:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國民中小學學習障礙學生在魏氏兒童智力量表三版(WISC-III)表現特徵研究
書刊名:新竹教育大學教育學報
作者:黃姿慎孟瑛如 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Tzu-shenMeng, Ying-ru
出版日期:2008
卷期:25:1
頁次:頁99-125
主題關鍵詞:學習障礙鑑定魏氏兒童智力量表三版特殊組型Learning disabilitiesAssessmentWISC-IIISubtest patterns
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:176
  • 點閱點閱:194
本研究旨在探討學習障礙學生在不同「性別」及「就學年段」背景下之WISC-Ⅲ表現。本研究之「學習障礙學生」為九十二、九十三年國內北、中、南、東區經鑑定為學習障礙之1,656位國中小學生。研究發現學習障礙學生WISC-Ⅲ表現較一般學生差,差距分數及特殊組型出現率則高於一般學生。此外,學習障礙學生「語文-作業差距分數」接近15分,Bannatyne分類組型出現率最高。其次,男性學習障礙學生在多項分數、特殊組型出現率高於女性;兩者皆以迷津最佳,常識最差。此外,學習障礙學生就學年段越高,差距分數越明顯,並非所有能力皆隨就學年段提升而增加。本研究依上述結論,提出對未來教育與研究的建議。
Different Characteristics of Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition(WISC-Ⅲ)between students with learning disabilities(LD) and normal students have been examined in this paper. The subjects of ''LD'' were 1656 elementary and junior high school students who were from the north, center, south, and east area of Taiwan that had been considered to have learning disabilities by legal processing in 2003 to 2004. LD students' WISC-Ⅲ scores were lower and the base rate of subtest patterns was higher than that of general students. The ''V-P Score'' was close to15 and the highest base rate of subtest patterns with LD students was ''Bannatyne subtype''. Between the different sex, male LD students earned higher WISC-Ⅲ scores, ''V-P Score'' and the base rate of subtest patterns than female. Between the different educational levels, LD students get higher ''V-P Score'' with higher educational levels. The results of this study provide suggestions for future education and studies that help teachers and researchers to understand LD students more.
期刊論文
1.Mayes, S. D.、Calhoun, S. L.、Crowell, E. W.(1998)。WISC-III Profiles for Children with and without Learning Disabilities。Psychology in the Schools,35(4),309-316。  new window
2.王瓊珠(20040600)。學習障礙學生鑑定問題探討--以臺北市國小為例。國小特殊教育,37,39-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.楊坤堂(19950600)。學習障礙兒童的課程、評量與學習策略教學。國小特殊教育,19,10-18。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.鍾曉芬、孟瑛如(20040300)。魏氏兒童智力量表第三版(WISC-Ⅲ)對學習障礙學生的診斷功能之探析。特殊教育研究學刊,26,319-341。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳淑麗、洪儷瑜(20030300)。學習障礙國中學生在不同差距標準差異之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,24,85-111。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.洪儷瑜、陳淑麗、陳心怡(20031000)。學習障礙國中學生的智力特質之研究。師大學報. 教育類,48(2),215-238。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.胡永崇(20040300)。國民中小學閱讀障礙學生之WISC-Ⅲ及基本學業測驗表現分析。屏東師院學報,20,141-180。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.胡永崇(20020900)。高雄地區國中三年級學習障礙學生之WISC-Ⅲ(中文版)測驗表現分析。屏東師院學報,17,289-328。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Bannatyne, A.(1974)。Diagnosis: A Note on Recategorization of the WISC Scaled Scores。Journal of Learning Disabilities,7,272-274。  new window
10.陳心怡、陳榮華、朱建軍(20010100)。臺灣魏氏兒童智力量表「一般能力指數」之常模建立與運用。測驗年刊,48(1),89-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Bowers, T. G.、Risser, M. G.、Suchanec, J. F.、Tinker, D. E.、Ramer, J. C.、Domoto, M.(1992)。A developmental index using the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children: Implications for the diagnosis and nature of ADHD。Journal of Learning Disabilities,25(3),178-185。  new window
12.陳心怡、楊宗仁(20000700)。WISC-III分測驗特殊組型基本率研究:臺灣常模、學習障礙及注意力缺陷過動症兒童之比較。測驗年刊,47(2),91-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.李宏鎰(20020600)。WISC-III可以瞭解學習障礙兒童的學習特徵嗎﹖。國小特殊教育,33,35-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.胡永崇(20011000)。魏氏兒童智力量表(WISC-Ⅲ,中文版)的施測與結果分析。屏師特殊教育,1,16-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.陳心怡、朱建軍、陳榮華(20000900)。WISC-Ⅲ分測驗組合之假設解釋與信度估計。特殊教育研究學刊,19,1-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.王振德(1979)。魏氏兒童智慧量表的智力結構分析及應用。國教月刊,26(1),30。  延伸查詢new window
17.孟瑛如、陳麗如(2000)。學習障礙兒童在魏氏兒童智力量表上顯現之特質研究。特殊育季刊,74,1-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.陳心怡(2001)。語文與作業能力差距之基本率研究「魏氏兒童智力量表」臺灣常模分析。花蓮師範學院學報,12,51-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.單延愷、洪儷瑜(2003)。由操作性概念談學習障礙。特殊教育季刊,87,9-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.黃瑞珍(2001)。學習障礙兒童在WISC-Ⅲ之特質分析與臨床分析。國小特殊教育,31,19-29。  延伸查詢new window
21.楊坤堂(2001)。量身訂作:學習障礙與情緒障礙學生的鑑定與診斷。國小特殊教育,32,5-13。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Henry, S. A.,、Wittman, R. D.(1981)。Diagnostic implications of Bannatyne's recategorizes WISC-R Sscores for identifying learning disabled children。Journal of Learning Disabilities,14(9),517-520。  new window
23.Reynolds, C. R.(1981)。A note on determining significant discrepancies among categoryscores on Bannatyne's regrouping WISC -R subtests。Journal of Learning Disabilities,14(8),468-469。  new window
24.Reynolds, C. R.,、Gutkin, T. B.(1981)。Statistics for the interpretation of Bannatyne recategorization of WPPSI subtests。Journal of Learning Disabilities,14(8),464-467。  new window
25.Slate, J. R.(1995)。Discrepancies between IQ and Index scores for a clinical sample of students:Useful diagnostic indicators。Psychology in the Schools,32,103-108。  new window
26.Ward, S. B., Ward, T. J., Hatt, C. C., Young, D. L.,、Mollmer, N. R.(1995)。Theincidence and utility of the ACID, ACIDS, and SCAD profiles in referred population。Psychology in the Schools,32,267-276。  new window
27.Watkins, M. W.(1996)。Diagnostic Utility of the WISC-Ⅲ developmental index as apredictor of learning disabilities。Journal of Learning Disabilities,29(3),305-312。  new window
28.林寶貴、吳淑敏、曾怡惇、林美秀(1988)。特殊教育評量、鑑定工具調查研究。特殊教育研究學刊,16,23-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.鍾曉芬(2003)。魏氏兒童智力量表第三版(WISC-Ⅲ)對學習障礙學生診斷功能之探析,台東市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Kirk, S. A.、Gallagher, J. J.、Anastasiow, N. T.(2003)。Educating exceptional children。New York:Houghton Mifflin。  new window
2.孟瑛如(2002)。學習障礙與補救教學--教師與家長實用手冊。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Lerner, J. W.(2003)。Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies。New York:Houghton Mifflin Company。  new window
4.Kaufman, A. S.(1994)。Intelligent testing with the WISC-Ⅲ。New York:Wiley。  new window
5.孟瑛如(1999)。資源教室方案:班級經營與補救教學。臺北:五南圖書出版有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.柯華葳、邱上真(2000)。學習障礙學生鑑定與診斷。學習障礙學生鑑定與診斷模式的建立指導手冊。臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.席行蕙(譯);Priscilla Vail(1999)。聰明孩子壞成績。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳榮華(2002)。魏氏兒童智力量表第三版(中文版)指導手冊(再版)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.Kaufman, A. S.,、Lichtenberger, E.O.(2000)。Essentials of WISC-III & WPPSI-Rassessment。New York。  new window
10.Pennington, B. F.(1991)。Diagnosing learning disorders: A neuropsychological framwork。New York。  new window
11.Sattler, J. M.(1988)。Assessment of children(3rd)。San Diego, CA。  new window
其他
1.教育部(2002)。身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定標準,臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Prifitera, A.、Dersh, J.(1993)。Base rates of WISC-III diagnostic subtest patterns among normal,learning disabled, and ADHD samples。Advances in Psychological Assessment: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children。  new window
2.周台傑(1999)。學習障礙學生鑑定原則鑑定基準說明。身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定原則鑑定基準說明手冊。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE