The Curriculum Guideline is commonly taken as the base for designing elementary and secondary curriculum in Taiwan. As a result, the specification in the guideline affects fundamentally the way curriculum is designed. Compared to the traditional emphasis on outlines of teaching materials, the Curriculum Guideline which were introduced in 2000 made a shift to "competence indicators" It was this change that lead to widespread concern and controversy. The purpose of this paper is to argue that a curriculum design model with emphases only on competences has not only theoretical weakness but also practical problems. By contrast, a curriculum design model which can include content and process dimensions is needed. First, two main models for curriculum design: Objective model and Process model were discussed. Second, the ways how educational objectives are pressed was investigated. In particular, Tyler (1949), Bloom, Engelhart, Furst, Hill, & Krathwohl (1956), and Anderson & Krathwohl (2001) were reviewed with reference to different taxonomies and two-dimensional tables. Third, controversy related to curriculum design in elementary and secondary education were also analyzed. Finally, the concept of "learning foci" in the newly introduced Curriculum Guideline 2014 was discussed. The learning foci highlight a two-dimensional framework with leaning performance and leaning content as two different aspects. It is argued that the new two-dimensional framework indicate a new model of curriculum design with emphases both on content and process.