李贄於《世說新語補》評點別於傳統注疏，以「無味」或「大無味」為評點語，或能從主觀、個人性探討可能原因及效用。筆者藉「視域融合」思維，嘗試論述李贄在《世說補》以「無味」展現其主觀評點，或能發現《世說補》所錄之事為其例證及思維之展示。李贄的評點語，可能是為了建構別於以往的閱讀批判，期待閱讀受眾「建立虛擬的對話空間」並「重構思考模式」。本文將藉學者研究成果並對典籍進行對校及確認，掌握李贄「無味」評語並考察，將據以下論述：一、以「味」評點：「無味」、「無大味」、「大無味」；二、評點語效用：無味層次；三、可能意義：批判與重構。

Li Zhi's commentary for ＂Shi Shuo Xin Yu Bu＂ is different from traditional annotations. Using ＂tasteless＂ or ＂big tasteless＂ as a commentary he explored possible causes and effects from subjective and personal. By using the ＂fusion of horizons＂ thinking, the author try to discuss that Li Zhi's tasteless commentary for ＂Shi Shuo Xin Yu Bu＂ showed his subjective comments and may find out what is recorded in ＂Shi Shu Bu＂ as an example and a demonstration of his thoughts. Li Zhi's commentary might construct a different reading critique from the past expecting readers to ＂create a virtual dialogue space＂ and ＂reconstruct the thinking mode＂. This article would discuss by the scholar's research results reviewing and confirming the classics. The author assume Li Zhi's ＂tasteless＂ comments and inspections, and the article would discuss as follows: first, the comment about ＂taste＂: ＂tasteless＂, ＂no big taste＂, ＂big tasteless＂; second, comment language utility: tasteless level; third, possible meaning: criticism and reconstruction.