:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:扶助弱勢學生學習:教師教學信念與教學取向之探究
書刊名:嘉大教育研究學刊
作者:宋佩芬 引用關係
作者(外文):Sung, Pei-fen
出版日期:2016
卷期:37
頁次:頁149-180
主題關鍵詞:弱勢學生教師信念教學取向Disadvantaged studentsTeacher beliefsTeaching approaches
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:145
  • 點閱點閱:116
近年來教育部對於弱勢學生的學習進行多項扶助的方案,然而教師信念在其中所扮 演的角色為何?本研究試圓探究參與扶助弱勢學生學習之方案教師的教學信念及教學方 式,以瞭解教師對學生的期望及作法有何不同。本研究對台北市及新北市16位參與不同 方案之中小學教師進行半結構式訪談,並以紮根理論進行資料分析。研究發現,扶助弱 勢學習的教師在教學上有四種取向一即傳統消極、傳統積極、引發動機及關懷取向。文化 回應教學在四種取向中皆不受重視。教師的教學信念影響其對弱勢教學的實質內涵,方 案特色亦有影響。本文建議扶助弱勢的政策應該協助教師檢視與釐清(1)教師本身對弱 勢學生的教學信念,及(2)所參與之方案的目標,以協助教師反思自己的教學取向,考 量不同的教學方式,使弱勢學生得到真正具轉化性的幫助。
The Ministry of Education has funded various kinds of remedial projects to boost learning outcomes of disadvantaged students through the years. However, we do not know in what ways teachers teach in those projects. This study attempts to explore the beliefs and practices of teachers in order to understand how students might be affected by their teaching. Sixteen teachers from different elementary and junior-high schools in Taipei and New Taipei City were interviewed. The result shows that teachers demonstrate four teaching approaches when helping disadvantaged students--the passive traditional, the progressive traditional, the motivating, and the caring approaches. Culturally responsive teaching is overlooked in all four approaches. The analysis shows that teacher beliefs influence classroom practices; project characteristics also have bearing on teaching. The author suggests that policies should help teachers examine and clarify their beliefs about teaching disadvantaged students, as well as their goals for participating in the remedial projects, so that they may reflect upon their teaching approaches and consider different methods to facilitate students’ learning in a more transforming way.
期刊論文
1.陳伯璋、林世華、謝進昌、陳清溪、曾建銘、林宜臻、金冠宇(20091200)。國民中小學教師對於攜手計畫執行現況之調查研究。研習資訊,26(6),27-38。  延伸查詢new window
2.王世英、溫明麗、羅天豪(20070200)。臺灣人口結構變遷之外籍配偶子女補救教學模式建構。教育資料與研究,74,73-96。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.黃玉幸(20110600)。高雄市國民小學實施攜手計畫課後扶助之樣貌。正修通識教育學報,8,259-279。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Kagan, Dona M.(1992)。Implication of Research on Teacher Belief。Educational Psychologist,27(1),65-90。  new window
5.湯維玲(20140600)。論述補救教學方案績優學校之積極作為。教育研究,242,31-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.李孟峰、連廷嘉(20100600)。「攜手計畫--課後扶助方案」實施歷程與成效之研究。教育實踐與研究,23(1),115-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Pajares, M. Frank(1992)。Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct。Review of Educational Research,62(3),307-332。  new window
8.陳淑麗(20080600)。國小弱勢學生課業輔導現況調查之研究。臺東大學教育學報,19(1),1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Solomon, D.、Battistich, V.(1996)。Teacher beliefs and practices in schools serving communities that differ in socioeconomic level。Journal of Experimental Education,64(4),327-347。  new window
10.陳淑麗、熊同鑫(20070600)。臺東地區弱勢國中學生課輔現況與困境之探究。教育資料與研究,76,105-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.李祐宗(20120500)。國中補救教學示例--從拼圖學因式分解。科學教育,348,37-45。  延伸查詢new window
12.洪清一(20110600)。夜光天使點燈計畫對原住民高危險群學生學業學習、行為表現成效及其相關問題之研究。臺灣原住民研究論叢,9,37-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.陳惠珍(20141200)。運用部件識字教學法提升三年級攜手計畫學生文本閱讀理解之研究。中國語文,115(6)=690,13-24。  延伸查詢new window
14.黃雪雲(20091200)。評估任務式語言教學法應用於英文補救教學之可行性。人文社會科學學刊,1,237-246。  延伸查詢new window
15.齊宗豫(20091200)。結合識字閱讀作文教學做為國語文補救教學模式之行動研究--以五年級攜手計畫學生為例。新竹縣教育研究集刊,9,39-68。  延伸查詢new window
16.Ryan, A.(2005)。Teacher development and educational change: Empowerment through structured reflection。Irish Educational Studies,24(2/3),179-198。  new window
17.Reiter, A. B.、Davis, S. N.(2011)。Factors influencing pre-service teachers' beliefs about student achievement evaluation of a pre-service teacher diversity awareness program。Multicultural Education,18(3),41-46。  new window
18.Peabody, D.(2011)。Beliefs and instructional practices among secondary teachers within selected high- and low-performing high schools。Florida Journal of Educational Administration & Policy,4(2),181-192。  new window
19.Middleton, V. A.(2002)。Increasing preservice teachers' diversity beliefs and commitment。The Urban Review,34(4),343-361。  new window
20.McGregor, D.、Gunter, B.(2006)。Invigorating pedagogic change: Suggestions from findings of the development of secondary science teachers' practice and cognisance of the learning process。European Journal of Teacher Education,29(1),23-48。  new window
21.McDonald, L.(2009)。Teacher change: A dynamic interactive approach。International Journal of Learning,16(10),623-636。  new window
22.Hachfeld, A.、Hahn, A.、Schroeder, S.、Anders, Y.、Stanat, P.、Kunter, M.(2011)。Assessing teachers' multicultural and egalitarian beliefs: The Teacher Cultural Beliefs Scale。Teaching & Teacher Education,27(6),986-996。  new window
23.Garmon, M. A.(2004)。Changing preservice teachers' attitudes/beliefs about diversity。Journal of Teacher Education,55(3),201-213。  new window
24.Cuban, L.(1983)。How did teachers teach, 1890-1980。Theory into Practice,22(3),159-165。  new window
25.Carrington, S.、Deppeler, J.、Moss, J.(2010)。Cultivating teachers' beliefs, knowledge and skills for leading change in schools。Australian Journal of Teacher Education,35(1),1-13。  new window
26.Calabrese, R. L.、Hummel, C.、San Martin, T.(2007)。Learning to appreciate at-risk students: Challenging the beliefs and attitudes of teachers and administrators。International Journal of Educational Management,21(4),275-291。  new window
27.Braun, C.(1976)。Teacher expectation: Sociopsychological dynamics。Review of Educational Research,46(2),185-213。  new window
28.鄭勝耀(20111100)。弱勢教育公平指標之研究。教育政策論壇,14(4)=40,63-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.簡良平(20101200)。偏遠地區小學教師對弱勢社區環境之覺知及其教學回應。教育實踐與研究,23(2),37-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.呂佩真、鄭勝耀(2009)。國民小學課輔教師教學信念之個案研究。弱勢學生師資專業素養學術研討會。台北縣:淡江大學。21-56。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張福松(2010)。數學低成就學生實施補救教學困境之研究--以台東縣某國小為例(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃淑容(2009)。國小攜手計畫實施成效之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學,臺東縣。  延伸查詢new window
3.許秋儂(2008)。國民小學辦理兒童課後照顧服務與其家長滿意度調查研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.熊正蕙(2009)。攜手計畫課後扶助政策執行現況與影響因素之研究--以臺北縣為例(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳瑩甄(2010)。國小補救教學教師教學信念與教學行為關係之研究--以嘉義縣一所國小為例(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.王翠嬋(2010)。澎湖縣國民中小學辦理課後照顧實施現況之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.吳雪錚(2011)。參與攜手計畫教師多元文化素養與教學實踐之個案研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.呂佩真(2009)。四位國小課輔教師教學信念與教學行為之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.林瑞吉(2007)。雲林縣國小三年級課輔班課程發展之行動研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.紀淑珍(2010)。新北市國中「攜手計畫--課後扶助」方案實施現況之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.許如芬(2010)。攜手計畫政策的執行過程與學校回應--以彰化縣國民小學為例(碩士論文)。南華大學。  延伸查詢new window
12.詹文佐(2012)。國小教學中的文化回應探究--以「攜手計畫課後扶助方案」為例(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
13.彭惠君(2009)。攜手計畫-課後扶助班的教學實踐--我與弱勢學生的教與學(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
14.龔湘嵐(2010)。國中攜手計畫方案之英語課業輔導現況調查之研究--以高雄市與台東縣為例(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學。  延伸查詢new window
15.謝芝棋(2009)。社會弱勢學童課後照顧教師的教學經驗--一個多元文化教育觀點的研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.劉美慧(2009)。多元文化教育名著導讀。台北:學富文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.Noddings, N.(2005)。The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education。New York:Teachers College Press。  new window
3.Cuban, L.(1993)。How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms 1880-1990。New York:Teachers College Press。  new window
4.游美惠、劉美慧、譚光鼎(2012)。多元文化教育。臺北:高等教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Glaser, B. G.、Strauss, A. L.(1968)。The Discovery of Grounded Theory。Aldine de Gruyter。  new window
6.Maxwell, J. A.(2012)。Qualitative research design: An interactive approach: An interactive approach。Sage。  new window
7.Cain, K.(2009)。Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS。OECD。  new window
8.Gay, Geneva(2000)。Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research and practice。Teachers College Press。  new window
單篇論文
1.McCombs, B. L.,Whisler, J. S.(1997)。The Learner-Centered Classroom and School: Strategies for Increasing Student Motivation and Achievement。  new window
其他
1.教育部(20090623)。97-100年度教育部「夜光天使點燈專案計畫」辦理情形,http://www.edu.tw/plannews_detail.aspx?sn=200&pages=6。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(20140410)。教育施政理念與政策,http://140.111.34.54/files/site_content/EDU01/10109%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E6%96%BD%E6%94%BF%E7%90%86%E5%BF%B5%E8%88%87%E6%94%BF%E7%AD%96.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.Noddings, N.(1994)。An Ethic of Caring and Its Implications for Instructional Arrangements。The Education Feminism Reader。New York:Routledge。  new window
2.張新仁(2003)。Ausubel有意義的學習理論與教學應用。學習與教學新趨勢。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
3.Richardson, V.(1996)。The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach。Handbook of research on teacher education。New York:Macmillan。  new window
4.張新仁(2003)。Gagné 學習條件理論與教學應用。學習與教學新趨勢。台北市:心理。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE