:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:運用反思於國小文化教學之探討與教師專業發展
書刊名:屏東教育大學學報. 教育類
作者:簡梅瑩
作者(外文):Chien, Mei-ying
出版日期:2007
卷期:29
頁次:頁67-88
主題關鍵詞:多元文化教學教學專業發展批判反思Multicultural teachingTeaching profession developmentCritical reflection
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:167
  • 點閱點閱:53
此文以五位教師所進行之個案研究,介紹教師如何運用反思於多元文化教學之探討與個人教學專業之發展。五位教師分別為現職、及有代課經驗之國小教師,也是參與筆者所擔任「多元文化教學與課程發展」之研究所學生;透過課程的參與,進行多元文化教育相關知識的探索與學習。筆者認為教學專業的發展,教師要能覺察自我的信念、態度、與價值觀,並能同時批判反思所採取的教學決定與行動。因此,多元文化教學之中小學師資教育規劃與實施,應能積極提供教師批判反思的機會,並促使教師能將反思之經驗,應用至教學的準備、修正、與實施。筆者,也是師資培育者,除以課堂對話的方式,幫助教師進行理論知識與教學實務經驗的聯結,並同時提供個案研究的機會,促使教師能應用所學知識於教學現場的分析。筆者根據對五位教師所提供個案報告之分析,分別以「國小文化教學之現況」、及「國小文化教學之努力方向」兩部分,陳述五位教師如何運用反思於國小文化教學之探討、及個人教學專業之發展。
This paper is based on the cases-study conducted by five school teachers, and it is addressed to introduce how these teachers have used the reflection on exploring the multicultural teaching and developing their teaching profession. These 5 school teachers, three were practitioners and two were once supplement teachers in the elementary schools. They were also the research students for the course「multicultural teaching and curriculum development」, which was run by the author to introduce the theories and discussions of multicultural education. The development of teaching profession is based on the awareness of one’s belief, attitude, and value, as well as the critical reflection on the decision and actions taken for teaching. Hence, teachers education programs planned and implemented for developing multicultural teaching should actively provide various opportunities for teachers to reflect on their teaching, and should facilitate them to apply the reflective skills into modifying, preparing and practicing their teaching. The author, as a teacher educator, has not only used the dialogues to help the teachers integrate the knowledge and experience, but also provided the cases-study opportunity to help teachers apply the knowledge into the field. The discussion of this paper was then focused on how the teachers have used the reflective skills to explore the culture teaching in the elementary schools, and to develop their teaching profession.
期刊論文
1.石雅玫(20010100)。花蓮地區國小教師議題中心教學信念及多元文化議題調查之研究。課程與教學,4(1),129-154+170。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳美玉(19981000)。札記反省法在教師專業發展上應用之探討。中等教育,49(5),60-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.王慧豐、陸正威(20021200)。國小教師進行「文化學習與國際了解」課程實驗之行動研究。南投文教,17,24-29。  延伸查詢new window
4.高熏芳、陳劍涵(20030800)。提升文化學習能力之教學策略:全球教育的啟示。教育研究月刊,112,127-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳憶芬(20010800)。師資培育中的多元文化教育課程探究。中等教育,52(4),84-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.單文經、高博銓(20010900)。同中有異--多元文化社會中的教學原則。教育資料與研究,42,85-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.呂枝益(20000600)。多元文化教育與九年一貫課程發展。中等教育,51(3),28-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.劉美慧(20001200)。建構文化回應教學模式:一個多族群班級的教學實驗。花蓮師院學報,11,115-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Howard, T. G.(2003)。Culturally relevant pedagogy: Ingredients for critical teacher education。Theory into Practice,42(3),195-202。  new window
10.Rodgers, C.(2002)。Defining reflective teaching: Another look at John Dewey and reflective teaching。Teachers College Record,104(4),842-866。  new window
圖書
1.Sleeter, C. A.、Grant, C. E.(1988)。Making choices for multicultural education: Five approaches to race, class, and gender。Columbus, OH:Merrill。  new window
2.教育部(2001)。九年一貫新課程大綱。台北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.Berg, Bruce L.(2004)。Qualitative research methods: For the social science。Pearson。  new window
4.Burgess, R. G.(1995)。In the Field: An introduction to field research。London:Routledge。  new window
5.Schon, D.(1978)。Educating the reflective practitioner: Towards a new design for teaching and learning in the professions。San Francisco:Jossey Bass。  new window
6.Banks, J. A.、李苹綺(1998)。多元文化教育概論述。臺北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.Banks, J. A.、Banks, C. A. M.(2003)。Multicultural Education: Issues and Perspectives。New York:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
8.Nieto, S.(1999)。The light in their eyes: Creating multicultural learning communities。New York:Teachers College Press。  new window
9.Nieto, S.(2000)。Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education。New York:Longman。  new window
10.Schön, Donald A.、夏林清、鄭村棋(2004)。反映的實踐者:專業工作者如何在行動中思考。台北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳美如(2000)。多元文化課程的理念與實踐。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
12.歐用生(1998)。課程發展的基本原理。高雄:復文。  延伸查詢new window
13.Stake, Robert E.(1995)。The Art of Case Study Research。Sage Publications。  new window
14.Freire, Paulo(1973)。Education for critical consciousness。New York, NY:Continuum。  new window
15.Banks, J. A.(1999)。An introduction to multicultural education。Boston, Massachusetts:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
16.黃政傑(1995)。多元社會課程取向。臺北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。臺北市:心理出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
18.Gay, Geneva(2000)。Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research and practice。Teachers College Press。  new window
19.Glaser, Barney G.(1978)。Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory。Sociology Press。  new window
20.Glaser, Barney G.、Strauss, Anselm L.(1967)。The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research。Aldine。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳美如(2003)。多元文化社會如何可能?--多元文化課程在課程改革之後的省思與作為。課程改革:反省與前瞻。台北:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE