:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:混沌現象敏銳度在國小教師班級經營效能評鑑之運用研究
書刊名:彰化師大教育學報
作者:陳木金 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Andy M.
出版日期:2003
卷期:4
頁次:頁23-46
主題關鍵詞:混沌現象敏銳度教師混沌現象敏銳度班級經營效能Chaos sensibilityTeacher's chaos sensibilityClassroom management effectiveness
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:85
  • 點閱點閱:30
本研究之目的期望從混沌理論的研究取向,來建構一套國民小學教師教室混沌現象敏銳度在班級經營的效能評鑑,以作為協助國民小學教師有效班級經營之參考。首先,經由分析混沌現象敏銳度在班級經營探討的相關文獻歸納研究向度,之後透過教室訪視、教師訪談、校長主任組長座談及實務工作者的諮詢會議等方式,來對研究向度進行探究,歸納國民小學教師教室混沌現象敏銳度之研究內涵,包括:蝴蝶效應敏銳度、混亂起源敏銳度、驅散結構敏銳度、隨機龐雜震撼敏銳度、奇異吸子敏銳度、迴路遞移對稱敏銳度、回饋機制敏銳度等七個向度,發展國民小學教師教室混沌現象敏銳度在班級經營效能評鑑的研究工具,建構混沌現象敏銳度在國民小學班級經營效能的評鑑項目。隨後抽樣臺北市、臺北縣國小教師為研究對象,驗證本研究所發展之的班級經營效能評鑑工具的建構情形,分析本研究工具的信度與效度。研究結果如下:1. 從考驗「國民小學教師教室混沌現象敏銳度在班級經營效能評鑑量表」各向度的內部一致性,發現各向度Cronbach α係數達從 .73至 .92,顯示本研究工具之各向度內部一致性高,信度佳。另外,也分析每題之「校正後項目總相關」及「單題刪除後α係數減低情形」,以作為發展正式工具選題之依據。2. 從考驗「國民小學教師教室混沌現象敏銳度在班級經營效能評鑑」總量表與七向度之結構模式,發現模式基本適配標準評鑑結果佳、模式整體適配標準評鑑結果佳、模式內在結構適配標準評鑑結果佳,都支持本研究結構模式之成立,顯示本評鑑指標之建構效度佳,值得作為教師班級經營效能評鑑及自我檢核之參考。
This study focused on understanding the reality for teacher's chaos sensibility at classroom management effectiveness evaluation indicators from Taiwan Elementary School. This study employed the survey method. The subjects were 716 teachers randomly sampled from 100 elementary schools in Taipei district. The Instrument was "Inventory of the Teacher's Chaos Sensibility at Classroom Management Effectiveness" included seven dimensions: butterfly effect, onset of turbulence, dissipative structure, random shock, strange attractor, recursive symmetries, feedback mechanisms. Data were analyzed using the method of Reliability and LISREL. The major findings were: 1. According Reliability analysis, the Cronbach α of the seven dimensions of Inventory are from .73 to .92. 2. There is a good fit model at teacher's chaos sensibility at classroom management effectiveness evaluation inventory form AGFI、GFI indicator of Lisrel. 3. The findings of the study supported the constructed model, and the seven dimensions of teacher's chaos sensibility had a great influence on the classroom management effectiveness.
期刊論文
1.Sungaila, H.(1990)。Organization alive: Have we at last found the key to a science of educational administration?。Studies of Educational Administration,52,3-26。  new window
2.Curtis, R. K.(1990)。Complexity and Predictability: The Application of Chaos Theory to Economic Forecasting。Futures Research Quarterly,6(4),57-70。  new window
3.陳木金(2000)。Eisenhart & Borko「班級經營」專書導覽與分析。課程與教學季刊,3(1),135-148。  延伸查詢new window
4.Adams, H. M.、Russ, J. C.(1992)。Chaos in the classroom: Exposing gifted elementary school children to chaos and fractals。Journal of Science Education and Technology,1(3),191-209。  new window
5.Friedrich, P.(1988)。Eerie chaos and eerier order。Journal of Anthropological Research,44,435-444。  new window
6.Jackett, D.(1990)。Chaos in the classroom。Science Teacher,57(4),8-41。  new window
7.Salmon, V.(1999)。Chaos in the composition: Why do some classes fail to function?。Inquiry,4(2),58-61。  new window
8.Schlozman, S. C.、Schlozman, V. R.(2000)。Chaos in the classroom: Looking as ADHD。Educational Leadership,58(3),28-33。  new window
9.Sterman, J. D.(1988)。Deterministic chaos in models of human behavior: Methodological issues and experimental results。System Dynamics Review,4,148-178。  new window
10.秦夢群(19950900)。渾沌理論在教育行政上之應用。教育與心理研究,18,83-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.陳木金(19990500)。混沌理論對學校組織變革因應策略之啟示。學校行政,1,61-68。  延伸查詢new window
12.Cziko, G. A.(1989)。Unpredictability and indeterminism in human behavior。Arguments and implications for educational research,18(3),17-25。  new window
13.姜濤(19930500)。混沌理論與其發展簡介。歐華學報,3,146-149。  延伸查詢new window
14.陳木金(19960300)。混沌現象(Chaos)對學校行政的啟示。教育資料與研究,9,69-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Griffiths, D. E.、Hart, A. W.、Blair, B. G.(1991)。Still another approach to administration: chaos theory。Educational administration quarterly,27(3),430-451。  new window
16.陳木金(19971200)。國民小學教師教學效能評鑑量表編製之研究。藝術學報,61,221-253。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Bagozzi, Richard P.、Yi, Youjae(1988)。On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models。Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16(1),74-94。  new window
會議論文
1.Trygestad, J.(1997)。Chaos in the classroom: An application of chaos theory。The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association。Chicago, Illinois。  new window
研究報告
1.陳木金(2000)。混沌理論在班級經營評鑑指標建構之研究。台北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.邱淑玲(1997)。混沌理論在政府組織管理中的運用(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.徐振邦(2000)。國民中學學校行政混沌現象之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.林妮燕(1999)。運用混沌理論批判我國教師法之立法與實施(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Briggs, John、Peat, F. David、姜靜繪(2000)。亂中求序:混沌理論的永恆智慧。臺北市:先覺出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.袁闖(1999)。混沌管理:中國的管理智慧。台北市:生智出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Briggs, J.、Peat, F. D.(1999)。Seven life lessons of chaos。Parper Collins Publishers。  new window
4.Eisenhart, Margret A.、Borko, Hilda(1993)。Designing Classroom Research: Themes, Issues, and Struggles。Needham Heights, Mass.:Boston:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
5.陳木金(1999)。班級經營。揚智文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.Briggs, John、Peat, F. David、王彥文(1993)。混沌魔鏡。台北:牛頓。  延伸查詢new window
7.Prigogine, I.、Stengers, I.(1984)。Order Out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature。New York, NY:Bantam Books。  new window
8.Gleick, J.、林和(1992)。混沌:不測風雲的背後。臺北:天下文化。  延伸查詢new window
9.Gleick, James(1987)。Chaos: Making a New Science。New York, NY:Viking。  new window
10.Hayles, N. K.(1990)。Chaos Bound: Orderly Disorder in Contemporary Literature and Science。Ithaca, New York:Cornell University Press。  new window
11.普里戈金、沈力(1990)。混沌中的秩序。台北:結構群。  延伸查詢new window
12.Edwards, C. H.(1993)。Classroom Discipline and Management。New York, NY:Macmillan。  new window
13.Bollen, K. A.(1989)。Structural Equations with Latent Variables。New York:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
14.Jöreskog, Karl G.、Sörbom, Dag(1989)。LISREL 7 User's Reference Guide。Scientific Software International, Inc.。  new window
15.單文經(1994)。班級經營策略研究。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE