:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:社會學習領域分段能力指標之解讀--由Bloom教育目標分類系統(修訂版)析之
書刊名:國立臺北師範學院學報. 教育類
作者:李宜玫 引用關係王逸慧林世華
作者(外文):Lee, Yi-meiWang, I-hueiLin, Sieh-hwa
出版日期:2004
卷期:17:2
頁次:頁1-34
主題關鍵詞:社會學習領域能力指標解讀Bloom教育目標分類(修訂版)Learning areas of social studiesElucidation of competence standardsBloom's classification system of educational objectives (revised edition)
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(4) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:123
  • 點閱點閱:83
     教育部於民國八十七年公布「國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要」,並於九十學年度起逐年實施九年一貫課程,此課程迥異於過去課程的特點之一,即是以「基本能力」取替「學科知識」,希冀突破傳統重學科知識所產生的束縛與窠臼,培養學生具備「帶著走的」十項能力。綜觀新課程所規劃的理念極富整全與前瞻性,卻也相對凸顯出課程實施的挑戰,其中之一即為課程綱要中能力指標解讀與轉化深具難度。截至目前,已有數所學校及數場研習會正在進行指標解讀並據以轉化為教學指引,諸此顯現出教育現場對指標具體化以支持教學運作之企望。本文考量教育工作者對Bloom教育目標分類系統之熟稔及援用程度,意圖從該系統(修訂版)進行社會學習領域能力指標之解讀。行文先闡明能力指標的特性及其對能力指標解讀之指引,繼而概述Bloom教育目標分類系統(修訂版)之內涵,而後結合前者觀點進行九年一貫課程社會學習領域分段能力指標整體分析與評估,期能提供教育工作者進行教學、評量以及後續分析之參酌。
     The Ministry of Education promulgates Grade 1-9 Curriculum Guidelines in 1998, and implements Grade 1-9 Curriculum gradually since the 90th school year. One of the traits of the curriculum is its focus on “core competence”instead of “subject knowledge” to break the regulation and defects of traditional curriculum, and to build up the ten capacities for lifelong learning. The idea of Grade 1-9 Curriculum is holistic and prospective, but relatively has some challenges of the curriculum implementation. One of the challenges is to elucidate and transform competence indicators or benchmarks. Nowadays several schools and workshops are elucidating and transforming competence indicators or benchmarks to be instructional indicators. Considering that the teaching staffs are familiar with and often apply Bloom's classification system of educational objectives, the study intents to elucidate and transform competence indicators or benchmarks of learning areas of Social Studies. First, the study interprets characteristics of competence indicators or benchmarks. Second, the study illustrates the content of Bloom's classification system of educational objectives. Finally, the study applies the perspectives discussed above to analyze and evaluate competence indicators or benchmarks of learning areas of Social Studies of Grade 1-9 Curriculum Guidelines to provide reference resources for teaching, assessment, and further studies.
期刊論文
1.秦葆琦(20020600)。一上生活課程之各版本分析(2)--教學目標篇。研習資訊,19(3),6-19。  延伸查詢new window
2.Krathwohl, D. R.(2002)。A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview。Theory Into Practice,41(4),212-219。  new window
3.秦葆琦(20020400)。一上生活課程之各版本分析(1)--課程架構篇。研習資訊,19(2),18-30。  延伸查詢new window
4.Glaser, R.(1982)。Instructional psychology: past, present, and future。American Psychologyist,37(3),292-305。  new window
5.林清山(20000700)。學習理論與教學心理學的互動。教育研究集刊,45,1-13。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.吳清山、林天佑(1998)。基本能力、基本學力。教育資料與研究,25,75-77。  延伸查詢new window
7.葉連祺、林淑萍(20030100)。布魯姆認知領域教育目標分類修訂版之探討。教育研究月刊,105,94-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.李宜玫(2003)。重尋失落的情意教育--整合情意教育內涵與運作的新觀點。九十二年度教育學術論文發表會,國立台北師範學院 (會議日期: 2003年11月29日)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.教育部(2003)。國民教育階段九年一貫課程總網網要。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bloom, B. S.、Engelhart, M. D.、Furst, E. J.、Hill, W. H.、Krathwohl, D. R.(1956)。Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals (Handbook I: cognitive domain)。David Mckay Company, Inc.。  new window
3.Bloom, B. S.、Engelhart, M. D.、Furst, E. J.、Hill, W. H.、Krathwohl, D. R.(1964)。Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. (Handbook II: affective domain)。New York:David Mckay。  new window
4.Gronlund, N. E.(2000)。How to write and use instructives。New Jersey:Prentice Hall Inc。  new window
5.Mager, R.(1975)。Preparing instructional objectives。Palo Alto, CA:Fearon。  new window
6.教育部(1998)。國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要。台北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
7.張鈿富(1999)。教育政策與行政--指標發展與應用。台北:師苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Anderson, Lorin W.、Krathwohl, David R.、Airasian, Peter W.、Cruikshank, Kathleen A.、Mayer, Richard E.、Pintrich, Paul R.、Wittrock, Merlin C.、Raths, James(2001)。A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives。Addison Wesley Longman。  new window
單篇論文
1.Title, C. K.,Hecht, D.,Moore, P.(1989)。From taxonomy to constructing meaning in context: revisiting the taxonomy of educational objectives: II, affective domain, 25years later(ED306272)。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳新轉(2002)。能力指標轉化模式(二):能力指標之「表徵能力」課程轉化模式。社會學習領域課程設計與教學策略。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.高新建(2002)。能力指標轉化模式(一):能力指標之分析及其教學轉化。社會學習領域課程設計與教學策略。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃炳煌(2002)。基本原理與課程目標。社會學習領域課程設計與教學策略。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE