:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國中資源班學生學校生活素質之研究
書刊名:特殊教育學報
作者:金慶瑞林惠芬 引用關係
作者(外文):Chin, Ching-jui
出版日期:2003
卷期:18
頁次:頁247-278
主題關鍵詞:資源教室方案學校生活素質Resource room programQuality of school life
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:204
  • 點閱點閱:33
     本研究旨在探討國中資源班學生學校生活素質之現況,藉由研究結果提出具體建議以作為改善資源教室方案之參考。 本研究採用自編之「國中資源班學生學校生活素質問卷」進行資料蒐集,母群體共有367位國中資源班學生,研究結果如下: (1)國中資源班學生的學校生活素質,整體而言達到滿意的指標,尤其對資源班各向度感到滿意,但是對普通班環境中的「自我概念」、「課業學習」兩向度感到不滿意。(2)國中資源班學生的個人背景變項中,學校生活素質感受「女生」較「男生」感到滿意、「高年級學生」較「低年級學生」感到滿意,以及「國小有進入資源班的學生」較「國小沒有進入資源班的學生」感到滿意;至於沒有顯著差異的變項則有「障礙類別」、「資源班上課時數」、「家庭社經地位」及「學校地區」等。(3)國中資源班學生在「資源班」的學校生活素質感受明顯高於在「普通班」。 研究者亦根據問卷調查的結果,提出提昇國中資源班學生學校生活素質之具體建議,以供相關人員參考。
     The purposes of this study were to investigate the quality of school life for students in resource room at junior high school in Taiwan. A questionnaire developed by the researches was sent to 367student in resource room program. The results are summarized as follows: 1. Students in resource room are not satisfied with self-concept and learning in general class environment. But generally speaking, they are satisfied with their school life. 2. There were significant differences in quality of school life for students in resource room with the effects of gender, grade and placement at elementary school. The handicap classifications, class hours in resource room, parents' socioeconomic status and school areas were not the significant variables to the quality of school life. 3. Students in resource room have more satisfactory quality of school life than in general class.
期刊論文
1.王振德(19980300)。資源教室的行政管理與經營。特教園丁,13(3),1-6。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃武鎮(19830900)。臺灣省實施資源教室的現況及展望。特殊教育季刊,10,5-10。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.莊明貞(19851200)。國中學生學校生活素質與學校適應行為的關係。新竹師專學報,12,498-434。  延伸查詢new window
4.胡永崇(20000600)。國小身心障礙類資源班實施現況及改進之研究:以高雄縣為例。屏東師院學報,13,75-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.林月盛(19980600)。資源教室方案的現況與改進。特殊教育季刊,67,27-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.葉靖雲(19980300)。資源教室的概念知多少?。特教園丁,13(3),19-22。  延伸查詢new window
7.Landesman, S.(1986)。Quality of life and personal life satisfaction: definition and measurement issues。Mental Retardation,24,141-143。  new window
8.Felce, D.、Perry, J.(1995)。Quality of life: its definition and measurement。Research in Developmental Disabilities,16(1),51-74。  new window
9.Sands, D. J.、Kozleski, E. B.(1994)。Quality of life differences between adults with and without disabilities。Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities,29(2),90-101。  new window
10.王天苗(19830900)。國中小資源教室實施狀況之調查研究。特殊教育季刊,10,14-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.楊國樞(19801200)。生活素質的心理學觀。中華心理學刊,22(2),11-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.洪榮照(19971100)。「資源班的經營方向」座談會記錄。特教新知通訊,5(2),1-5。  延伸查詢new window
13.張蓓莉(19980600)。資源教室方案應提供的支援服務。特殊教育季刊,67,1-5+40。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Karatzias, A.、Power, K. G.、Swanson, V.(2001)。Quality of School Life: Development and Preliminary Standardisation of an Instrument Based on Performance Indicators in Scottish Secondary Schools。School Effectiveness and School Improvement,12,265-284。  new window
15.Karatzias, A.、Power, K. G.、Flemming, J.、Lennan, F.、Swanson, V.(2002)。The role of demographics, personality variables and schools stress on predicting school satisfaction/ dissatisfaction: Review of the literature and research findings。Educational Psychology,22,33-50。  new window
16.Kidd, R.、Hornby, G.(1993)。Transfer from special to mainstream。British Journal of Special Education,20(1),17-19。  new window
17.Lewis, A.(1992)。Resource room and the consulting model for servicing low achieving students: A review and analysis。Journal of Special Education,16(3),259-281。  new window
會議論文
1.Fuller, M. L.(1993)。Restructuring for student success in a rural school: Preliminary analyses。沒有紀錄。  new window
2.Wong, R. E.(1994)。The relationship between interest in teaching as a career choice and perceptions of school/ classroom environment of 7th and 8th grade students。沒有紀錄。  new window
研究報告
1.張勝成(1998)。臺灣地區身心障礙青年「學校生活素質」之研究(II)。臺北:行政國家科學委員會/國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳靜江、鈕文英(1998)。臺灣地區身心障礙青年「心理生活素質」之研究(II)。沒有紀錄。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張琴音(1999)。國中智能障礙學生學校生活素質之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.藍祺琳(1997)。國民小學身心障礙資源班教師角色期望與角色踐行之調查研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.王振德(1987)。我國資源教室方案實施現況及其成效評鑑(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.方盈傑(1999)。國中特殊班與普通班學生學校生活品質感受之調查研究,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
5.施相如(1997)。國中聽覺障礙學生學校生活素質之研究,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
6.許照庸(1985)。臺北縣國中學生學校生活素質之調查研究,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.董媛卿(1998)。補救教學--資源教室的運作。臺北市:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Harris, W. J.、Schultz, P. N. B.(1986)。The special education resource program。The special education resource program。Columbus, OH:A Bell & Howell Company。  new window
3.張蓓莉(1991)。國民中學資源班實施手冊。台北:國立臺灣師院大學特殊教育中心。  延伸查詢new window
4.王振德(1999)。資源教室方案。臺北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Lerner, J. W.(1997)。Learning disabilities: theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies。Boston, Massachusetts:Houghton Mifflin。  new window
6.Tabachnick, B. G.、Fidell, L. S.(1996)。Using multivariate statistics。HarperCollins Publishers。  new window
7.Wiederholt, J. L.、Hammill, D. D.、Brown, V. L.(1993)。The Resource Program: Organization and Implementation。Austin, TX:PRO-ED。  new window
8.楊坤堂(1999)。學習障礙教材教法。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃瑞珍(1993)。資源教室的經營與管理。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
10.孟瑛如(1999)。資源教室方案:班級經營與補救教學。臺北:五南圖書出版有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Campbell, Angus、Converse, Philip E.、Rodgers, Willard L.(1976)。The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations, and Satisfactions。Russell Sage Foundation。  new window
12.Mercer, C. D.(1992)。Student with learning disabilities。Columbus, OH:Merrill Publishing Company。  new window
13.林素貞、鈕文英、江峰(1988)。資源教室的理論與實際。高雄市:國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
14.楊坤堂(1998)。國民小學資源班課程與教學。臺北市:臺北市政府教育局。  延伸查詢new window
15.Bellamy, G. T.、Newton, J. S.、Le Baron, N. M.、Horner, R. H.(1990)。Quality of life and lifestyle outcomes: A challenge for residential programs。Quality of Life: Perspectives and Issues。Washington, DC。  new window
16.Borthwick-Duffy, S. A.(1990)。Quality of life of persons with severe or profound mental retardation。Quality of Life: Perspectives and Issues。Washington, DC。  new window
17.(1981)。The Quality of School Life。The Quality of School Life。Washington, DC。  new window
18.Scheerer, H.(1981)。Choice schemes and the quality of school life in West German comprehensive schools。The Quality of School Life。Massachusetts, D. C.。  new window
19.Woodill, G.、Renwick, R.、Brown, I.、Raphael, D.(1994)。Being, belonging, becoming: An approach to the quality life of persons with developmental disabilities。Quality of Life for Persons with Disabilities: International Perspectives and Issues。Cambridge, MA。  new window
其他
1.臺北市教育局(1999)。臺北市八十八學年度特殊教育設班概況,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Goode, D.(1990)。Thinking about and discussing quality of life。Quality of life: Perspectives and issues。Washington, DC:American Association of Mental Retardation。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE