宋代儒者多好讀《莊子》，然而《莊子》中有許多批判孔子的言論，使儒者的立場顯得尷尬。為避免這樣的困境，學者在探討莊子與儒家的關係時，往往主張莊子與儒家思想可以會通，進而以為莊子思想源於儒家，王安石認為莊子矯天下之弊的用心近於聖人，蘇軾則認為莊子對孔子是「實予而文不予，陽擠而陰助之」，朱熹認為莊子的議論甚好，「度亦承接得孔門之徒」，林希逸認為莊子的文章雖然跌蕩戲劇，但「大綱領、大宗旨未嘗於聖人異也」，已蔚為宋代莊學發展的重要趨勢。本論文先釐清「援莊入儒」相關概念的意涵，而後從宋代莊學論述中，說明「援莊入儒」的背景與內涵，並檢討「援莊入儒」相關課題，從而彰顯宋代莊學的特色。

There were many confucianism scholars who liked reading ”Zhuang Zi” in the Song Dynasty. But in the book of ”Zhuang Zi” there were many critics to Kong Zi's opinion; therefore, causing Confucianism scholars standpoint appearing awkward. In order to avoid the predicament, when the scholars discussesd Zhuang Zi and Confucianist's relations, they often advocated that Zhuang Zi's individual thought and the Confucian touhghts may intercommunicate, then thought Zhuang Zi's thought stems from the Confucianist. Wang, Anshi thought that Zhuang Zi attentively rectified all the malpractice, which nearly made him a saint. Su, Shi thought that on the surface, Zhuang Zi did not seem to support Kong Zi's philosophy; however, the core belief of Zhuang Zi's echoed Kong Zi's thoughts. Zhu, Xi thought that Zhuang Zi's discussion was good and thaught Zhuang Zi continued Kong Zi's thought. Lin, Xiyi thought that Zhuang Zi's articles although unconventionally playful, the confents of his work were no different from sages' viewpoints. The present paper first clarify the concept of ”guiding Zhuang Zi to the Confucianism.” Then, the author will illustrate the background and meaning of the above concept and related issues. Zhuang Zi's philosophy in Song Dynasty can be better understood through such discussion.