:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「仁」與「禮」:臺灣民眾的家庭價值觀與工作態度
書刊名:應用心理研究
作者:陳舜文 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Shuen-wen
出版日期:1999
卷期:4
頁次:頁205-227
主題關鍵詞:家庭價值社會表徵理論儒家倫理Family valuesSocial representation theoryConfucian ethics
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(13) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(3)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:12
  • 共同引用共同引用:347
  • 點閱點閱:45
     過去研究顯示,在社會變遷的過程中,臺灣民眾的家庭價值觀具有正在改變與 不易改變的部份。然而,此類研究發現卻缺乏一致的理論說明。本文認為:經驗研究的發 現必須置於理論的脈絡中加以解釋,其意義才能彰顯。因此,本文從社會表徵理論與「行 動理路」的觀點,在理論上探討社會價值的形成與變遷,以及文化分析與社會心理研究的 關連。再自儒家「庶人倫理」的結構理路論述華人的家庭價值觀,並重新分析解釋「臺灣 社會變遷調查」的實徵資料。研究一結果顯示:(1)當代臺灣民眾的家庭價值觀含有兩個因 素成分:「情感因素」與「規範因素」。此兩項因素的意義,可以從民眾對傳統儒家思想 中「仁」與「禮」的社會表徵來理解。(2)年輕者較年長者重視「情感因素」,而年長者 則較年輕者重視「規範因素」。由於文化中的各種成分常是互相關連的,兩家庭是華人最 重視的社會團體,並且華人又傾向以所屬群體作為工作成就動機的來源,本研究推測:華 人努力工作的態度會與家庭價值具有正向的關聯。研究二根據實徵資料進行分析,結果顯 示:(1)家庭價值中的「情感因素」和「規範因素」都與「勤奮工作」具有顯著正相關。( 2)家庭價值各因素與「休閒價值」或「個人成就」都無顯著相關。此結果符合本研究的推 測。
     Although many empirical studies showed that there are both changing and unchanged aspects in the Taiwanese family values, no theoretical explanation for such phenomenon has been provided. Those empirical findings will be unintelligible until they can be interpreted in terms of theoretical frameworks. Based on the social representation theory and the conceptual framework of three-fold rationales for action proposed by Yeh (1995), this article explicates the change of social values that are formalized by cultural norms and social discourses. Two core concepts of Confucian ethics for ordinary people (Hwang, 1995), jen (benevolence) and li (propriety), and their implications on Chinese familism are discussed. Study 1 re-analyzes parts of data collected in Taiwan Social Change Survey (1994), results show that (1) the-two factors of Taiwanese family values can be viewed as Confucian 6- thics of jen and li, and (2) there are opposite trends of cohort differences on these two family values. Study II deduces the relationships between these two family values and the attitudes toward work. The results of analysing the same data indicate that (1) the attitude of hardworking is positively correlated with family values, (2) there is no correlation between the attitude toward leisure and family values, and (3) there is no correlation between the attitude of working for oneself and family values.
期刊論文
1.葉啟政(1995)。結構之外:歷史的社會學理路初探。二十一世紀雙月刊,32,39-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Cheng, C. K.(1944)。Familism: The foundation of Chinese social organization。Social Forces,23,50-59。  new window
3.Lin, Y. S.(1974)。The evolution of the Pre-Confucian meaning of Jen and the Confucian concept of moral autonomy。Monumenta Serica,31,178-198。  new window
4.Gusfield, J. R.(1968)。Tradition and modernity: Conflict and congruence。Journal of Social Issues,14,1-7。  new window
5.Wagner, W.、Duveen, G.、Farr, R.、Jovchelovitch, S.、Lorenzi-Cioldi, F.、Markova, I.、Rose, D.(1999)。Theory and method of social representations。Asian Journal of Social Psychology,2,95-125。  new window
6.Moscovici, S.(1963)。Attitudes and opinions。Annual Review of Psychology,14,231-260。  new window
7.Hwang, K. K.(1999)。Filial piety and loyalty: The types of social identification in Confucianism。Asian Journal of Social Psychology,2,129-149。  new window
8.黃光國(19950200)。儒家價值觀的現代轉化:理論分析與實徵研究。本土心理學研究,3,276-338。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.黃光國(1997)。開創台灣儒學的新貌:論儒家文化傳統的社會科學研究。第一屆台灣儒學研究國際學術研討會,成功大學主辦 。台南。  延伸查詢new window
2.朱瑞玲(1997)。台灣社會的家庭倫理變遷。第二屆國際華人心理學學術研討會,香港中文大學心理系主辦 。香港。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.瞿海源(1994)。台灣地區社會變遷基本調查計劃:第二期第五次調查計劃執行報告 (計畫編號:NSC 83-0301-H-001-034-B1)。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Kahn, Herman(1979)。World economic development: 1979 and beyond。London:Croom Helm。  new window
2.Hofstede, G.(1980)。Culture's Consequences: International Difference in Work-Related Values。Beverly Hills, CA:Sage Publications, Inc.。  new window
3.張德勝(1989)。儒家倫理與秩序情結--中國思想的社會學詮釋。臺北:巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Hsu, F. L. K.(1953)。Americans and Chinese: Two ways of life。New York:Henry Schuman。  new window
5.黃光國(19980000)。知識與行動:中華文化傳統的社會心理詮釋。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.McClelland, David C.(1961)。The Achieving Society。Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.。  new window
圖書論文
1.Wilson, R. W.、Pusey, A. W.(1982)。Achievement Motivation and Small Business Relationship Patterns in Chinese Society。Social Interaction in Chinese Society。New York:Praeger Publishers。  new window
2.Redding, S. G.、Norman, A.、Schlander, A.(1992)。The nature of individual attachment to the organization: A review of East Asian variations。Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology。Palo Alto, CA:Consulting Psychology Press。  new window
3.Far, R.(1993)。Theory and method in the study of social representations。Empirical approaches to social representations。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
4.張瑞穗(1982)。仁與禮--道德自主與社會制約。天道與人道。台北:聯經出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Yang, K. S.(1986)。Chinese personality and its change。The psychology of the Chinese people。Hong Kong:Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Yang, C. F.(1988)。Familism and development: An examination of the role of family in contemporary China Mainland, Hong Kong, and Taiwan。Social Values and Development: Asian Perspectives。New Delhi:Sage。  new window
7.Triandis, H. C.(1988)。Collectivism vs. individualism: A reconceptualisation of a basic concept in cross-cultural social psychology。Cross-cultural studies of personality, attitudes, and cognitions。London:Macmillan。  new window
8.LeVine, R. A.(1984)。Properties of culture: An ethnographic view。Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion。Cambridge, England:New York:Cambridge University Press:Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Freedman, M.(1979)。The family in China, past and present。The study of Chinese society: Essays by Maurice Freedman。Stanford:Stanford University Press。  new window
10.D'Andrade, R. G.(1984)。Cultural meaning system。Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion。Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.Bond, Michael H.(1988)。Invitation to a Wedding: Chinese Values and Global Economic Growth。Social Values and Development: Asian Perspectives。New York:Sage。  new window
12.楊懋春(1988)。中國的家族主義與國民性格。中國人的性格。臺北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
13.葉光輝(1997)。台灣民眾之孝道觀念的變遷情形。九〇年代的臺灣社會。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
14.翁儷禎(1995)。因素分析應用之一覽。社會調查與分析 : 社會科學研究方法檢討與前瞻之一。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
15.王叢桂(1998)。三個世代大學畢業工作者的價值觀。海峽兩岸之企業倫理與工作價值。臺北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE