:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從有身到無身--論《老子》的身體觀
書刊名:國文學誌
作者:王志楣 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Chih-mei
出版日期:2007
卷期:15
頁次:頁31-49
主題關鍵詞:道家老子身體身心形神TaoistLaotzeBodySpiritualForm
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:334
  • 點閱點閱:85
從西方身體觀切入探索生命的方法,已蔚為當今學術研究風潮,本文據此為出發點剖析道家老子思想,俾能從另一側面解讀老子對自我主體內涵建構與價值實踐之觀點。 首先,本文探索《老子》涉及到的身體概念發現老子的身體觀涵蓋了心物整體,這與早期經典文獻中對身體意義的了解有一致性,皆是統合了形體與精神,顯示老子時期所關注的是整體生命存在狀態,至於身心二元的分化則是老子以後的事,這也符合思想史的發展邏輯。其次,本文比對了《老子》中身體與道的密切關連,這也可作為人們通過對身體的修養而臻治道的境界依據。再者,本文嘗試解析老子對身體基本結構如形、心、氣的看法;然而,道家老子重視者,乃是從有身到無深的超越,如老子言:「吾所以有大患者,為吾有身,乃吾無身,又有何患?」因此,不可忽略老子從有身到無身的身體化悟道實踐,本文歸納出二種識道的方法:觀無的思維認識及虛靜的修養工夫,並指出老子思想乃是一身體的道體間開放的辯證發展過程。
As it is common that contemporary academic researches focused on life exploration begin from the Western view of human body, this article is to make an analysis of the thoughts of Taoist Laotze accordingly with the expectation that the inner nature structure and the value materialization Laotze sees in oneself could be interpreted from a different prospect. In the first place, as we study the concept of body referred in Laotze, we come to be aware of the fact that is covers the spiritual-material unity, which matches the understandings registered in ancient books and literatures discussing meaning of body, when tangible forms and spirit are one suggesting a major concern about existence of the entire life back in the days of Laotze. The segregation of the physic from the spiritual came after Laotze, something that explains the logic evolution of thoughts. Secondly, this work brings in comparisons between the body and the doctrine, the two closely bonded elements in Laotze, making them a solid ground that guides people toward the doctrine by means of culturing their body. Further, we are also trying to break down Laotze's views on the physical, spiritual and breath that are the basic elements to human body. Nevertheless, what Taoist Laotze does care is the passage from tangible to intangible. As Laotze once said: The tangible body is our major concern and, without it, we would have no concerns. Without ignoring the physical observation of the doctrine from tangible to intangible of Laotze, we have highlighted 2 ways of learning the doctrine: learning the thinking of obseving emptiness and polishing oneself in a calm and quiet manner and finally we like to point out that the Laotze thoughts reflect an evolution of open dialectic development between the body and the doctrine.
期刊論文
1.張文喜(2002)。論笛卡爾與胡賽爾的身體觀及其實踐意義。社會科學輯刊,2002(3),15-18。  延伸查詢new window
2.張世英(1998)。哲學的新方向。北京大學學報;哲學社會科學學版,1998(2),178。  延伸查詢new window
3.李清良(2006)。中國身體觀與中國問題。哲學動態,2006(5),21-27。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃俊傑(20020300)。中國思想史中「身體觀」研究的新視野。中國文哲研究集刊,20,541-563。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.林文琪(20050800)。論對於道的認識是一種身體化的認識--以《老子》、《管子》四篇為例的說明。東吳哲學學報,12,63-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黃崇修(1999)。從身體觀論虛靜工夫的哲學義涵---以先秦氣化思想為核心(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.周與沉(2005)。身體:思想與修行。北京市:中國社會科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳鼓應(1991)。老子今注今譯。臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
3.蘭德曼, M.、閻嘉(2006)。哲學人類學。貴州:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.(1985)。十三經注疏。藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
5.李霞(2004)。生死智慧。北京:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉孝敢(2006)。老子古今。北京:中國社會科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳榮華(1998)。中國身體觀與中國問題。臺北:明文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.楊儒賓(19930000)。中國古代思想中的氣論及身體觀。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.老聃、大安出版社編輯部、王弼、河上公(1999)。老子四種。臺北:大安出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE