:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:利用現實治療法改變犯罪少年自我觀念之實驗研究
書刊名:輔導學報
作者:吳秀碧
出版日期:1982
卷期:5
頁次:頁17-52
主題關鍵詞:犯罪少年自我觀念治療法
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:252
  • 點閱點閱:53
本研究主要目的,在以實驗方法觀察現實治療法改變犯罪少年自我觀念之一般情形。 本研究採用實驗組控制組隨機抽樣前後測設計,以實驗組9名犯罪少年與控制組11名犯罪少年在「田納西自我概念量表」上前測與後測反應,以便比較前測兩組的分數和後測兩組的分數,並比較控制組前後測分數以及實驗組前後測分數。 研究結果發現: (1) 控制組前測與後測分數之比較,其差異未達顯著水準;(2) 實驗組前測與後測分數之比較,除生理自我、社會自我、自我批評三項外,餘七項均後測顯著優於前測;(3) 在前測控制組與實驗組分數之比較,除自我批評一項外,其餘九項之平均數,控制組均高於實驗組,並有心理自我和自我認同兩項,控制組顯著優於實驗組。然而在後測控制組與實驗組分數之比較,於剔除前測分數的影響力,調整兩組後測各項分數的平均數後,除生理自我和自我批評兩項外,其餘八項之平均數,實驗組均高於控制組,並有心理自我、自我認同和自我總分等三項分數,實驗組顯著高於控制組。基於以上發現,顯然現實治療對犯罪少年自我觀念具有正向治療效用。
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of reality therapy on the self-concept of institutionalized juvenile delinquents. An experimental study was designed in which 3P juvenile delinquents who were in Tai- Jong Reformatory participated in one of two groups by randomly drawn. The treatment group received reality therapy, while the control group had no treatment at all. All subjects were pre and post-tested on the Tennessee Self Concept Scale ( TSCS ). Gain scores were computed and analyses of variance performed on the ten variables of the TSCS. Results revealed that: 1) There were no significant differences among Scores of pre and post-teston the TSCS of control group. 2) On comparing pre and post -tested scores on TSCS of experimental group, scores on ME, PER, FA, ID, SA, B and TOT of post-test were significantly higher than pre-test. 3) On comparing the scores of the post-tested between two groups, Scores on PER, ID and TOT of experimental group were significantly higher than control group's. Obviously, the experimental group did achieve greater gain scores, and that changes of this group were not due to chance but to the treatment of reality therapy. Given that reality therapy did have a pasitive influence on the self-concept of juvenile delinquents, it was reconuneded that our correctional institutions of juvenile delinquents seek to implement reality therapy as an effective correctional method. Also recommeded were follow up studies utilizing reality therapy. Lastly, researchers were encouraged to continue exploration of this treatment plans for juvenile delinquents.
期刊論文
1.蔡滄波(19801200)。從機構處遇的功能談青少年犯罪的矯治。警學叢刊,11(2),62-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Omwake, K. T.(1954)。The relation between acceptance of self and acceptance of others shown by three personality inventories。Journal of Consulting Psychology,18(6),443-446。  new window
3.Reese, H. W.(1961)。Relationships between self-acceptance and sociometric choices。Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,62,472-474。  new window
4.Truax, C. B.、Suhuldt, W. J.、Wargo, D. G.(1968)。Self-ideal concept congruence and improvement in Psychotherapy。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,32,47-53。  new window
5.吳秀碧(19810600)。父母管教態度與犯罪少年自我觀念之關係。輔導學報,4,135-158。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Caplin, A. D.、Holtzman, W. H.(1957)。Adjustment and the discrepancy between parental acceptance and adjustment of children。Child Development,28,65-67。  new window
7.陳漢亭(19771200)。如何發揮少年監獄的矯正功能?。警學叢刊,8(2),22-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Chassin, L.、Presson, C. C.、Young, R. D.、Light, R.(1981)。Self-Concepts of Institutionalized adolescents: A Framework for Conceptualizing Labeling Effects。Journal of Abnormal Psychology,90(2),143-151。  new window
9.Helper, M. M.(1958)。Parental Evaluation of Children and Children's Self-Evaluation。Journal of abnormal and Social Psychology,56,190-194。  new window
10.Lee, W. S.(1970)。Human Relations Training for Teachers; The Effectiveness of Sensitivity Training。California Journal of Educational Research,21,28-34。  new window
11.謝廣全(19790500)。少年犯與非少年犯人格因素及父母管教態度之比較研究。輔導學報,2,39-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Eckstein, D. G.(1973)。An Investigation of Self-Concept Differences and the Use of Group Counseling with Incarcerated and Nonincarcerated Juvenile Delinquents。The Annual Meeting of the American Personnel and Guidance Association。San Diego, California。  new window
研究報告
1.內政部警政署、刑事警察局(1981)。六十九年台灣刑案統計。  延伸查詢new window
2.內政部警政署(1981)。台灣省警務統計分析。  延伸查詢new window
3.Mayyotte, A. C.(1975)。Effects of a group Counseling Model on Self-concept and related variables with Adult members of Disadvantaged Families. An affective Evaluation Study。  new window
學位論文
1.何秀珠(1981)。女性少年犯輔導效果研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣教育學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.魏渭堂(1981)。12-16歲男性少年犯輔導效果研究(碩士論文)。國立台灣教育學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.Strickland, T.(1980)。Modifying Delinquent Adolescent Affective Responses Related to Self-Perception and the use of Drugs through a Temporary Group Experience(博士論文)。University of Kentucky。  new window
圖書
1.Glasser, W.(1965)。Reality therapy。New York:Harper & Row。  new window
2.馬傳鎮(1978)。台灣地區犯罪少年與一般少年之比較研究:人格特質及父母管教態度之差異。中國行為科學社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Trojanowicz, R. C.(1973)。Juvenile Delinquency: Concepts and Control。NJ:Prentice-Hall。  new window
4.Lieberman, Morton A.、Yalom, Irvin D.、Miles, Matthew B.(1973)。Encounter groups: First facts。New York:Basic Books。  new window
5.Gazda, G. M.(1977)。Basic approaches to group psychotherapy and group counseling。Springfield, Ill.:Charles C. Thomas。  new window
6.Trotzer, J. P.(1977)。The Counselor and The Group: Integrating Theory, Training, and Practice。Monterey, Calif.:Brooks/Cole。  new window
7.Glasser, W.、Iverson, N.(1966)。Reality Therapy in Large Group Counseling。Los Angeles:The Reality Press。  new window
8.Fitts, H.、Hamner, W. T.(1969)。The Self Concept of Delinquenc。Nashville:Counselor Recording and Tests。  new window
9.Glasser, W.(1975)。The Identity Society。William Glasser, Inc.。  new window
10.Griffin, B. S.、Griffin, C. T.(1978)。Juvenile Delinquency in Perspective。Harper and Row。  new window
11.Hansen, J. C.、Stevie, R. R.、Warner, R. W.(1978)。Counseling: Theory and Process。Allyn and Bacon, Inc.。  new window
12.Reckless, W. C.(1967)。The Crime Problem。New York:Appleton Century Crofts。  new window
13.Sandhu, H. S.(1977)。Juvenile Delinquency: Causes, Control, and Prevention。Gregg Division / McGowan-Hill Book Company。  new window
14.Rogers, C.、Dymond, Rosolind F.(1964)。Psychotherapy and Personality。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。  new window
15.郭為藩(1972)。自我心理學。台南:開山書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.McRace, B. S.(1972)。The Comparative Effects of two Counseling Treatments on Sixth. Grade Students with Low Self Concept。  new window
圖書論文
1.Glasser, W.、Zunin, L. M.(1973)。Reality therapy。Current psychotherapies。Illinois:F. E. Peacock。  new window
2.Glasser, W.(1965)。Reality therapy: A realistic approach to the young offender。Reading in delinguency and treatment。University of Southern California。  new window
3.Kaltenbach, R. F.、Gazda, G. M.(1977)。Reality Therapy in Groups。Basic Approaches to Group Psychotherapy and Group Counseling。Springfield, Illinois:Charles C. Thomas Publisher。  new window
4.Sarbin, T. R.(1969)。The Scientific Status of the mental Illness metaphor。Changing Perspectives in mental Illness。New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston。  new window
5.Trozter, J. R.(1972)。Group Counseling: Process and Perspective。Guidelines for Pupil Services。Madison:Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction。  new window
6.林邦傑(1980)。田納西自我概念量表。田納西自我概念量表指導手冊。臺北:正昇。  延伸查詢new window
7.Bebout, J.、Gordon, B.(1972)。The value of encounter。New perspectives on encounter groups。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE