Yung-jaanLin, Chi-hsien
出版日期:1998
卷期:25:2
頁次:頁133-153
主題關鍵詞:環境態度鄰避型公共設施鄰避情結更新接受意願Environmental attitudesNIMBY facilityNimby syndromeWillingness to accept
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:717
  • 點閱點閱:66
     本研究以 1997 年 752 位臺北市民之家戶訪談資料為基礎,進行鄰避型公共設施 之環境態度與更新接受意願之分析。研究結果發現,大多數受訪民眾對鄰避型公共設施的態 度具持平的看法,而不少受訪民眾顯示了某種程度的「鄰避情結」。超過百分之五十的受訪 民眾不同意「政府已經提供了足夠的公共設施相關風險資訊」的說法,這些受訪民眾明白地 表達了他們對政府在處理鄰避型公共設施設置或更新問題時無法扮演足夠的角色之關切。經 由因子分析的操作,本研究由受訪民眾的環境態度中歸納出心理、社會公平、政治決策、動 機與行動等五個因子,其中以心理因子、社會公平因子與動機因子最為受訪民眾重視。 經由 Pearson 相關分析及淨相關分析的結果得知, 受訪民眾對鄰避型公共設施的更新接受 意願與性別、教育程度、及年齡均具有顯著的負相關,亦即女性較男性的接受意願要高,而 教育程度愈高者、年紀愈長者其接受意願愈低。而不同社經屬性的受訪民眾和環境態度因子 之間具有某種程度的關係,其中性別、教育程度、年齡、家庭收入等四個變數和五個環境態 度因子之間具有預期的統計上之關聯性,而教育程度是這五個因子中最有力的解釋變數,但 是當控制住其他變數時,家庭收入和環境態度因子之間便不具統計上的相關,而居住期間的 長短則和環境態度因子之間不具統計上顯著的相關性。
     A citywide interview of 752 Taipei residents conducted in 1997 provided data on residents' environmental attitudes toward NIMBY facilities. Taipei residents expressed a modest concern toward NIMBY facilities and expressed the concern with the government's ability to deal with the facility siting and renewal information. Factor analysis revealed that there are five sub-scales for NIMBY facility attitudes: psychological, social equity, political decision, motivation, and action. Analysis of the relationships of the various social characteristics to respondents' willingness to accept (WTA) factors was carried out using Pearson bivariate correlation and Partial correlation procedures. Overall, female respondents have higher WTA scores than male and younger respondents have higher WTA scores than older ones. Those individuals having a higher education tend to have lower scores of WTA. Correlation analysis revealed that bivariate relationships could be found between social characteristics and NIMBY facility factors. Gender, education, age, and family income were found to show bivariate relationships with all the five NIMBY facility factors, with the relationship between family income and psychological dropped to non-significance when the effects of the other variables were held constant. Years of residence and number of residents in our study showed no significant relationships with facility renewal factors.
期刊論文
1.李永展、何紀芳(1995)。都市服務設施「鄰避」效果與選址規劃原則。環境教育,24,2-10。  延伸查詢new window
2.Dear, M.(1992)。Understanding and Overcoming the NIMBY Syndrome。Journal of the American Planning Association,58,288-300。  new window
3.Dunlap, R. E.、Van Liere, K. D.(1978)。The 'New Environmental Paradigm': A Proposed Instrument and Preliminary Results。Journal of Environmental Education,9,10-19。  new window
4.Gamba, R. J.、Oskamp, S.(1994)。Factors Influencing Community Residents' Participation in Commingled Curbside Recycling Programs。Journal of Environment and Behavior,26,587-612。  new window
5.Lee, Y. J.、De Young, R.、Marans, R. W.(1995)。Factors Influencing Individual Recycling Behavior in Office Settings: A Study of Office Workers in Taiwan。Environment and Behavior,27(3),380-403。  new window
6.Maloney, M. P.、Ward, M. P.(1973)。Let's Hear from the People。American Psychologist,28,583-586。  new window
7.Mitchell, R. C.(1986)。Property Right, Protes, and the Siting of Hazardous Waste Facilities。American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings,76(2),285-290。  new window
8.Newhouse, N.(1990)。Implications of attitude and behavior research for environmental conservation。Journal of Environmental Education,21,26-32。  new window
9.Noe, F. P.、Snow, R.(1990)。The New Environmental Paradigm and Further Analysis。Journal of Environmental Education,21,20-26。  new window
10.Scott, D.、Willits, F. K.(1994)。Environmental Attitudes and Behavior: A Pennsylvania Survey。Environment and Behavior,26(2),239-260。  new window
11.Van Liere, K. D.、Dunlap, R. E.(1980)。The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses, Explanations, and Empirical Evidence。Public Opinion Quarterly,44(2),181-197。  new window
12.Weisberg, B.(1993)。One City's Approach to NIMBY: How New York City Developed a Fair Share Siting Process。Journal of the American Planning Association,59,93-97。  new window
13.李永展(19941100)。鄰避設施與社區關係。人與地,131/132,46-53。  延伸查詢new window
14.李永展、何紀芳(19960900)。臺北地方生活圈都市服務設施之鄰避效果。都市與計劃,23(1),95-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.何紀芳、李永展(19961200)。都市服務設施接受意願與影響因子之探討。建築學報,19,27-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.李永展(19970300)。鄰避症候群之解析。都市與計劃,24(1),69-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.李永展(19910900)。環境態度與保育行為之研究:美國文獻回顧與概念模式之發展。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報,6,73-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.李永展(19960500)。鄰避設施對社區環境品質之影響--以臺北市三個垃圾焚化廠為例。國立政治大學學報,72(下),263-297。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.李永展(1997)。修訂台北市綜合發展計畫地區發展構想--文山區發展構想。  延伸查詢new window
2.瞿海源(1994)。台灣地區社會變遷基本調查計劃:第二期第五次調查計劃執行報告 (計畫編號:NSC 83-0301-H-001-034-B1)。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳建甫(1990)。環境保護行為模式之研究--以工業區附近鄉村居民反污染行動為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.何紀芳(1995)。都市服務設施鄰避效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.翁久惠(1994)。嫌惡性設施對生活環境品質影響之研究--以台北市內湖、木柵、士林三個垃圾焚化廠為例(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.李永展(19950000)。環境態度與環保行為:理論與實證。臺北:胡氏圖書。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.黃懿慧(1994)。科技風險與環保抗爭台灣民眾認知與個案研究。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉錦添(1989)。污染性設施設置程序之研究。行政院經濟建設委員會健全經社法規工作小組。  延伸查詢new window
4.Bailey, K. D.(1993)。Methods of Social Research。New York:Free Press。  new window
5.Banerjee, T.、Bear, W. C.(1984)。Beyond the Neighborhood Unit。New York:Plenumm Press。  new window
6.Daniel Yankelovich Group(1990)。Public Attitudes Toward People with Chronic Mental Illness: Executive Summary。Princeton, NJ:The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation。  new window
7.De Young, R.(1990)。Conserving Natural Resources by Integrated Waste Management: Some Available Alternatives。Ann Arbor, MI:University of Michigan。  new window
8.楊國樞、文崇一、吳聰賢、李亦園(1989)。社會及行為科學研究法。臺北市:東華出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Smith, D. A.(1986)。Neighborhood Context of Police Behavior。Communities and Crime。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE