:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:多元化訓練模式英文口語教學成效之探究--以輔仁大學大一英文課程為例
書刊名:輔仁外語學報:語言學、文學、文化
作者:鄭愛倫
作者(外文):Cheng, Ellen
出版日期:2012
卷期:9
頁次:頁127-154
主題關鍵詞:英文口語訓練全英語授課以學生為中心網路教學平臺教學助理Communicative EnglishEnglish only instructionConstructivismE-learning platformTeaching assistant
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:137
  • 點閱點閱:90
臺灣大學生英文口語能力普遍下降,許多大學四年只有大一英文課。想要在有限授課時間、大班教學、「聽說讀寫」樣樣兼顧侷限下,加強學生英文口語訓練,是大學英語教學的一大挑戰。本研究在「教學卓越計畫:教材設計與發展」的協助下進行,試圖對上述問題提出有效的教學策略。本研究旨在探討結合「全英語授課、網路教學平臺、教學助理」多元化訓練模式實際應用在大一英文課「英文口語訓練」上的成效。研究方法在量的方面採用量表問卷調查,在質的方面採用錄影訪談、開放式問卷調查等,深入瞭解學生的學習態度與心得,進而探討本教學研究計畫學生的接受度與可行性。研究結果發現學生對加強本身英文及口語能力有強烈的需求與動機。高達95%學生認同「全英語授課」,並表達教師口語示範及訓練的重要性。「網路教學平臺」功能設計是否符合教學需求,以及多媒體影音輔佐教材的選擇是否能引起學生學習興趣均悠關其成敗。教學助理英語能力、教學技巧及網路教學平臺的訓練至為重要,專業能力與親善態度是影響其成功與否的關鍵,因同儕心理「親善態度」尤其重要。最後,本研究建議:(一)依據期末學習問卷及訪問調查,高達80%學生表示自己英文口語有進,本教學研究或可成為語言教學的參考。(二)未來可延伸對象至全國各大學做全校性研究,相信將有助於各大學未來制定大一英文課程的目標與方向。(三)建議後續研究可就「全英語授課、網路教學平臺、教學助理」三變項進行擴充以建立更完整與精確的教學方向。
Taiwan's college students' communicative English ability is gradually declining. However, many universities only offer a one-year Freshman English course for the students. When encountering the following three obstacles of 1) limited class hours, 2) a large class, and 3) required instruction of the four language learning skills of ”listening, speaking, reading, and writing,” the attempt to improve students' communicative English has become a difficult task. This research project combined the multi-method teaching strategies of ”English Only, E-Learning Platform, and Teaching Assistant” to form a teaching research project and designed a teaching method. With financial assistance from the Ministry of Education's ”Teaching Excellence Project,” this research project utilized the teaching method for one year in the hopes of finding a solution to the problem. To find out more about the views and feedbacks of students' learning, this research project applied both quantitative research which involved student learning questionnaires, and qualitative research which involved TA open-ended teaching questionnaires, taped face-face interviews, etc. This research project found that the application of this multi-method of ”English Only, E-Learning Platform, and Teaching Assistant” to the Freshman English class in order to improve students' communicative ability was very successful. According to the conducted surveys, 80% of students claimed that they had made progress with their communicative English ability. The positive result of this teaching research project might provide language teachers with a different perspective for future language teaching.
期刊論文
1.張武昌(20060400)。臺灣的英語教育:現況與省思。教育資料與研究,69,129-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.江宜樺(20050900)。從博雅到通識:大學教育理念的發展與現況。政治與社會哲學評論,14,37-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.吳京玲、李信(20090600)。大學專業與通識課程運用教學助理之成效與影響因素分析。通識教育學刊,3,67-96。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.李采洪、費國禎(2002)。大陸勤奮潮會不會淹沒富裕臺灣的下一代?。商業周刊,788,92-100。  延伸查詢new window
5.崔林(2005)。外語聽力課堂活動的設計原則。遼寧師範大學學報,28(2),69-72。  延伸查詢new window
6.楊少强(2002)。六三%教授:臺灣大學生比十年前差。商業周刊,21-34。  延伸查詢new window
7.De Guerrero, Maria M.、Olga S. Villamil.(2000)。Activating the ZPD: Mutual Scaffolding in L2 Peer Revision。The Modern Language Journal,84(1),51-68。  new window
8.Massi, Maria P.、Adriana G. Merino.(1996)。Films and EFL: What’s Playing in Language Classroom?。English Teaching Forum,34(1),20-23。  new window
9.Moust, Jos H. C.、Henk G.. Schmidt.(1994)。Facilitating Small Group Learning: a Comparison of Student and Staff Tutors’ Behavior。Instructional Science,22,287-301。  new window
10.Parker, C. C.(2002)。Neither Fish nor Fowl? The Perceived Benefits Problems of Using Graduate Teaching Assistants (GTAs) to Teach Undergraduate Students。High Education Review,35(1),30-42。  new window
會議論文
1.李文瑞(2003)。全國各大專院校普設英語畢業門檻標準之省思。高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黃祺婷(2009)。教學助理在數位學習平台運作成效之探究。長榮大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳煌珍(2009)。大學教學助理之探究。國立嘉義大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.高震峰(2002)。藝術與人文建構式教學取向 : 超廣度與超深度。新課程建構式教學理論與實踐 : 語文.社會.藝術與人文.綜合活動。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳年興、楊錦潭(2006)。數位學習:理論與實務。臺北:博碩文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hadley, Alice Omaggio(2001)。Teaching language in context。Boston:Heinle & Heinle。  new window
4.Krashen, Steven D.、Terrell, Tracy D.(1983)。The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom。New York:McGraw Hill。  new window
5.鄒景平、陳旻萃、陳欣舜、蕭涵云、張淑萍、蔡德祿、廖致凱、黃進烽(2003)。數位學習最佳指引。臺北市:資策會教育訓練處。  延伸查詢new window
6.Larsen-Freeman, Diane(1986)。Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching。Oxford University Press。  new window
7.張雪梅(1999)。大學教育對學生的衝擊--我國大學生校園經驗與學習成果之實證研究。台北市:張老師文化。  延伸查詢new window
8.黄自來(1993)。應用語言學與語言教學。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
9.Griffee, Dale T.(1992)。Songs in Action。London:Prentice Hall International Ltd.。  new window
10.吳舜文(2002)。建構主義運用於音樂教學之理念與做法。新課程建構式教學理論與實踐 : 語文.社會.藝術與人文.綜合活動。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(2010)。大學考試入學分發委員會99學年統計資料,http://www.jbcrc.edu.tw/left-11.htm, 20101212。  延伸查詢new window
2.(2006)。教育部顧問室個別型通識教育改進計畫活動特刊,http://www3.nccu.edu.tw/~cyberlin/index.htm, 20101212。  延伸查詢new window
3.盧令婕,吳蕙宇,索賀(2007)。國中一綱多本的探討,http://www.shs.edu.tw/works/essay/2007/10/2007103116545723.pdf, 20120225。  延伸查詢new window
4.盧羿廷(2007)。正視大學生素質問題--從大專校院教師觀點來看,https://www.cher.ntnu,edu.tw/epaperi/topics/nindex2.php?no=10。  延伸查詢new window
5.楊聰榮(2002)。香港三語兩文政策值得參考,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
6.嚴文廷(2010)。臺大新老師要能全英語授課,http://mag.udn.com/mag/campus/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=272870, 20120525。  延伸查詢new window
7.邱瓊平(2005)。What Is Watch?程振隆:65萬技職生連國中程度都沒有,http://news.yam.com/ettoday/garden/200510/20051026452731.html, 20060103。  延伸查詢new window
8.Arizona Department of Education(2004)。The Effects of Bilingual Education Programs and Structured English Immersion Programs on Student Achievement: A Large-Scale Comparison,http://epsl.asu.edu/epru/articles/EPRU-0408-66-OWI.pdf, 20120500。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE