參考文獻
中文部份
1.王天佑,黃芳銘(1999),「對中大學生環境認知、態度與行為研究調查」,中大社會人文學報,8,189-216。
2.王姵琪(2000), 西門徒步空間改造與網絡整合,台灣大學園藝研究所碩論。
3.台北市都市發展局(民83年10月20日),「台北市徒步區闢建及管理維護辦法」,台北市政府。民93年9月29日,取自http://www.planning.taipei.gov.tw/5/501/
50101/551.htm。
4.呂玉琪(1995),方向和距離與認知地圖之關係,中正大學心理學系碩論。
5.李永展(1980),「認知圖與偏好矩陣─環境心理學研究方法之介紹」,國立台灣大學城鄉研究學報,5(1)。6.李永展(1998),都市服務設施認知與設施意象圖之研究,政治大學地政學系,國科會研究報告(NSC87-2415-H-004-016)。
7.李素馨、蘇群超(1999),「大坑登山步道遊憩環境與選擇行為關係之研究」,戶外遊憩研究,12(4),21-24。8.林欽榮(1986),「行人的天地─西門徒步區構想」,都市交通月刊,3,5-9。9.胡幼慧(1994),質化研究─理論、方法及本土女性研究實例,心理出版社,台北。
10.胡凱傑(2003),以知覺價值模式為基礎探討汽車客運業乘客再搭乘意願之影響因素,交通大學運輸科技與管理學系博論。
11. Babbie, E. 著,李美華等譯,1998,社會科學研究方法,初版,時英出版社,台北。
12. Maxwell, J. A. 著,高熏芳等譯(2001),質化研究設計─一種互動取向的方法,初版,心理出版社,台北。
13.陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵(2003),多變量分析方法─統計軟體應用,初版,五南出版社,台北。
14.陳格理(1999),「圖書館尋路工作之理念與設計」,中國圖書館學會會報,62,119-134。15.陳墀吉(1997),世新學院校園地方偏好之研究,中國文化大學地理學系地理研究報告,10,78-99。
16.陳婷妤(2000),街道物件促進商業空間溝通活化之研究─以台北市西門町行人徒步區空間為例,東海工業設計研究所碩論。
17.陳順宇(2000),多變量分析,第二版,華泰書局,台北。
18.畢恆達(2001),“環境心理學”上課講義,未出版,台灣大學城鄉研究所。
19.溫日宏(1995),新市鎮人行步道系統規劃與設計之研究─以高雄新市鎮綜合示範社區為例,交大交通運輸研究所碩論。
20.黃芳銘(2002),結構方程模式理論與應用,初版,五南圖書,台北。
21.黃俊杰(1999),都市人行道界面組成型態對行人知覺影響之研究,台大園藝研究所碩論。22.黃富瑜(1998),淡水捷運使用者對沿線景觀知覺與偏好之探討,台大園藝研究所碩論。
23.張文峰(2000),以使用者行為的觀點探討都市公共空間─以台北市西門行人徒步區為例,中華大學建築與都市計畫研究所碩論。
24.曾國雄、鄧振源(1984),多變量分析(I)─理論應用篇,初版,華泰書局,台北。
25.馮正民、林楨家、邱裕鈞(2001)「交通運輸與都市區域之研究方法與發展」區域研究及人文地理學門【研究方法及資料庫運用】研討會,行政院國科會人文及社會科學發展處。
26.董娟鳴、楊致祥(2003),「西門徒步區步行者個體空間決策模式之探討」,2003設計學術研究成果研討會,台北:中華民國設計學會。
27.董娟鳴(2004),「西門徒步區步行者個體空間選擇影響因素之初探」,中華技術學院36週年校慶論文發表會:土木建築類組論文,(pp.1-11),中華技術學院編,台北。
28.董娟鳴、馮正民、邊泰明(2002),「影響都市行人徒步區使用者空間認知因素
之研究」,國科會獎勵技職院校應用先期研究計畫(計畫編號:NSC 91-2626-H-157-001)。
29.董娟鳴、馮正民、邊泰明(2004),「都市行人徒步區步行者找路判斷影響因素之分析」,建築學報,47,1-14。
30.董娟鳴、馮正民、邊泰明(2004),「徒步區步行者空間認知對活動點空間選擇之影響分析」,戶外遊憩研究,17(2),69-95。31.董娟鳴、馮正民、邊泰明(2004),「徒步區步行者空間認知對路徑選擇影響之研究」,都市與計畫,31(3),269-291。32.潘榮傑(1999),都市意象之研究─以台北西門町地區為例,台灣科技大學工程技術研究所碩論。
33.鄭昭明(1993),認知心理學理論與實踐,97年9月修定三刷,桂冠出版社,台北。34.蕭秀玲、莊慧秋、黃漢耀譯(1991),環境心理學,初版,心理出版社,台北。
英文部分
35. Allen, G. L. (1999). Spatial abilities, cognitive map, and wayfinding. In R.G. Golledge (ed.), Wayfinding behavior , Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press., 46-80.
36. Amorim, M. A. (1999). A neurocognitive approach to human navigation. In R.G. Golledge (ed.), Wayfinding behavior , Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press., 152-167.
37. Anderson, J. C. and Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommend two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103, 411-423.
38. Axelord, R. (1976), Structure of decision─The cognitive map of political elites, London: Princeton university press.
39. Banerjee, T. and Southworth, M. (ed.) (1991), City sence and city design─Writing and projects of Kevin Lynch, Cambridge:The MIT press.
40. Borgers, A. W. J. and Timmermans, H. J. P. (1986). A model of pedestrian route choice and demand for retail facilities within Inner-City shopping area. Geographical analysis, 18(2), 115-128.
41. Borgers, A. W. J. and Timmermans, H. J. P. (1986). City centre entry points, store location patterns and pedestrian route choice behaviour: a microlevel simulation model, Socio-economic planning sciences ,20, 25-31.
42. Borgers, A. W. J. and Timmermans, H. J. P. (1987). A model of pedestrian route choice and demand for retail facilities within Inner-City shopping area. Geographical analysis, 18(2),115-128.
43. Cornell, E. H., Donald H. and Alberts, D. M. (1994). Place recognition and way finding by children and adults. Memory and cognition, 22(6), 633-643.
44. Downs, R. M. and Stea, D. (1973). Theory. In R.M. Downs and D. Stea, Eds., Image and environment. Chicago: Aldine press, 1-7.
45. Freksa, C., Habel, C. and Wender, K.F. (ed.) (1998). Spatial cognition- an interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge. Berlin: Springer-Verlag press.
46. Gärling, T., Book, A., and Lindberg, E. (1986). Spatial orientation and wayfinding in the designed environment:A conceptual analysis and some suggestions for post occupancy evaluation. Journal of architectural and planning research, 3(3), 55-64.
47. Gärling, T. (1989). The role of cognitive maps in spatial decisions. Journal of environmental psychology, 9, 269-278.
48. Gärling, T., Karlsson, N., Romanus J., and Selart, M. (1997). Influences of the past on choice on the future. In R. Ranyard, R. Crozier, and O. Sevenson(eds.), Decision making:Models and explanations, London: Routledge,167-188.
49. Gärling, T. (1999). Human information processing in sequential spatial choice. In R.G. Golledge (ed.). Wayfinding behavior, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 81-98.
50. Gerbing, D.W. and Anderson, J.C (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment, Journal of Marketing research, Vol. XXV ,186-192.
51. Golledge, R.G. (1999). Human wayfinding and cognitive map. In R.G. Golledge (ed.), Wayfinding behavior, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins university press, 5-45.
52. Golledge, R.G. (ed.) (1999). Wayfinding behavior, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
53. Hart, R.A. and Moore G.T. (1976). Extracts from the development of spatial cognition. In Proshansky, H.M., Ittelson, W. H. and Rivlin, L.G. (ed.), Environmental psychology, people and their physical settings, Holt: Rinehart and Winston press, 258-281.
54. Hatcher, L. (1994). Step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation model, 3rd, Cary :SAS Institute Inc.
55. Hayes-Roth B. , Hayes-Roth E. (1979). A cognitive model of planning. Cognitive science , 3, 275-310.
56. Hillier, B. (1996). Space is the machine. Cambridge:Cambridge university press.
57. Hirtle, S. C. and Gärling, T. (1992). Heuristic rules for sequential spatial decisions. Geoforum, 23(2), 227-238.
58. Hoogendoorn, S. P. and Bovy, P. H. L. (2004). Pedestrian route-choice and activity scheduling theory and models. Transportation research part B, 38,169-190.
59. Ingwerson, P. (1982). Research procedures in the library: analyzed from the cognitive point of view. Journal of documentation, 38, 168.
60. Kaplan and Kaplan (1981). Cognition and environment functioning in an uncertain world, Ann Arbor :Ulrich’s bookstore press.
61. Kitchin, R.M. (1994). Cognitive maps: What are they and why study them. Journal of environmental psychology, 14, 1-19.
62. Kurose, S. Borgers, A.W. J. and Timmermans, H. J. P. (2001). Classify pedestrian shopping behaviour according to implied heuristic rules. Environment and planning B, 28, 405-418.
63. Kvale, Steinar (1996). Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, Sage.
64. Lawton, C.A. (1994) Gender differences in way-finding strategies: relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex roles, 30, 765-779.
65. Lovas, G. C. (1994). Modeling and simulation of pedestrian traffic flow. Transportation research B, 28(6), 429-443.
66. Miller, H. J. (1992). Human wayfinding, environment-behavior relationships, and artificial intelligence. Journal of planning literature, 7(2), 139-149.
67. Moore, G. T. (1979). Knowing about environmental knowing: the current state of theory and research on environmental cognition. Environment and behavior, 11, 33-70.
68. Norman, D. (1988). The design of everyday things. Doubleday press.
69. Olshavsky, R. W., Mackay, D. B., and Sentell, G. (1975). Perceptual maps of supermarket locations. Journal of applied psychology , 60, 80-86.
70. Payne, J.W. , Bettman, J.R. and Johnson, E.J. (1992). The adaptive decision maker. New York : Cambridge University press.
71. Peponis, J., Ross, C. and Rashid, M. (1997).The structure of urban space, movement and co-presence: the case of Atlanta. Geoforum, 28(3-4), 341-358.
72. Prestopnik, J. L. and Roskos-Ewoldsen, B. (2000). The relations among wayfinding strategy use, sense of direction, sex, familiarity, and wayfinding ability. Journal of environmental psychology, 20, 177-191.
73. Portugali, J. (ed.) (1996). The construction of cognitive map. Dordrecht :Kluwer academics publishers.
74. Raubal, M. and Egenhofer, M. J. (1998). Comparing the complexity of wayfinding tasks in built environments, Environment and planning B, 25, 895-913.
75. Säisä, J. and Gärling, T. (1987). Sequential spatial choice in the large-scale environment. Environment and behavior, 19(5), 614-635.
76. Siegel, A.W. and White, S.H. (1975). The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments, In H. W. Reese Ed., advances in child development and behavior. Vol.10, New York: H Reese Academic Press.
77. Stea, D. and Blaut, M. (1973). Some preliminary observations on spatial learning in school children. In R.M. Downs and D. Stea, Eds., Image and environment. Chicago: Aldine, 226-234.
78. Stern, E. and Portugali, J. (1999). Environmental cognition and decision making in urban navigation. In R. G. Golledge (ed.), Wayfinding behavior, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins university press, 99-119 .
79. Timmermans, H. and Golledge, R. G. (1990). Applications of behavioural research on spatial problems ΙΙ: Preference and choice. Progress in human geography, 14, 312-353.
80. Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive map in rats and men. Psychological review, 55, 189-208.
81. Weisman, J. (1981). Evaluating architectural legibility: Wayfinding in the built environment, Environment and behavior,13, 189-204.