臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臺灣、美國和新加坡小一數學教材內容之比較研究
書刊名：課程與教學
作者：楊德清 引用關係／施怡真／徐偉民 引用關係／尤欣涵
作者(外文)：Yang, Der-ching／Shih, I-chen／Hsu, Wei-min／Yu, Hsin-han
出版日期：2011
卷期：14:2
頁次：頁103-134
主題關鍵詞：一年級；內容分析法；國小；教科書；數學；First-grade；Content analysis；Elementary school；Textbooks；Mathematics
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:59
  • 點閱點閱:87
本研究之主要目的是探討台灣、美國和新加坡三個國家的數學教科書中，市佔率較高之台灣部編版數學、美國每日數學（Everyday Mathematics）與新加坡大家一起學數學（My Pals are Here！ Maths.）之國小一年級數學教材內容之差異。本研究採用內容分析法，以教學目標為分析單位。研究發現如下：1.「大家一起學數學」的內容較深較廣，教材內容包含心算、進位加法和退位減法的直式運算，以及乘法運算與除法概念，並強調理解與熟練。2.「每日數學」的教學內容除了分數教學外，對於「容量」、「面積」、「溫度」和「機率」方面皆有初步的概念介紹。3.「部編版數學」則缺少幾何樣式的延伸、輔助學習的圖像表徵以及「擬題」之相關單元的教學目標，亦未看到使用科技輔助數學學習的融入。
The major purpose of this study is to investigate the first-grade mathematics textbooks content differences which are more popular among Taiwan, America,. and Singapore. The selected samples are the math textbooks directed by the Ministry of Education in Taiwan, Everyday Mathematics in America, and My Pals are Here! Maths (MPHM) in Singapore. The results show: (1) The contents of MPHM are deeper and wider. It includes mental computation, the straightforward computation of addition and subtraction, and the concepts of multiplication and division. It also highlights understanding and computational fluency. (2) Everyday mathematics includes more topics, such as capacity, area, temperature, and probability. (3) The Taiwan textbooks lack of geometry patterns, pictorial representations, and posing problems. We do hope this study will help the future study and development of mathematics textbooks through the international comparison.
期刊論文
1.Reys, B. J.、Reys, R. E.(2006)。The development and publication of elementary mathematics textbooks: Let the buyer beware!。Phi Delta Kappan，87(5)，377-383。  new window
2.Reys, B. J.、Reys, R. E.(2004)。Why mathematics textbooks matter。Educational Leadership，61(5)，61-66。  new window
3.陳梅生、吳德邦(1986)。我國與美國小學數學教育比較研究一美國波斯頓小 學數學課程與我國小學數學課程比較。師大學報，31，565-602。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Glenda, A.(2009)。Mathematics Education in the Early Years: building bridges。Issues in Early Childhood，10(2)，107-121。  new window
5.Kalifatidou, E. R.(2008)。Design of Activities on Numerical Representations Based on Cognitive Research。Teaching Children Mathematics，14(6)，355-360。  new window
6.Stigler, J. W.(2004)。Improving matnematics teaching。Educational Leadership，61(5)，12-17。  new window
7.Tarr, J(2006)。From the written to enacted curricula: Intermediary role of middle school mathematics in shaping students5 opportunity to learn。School Science and Mathematics J，06(4)，191-201。  new window
8.王國亨、簡清華(20080900)。屏東縣國小一年級新生的數與計算能力。教育實踐與研究，21(2)，1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.張麗芬(20050800)。兒童數能力的發展。兒童與教育研究，1，85-109。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.吳麗玲、楊德清(20070300)。臺灣、新加坡與美國五、六年級分數教材佈題呈現與知識屬性差異之研究。國立編譯館館刊，35(1)，27-40。  延伸查詢new window
11.徐偉民、徐于婷(20091200)。國小數學教科書代數教材之內容分析：臺灣與香港之比較。教育實踐與研究，22(2)，67-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.黃政傑(19980100)。建立優良的教科書審定制度。課程與教學，1(1)，1-15。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李貞慧。低年級學童使用數的分解紀錄對解決加減問題效性之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.翁婉珣(2005)。臺灣與新加坡之十二年數學課程比較(碩士論文)。國立中央大學，桃園。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.國立教育硏究院籌備處(2006)。國民小學數學第一冊。臺北：國立教育硏究院籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bell, J(2004)。Everyday Mathematics Grade 1。Chicago：Wright Group/Me Graw Hill.。  new window
3.Fong, H. K.、Ramakrishnan, C.、Lau, P. W.。Math 1A. Singapore, Marshall Cavendish Education。  new window
4.Fong, H.、KRamakrishnan, C.、Lau, P. W.(2007)。Math IB. Singapore, Marshall Cavendish Education。  new window
5.Tomroos, J.(2004)。Mathematics Textbooks, Opportunity to Learn and Achievement。Copenhagen, Denmark。  new window
6.Wright Group.(2004)。Everyday Mathematics Student Math Journal。Chicago：McGraw-Hill。  new window
7.Wright Group.(2004)。Everyday Mathematics Teacher, s Lesson Guide。Chicago：McGraw-Hill。  new window
8.王石番(1996)。傳播內容分析法--理論與實證。台北：幼獅。  延伸查詢new window
9.教育部(2003)。國民中學九年一貫課程綱要--數學學習領域。臺北市：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
10.Curriculum Planning and Development Division(2006)。Mathematics syllabus primary。Ministry of Education。  new window
11.Hiebert, J.、Gallimore, R.、Garnier, H.、Givvin, K. B.、Hollingsworth, H.、Jacobs, J.、Chiu, A. M. Y.、Wearne, D.、Smith, M.、Kersting, N.、Manaster, A.、Tseng, E.、Etterbeek, W.、Manaster, C.、Gonzales, P.、Stigler, J.(2003)。Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study。Washington, DC：National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
12.歐用生(1998)。課程與教學：概念、理論與實際。文景。  延伸查詢new window
13.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(2000)。Principles and standards for school mathematics。Reston, Virginia：National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
14.郭生玉(2005)。心理與教育研究法。精華書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(1989)。Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics。Reston, VA：National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
16.陳宜良、單維彰、洪萬生、袁媛(2005)。中小學數學科數學綱要評估與發展研究報告書。臺北：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.李盈萩(2009)。康軒版、南一版與部編版：一年級數學教科書計算内容之比較硏究，http://www.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/79/79-16.htm， 2010/06/16。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部國教司(20051011)。引導國中小優質發展一部編本教科書編輯理念與特色，http://epaper.edu.tw/165/storymain.htm。  延伸查詢new window
3.Singapore Math. Com. Inc(2005)。FAQ for primary level math，http://www.singaporemath.com/faa PrimaryMath.htm， 2005/01/27。  new window
圖書論文
1.Cheung, J.(1993)。Towards Mathematical Excellence in Singapor。Asian Perspectives on Mathematics Education。Lismore：The Northern Rivers Mathematical Association。  new window
2.Floden, R. E.(2002)。The measurement of opportunity to learn。Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement。Washington：National Academy Press。  new window
3.Gelman, RMeek, E.(1992)。Early principle ain initial but not later conceptions of number。Pathway to number。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
4.Grouws, D.、Smith, M.(2004)。The preparation and teacning practices of United States mathematics teachers: Grades 4 and 8。Results and interpretations of the 1990 through 2000 mathematics assessments of the National Assessment of Educational Progress。Reston, VA：National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
5.Mullis, I.V.S.、Martin, M. O.、Gonzalez, E. J.(2004)。TIMSS 2003 international mathematics report: Findings from IE A's Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the fourth and eighth grades。Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center。Chestnut Hill, MA：Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.。  new window
6.National Research Council(2004)。Framework for evaluating curricular effectiveness. On evaluating curricular effectiveness: Judging the quality of K-12 mathematics evaluations。On evaluating curricular effectiveness: Judging the quality of K-12 mathematics evaluations。Washington, DC：National Academies Press。  new window
7.Stein, M. K.、Remillard, J.(2007)。How curriculum influences student learning. handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning。Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning。Charlotte, NC：Information Age132 Publishing。  new window
8.Putnam, R. T.、Lampert, M.、Peterson, P. L.(1990)。Alternative Perspectives on Knowing Mathematics in Elementary Schools。Review of Research in Education。Washington, DC：AERA。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：728（臺灣：719，外國：9） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1908780 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67720222
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上