:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小教師創意管教與學生自尊、滿意度之關係
書刊名:初等教育學刊
作者:林志哲 引用關係
出版日期:2008
卷期:29
頁次:頁57-83
主題關鍵詞:自尊創意管教管教行為滿意度Creative disciplineDisciplinary behaviorSatisfactionSelf-esteem
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:658
  • 點閱點閱:71
本研究之目的有二:(一)探討國小教師的創意管教與學生自尊表現之關係;(二)探討國小教師的創意管教與學生滿意度之關係。 本研究採取問卷調查法,以便利取樣的方式,選取臺灣地區 (不合離島) 北、中、南、東四區的國小六年級學生818人為研究對象,以「教師管教行為及滿意度量表」、「兒童自尊量表」為研究工具。所得資料採單因子多變量變異數、單因子重複量數分析,比較國小教師採用不同類型的管教行為,學生自尊表現及滿意度之差異性。 本研究的主要發現如下: 一、接受教師創意型管教行為的國小學生在「個人自尊」的表現優於接受軟性施壓型和硬性懲罰型二類型管教行為的學生。 二、接受創意型管教行為的學生,對管教的滿意度高於接受軟性施壓型和硬性懲罰型二類型管教行為的學生。再者,接受軟性施壓型管教行為的學生,對管教的滿意度亦高於接受硬性懲罰型管教行為的學生。 最後,本研究根據研究結果進行討論,並對教育行政和師資培育機構、學校當局和現場實務教師及未來研究提出具體建議。
The main purposes of this study is to (1) explore the relationship between elementary teachers' creative disciplinary behaviors and students' self-esteem; (2) explore the relationship between elementary teachers' creative disciplinary behaviors and students' satisfaction. This study adopts Questionnaire Survey and convenience sampling. Samples, drawn from the northern, middle, southern, and eastern areas of Taiwan, include 818 sixth grade students of elementary schools. As to measurement tools, Teachers' Disciplinary Behavior Inventory (TDBI) and Children' Self-Esteem Inventory (CSEI) are both used. Acquired data is analyzed by the following methods, including one-way MANOV A and one-way repeated measure, to compare differences within students' self-esteem and satisfaction in teachers' disciplinary behaviors. Some conclusions of this study are as follows: 1.The level of "whole self-esteem" in the students who were disciplined by "creative" methods is higher than that in the students who were disciplined by "mild punishment" or "severe punishment" methods. 2.The level of "satisfaction" in the students who were disciplined by "creative" methods is higher than those students who were disciplined by "mild punishment" or "severe punishment" methods. In addition, the level of "satisfaction" in the students who were disciplined by "mild punishment" methods is higher than those students who were disciplined by "severe punishment" methods. According to the findings, the researcher also lists some suggestions for educational authorities, schools, teachers as well as further research.
期刊論文
1.Debra, K. A.、Larry, D. G.(1996)。integrity of the self-esteem index: A comparison of normative and field study results。Educational and Psychological Measurement,56,537-550。  new window
2.林文瑛(19920500)。體罰實態、理論及心理因素之探討。應用心理學報,1,53-77。  延伸查詢new window
3.詹志禹(20020800)。「創造力」的定義與創造力的發展--兒童會創造嗎?。教育研究,100,117-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.姜逸群、黃雅文、連海生(20000600)。父母教養型態、家庭支持、教師教學行為、學生自尊與健康行為之研究。國立臺北師範學院學報,13,149+151-176。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.張秀敏(20030400)。學生行為管教的方法與策略。國教天地,152,8-19。  延伸查詢new window
6.程小蘋(19860700)。國中生性別、學業成績、焦慮和自尊之關係。諮商與輔導,7,7-10。  延伸查詢new window
7.李輝(19940600)。影響國小兒童自我觀念發展之重要因素。國民教育,34(9/10),6-9。  延伸查詢new window
8.Rhodes, M.(1961)。An analysis of creativity。The Phi Delta Kappan,42(7),305-310。  new window
9.林杏足(20031200)。青少年自尊量表編製報告。測驗學刊,50(2),223-256。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Stachowski, L. L.(1998)。Student teachers’ efforts to promote self-esteem in Navajo pupils。Educational Forum,62,341-346。  new window
11.Zounhia, K., Hatziharistos, D.,、Emmanouel, K.(2003)。Greek secondary school pupils’ perceived reasons for behaving appropriately and perceived teachers’ strategies to maintain discipline。Educational Rewiew,55(3),289-303。  new window
12.Harford, J.(1998)。Easing the way for teachers。Educational Leadership,55(5),33-36。  new window
13.Hwang, C. L.,、Michael, T.(1997)。Student preferences of teacher discipline styles。Journal of Instructional Psychology,24(3),168-175。  new window
會議論文
1.歐陽教(1996)。體罰問題與學生管教。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Witcher, A. E., Filer, J.,、Downing, J.(2000)。Factors associated with teachers' beliefs on discipline。Lexington, KY。  new window
3.林志哲、王鍾和(2005)。從教師「創意型管教行為量表」的發展談教師管教與學生自尊之關係。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.毛連塭(1993)。國民小學學生管教問題調查研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.David, B.,、Gary, M.(2001)。Enhancing students’ social and psychology development。  new window
學位論文
1.朱文揚(2003)。臺北市公立高中女生體育教學滿意度之調查研究,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃家燊(2004)。國小高年級學童內外控信念、父母及教師管教方式與焦慮之相關研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃馨儀(2000)。論我國中小學教師管教權之合理界限(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃明珠(2001)。國民小學教師人權教育認知與管教行為之研究(碩士論文)。屏東師範學院,屏東縣。  延伸查詢new window
5.林美伶(1999)。國中教師對管教權的認知與管教行為之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.游美惠(1994)。體罰之法規範及其實證基礎--以桃園縣中小學教師為對象(碩士論文)。國立師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃淑芬(1998)。國小兒童自尊發展之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺南師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃玉臻(1997)。國小學童A型行為、父母管教方式與生活適應相關之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
9.施玉鵬(2002)。出生序、父母管教方式對國小高年級學生自我概念、同儕關係、社會興趣之關係研究(碩士論文)。臺南師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
10.黃順利(1999)。國小教師權威性格、自我效能信念、學生行為信念與體罰態度及行為之相關研究(碩士論文)。臺東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳根旺(2003)。阿德勒取向探索活動對國小低自尊學生輔導效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.詹素珠(1996)。教師口語行為、國中學生自尊與學校適應行為之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
13.黃姬芬(2002)。國小教師管教信念與管教行為相關之研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
14.王鍾和(1993)。家庭結構、父母管教方式與子女行為表現(博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.林偉文(2002)。國民中小學學校組織文化、教師創意教學潛能與創意教學之關係(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.吳清山(1984)。台北市國民中學導師專業教育背景、管教態度對學生生活適應之影響(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
17.王財印(1992)。國民中學導師背景因素、期望水準與管教態度對學生成就影響之研究,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
18.高永勳(2004)。綜合高中專門學程滿意度之研究,彰化縣。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Charles, C. M.(1999)。Building classroom discipline。New York:Longman。  new window
2.Woolfolk, A. E.(2004)。Educational Psychology。OH:Boston, MA:Pearson:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
3.Curwin, R. L.、Mendler, A. N.(1988)。Discipline with dignity。Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
4.張春興(1992)。現代心理學:現代人研究自身問題的科學。臺北市:東華書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.邱連煌(1997)。班級經營:學生管教模式、策略與方法。臺北市:文景。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳仲庚、張雨新(1989)。人格心理學。台北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.秦夢群(1997)。教育行政:理論部分。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.孫敏芝(1989)。教師期望與師生交互作用:一個國小教室的觀察。高雄復文。  延伸查詢new window
9.Wolfgang, C. H.(1995)。Solving discipline problems:Methods and models for today’s teachers (3rd ed)。Boston。  new window
圖書論文
1.Mayer, R. E.(1999)。Fifty Years of Creativity Research。Handbook of Creativity。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE