:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣社區工作的政策典範與治理–社區照顧關懷據點的省思
作者:蕭文高
作者(外文):Hsiao, Wen-Kao
校院名稱:國立暨南國際大學
系所名稱:社會政策與社會工作學系
指導教授:黃源協
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2007
主題關鍵詞:社區發展社區營造社區照顧社群主義治理community developmentcommunity empoweringcommunity carecommunitarianismgovernance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(21) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:17
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:120
臺灣政府自1960年代開始致力於推動社區發展工作,然而由於行政科層與執政當局過度著重硬體建設,造成社區相當依賴政府的資源,亦喪失其自主性。於是,隨著臺灣邁向工業化與民主化,對於社區參與不足之省思,孕育了另外一股社區政策的思潮,政府亦在1990年代採行了社區營造政策。在此兩種不同的背景脈絡下,相關比較性研究陸續產生,只不過對於政府的角色以及政策之理念基礎,各方看法仍是分歧;此外,對於社區營造所主張的社群主義價值是否能真正地落實在政策的執行,也需要更為詳細的分析與檢視。本研究的目的在於從政策典範的觀點,分析並比較社區發展與社區營造之政策變遷過程,接著藉由瞭解「建立社區照顧關懷據點實施計畫」之治理制度與工具,探討公部門與社區組織進行服務供給之互動與調適行為,以及它在社群主義之價值面向所產生之影響。
為了達成研究之目的,本研究採取文獻分析與質性研究的方法,一方面分析政府文件與相關研究,另一方面則針對地方政府社會行政人員與社區組織領導者進行訪談工作。研究主要發現包括:
一、受到許多政策行動者理念在政策典範形成所扮演的關鍵角色,讓社區營造取代社區發展成為政府目前的政策重心,政府所關注的社區議題亦產生轉變,這不僅促成政策變遷,政策目標與工具之設定也有相當大之差異。然而,部份社區營造之計畫項目並不能與其政策理念相符,亦遭逢過去社區發展所面對的制度性問題。
二、中央政府、地方政府與社區組織間之互動過程,影響了照顧據點運作之機會與限制,即便政策計畫納入許多能力建構的措施,在供給與需求間仍然存在落差,加上相關制度之不完善,社會行政人員將面臨治理失靈的威脅,進而產生不同的因應策略。
三、每個社區組織參與照顧據點計畫之動機,以及網絡建構的策略並不相同,為了促進照顧據點之運作順暢,社區組織領導者必須處理社區居民與組織之不信任,並面對自我治理失靈之挑戰。儘管如此,參與照顧據點仍對社區與組織帶來改變,並形成許多社群主義的價值。
最後,本研究對於社區、社區組織、治理以及社群主義之相關概念與理論進行討論,並就政府與社區組織在互動過程所應扮演的角色,提出下列建議:
一、政府部份:(1)建立地理資訊系統;(2)培養社區組織的中介組織;(3)從效率走向過程的政策評估;(4)思考政策工具的運用與設定;(5)擴大地方公所之合作參與。
二、社區組織部份:(1)建立並經營社區組織的社會資本;(2)避免介入社區權力的衝突;(3)發展組織願景與策略性規劃。
Taiwan government have devoted to Community Development since the 1960s. However, because administrators and leaders of ruling parties have been interested in physical construction, most of the communities have had to rely on government’s resources and, there, lost their autonomy at the same time. Within the process of industrialization and democratization, insufficient community participation was reflected and different ideas of community policies were conceived. Also, Community Building policy was adopted in the 1990s. Between two different contexts, comparative studies on community policies grow in number, but opinions of government’s role as well as policy ideas are still in dispute. Furthermore, it needs to analyze whether or not communitarian values of Community Building have been put into practice. As mentioned above, the purposes of this study are:
1)To analyze and compare policy changing process between Community Development and Community Building with theories of policy paradigms.
2)To investigate interactive and adoptive behaviors between public sector and community organizations in service providing with special reference to governance institutions and policy instruments in the ”Program to Set Up Community Caring-Concern Centers”.
3)To understand value effects of the ”Program to Set Up Community Caring- Concern Centers” in light of communitarian perspective.
Research methods used in this study are:(a)literature review on policy documents and related researches;(b)qualitative interview with social administrators in local government and leaders of community organizations. Main findings of this study include:
1)Because some policy actors’ ideas played a key role in institutionalizing distinct policy paradigms, Community Building replaced Community Development as the principal focus of government now. As a result of this development, the locus of authority over community issues began to shift. Not only were the settings of policy changed but the hierarchy of goals and set of instruments employed to guide policy shifted radically as well. However, parts of Community Building violated its own policy ideas, and also met some institutional problems that Community Development had ever encountered.
2)Interactive process among central government, local government and community organizations influence opportunities and restrictions for running Community Caring-Concern Centers. Even though program devised many capacity-building measures, it also exist gaps between supply and demand sides. In addition, imperfect institutions sink social administrators into threats of governance failure; meanwhile, various coping strategies were utilized.
3)By joining this program, motivations and networking strategies of community organizations are different. For the sake of running Community Caring-Concern Centers successfully, leaders of community organizations need to deal with mistrust from community residents and organizations and face challenges of self-governance failure. Nevertheless, it also makes changes and injects communitarian values into communities and organizations.
Finally, implications for theories and concepts of community, community organization, governance and communitarianism were discussed. Furthermore, suggestions for government and community organizations in the interactive process include:
1)For government:(a)to set up geographic information system;(b)to promote intermediary community organizations;(c)to change its policy evaluation methods from efficient to process oriented;(d)to deliberate settings and applications of policy instruments;(e)to expand collaboration and participation of district government.
2)For community organizations:(a)to build and manage its social capital;(b)to avoid to engage in community power conflicts;(c)to develop its vision and strategic planning.
一、中文文獻

中共中央編譯局譯(1869/2001)。《路易.波拿巴的霧月十八日》。北京:人民出版社。(Karl Marx原著)
文建會(1999)。《臺灣社區總體營造的軌跡》。臺北:行政院文化建設委員會。
文崇一(1969)。〈社區發展與現代化問題(座談會記錄) - 社區發展與現代化問題〉《思與言》,第7卷第4期,頁1-3。
王培勳(1971)。〈社區發展工作涵義及今後我國努力途徑〉。《社會建設季刊》,第九號,頁124-133
王培勳(2002)。〈我國社區發展之回顧〉。《社區發展季刊》,第一○○期,頁44-59。new window
王震寰(1996)。《誰統治臺灣?轉型中的國家機器與權力結構》。臺北:巨流。
史可乘(1954)。〈人類之家.臺灣ESP學會〉。《臺北文物》,3(2):91-93。
民生報(1993)。〈且看今朝人物 推動文化新境 文化界新容顏2 - 陳其南〉《民生報》(1993/12/26),第33版。
申學庸、陳其南(2000)。《文化建設與國家發展》。臺北:中國國民黨中央委員會政策研究工作會。
白秀雄(1989)。《臺北市社區工作之回顧與展望》。臺北:臺北市政府社會局。
立法院公報(1989)。〈立法院教育委員會第八十二會期第四次會議紀錄〉。《立法院公報》,第七十八卷,第二十四期。
立法院公報(1993)。〈立法院第二屆第二會期教育委員會第十二次會議紀錄〉。《立法院公報》,第八十二卷,第七十三期。
立法院公報(1994a)。〈立法院第二屆第四會期教育委員會第五次會議紀錄〉。《立法院公報》。第八十三卷,第六十四期。
立法院公報(1994b)。〈立法院第二屆第三會期教育委員會第六次會議紀錄〉。《立法院公報》,第八十三卷,第二十二期。
立法院公報(1996)。〈立法院第三屆第二會期教育委員會第六次會議紀錄〉。《立法院公報》。第八十五卷,第五十期。
行政院組織改造委員會(2003)。《攜手民間、獨步全球 – 政府組織改造在臺灣》。臺北:行政院組織改造委員會。
吳夢桂(1976)。《臺灣地方社會行政實務研究》。臺北,嵩豐企業。
呂寶靜(2001)。《老人照顧:老人家庭正式服務》。臺北:五南圖書公司。new window
岑士麟(1979)。〈社區發展有關法規之研究〉。《社區發展季刊》,第七期,頁22-50。new window
李建興(1982)。〈我國推行「社區媽媽教室」活動實況及對其社區發展教學之貢獻〉。《社區發展季刊》,第十九期,頁22-24。new window
李登輝(1996)。《經營大臺灣》。臺北:遠流。
周月清(2000)。《英國社區照顧:源起與爭議》。臺北:五南圖書公司。
周思萍(1996)。《臺灣社區發展政策演變之研究 – 論國家對社區發展的介入》。臺北:國立臺灣大學社會研究所碩士論文。
林平洋(1980)。〈臺灣省政府六十九年度社區發展考核情形〉。《社區發展季刊》,第十二期,頁124-128。new window
林平洋(1995)。〈如何有效檢討社區發展的實務困境暨法規研修〉。《社區發展季刊》,全國社區發展會議特刊,頁149-154。
林洋港(1982)。〈今後社區發展工作之重點與方向 – 林部長洋港巡視本中心後的指示〉。《社區發展季刊》,第十八期,頁6-7。
林振春(1982)。〈我國社區發展與基層建設之比較〉。《社區發展季刊》,第十九期,頁37-52。new window
林盛豐(1993)。〈《主題書評》社區建築 – 人民如何創造自我的環境〉《聯合報》(1993/12/09),第35版。
林勝義(2004)。〈從社區評鑑探討臺灣社區發展的走向〉,《社區發展季刊》,第107期,頁52-63。new window
林榮遠譯(1999)。《共同體與社會 – 純粹社會學的基本概念》。北京:商務印書館。(Ferdinand Tönnies原著)
林衡道(1995)。〈【臺灣舊聞】日本安那其在臺灣〉。《聯合報》(1995/10/24),第34版。
社區發展月刊(1972)。〈臺灣省六十年度社區發展考核委員會考核報告〉。《社區發展月刊》,第一卷第三期,頁15-18。
社區發展季刊(1977)。〈臺灣省擴大「小康計畫」全面照顧低收入民眾〉。《社區發展季刊》,第1期,頁121-124。
社區發展季刊(1978)。〈運用專業方法,再創社區發展工作高潮〉。《社區發展季刊》,第五期,頁4。
社區發展季刊(1995)。《社區發展季刊 - 全國社區發展會議特刊》。臺北:內政部。
社會建設季刊(1971)。〈臺灣社區發展業務概況〉。《社會建設季刊》,第九號,頁63-68
俞可平(1998)。《社群主義》。北京:中國社會科學出版社。new window
姚克明、王慧娣譯(1980)。《社區組織的理論與實際》。臺北:臺灣省公共衛生研究所。(Murray G. Ross原著)
思與言(1969)。〈社區發展與現代化問題(座談會記錄)〉。《思與言》,第7卷第4期,頁1-14。
施教裕(1999)。〈埔里福利社區化的工作和檢討〉。《社區發展季刊》,第87期,頁72-109。new window
柯逸山(1969)。〈社區發展〉。《思與言》,第七卷第四期,頁73-78。new window
洪玉昆(1978)。《國父地方自治體制與臺灣社區發展之研究》。臺北:中央文物供應社。
省政府公報(1967)。〈臺灣省議會第三屆第十次大會省政府主席施政報告〉。《臺灣省政府公報》,五十六年冬字,第三十一期。
省政府公報(1973)。〈對臺灣省議會第五屆第二次大會施政報告〉。《臺灣省政府公報》,六十二年秋字,第六十九期。
省政府公報(1975)。〈對臺灣省議會第五屆第五次大會施政報告〉。《臺灣省政府公報》,六十四年春字,第六十二期。
省政府公報(1981)。〈本府主席對臺灣省議會第六屆第八次大會施政報告〉。《臺灣省政府公報》,七十年秋字,第三十七期。
省政府公報(1985)。〈本府主席對臺灣省議會第七屆第八次大會施政報告〉。《臺灣省政府公報》,七十四年秋字,第四十五期。
省政府公報(1991)。〈本府主席對臺灣省議會第九屆第四次大會施政報告〉。《臺灣省政府公報》,八十年冬字,第十三期。
省政府公報(1992)。〈本府主席對臺灣省議會第九屆第五次大會施政報告〉。《臺灣省政府公報》,八十一年夏字,第十七期。
唐啟明(1995)。〈內政部推展社區發展工作業務報告〉,《社區發展季刊》,全國社區發展會議特刊,頁32-35。
唐啟明(1997)。〈臺灣省社會福利社區化的過去、現在與未來〉。《社區發展季刊》,第七十七期,頁13-21。new window
徐 震(1980)。《社區與社區發展》。臺北:正中書局。
徐 震(1984)。〈社區發展的工作模式:重物乎?重人乎?〉,《社區發展季刊》,第26期,頁8-11。
徐 震(1999)。〈臺灣社區工作的新形勢與新願景〉,《社區發展季刊》,第88期,頁168-176。
徐 震(2004)。〈臺灣社區發展與社區營造的異同 – 論社區工作中微視與鉅視面的兩條路線〉,《社區發展季刊》,第107期,頁22-31。
徐慶鐘(1971)。〈社區發展工作現況及檢討〉。《社會建設季刊》,第九號,頁57-62
徐慶鐘(1972)。〈社區發展工作之檢討〉。《社區發展月刊》,第一卷第六期,頁3。
秦修明、湯新楣、李宜培譯(2005)。《民主在美國》。臺北:左岸文化。(Alexis de Tocqueville原著)
袁頌西(1969)。〈社區發展與現代化問題(座談會記錄) - 今後臺灣社區發展之可行途徑 – 結論〉《思與言》,第7卷第4期,頁13。
康 原(1999)。〈尋找社區精神,營造新的故鄉 – 參與社區營造的一些感想〉,《八十八年全國鄉鎮展演設施暨社區總體營造博覽會成果專輯》。彰化:彰化縣立文化中心。
張鴻鈞(1971)。〈社區發展的新動向〉。《社會建設季刊》,第九號,頁73-78。
張鴻鈞(1974)。《張鴻鈞先生社會發展言論彚編》。臺北:張鴻鈞先生獎學金基金管理委員會
莫藜藜(2004)。〈張鴻鈞先生與臺灣的社區發展工作〉,《社區發展季刊》,第107期,頁42-51。new window
許水德(1977)。〈為何及如何建立社會工作員制度〉,《社區發展季刊》,第1期,頁17。
許順有(1983)。〈臺灣省社會福利基金之管理與運用〉,《社區發展季刊》,第二十三期,頁25-42。new window
陳向明(2002)。《社會科學質的研究》。臺北:五南圖書公司。new window
陳其南(1992)。《公民國家意識與臺灣政治發展》。臺北:允晨。new window
陳其南(1997)。〈社區家園化 – 論社區總體營造〉,收錄於曠野雜誌編《社區營造 – 社區發展與總體營造》。臺北:曠野雜誌。
陳其南(1998)。〈陳其南 – 社區總體營造工程師〉。《民生報》(1998/12/01),第19版。
陳其南(1999)。〈社區總體營造-對啟蒙運動的反思〉。《聯合報》(1999/08/10),第14版。
陳其南(2003)。〈社區營造.不斷解決生活問題的過程〉,《社區營造學會電子報》,6。網址http://www.cesroc.org.tw/eNEWS/index6.htm
陳國鈞(1972)。〈考察南部社區發展〉。《社區發展月刊》,第一卷第十期,頁5-10。
陳錦煌(2005)。〈專題演講:社政十年的省思,迎接下一個十年〉。《邁向下一個社造十年 – 從人文、環境、產業再出發研討會會議手冊》。臺北:中華民國社區營造學會、好鄰居文教基金會。網址:http://www.cesroc.org.tw/event/next10/01.pdf.
陳錦煌(2005)。〈懷念黃武忠處長〉,《社區營造學會電子報》,第46期。網址http://www.cesroc.org.tw/eNEWS/index46.htm#03.
陸 光(1987)。《推行統一勸募改革社區發展》。臺北:中華民國社區發展研究訓練中心。
陶蕃瀛(1992)。〈論臺灣地區的社區發展〉。《社會福利》,第100期,頁34-38。
曾旭正(1999)。〈臺灣社區營造政策的回顧與展望〉。《文化生活》,第二卷第四期,頁3-6。
曾華源(1981)。〈推動社區工作之途徑與社區工作者角色之探討〉,《社區發展季刊》,第14期,頁71-79。new window
渠東譯(2002)。《社會分工論》。臺北:左岸文化事業有限公司。(Emile Durkheim原著)
黃昆輝(1995)。〈社區發展再出發〉。《社區發展季刊》,全國社區發展會議特刊,頁6-10。
黃源協(2000)。《社區照顧–臺灣與英國經驗的檢視》。臺北:揚智出版社。new window
黃源協(2004)。〈社區工作何去何從:社區發展?社區營造?〉,《社區發展季刊》,第107期,頁78-87。new window
黃煌雄、郭石吉、林時機(2001)。《社區總體營造總體檢調查報告書》。臺北:遠流。
黃肇新(1997)。〈迎向新社區時代 – 臺灣社區發展的回顧與展望〉,收錄於曠野雜誌編《社區營造 – 社區發展與總體營造》。臺北:曠野雜誌。
黃麗玲(1995)。《新國家建構中社區角色的轉變––社區共同體的論述分析》。臺北:臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
黃麗玲(1999)。〈從文化認同轉向區域治理 – 921地震災後重建工作對「社區總體營造」論述的挑戰〉。《城市與設計學報》,第九/十期:頁147-174。new window
楊家騄(1978)。〈臺灣社區發展資料分析〉,《社區發展季刊》,第2期,頁96-108。new window
萬育維(1998)。〈福利社區化之理論與原則〉,收錄於中華民國社區營造學會編《社會福利社區化論文集》。臺北:中華民國社區營造學會。
經建會(2005)。《挑戰2008:國家發展重點計畫(2002-2007)》。臺北:行政院經濟建設委員會。
監察院(2005)。《推動社區總體營造工作之成效與檢討專案調查研究》。臺北:監察院。
臺灣省文獻會(1960)。《臺灣省通志稿》(卷三政事志社會篇)。臺北:臺灣省文獻會。
臺灣省文獻會(1971)。《臺灣省通志》(卷三政事志社會篇)。臺北:臺灣省文獻會。
臺灣省社會處(1979)。〈臺灣省社區發展推行概況〉。《社區發展季刊》,第八期,頁133-138。new window
臺灣省社會處(1984)。《七十三年社政年報》。南投:臺灣省政府社會處。
趙守博(1986)。〈建立社區福利服務體系的想法與做法〉。《社區發展季刊》,第三十五期,頁44-48。new window
劉晏齊(2005)。《從救恤到「社會事業」 – 臺灣近代社會福利制度之建立》。臺北:臺灣大學法律研究所碩士論文。
劉脩如(1977)。〈社區發展在臺灣地區的回顧與展望〉,《社區發展季刊》,第1期,頁35-37。new window
蔡漢賢(2000)。《社會立法析評》。臺北:中國社會行政學會。
鄭淑敏(2003)。〈引領地方文化風潮的播種者〉。收錄於文建會(編)。《文化土壤 接力深耕 – 文建會二十年紀念集》。臺北:行政院文化建設委員會。
蕭玉煌(1984)。〈擴大參與社區發展提高生活品質〉。《社區發展季刊》,第二十六期,頁42-56。
蕭玉煌(1995)。〈社區發展的回顧與展望 – 如何有效檢討社區發展的實務困境暨法規研修〉,《社區發展季刊》,全國社區發展會議特刊,頁137-148。new window
賴文輝(1969)。〈社區發展與現代化問題(座談會記錄) - 教育與社區發展〉《思與言》,第7卷第4期,頁7-10。
賴兩陽(2002a)。〈臺灣社區工作的歷史發展與功能轉型〉。《社區發展季刊》,第一○○期,頁69-80。new window
賴兩陽(2002b)。《社區工作與社會福利社區化》。臺北:洪葉。
聯合報(1962)。〈臺省實驗基層民生建設獲致良好成果,今年將推廣及每一鄉鎮,張寶樹籲社會民間支持此運動〉。《聯合報》(1962/06/19),第2版。
聯合報(1970)。〈地方政府組織即將調整〉。《聯合報》(1970/04/14),第2版。
聨合報(1971)。〈三民主學學者指出推行社區發展不符國父遺教〉。《聯合報》(1970/04/14),第2版。
聯合報(1997)。〈官僚行政體系與居民自主意識作梗 社區總體營造計畫行不得也﹗〉《聯合報》(1997/07/02),第十八版。
謝長廷(1995)。《謝長廷新文化教室》。臺北:月旦。
謝長廷(2005)。〈臺灣健康社區六星計畫之理念與期望〉。《跨越季刊》,第5期:頁4-7。
謝慶達(1995)。《戰後臺灣社區發展運動之歷史分析》。臺北:國立臺灣大學土木工程學研究所博士論文。
蘇昭英等(1999)。《臺灣縣市文化藝術發展 – 理念與實務》。臺北:文化環境工作室。
蘇麗瓊、田基武(2004)。〈”新故鄉社區營造計畫”與”社區營造條例草案”的介紹〉,《社區發展季刊》,第107期,頁5-21。new window

二、英文文獻

6, P., D. Leat, K. Seltzer and G. Stoker(2002). Towards Holistic Governance – The New Reform Agenda. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Alcock, P.(2004). ‘Participation or Pathology: Contradictory Tensions in Area-Based Policy’, Social Policy & Society, 3(2): 87-96.
Andersen, B.(1991). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
Baldock, P.(1974). Community Work and Social Work. London: Rouledge & Kegan Paul.
Baldock, P.(1980). ‘The Origins of Community Work in the United Kingdom’, in P. Henderson, D. Jones and D. N. Thomas(eds.), The Boundaries of Change in Community Work. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Baldock, P.(1983). ‘Community Development and Community Care’, Community Development Journal, 18(3): 231-237.
Bauman, Z.(2001). Community: Seeking Safety in an Insecure World. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beam, D. R. and T. J. Conlan(2002). ’Grants’, in L. M. Salamon(ed.), The Tools of Government – A Guide to the New Governance, pp.340-380. New York: Oxford University Press.
Béland, D.(2005). ‘Ideas and Social Policy: An Institutionalist Perspective’, Social Policy & Administration, 39(1): 1-18.
Bellah, R. N.(1995/96). ‘Community Properly Understood: A Defense of “Democratic Communitarianism”’, The Responsive Community, 6(1): 49-54.
Beverage, W.(1948). Voluntary Action – A Report on Methods of Social Advance. London: Geroge Allen & Unwin.
Boeck, T. and J. Fleming(2005). ‘Social Policy – A Help or a Hindrance to Social Capital?’, Social Policy & Society, 4(3): 259-70.
Braun, D.(1999). ‘Interests of Ideas? An Overview of Ideational Concepts in Public Policy Research’, in D. Braun and A. Busch(eds.), Public Policy and Political Ideas, pp.11-29. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Bruijn, J. A. and E. F. Heuvelhof(1997). ‘Instruments for Network Management’, in W. J. M. Kickert, E. Klijn and J. F. M. Koppenjan(eds.), Managing Complex Networks – Strategies for the Public Sector, pp.119-136. London: Sage.
Busch, A. and D. Braun(1999). ‘Introduction’, in D. Braun and A. Busch(eds.), Public Policy and Political Ideas, pp.1-10. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Butcher, H.(1993)’Introduction: Some Examples and Definitions’, in H. Butcher, A. Glen, P. Henderson and J. Smith(eds.), Community and Public Policy. pp.3-21. London: Pluto Press.
Chaskin, R. J., P. Brown, S. Venkatesh and A. Vidal(2001). Building Community Capacity. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Christenson, J. A., K. Fendley and J. W. Robinson(1989). ‘Community Development’, in J. A. Christenson and J. W. Robinson(eds.), Community Development in Perspective, pp.3-25. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
Cochrane, A.(2003). ‘The Governance of Local Welfare’, in P. Alcock, A. Erskine and M. May(eds.), The Student’s Companion to Social Policy, pp.217-224. London: Blackwell.
Colonial Office(1957). Community Development – A Handbook. London: HMSO.
Coulton, C.(2005). ‘The Place of Community in Social Work Practice Research: Conceptual and Methodological Developments’, Social Work Research, 29(2): 73-86.
Cox, R.(2004). ‘The Path-dependency of an Idea: Why Scandinavian Welfae States Remain Distinct’, Social Policy & Administration, 38(2): 204-219.
Craig, G.(2003), ‘Editorial Introduction’, Community Development Journal, 38(1):1-4
Craig, G., M. Taylor, N. Carlton, R. Garbutt, R. Kimberlee, E. Lepine and A. Syed(2005). The Paradox of Compacts: Monitoring the Impact of Compacts. London: Home Office.
Daley, J. M. and F. F. Marsiglia(2000), ‘Community Participation: Old Wine in New Bottles?’, Journal of Community Practice, 8(1): 61-86.
Delanty, G.(2003). Community. London: Routledge.
Denhardt R. B. and J. V. Denhardt(2000). ‘The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering’, Public Administration Review, 60(6): 549-559.
Douglass, R. B.(1994). ‘The Renewal of Democracy and the Communitarian Prospect’, The Responsive Community, 4(3): 55-62.
Duyvendak, J. W.(2001). ‘Learning from Social Movements: Linking Community Development and Civil Society to the State’, in P. Sałustowicz(ed.), Civil Society and Social Development, pp.51-66. Berlin: Peter Lang.
Etzioni, A.(1993). The Spirit of Community – The Reinvention of American Society. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Etzioni, A.(1996). The New Golden Rule – Community and Morality in a Democratic Society. New York: Basic Books.
Etzioni, A.(1998). ‘Should We End Social Security? – A Community Approach’, Challenge, 41(5): 5-15.
Etzioni, A.(2001). Next – The Road to the Good Soceity. New York: Basic Books.
Etzioni, A.(2003). ‘Communitarianism’, in K. Christensen and D. Levinson(eds.), Encyclopedia of Community: From the Village to the Virtual World, Vol. 1, pp.224-228. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Evans, N. (2002). ‘Machi-zukuri as A New Paradigm in Japanese Urban Planning – Reality or Myth?’, Japan Forum, 14(3): 443-464.
Evers, A. and J. Laville(2004). ’Defining the Third Sector in Europe’, in A. Evers. and J. Laville(eds.), The Third Sector in Europe, pp.11-42. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Figueira-MacDonough, J.(2001). Community Analysis and Praxis – Toward a Grounded Civil Soceity. Philadelphia: Brunner-Routledge.
Fisher, R.(2005). ‘History, Context, and Emerging Issues for Community Practice’, in M. Weil(ed.), The Handbook of Community Practice, pp.34-58. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Fitzpatrick, T.(2001). Welfare Theory: An Introduction. Hampshire: Palgrave.
Foucault, M.(1983). ‘The Subject and Power’, afterword in H. L. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow(eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, pp.208-228. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fraser, J. and J. Lepofsky(2004). ‘The Use of Knowledge in Neighbourhood Revitalization’, Community Development Journal, 39(1): 4-12.
Frazer, E.(1996). ‘The Value of Locality’, in D. King and G. Stoker(eds.), Rethinking Local Democracy, pp.89-110. London: Macmillan.
Giddens, A.(1998). The Third Way – The Renew of Social Democracy. London: Polity Press.
Gilbert, A. and P. Ward(1984). Community Action by the Urban Poor: Democratic Involvement, Community Self-help or a Means of Social Control? World Development, 12(8):769-782.
Gilbert, N. and H. Specht(1977). ‘Process versus Task in Social Planning’, Social Work, 22(3): 178-83.
Gilchrist, A.(2004). The Well-Connected Community – A Networking Approach to Community Development. Bristol: Polity Press.
Gittell, R. and A. Vidal(1998). Community Organizing – Building Social Capital as a Development Strategy. Thousands Oaks: Sage.
Gordon, D. S. and S. C. Donald(1993). Community Social Work, Older People and Informal Care. Aldershot: Avebury.
Goss, S.(2001). Making Local Governance Work – Networks, Relationships and the Management of Change. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Hall, P. A.(1992). ‘The Movement from Keynesianism to Monetarism: Institutional Analysis and British Economic Policy in the 1970s’, in S. Steinmo, K. Thelen and F. Longstreth(eds.), Structuring Politics – Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, pp.90-113. Cambridge: Combridge University Press.
Hall, P. A.(1993). ‘Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State – The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain’, Comparative Politics, 25(3): 275-96.
Hardcastle, D. A., S. Wencour and P. Powers(1997). Community Practice – Theories and Skills for Social Workers. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hardina, D.(2002). Analytical Skills for Community Organization Practice. New York: Columbia University Press.
Harrison, W. D.(1995). ‘Community Development’, in R. L. Edwards(ed.-in-chief), Encyclopedia of Social Work, pp.555-562. Washington D.C.: NASW.
Healy, J.(1998). Welfare Options – Delivering Social Services. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.
Held, D.(2004). Global Covenant – The Social Democratic Alternative to the Washington Consensus. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hemerijck, A. and K. van Kersbergen(1999). ‘Negotiated Policy Change: Towards a Theory of Institutional Learning in Tightly Coupled Welfare State’, in D. Braun and A. Busch(eds.), Public Policy and Political Ideas, pp.168-185. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Henderson, P. and D. N. Thomas(2002). Skills in Neighbourhood Work. London: Routledge.
Herrick, J. M.(2000). ‘Social Policy and the Progressive Era’, in J. Midgley, M. B. Tracy and M. Livermore(eds.), The Handbook of Social Policy, pp.97-110. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Hood, C.(1998). The Art of the State – Culture, Rhetoric and Public Management. Oxford: Clarendon.
Jessop, B.(2000). ‘Governance Failure’, in G. Stoker(ed.), The New Politics of British Local Governance, pp.11-32. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Jones, D.(1981). ‘Community Work in the United Kingdom’, in P. Henderson and D. N. Thomas(eds.), Readings in Community Work, pp.5-10. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Kettl, D. F.(2002). ‘Managing Indirect Government’, in L. M. Salamon(ed.), The Tools of Government – A Guide to the New Governance, pp.490-510. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kickert, W. J. M. and J. F. M. Koppenjan(1997). ‘Public Management and Network Management: An Overview’, in W. J. M. Kickert, E. Klijn and J. F. M. Koppenjan(eds.), Managing Complex Networks – Strategies for the Public Sector, pp.35-61. London: Sage.
Kickert, W. J. M., E. Klijn and J. F. M. Koppenjan(1997). ‘Introduction: A Management Perspective on Policy Network’, in W. J. M. Kickert, E. Klijn and J. F. M. Koppenjan(eds.), Managing Complex Networks – Strategies for the Public Sector, pp.1-13. London: Sage.
Kingdon, J. W.(2003). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Polices. New York: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc.
Kooiman, J.(1993). ‘Governance and Governability: Using Complexity, Dynamics and Diversity’, in J. Kooiman(ed.), Modern Governance – New Government-Society Interactions, pp.34-48. London: Sage.
Kooiman, J.(2003). Governing as Governance. London: Sage.
Krestzmann, J. P. and J. L. McKnight(1993). Building Communities from the Inside Out: A Path toward Finding and Mobilizing A Community’s Assets. Evanston: Northwestern University.
Kubisch, A. C., P. Auspos, P. Brown, R. Chaskin, K. Fulbright-Anderson and R.Hamilton(2002). Voices from the Field Ⅱ - Reflections on Comprehensive Community Change. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
Kuenstler, P.(1961). ’Community Organization’, in P. Kuenstler(ed.), Community Organization in Great Britain, pp.15-26. New York: Association Press.
Kuhn, T. S.(1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kymlicka, W.(2002). Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Latham, M. E.(2000). Modernization As Ideology – American Social Science and "Nation-Building" in the Kennedy Era. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
Lee, J.(1977). A Study of Resident Participation in Community Development Programs in Taiwan. Ann Arbor: Univerity Microfilms International.
Lewis, J.(2002). ‘Gender and Welfare State Change’, European Societies, 4(4): 331-57.
Littrell, D. W. and D. Hobbs(1989). ‘The Self-Help Approach ’, in J. A. Christenson and J. W. Robinson(eds.), Community Development in Perspective, pp.48-68. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
Lohmann, R. A and J. McNutt(2005). ‘Practice in Electronic Community’, in M. Weil(ed.), The Handbook of Community Practice, pp.636-646. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Lowndes, V.(2005). ‘Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed… – How Institutions Change(and Stay the Same)in Local Governance, Policy Studies, 26(3/4): 291-309.
Martin, L. L.(2000). ‘The Environmental Context of Social Welfare Administration’, in R. J. Patti(ed.), The Handbook of Social Welfare Management, pp.55-68. Thousands Oaks: Sage.
Mattessich, P. and B. Monsey(1997). Community Building: What Makes It Work – A Review of Factors Influencing Successful Community Building. Minnesota: Amherst H. Wilder Foundation.
Maxwell, J. A.(1996). Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Mayo, M. and M. Taylor(2001). ‘Partnerships and Power in Community Regeneration’, in S. Balloch and M. Taylor(eds.), Partnership Working – Policy and Practice, pp.39-56. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Mayo, M.(1994). Communities and Caring – The Mixed Economy of Welfare. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Midgley, J. and M. Livermore(2005). ’Development Theory an Community Practice’, in M. Weil(ed.), The Handbook of Community Practice, pp.153-168. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Midgley, J.(1986). Community Participation, Social Development and the State. London: Methuen.
Midgley, J.(1995). Social Development – The Developmental Perspective in Social Welfare. London: Sage.
Miller, S. M.(1987). ’Introduction: The Legacy of Richard Titmuss’, in B. Abel-Smith and K. Titmuss(eds.), The Philosophy of Welfare: Selected Writing of Richard M. Titmuss, pp.1-17. London: Allen & Unwin.
Nahrath, S.(1999). ‘The Power of Ideas in Policy Research: A Critical Assessment’, in D. Braun and A. Busch(eds.), Public Policy and Political Ideas, pp.41-60. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
National Audit Office(2004). An Early Progrss Report on the New Deal for Communities Programme. London: NAO.
Nelson, G. M.(2000). Self-Governance in Communities and Families. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Newman, J.(2001). Modernising Governance – New Labour, Policy and Society. London: Sage.
Norihiro, N.(2002). ‘Toshi Keikaku and Machi-rukuri’, Social Science Japan, 32: 17-19.
Nozick, R.(1974). Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
Patti, R. J.(2000). ‘The Landscape of Social Welfare Management’, in R. J. Patti(ed.), The Handbook of Social Welfare Management, pp.3-26. London: Sage.
Peters, B. G.(2004). American Public Policy – Promise and Performance. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
Pierre, J. and B. G. Peters(2000). Governance, Politics and the State. London: Macmillan.
Popple, K.(1995). Analysing Community Work – Its Theory and Practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Powell, M. and M. Exworthy(2002). ‘Partnerships, Quasi-networks and Social Policy’, in C. Glendinning, P. Martin and K. Rummery(eds.), Partnerships, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare, pp.15-32. Bristol: The Polity Press.
Putnam, R.(1995). ‘Bowling Alone, Revisited’, The Responsive Community, 5(2): 18-33.
Putnam, R.(2000). Bowling Alone – The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon Schuster.
Rawls, J.(2001). Justice ad Fairness – A Restatement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Reed, B. G.(2005).’Theorizing in Community Practice: Essential Tools for Building Community, Promoting Social Justice, and Implementing Social Change’, in M. Weil(ed.), The Handbook of Community Practice, pp.84-102. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Rodger, J. J.(2003). ‘Social Solidarity, Welfare and Post-Emotionalism’, Journal of Social Policy, 32(3): 403-421.
Rothman, J. and J. L. Erlich(2001). ’Introduction’, in J. Rothman, J. L. Erlich and J. E. Tropman(eds.), Strategies of Community Intervention, pp.3-26. Belmont: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Rothman, J.(1999). ‘Historical Context in Community Intervention’, in J. Rothman(ed.), Reflections on Community Organization – Enduring Themes and Critical Issues, pp.27-56. Itasca: F. E. Peacock.
Rothman, J.(2001). ‘Approaches to Community Intervention’, in J. Rothman, J. L. Erlich and J. E. Tropman(eds.), Strategies of Community Intervention, pp.27-64. Belmont: Wadsworth/ Thomson Learning.
Salamon, L. M.(2002). ‘The New Governance and the Tools of Public Action: An Introduction’, in L. M. Salamon(ed.), The Tools of Government – A Guide to the New Governance, pp.1-47. New York: Oxford University Press.
Salamon, L. M. and H. K. Anheier(1997). Defining the Nonprofit Sector – A Cross-National Analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Sałustowicz, P.(2001). ‘Civil Society, Solidarity and Community Development’, in P. Sałustowicz(ed.), Civil Society and Social Development, pp.129-148. Berlin: Peter Lang.
Sandel, M. J.(1982). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sanders, I. T.(1970). ‘The Concept of Community Development’, in L. J. Cary(ed.), Community Development as a Process, pp.9-31. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
Schaap, L. and M. J. W. van Twist(1997). ‘The Dynamics of Closedness in Networks’, in W. J. M. Kickert, E. Klijn and J. F. M. Koppenjan(eds.), Managing Complex Networks – Strategies for the Public Sector, pp.62-78. London: Sage.
Selznick, P.(1996). ‘Social Justice: A Communitarianism Perspective’, The Responsive Community, 6(4): 13-25.
SEU(1998). Bringing Britain Together: A National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal. London: HMSO.
Sinder, L.(1971). ‘The Real Meaning of Community Development’,《社區發展通訊》,第一卷第一期,頁16-18.
Sipilä, J., A. Anttonen and J. Baldock(2003). ‘The Importance of Social Care’, in A. Anttonen, J. Baldock and J. Sipilä(eds.), The Young, the Old and the State – Social Care Systems in Five Industrial Nations, pp.1-24. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Sowers, K., R. A. Ellis and N. Meyer-Adams(2001). ‘Literature Review’, in B. A. Thyer(ed.), The Handbook of Social Work Research Methods, pp.401-412. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Spicker, P.(2000). The Welfare State – A General Theory. London: Sage.
Stoker, G.(2004). Transforming Local Governance – From Thatchersim to New Labour. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sullivan, H.(2001). ‘Modernisation, Democratisation and Community Governance’, Local Government Studies, 27(3): 1-24.
Surel, Y.(2000). ‘The Role of Cognitive and Normative Frames in Policy-making’, Journal of European Public Policy, 7(4): 495-512.
Sztompka, P.(1999). Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tam, H. (1998). Communitrianism – A New Agenda for Politics and Citizenship. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
Taylor, C.(2004). Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press.
Taylor, M., A. Barr and A. West(2000). Signposts to Community Development. London: Community Development Foundation.
Taylor, M.(2003). Public Policy in the Community. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Taylor-Gooby, P. ed.(2005) Ideas and Welfare State Reform in Western Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Taylor-Gooby, P.(2005). ‘Ideas and Policy Chang’, in P. Taylor-Gooby(ed.), Ideas and Welfare State Reform in Western Europe, pp.1-11. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tenbensel, T.(2005). ’Multiple Modes of Governance: Disentangling the Alternatives to Hierarchies and Markets’, Public Management Review, 7(2): 267-288.
Thompson, G., J. Frances, R. Levačić and J. Mitchell eds.(1991). Markets, Hierarchies and Networks – The Coordination of Social Life. London: Sage.
Titmuss, R.(1974). Social Policy – An Introduction. London: Unwin Hyman.
Twelvetrees, A. (2002). Community Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
UN(1955). Social Progress through Community Development. New York: United Nation.
Warburton, D.(1998). ‘A Passionate Dialogue: Community and Sustainable Development’, in D. Warburton(ed.), Community and Sustainable Development: Participation in the Future, pp.1-39. London: Earthscan.
Warren, R. L.(1970). ‘The Context of Community Development’, in L. J. Cary(ed.), Community Development as a Process, pp.9-31. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
Weil, M. and D. N. Gamble(1995). ‘Community Practice Models’, in R. L. Edwards(ed.-in-chief), Encyclopedia of Social Work, pp.577-593. Washington D.C.: NASW.
Weil, M.(1996). ’Community Building: Building Community Practice’, Social Work, 41(5): 481-499.
Weir, M.(1992). ‘Ideas and the Politics of Bounded Innovation’, in S. Steinmo, K. Thelen and F. Longstreth(eds.), Structuring Politics – Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, pp.188-216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Whittington, C.(2003). ‘Collaboration and Partnership in Context’, in J. Weinstein, C. Whittington and T. Leiba(eds.), Collaboration in Social Work Practice, pp.13-38. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Wilding, P. and Geroge, V.(1975). ‘Social Values and Social Policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 4(4): 373-390.
Williams, C. C.(2005). ‘Harnessing the Community Sector – A Critical Evaluation of the Third Sector Approach’, Community, Work and Family, 8(1): 37-51.
Williams, F.(1999). ‘Good-enough Principles for Welfare’, Journal of Social Policy, 28(4): 667-87.
Woolcock, M.(2001). The Place of Social Capital in Understanding Social and Economic Outcome. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1): 11-17.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE