臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：高中探究本位課程之設計與實施的個案研究--以新興科技議題為例
書刊名：科學教育學刊
作者：洪振方 引用關係／陳毓凱
作者(外文)：Hung, Jeng-fung／Chen, Yu-kai
出版日期：2011
卷期：19:1
頁次：頁1-23
主題關鍵詞：中等教育；探究本位課程；新興科技；Secondary education；Inquiry-based curriculum；Emerging technology
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:56
  • 點閱點閱:83
摘要：本研究主要目的在於提供一個高中其設計與實施新興科技探究本位課程(Emerging Technology Inquiry-based Curriculum, ETIC)之成功範例。資料來源包括課室觀察記錄；教材、會議記錄等文本資料；教師與學生的半結構式晤談；以及學生的問卷資料。本研究採個案研究法，參與者為六位高中科學教師以及一個學生小組。研究主要發現如下：(1) ETIC之教學目標在培養學生對環境議題的關懷、發展替代能源的知識以及運用探究來進行學習；(2) ETIC之課程設計由教學目標轉化而成，主要包含「專家講座」、「補充教學」、「校外經驗」以及「科學探究」等成分；(3) ETIC在實施上採取「刺激誘發」、「教學介入」與「引導探究」等機制；(4) ETIC課程提供學生經驗科學探究的歷程，培養學生高層次思考的能力。
Abstract The purpose of this study was to provide a successful case for designing and implementing an Emerging Technology Inquiry-based Curriculum (ETIC) in a senior high school. The data sources included fieldnotes, a collection of artefacts (such as teaching materials, meeting records), interviews (both for instructors and students), and open-ended questionnaires from all students. The interview participants for this case study included six secondary science teachers and a purposively selected student group, with four students. The results revealed that (1) the objectives of ETIC included a concern for environmental issues, developing knowledge of renewable energy, and involvement in scientific inquiry; (2) the foundation for ETIC curriculum design was built around the objectives above, with the approach including “professional lectures,” “supplementary instruction,” “out-of-school experience,” and “scientific inquiry;” (3) the ETIC implementing mechanisms included “exciting stimulation,” “teaching intervention,” and “guided inquiry;” and (4) the students’ experiences closely reflected the objectives of ETIC. Furthermore, the students recognized important features of scientific research.
期刊論文
1.Palmer, D. H.(2009)。Student interest generated during an inquiry skills lesson。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，46(2)，147-165。  new window
2.Cuevas, P.、Lee, O.、Hart, J.、Deaktor, R.(2005)。Improving science inquiry with elementary students of diverse backgrounds。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，42(3)，337-357。  new window
3.Chinn, C. A.、Malhotra, B. A.(2002)。Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks。Science Education，86(2)，175-218。  new window
4.Pataray-Ching, J.、Roberson, M.(2002)。Misconceptions about a curriculum-as-inquiry framework。Language Arts，79(6)，498-505。  new window
5.Roehrig, G. H.、Luft, J. A.(2004)。Constraints experienced by beginning secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons。International Journal of Science Education，26(1)，3-24。  new window
6.Zimmerman, C.(2000)。The development of scientific reasoning skills。Developmental Review，20(1)，99-149。  new window
7.蔡執仲、段曉林(20050900)。探究式實驗教學對國二學生理化學習動機之影響。科學教育學刊，13(3)，289-315。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Chinn, C. A.、Hmelo-Silver, C. E.(2002)。Authentic inquiry: Introduction to the special section。Science Education，86(2)，171-174。  new window
9.Hofstein, Avi、Lunetta, Vincent N.(2004)。The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-first Century。Science Education，88(1)，28-54。  new window
10.Khan, Samia(2007)。Model-based inquiries in chemistry。Science Education，91(6)，877-905。  new window
11.Krajcik, J. S.、Blumenfeld, P. C.、Marx, R. W.、Bass, K. M.、Fredricks, J.、Soloway, E.(1998)。Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students。Journal of the Learning Science，7(3/4)，313-350。  new window
12.陳麗華、彭增龍(20070600)。全球觀課程設計的新視野：公民行動取向。教育研究與發展期刊，3(2)，1-15。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.楊秀停、王國華(20070800)。實施引導式探究教學對於國小學童學習成效之影響。科學教育學刊，15(4)，439-459。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Tsai, C.C.(2001)。Probing students’ cognitive structures in science: The use of a flow map method coupled with a meta-listening technique。Studies in Educational Evaluation，27(3)，257-268。  new window
15.Valk, T.、Jong, O.(2009)。Scaffolding science teachers in open-inquiry teaching。International Journal of Science Education，31(6)，829-850。  new window
16.Zion, M.、Cohen, S.、Amir, R.(2007)。The spectrum of dynamic inquiry teaching practices。Research in Science Education，37(4)，423-447。  new window
17.Edelson, D. C.、Gordin, D. N.、Pea, R. D.(1999)。Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design。Journal of the Learning Sciences，8(3/4)，391-450。  new window
18.Gibson, H. L.、Chase, C.(2002)。Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students' attitudes toward science。Science Education，86(5)，693-705。  new window
19.Jeanpierre, B.、Oberhauser, K.、Freeman, C.(2005)。Characteristics of professional development that effect change in secondary science teachers' classroom practices。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，42(6)，668-690。  new window
20.Abd-El-Khalick, F.、BouJaoude, S.、Duschl, R.、Lederman, N. G.、Mamlok-Naaman, R.、Hofstein, A.、Niaz, M.、Treagust, D.、Tuan, Hsiao-Lin(2004)。Inquiry in science education: International perspectives。Science Education，88(3)，397-419。  new window
21.Guba, E. G.(1981)。Criteria for Assessing the Trustworthiness of Naturalistic Inquiries。Educational Communication and Technology，29(2)，75-91。  new window
22.Ainley, Mary、Hidi, Suzanne、Berndorff, Dagmar(2002)。Interest, Learning, and the Psychological Processes That Mediate Their Relationship。Journal of Educational Psychology，94(3)，545-561。  new window
23.Hidi, Suzanne(1990)。Interest and Its Contribution as a Mental Resource for Learning。Review of Educational Research，60(4)，549-571。  new window
24.Hidi, S.、Harackiewicz, J. M.(2000)。Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century。Review of Educational Research，70(2)，151-179。  new window
25.Furtak, E. M.(2006)。The problem with answers: An exploration of guided scientific inquiry teaching。Science Education，90(3)，453-467。  new window
26.Marx, J. G.、Honeycutt, K. A.、Clayton, S. R.、Moreno, N. P.(2006)。The Elizabeth Towns incident: An inquiry-based approach to learning anatomy developed through high school-university collaboration。American Biology Teacher，68(3)，140-147。  new window
27.Palmer, D. H.(2005)。A motivational view of constructivist-informed teaching。International Journal of Science Education，27(15)，1853-1881。  new window
28.Park, J.、Jang, K. A.、Kim, I.(2009)。An analysis of the actual processes of physicists' research and the implications for teaching scientific inquiry in school。Research in Science Education，39(1)，111-129。  new window
29.Park Rogers, Meredith A.、Abell, Sandra K.(2008)。The design, enactment, and experience of inquiry-based instruction in undergraduate science education: A case study。Science Education，92(4)，591-607。  new window
30.Roberts, L. F.、Wassersug, R. J.(2009)。Does doing scientific research in high school correlate with students staying in science? A half-century retrospective study。Research in Science Education，39(2)，251-256。  new window
31.Shiland, T. W.(2002)。Reply to Pushkin。Science Education，86(2)，167-170。  new window
32.Baumgartner, E.、Zabin, C.(2008)。A case study of project-based instruction in the ninth grade: A semester-long study of intertidal biodiversity。Environmental Education Research，14(2)，97-114。  new window
33.Drayton, B.、Falk, J.(2006)。Dimensions that shape teacher-scientist collaborations for teacher enhancement。Science Education，90(4)，734-761。  new window
34.Singer, J.、Marx, R. W.、Krajcik, J.、Chambers, J. C.(2000)。Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform。Educational Psychologist，35(3)，165-178。  new window
35.Thompson, S. L.、Collins, A.、Metzgar, V.、Joeston, M. D.、Shepherd, V.(2002)。Exploring graduate-level scientists’ participation in a sustained K-12 teaching collaboration。School Science and Mathematics，102(6)，254-265。  new window
36.Tsai, C.-C.(2003)。Taiwanese science students’ and teachers’ perceptions of the laboratory learning environments: Exploring epistemological gaps。International Journal of Science Education，25(7)，847-860。  new window
37.Uitto, A.、Juuti, K.、Lavonen, J.、Meisalo, V.(2006)。Students’ interest in biology and their out-of-school experiences。Journal of Biological Education，40(3)，124-129。  new window
38.Zachos, P.、Hick, T. L.、Doane, W. E. J.、Sargent, C.(2000)。Setting theoretical and empirical foundations for assessing scientific inquiry and discovery in educational programs。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，37(9)，938-962。  new window
39.Zion, M.、Shapira, D.、Slezak, M.、Link, E.、Bashan, N.、Brumer, M.、et al.(2004)。Biomind -- A new biology curriculum that enables authentic inquiry learning。Journal of Biological Education，38(2)，59-67。  new window
學位論文
1.謝莉文(2005)。鷹架式科學探究課程研發與實踐的個案研究。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北巿。  延伸查詢new window
2.凌美璦(2006)。專題講座對於高中學生科學學習之研究。國立彰化師範大學，彰化巿。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Lawson, A. E.(1995)。Science teaching and development of thinking。Belmont, CA：Wadsworth。  new window
2.Hinrichsen, J.,、Jarrett, D.(1999)。Science inquiry for the classroom: A literature review。Portland, OR：Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory。  new window
3.Bell, P.、Lewenstein, B.、Shouse, A. W.、Feder, M. A.(2009)。Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits。Washington, DC：National Academy of Sciences。  new window
4.Etheredge, S.、Rudnitsky, A.(2003)。Introducing students to scientific inquiry: How do we know what we know?。Boston：Allyn & Bacon。  new window
5.Bransford, John D.、Brown, A. L.、Cocking, R. R.(1999)。How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school。Washington, DC：National Academy Press。  new window
6.Creswell, John W.(1998)。Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions。Sage Publications。  new window
7.National Research Council(1996)。National Science Education Standards。Washington, DC：National Academy Press。  new window
8.National Research Council(2000)。Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards。Washington, DC：National Academy Press。  new window
9.Patton, Michael Q.(2002)。Qualitative evaluation and research methods。Sage Publications。  new window
10.Hogan, K.、Fisherkeller, J.(2000)。Dialogue as data: Assessing students’ scientific reasoning with interactive protocols。Assessing science understanding: A human constructivist view \\ J. J. Mintzes ; J. H. Wandersee ; J. D. Novak (Eds.)。San Diego, CA。  new window
11.Lunetta, V. N.、Hofstein, A.、Clough, M. P.(2007)。Learning and teaching in the school science laboratory: An analysis of research, theory, and practice。Handbook of research on science education \\ S. K. Abell ; N. G. Lederman (Eds.)。Mahwah, NJ。  new window
12.Anderson, R. D.(2007)。Inquiry as on organizing theme for science curricula。Handbook of research on science education \\ S. K. Abell ; N. G. Lederman (Eds.)。Mahwah, NJ。  new window
其他
1.National Science Teachers Association.(2004)。Scientific inquiry & education -- NSTA position statements: Scientific inquiry。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：608（臺灣：581，外國：27） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2178223 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67980307
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上