臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：環境議題教學提升國小學生科學素養之硏究：以太陽能電池議題為例
書刊名：環境教育研究
作者：謝憶芳／劉湘瑤 引用關係／陳冠利
作者(外文)：Hsieh, Yi-fang／Liu, Shiang-yao／Chen, Kuan-li
出版日期：2013
卷期：10:1
頁次：頁35-64
主題關鍵詞：太陽能電池；科學素養；議題教學；Solar cell；Scientific literacy；Issue-based teaching
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:105
  • 點閱點閱:160
本研究之主要目的為探討「太陽能電池知多少？」之環境議題的教學前後，國小六年級學生之能源相關概念與科學素養的變化。參與學生是宜蘭市某國小六年級的兩個班級學生，共計65名學童。研究工具主要包含兩份問卷：一份為科學素養量表（稱為3C素養），用以了解學生科學能力素養、自信素養與合作素養的表現；另一份為太陽能電池知識問卷，檢測學生對於能源、電池、太陽能、節能減碳等面向的瞭解。分析結果顯示，在教學後，學生之能源、電池、太陽能的概念有顯著的提升，但對節能減碳的認知則無顯著提升；科學素養向度中，僅自信素養有顯著的差異。進一步分析學生自然科學業成績與3C素養表現，發現具有顯著之相關性；在教學後，高分組學生在自信素養方面具有顯著之差異，而低分組學生則在科學能力素養與自信素養方面具有顯著之差異。研究結果建議，議題教學可以提供合作學習的機會，進而有效提升學生的科學素養，特別是對自然科學習成就較低者最為明顯。
The purpose of this study was to explore sixth graders' performances of scientific literacy and energy-related content knowledge before and after the teaching activities, which involved an environmental issue about solar cell technology and its impact on environment. A total of 65 students from a school in Yilan County participated in this study. Two questionnaires were distributed to the students as pre- and post-tests. The first questionnaire was to assess students' scientific literacy on three constructs: Competency, Confidence, and Cooperation (as known as 3C literacy). The other questionnaire was to examine students' concepts about energy and solar cell. Results indicated that students' scientific concepts of energy and solar cell, as well as the literacy dimension of Confidence, were significantly improved after the teaching activities. It was also found that students' 3C literacy scores correlated with their GPAs of science courses. Students with higher GPAs of science showed a significant improvement on Confidence literacy, while those with low GPAs made significant progress in both Competency and Confidence literacy. This study suggests that issue-based environmental teaching could offer a cooperative learning environment, which is particularly effective in improving scientific literacy of low achievers.
期刊論文
1.Wellington, J.(1991)。Newspaper Science, School Science: Friends or Enemies?。International Journal of Science Education，13(4)，363-372。  new window
2.Gale, S. F.(2008)。深度檢視太陽能面板製造的需求。半導體科技，75。  延伸查詢new window
3.王靜如、周金燕、蔡瑞芬(20060300)。國小教師科學教學基準系列報導(2)--科學本質與科學探究。屏東教大科學教育，23，3-17。  延伸查詢new window
4.許良榮(19910800)。科學素養﹣﹣一個爭議中的論題。國教輔導，30(6)，58-63。  延伸查詢new window
5.許素(2002)。培育國小高年級學童科學探究能力--製作科學展覽的經驗與反省。現代教育論壇，7，679-686。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.李麗菁、劉湘瑤(20060900)。國小教師對爭論性環境議題之抉擇制定。環境教育研究，4(1)，1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陳子泰(2008)。太陽能電池產業製程及污染防治簡介。環保技術e報，59，6。  延伸查詢new window
8.Barrow, L. H.、Germann, P.(1987)。Acid rain education and its implications for curricular development: A teacher survey。Science Education，7(1)，15-20。  new window
9.Chang, Huey-por、Chen, Chin-chang、Guo, Gwo-jen、Cheng, Yeong-jin、Lin, Chen-yung、Jen, Tsung-hau(20111000)。The Development of a Competence Scale for Learning Science: Inquiry and Communication。International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education，9(5)，1213-1233。  new window
10.Krogman, N. T.、Darlington, J. D.(1996)。Sociology and the environment: An analysis of journal coverage。The American Sociologist，27(3)，39-55。  new window
11.Patronis, T.、Potari, D.、Spiliotopoulou, V.(1999)。Students' argumentation in decision-makingon a socio-scientific issue: implications for teaching。International Journal of Science Education，21(7)，745-754。  new window
12.Solomon, J.(1990)。The discussion of social issues in the science classroom。Science Education，18，105-126。  new window
13.Korpan, C. A.、Bisanz, G. L.、Henderson, J. M.、Bisanz, J.(1997)。Assessing Literacy in Science: Evaluation of Scientific News Briefs。Science Education，81(5)，515-532。  new window
14.Zeidler, D. L.、Sadler, T. D.(2004)。The Morality of Socioscientific Issues: Construal and Resolution of Genetic Engineering Dilemmas。Science Education，88(1)，4-27。  new window
15.Kolstø, Stein D.(2001)。Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues。Science Education，85(3)，291-310。  new window
16.Pantiz, T.(1999)。The motivational benefits of cooperative learning。New Directions for Teaching and Learning，78，59-67。  new window
17.汪靜明(20000900)。學校環境教育的理念與原理。環境教育季刊，43，18-34。  延伸查詢new window
18.許民陽、王郁軒、梁添水、鄭紹龍(20010300)。國小運用STS教學模式--天象與時空概念教學模組之探討。科學教育學刊，9(1)，79-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.許世璋(20010400)。我們真能教育出可解決環境問題的公民嗎？--論環境教育與環境行動。中等教育，52(2)，52-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.黃朝恩(19951000)。環境議題分析與教學。環境教育季刊，27，20-33。  延伸查詢new window
21.Oulton, C.、Dillon, J.、Grace, M. M.(2004)。Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues。International Journal of Science and Education，26(4)，411-423。  new window
22.Pedretti, E.(1999)。Decision making and STS education: Exploring scientific knowledge and social responsibility in schools and science centers through an issues-based approach。School Science and Mathematics，99(4)，174-181。  new window
23.DeBoer, G. E.(2000)。Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，37(6)，582-601。  new window
24.黃俊儒、簡妙如(20060100)。科學新聞文本的論述層次及結構分佈：構思另個科學傳播的起點。新聞學研究，86，135-170。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Driver, R.、Newton, P.、Osborne, J.(2000)。Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms。Science Education，84(3)，287-312。  new window
26.Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P.、Rodríguez, A. B.、Duschl, R. A.(2000)。"Doing the lesson" or "doing science": Argument in high school genetics。Science Education，84(6)，757-792。  new window
27.林樹聲、黃柏鴻(20090400)。國小六年級學生在社會性科學議題教學中之論證能力研究--不同學業成就學生間之比較。科學教育學刊，17(2)，111-133。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.張俊彥、翁玉華(20000300)。我國高一學生的問題解決能力與其科學過程技能之相關性研究。科學教育學刊，8(1)，35-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.Sadler, T. D.(2004)。Moral and ethical dimensions of socioscientific decision-making as integral components of scientific literacy。The Science Educator，13(1)，39-48。  new window
30.Bybee, R. W.(2008)。Scientific literacy, environmental issues, and PISA 2006: The 2008 Paul F-Brandwein lecture。Journal of Science Educational and Technology，17(6)，566-585。  new window
會議論文
1.林樹聲(2005)。國小五年級「基因改造食品」議題教學成效之研究。中華民國第21屆科學教育學術研討會。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bybee, R. W.(1997)。Achieving scientific literacy。Heinemann, NH：Portsmounth。  new window
2.呂宗昕(2009)。全面進攻奈米科技與太陽電池。台北：天下文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.經濟部工業局(2007)。半導體製程業污染防治技術。台北：經濟部。  延伸查詢new window
4.鄭湧運(2006)。促進學生3C素養--Competence, Cooperation, & Confidence科學課程發展與實施。台北：行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
5.Kouba, V. L.、Champagne, A. B.、Piscitelli, M.、Havasy, M.、White, K.、Hurley, M.(1998)。Literacy in the National Standards: Communication and reasoning。Albany：National Research Center on English Learning and Achievement。  new window
6.Langer, J. A.、Applebee, A. N.、Nystrand, M.(1995)。Technical proposal for National Research and Development Center in student learning and achievement in English。Albany：University at Albany。  new window
7.Orlich, D. C.、Kauchak, D. P.、Harder, R. J.、Pendergress , R. A.,、Callahan, R. C.、Keogh, A. J.、Kravas, C. H.(1998)。Teaching strategies: A guide to better instruction (2nd ed.。DC：Heath and Company。  new window
8.Ratcliffe, M. G.、Grace, M.(2003)。Science education for citizenship: Teaching socio-scientific issues。Maidenhead：Open University Press。  new window
9.Cohen, E. G.(1994)。Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom。New York：Teachers College, Columbia University。  new window
10.Yager, R. E.(1996)。Science/ Technology/ Society as Reform in Science Education。New York, NY：Albany：State University of New York：State University of New York。  new window
11.教育部(20030115)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要總綱。台北市：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
12.OECD(2001)。Knowledge and Skills for Life: First result from PISA 2000, Programme for International Student Assessment。Paris：OECD Publications。  new window
13.Slavin, R. E.(1994)。A practical guide to cooperative learning。Boston, Massachusetts：Allyn & Bacon。  new window
14.Johnson, D. W.、Johnson, R. T.(1999)。Learning Together And Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Needham Heights, Massachusetts：Boston：Prentice-Hall：Allyn and Bacon。  new window
15.Millar, R.、Osborne, J. F.(1998)。Beyond 2000: Science education for the future。London：King's College London School of Education。  new window
16.National Research Council(1996)。National Science Education Standards。Washington, DC：National Academy Press。  new window
17.Wessel, M. R.(1980)。Science and Conscience。New York, NY：Columbia University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Pedretti, E.(2003)。Teaching science, technology, society and environment (STSE) education。The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education。Netherlands：Springer。  new window
2.Aikenhead, G. S.(1990)。Scientific/ Technological Literacy, Critical Reasoning, and Classroom Practice。Foundations of Literacy Policy in Canada。Calgary：Detselig。  new window
3.Aikenhead, G. S.(1994)。What is STS science teaching?。STS education: International perspectives on reform。New York：Teachers College Press。  new window
4.Erickson, Frederick(1986)。Qualitative methods in research on teaching。Handbook of research on teaching。New York：Macmillan。  new window
5.林樹聲(2004)。重視自然與生活科技學習領域中科技爭議議題的融入與探討。國民中小學九年一貫課程理論基礎。臺北：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：886（臺灣：879，外國：7） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2111296 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67905991
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上