:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:政治效能感與政黨認同對選民投票抉擇的影響--以2002年北高市長選舉為例
書刊名:臺灣民主季刊
作者:陳陸輝 引用關係耿曙
作者(外文):Chen, Lu-hueiKeng, Shu
出版日期:2008
卷期:5:1
頁次:頁87-118
主題關鍵詞:政黨認同分立政府政治效能感系絡效應Party identificationDivided governmentPolitical efficacyContextual effect
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(18) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:17
  • 共同引用共同引用:427
  • 點閱點閱:115
本研究主要在探討於2002年北高市長選舉前,北高兩市不同背景選民在政治效能感上的差異,並分析政治效能感與政黨認同對選民投票傾向的影響。研究結果發現,大陸各省市民眾,對北市政府的市民效能感較高,而對中央政府的政治功效意識較低。不過,高市的大陸各省的民眾則對兩個層級政府的效能感皆偏低。本省閩南人則對北市政府的市民效能感較低,但卻對中央政府的效能感較高。至於高雄市的本省閩南人,則對兩個層級政府的效能感都較高。本研究也發現,高雄市民對地方政府政治效能感較高的民眾,較傾向支持現任市長繼續連任。台北市民眾,政治效能感較高者,會支持現任市長繼續執政,不過,民進黨認同者且具有較高政治效能感者,則不傾向支持現任的國民黨市長。本研究強調,民眾所居住地區政府對民眾的「回應性」(responsiveness)與其政治支持之間,具有顯著關聯,因此,地方行政首長在政策制訂時如能夠多回應民意的需求,必能讓民主政治得以在地方政治中紮根與成長。
This study examines the differences among the electorate in their sense of political efficacy and analyzes how it may have affected people’s voting behavior in the 2002 mayoral elections in Taipei and Kaohsiung cities. It demonstrates that mainlanders tend to have higher civic efficacy toward the Taipei city government, but they turn out to feel less effective toward the Kaohsiung city government. As to Minnanren, they have lower civic efficacy toward Taipei city but feel more effectively toward the central government. We also find Minnanren in Kaohsiung have higher efficacy toward both the local and central government. This study also demonstrates that party identification and incumbent mayors’ performances play major roles in affecting people’s voting behavior, for example people with higher civic efficacy toward the Kaohsiung government are more likely to vote for the incumbent mayor in Kaohsiung. However, DPP supporters with higher efficacy are more likely to vote for the DPP nominee in Taipei. This study emphasizes that local citizens take the responsiveness of the local government seriously, which manifests itself in political support during local elections. Heads of local government have to respond to the people’s demands when they make their decisions, so democracy can have deeper roots in local politics.
期刊論文
1.Steve E. Finkel(1987)。The Effects of Participation on Political Efficacy and Political Support: Evidence from a West German Panels。Journal of Politics,49(2),441-464。  new window
2.徐火炎(19931200)。選舉競爭與政治分歧結構的變遷:國民黨與民進黨勢力的消長。人文及社會科學集刊,6(1),37-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Iyengar, Shanto(1980)。Subjective Political Efficacy as a Measure of Diffuse Support。Public Opinion Quarterly,44(2),249-256。  new window
4.Niemi, Richard G.、Jennings, M. Kent(1991)。Issues and Inheritance in the Formation of Party Identification。American Journal of Political Science,35(4),970-988。  new window
5.Easton, David、Dennis, Jack(1967)。The Child's Acquisition of Regime Norms: Political Efficacy。American Political Science Review,61(1),25-38。  new window
6.Weissberg, Robert(1975)。Political Efficacy and Political Illusion。Journal of Political,37(2),469-487。  new window
7.White, Elliott S.(1968)。Intelligence and Sense of Political Efficacy in Children。Journal of Politics,30(3),710-731。  new window
8.Craig, Stephen C.、Niemi, Richard G.、Silver, Glenn E.(1990)。Political Efficacy and Trust: A Report on the NES Pilot Study Items。Political Behavior,12(3),289-314。  new window
9.陳陸輝、黃信豪(20070100)。社會化媒介、在學經驗與臺灣大學生的政治功效意識和政治參與。東亞研究,38(1),1-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.何思因(19940500)。臺灣地區選民政黨偏好的變遷:1989-1992。選舉研究,1(1),39-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Balch, George I.(1974)。Multiple Indicators in Survey Research: The Concept "Sense of Political Efficacy"。Political Methodology,1(2),1-43。  new window
12.Bobo, Lawrence、Gilliam, Franklin D. Jr.(1990)。Race, Sociopolitical Participation, and Black Empowerment。American Political Science Review,84(2),377-393。  new window
13.Jennings, M. Kent、Markus, Gregory B.(1984)。Partisan Orientations Over the Long Hall: Results From the Three-Wave Political Socialization Panel Study。American Political Science Review,78(4),1000-1018。  new window
14.MacKuen, Michael B.、Erikson, Robert S.、Stimson, James A.(1989)。Macropartisanship。American Political Science Review,83(4),1125-1142。  new window
15.王靖興、王德育(20070600)。臺灣民眾的政治參與對其政治功效意識之影響:以2004年總統選舉為例。臺灣政治學刊,11(1),69-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.黃信豪(20051100)。臺灣民眾政治功效意識的持續與變遷:政黨輪替前後的分析。選舉研究,12(2),111-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Niemi, Richard G.、Craig, Stephen C.、Mattei, Franco(1991)。Measuring Internal Political Efficacy in the 1988 National Election study。American Political Science Review,85(4),1407-1413。  new window
18.Converse, Philip E.、Markus, Gregory B.(1979)。Plus ça change…: The New CPS Election Study Panel。American Political Science Review,73(1),2-49。  new window
19.Finkel, Steven E.(1985)。Reciprocal Effects of Participation and Political Efficacy: A Panel Analysis。American Journal of Political Science,29(4),891-913。  new window
20.吳乃德(19950400)。社會分歧和政黨競爭--解釋國民黨為何繼續執政。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,78,101-130。  延伸查詢new window
21.陳陸輝(20001100)。臺灣選民政黨認同的持續與變遷。選舉研究,7(2),109-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.徐火炎(1992)。民主轉型過程中政黨的重組:臺灣地區選民的民主價值取向、政黨偏好與黨派投票改變之研究。人文及社會科學集刊,5(1),213-263。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.袁頌西(19740100)。我國家庭政治化與少年政治功效意識之研究。思與言,11(5),1-12。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.袁頌西(19740300)。我國家庭政治化與少年政治功效意識之研究。思與言,11(6),22-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.吳乃德(19931100)。國家認同和政黨支持--臺灣政黨競爭的社會基礎。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,74,33-61。  延伸查詢new window
26.鄭夙芬、陳陸輝、劉嘉薇(20050600)。2004年總統選舉中的候選人因素。臺灣民主季刊,2(2),31-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.吳重禮、譚寅寅、李世宏(20030600)。賦權理論與選民投票行為:以2001年縣市長與第五屆立法委員選舉為例。臺灣政治學刊,7(1),91-156。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.袁頌西(19721100)。家庭權威模式、教養方式與兒童之政治功效意識:景美研究。思與言,10(4),35-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.吳重禮、許文賓(20030600)。誰是政黨認同者與獨立選民?--以二〇〇一年臺灣地區選民政黨認同的決定因素為例。政治科學論叢,18,101-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.徐火炎(19911100)。政黨認同與投票抉擇:臺灣地區選民的政黨印象、偏好與黨派投票行為之分析。人文及社會科學集刊,4(1),1-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.吳重禮(20000300)。美國「分立性政府」研究文獻之評析:兼論臺灣地區的政治發展。問題與研究,39(3),75-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.莊天憐(20010500)。我國「獨立選民」的發展與變遷(1989-1999)。選舉研究,8(1),71-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.何思因、吳釗燮(19960500)。臺灣政黨體系之下政黨認同的測量方法。選舉研究,3(1),1-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.吳重禮、湯京平、黃紀(19991100)。我國「政治功效意識」測量之初探。選舉研究,6(2),23-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.陳陸輝(20060600)。政治信任的政治後果--以2004年立法委員選舉為例。臺灣民主季刊,3(2),39-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.Bandura, Albert(1982)。Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency。American Psychologist,37(2),122-147。  new window
37.胡佛、游盈隆(19841200)。選民的黨派選擇:態度取向及個人背景的分析。政治學報,12,1-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.陳義彥、陳陸輝(20040300)。臺灣大學生政治定向的持續與變遷。東吳政治學報,18,1-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.Abramson, Paul R.(1989)。Generations and Political Change in the United States。Research in Political Sociology,4,235-280。  new window
40.Lee, L. F. Francis(2005)。Collective Efficacy, Support for Democratization, and Political Participation in Hong Kong。International Journal of Public Opinion Research,18(3),297-317。  new window
會議論文
1.郭秋永(1991)。抽象概念的分析與測量:「政治功效感」的例釋。第二屆美國文學與思想研討會。台北:中央研究院美國文化研究所。305-342。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳義彥、陳陸輝(2002)。政治功效意識、政治信任感以及臺灣選民的民主價值。2001年選舉與民主化調查研究學術研討會。臺北:國立政治大學選舉研究中心。1-30。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.游清鑫(2002)。臺灣地區「分立政府」與「一致政府」之研究(2/2)--民眾政治態度與分立政府之間的關聯性:臺灣經驗的探索 (計畫編號:NSC 91-2414-H-004-059-)。臺北:行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳義彥(2000)。跨世紀總統選舉中選民投票行為科際整合研究 (計畫編號:NSC 89-2414-H-004-021-SSS)。臺北:行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃紀、朱雲漢、胡佛、劉義周、陳義彥、陳文俊、黃秀端、徐火炎、吳玉山(2001)。臺灣選舉與民主化調查:民國九十年立法委員選舉全國大型民意調查研究 (計畫編號:NSC90-2420-H-194-001)。國立政治大學選舉研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
4.雷飛龍、陳義彥(1987)。轉型期社會中的投票行為:臺灣地區選民的科際整合研究 (計畫編號:NSC76-0301-H004-12)。臺北:國立政治大學選舉研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Lazarsfeld, Pual F.、Lazarsfeld, Paul F.、Berelson, Bernard、Gaudet, Hazel(1944)。The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign。New York, NY:Columbia University Press。  new window
2.Abramson, Paul R.(1983)。Political Attitudes in America: Formation and Change。San Francisco, CA:W. H. Freeman and Company Press。  new window
3.Long, J. Scott(1997)。Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables。Sage Publications。  new window
4.Lane, Robert E.(1959)。Political Life: Why People Get Involved in Politics。New York, NY:Oxford University:Free Press。  new window
5.Almond, Gabriel A.、Verba, Sidney(1963)。The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations。Princeton University Press。  new window
6.Campbell, Angus、Converse, Philip E.、Miller, Warren E.、Stokes, Donald E.(1960)。The American Voter。The University of Chicago Press。  new window
7.Bandura, A.、Wessels, S.(1997)。Self-efficacy: The exercise of self-control。New York:Freeman。  new window
8.Bandura, Albert(1986)。Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
9.Campbell, Angus、Gurin, Gerald、Miller, Warren E.(1954)。The Voter Decides。Westport, Connecticut:Evanston, IL:Greenwood Press:Row, Peterson & Company。  new window
10.Sears, David O.(1975)。Political Socialization。Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 2: Micropolitical Theory。Reading, MA。  new window
11.Nie, Norman H.、Verba, Sidney、Petrocik, John R.(1976)。The Changing American Vote。The Changing American Vote。Cambridge, MA。  new window
圖書論文
1.Niemi, Richard G.、Weisberg, Herbert F.(1993)。How Meaningful is Party Identification?。Classic in Voting Behavior。Washington, DC:CQ Press。  new window
2.黃紀(2000)。質變數的計量分析員選舉全國大型民意調查研究。政治學的範圍與方法。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
3.Converse, Philip E.(1964)。The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics。Ideology and Discontent。Free Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE