一、中文
丁一顧（2006）。教師進階制度規劃與實施之雛議—從教師專業發展評鑑談起。中等教育，57（5），60-73。
丁一顧（2009）。區分化教師評鑑對我國教師專業發展評鑑的啟示。中等教育，60（2），8-19。丁一顧、張德銳（2004）。美英兩國教師評鑑系統比較分析及其對我國之啟示。台北市立師範學院學報，35（2），85-100。王文科（1987）。「公立學校教職員成績考核辦法」簡評。現代教育，6，21-26。
王文科（1983）。教育研究法。台北市：五南。王如哲（2009）。英國教師評鑑及其啟示。教育研究月刊，178，130-144。.卯靜儒、陳冠蓉、蘇源恭（2007）。教學專業與教師發展—美國教師評鑑指標分析。高教發展與評估雜誌，23（5），83-95。
朱芳謀（2004）。屏東縣國小教師對教師評鑑態度之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東師範學院，屏東縣。
行政院教育改革審議委員會（1996）。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北市：行政院。
伍振鷟（1976）。聯合國文教組織關於教師地位建議案。台北市：中國教育學會。
呂木琳、張德銳（譯）（1992）。教師發展評鑑系統。（原作者：B. M. Harris, & J. Hill）。新竹市：國立新竹師範學院。（原著出版年：1982）吳和堂（2007）。教師評鑑：理論與實務。台北市：高等教育。吳和堂、李清良(2001)。高雄市國小實施教師評鑑之研究:以一所國小為例。載於國立新竹師範學院第八次教育行政論壇論文輯(頁349─360)，新竹市。
吳政達（2002）。國民中小學教師評鑑政策實施之可行性評估。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫。吳政達、洪雅琪、吳盈瑩（2009）。教師專業發展評鑑政策取向與實際作法。教育研究，178，38-46。吳清山（2004）。提昇教師素質之探究。教育研究月刊，127，5-17。吳清山、張素偵（2002）。教師評鑑：理念、挑戰與策略。載於中華民國師範教育學會（主編），師資培育的政策與檢討（177-192頁）。台北市：學富文化。李奉儒（2006）。國中小學教師評鑑機制規劃之芻議：英國的經驗與啟示。教育研究與發展期刊， 2（3），193-216。林志成（2006）。教師專業發展與評鑑的困境與對策。新竹縣教育研究集刊，6，1-48。
邱錦昌（2001）。教育視導與學校效能。台北市：元照。柯嚴賀（2001）。國民小學教師考績制度現況與改進之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
高強華（1996）。論提昇教師專業成長的「教師評鑑」。載於中國教育學會（主編），教育評鑑（247-272頁）。台北市：師大書苑。高雄市政府教育局(2000)。高雄市高級中等以下學校教師專業評鑑試行要點。高雄市：高雄市政府教育局。
秦夢群（2000）。教學導師制度實施之檢討。教學導師制度研討會論文集。台北市：臺北市立師範學院。
秦夢群（2004）。美國教育法與判例。台北市：高等教育。
秦夢群、張嘉原（2007）。中小學教師成績考核制度與問題分析。教育研究月刊， 158，115-124。國立教育資料館編（2000）。 一九九九年全國教育改革研討會會議實錄。台北市：教育部。
教育部（1995）。中華民國教育報告書—邁向二十一世紀的教育遠景。台北市：教育部。
教育部（2002）。2001年教育改革之檢討與改進建議大會結論暨建議資料彙編。台北市：教育部。
教育部（2006）。試辦中小學教師專業發展評鑑宣導手冊。台北市：教育部。
教育部（2010）。第八次全國教育會議圓滿落幕－擘劃未來10年教育發展藍圖。2011年3月20日，取自http://www.edu.tw/itemize.aspx?itemize_sn=8676&pages=0&site_content_sn=21832
教育部（2011a）。修正教師法並完備相關配套推動中小學教師評鑑。取自http://140.111.34.34/docdb/files/dma7db04160a232c0c3.pdf
教育部（2011b）。中華民國教育報告書：黃金十年、百年樹人。台北市：教育部。
教師專業發展評鑑網（2011a）。各學年度辦理校數及教師人數簡表。取自 http://tepd.moe.gov.tw/chinese/05_download/01_list.php?fy=34
教師專業發展評鑑網（2011b）。99年各縣市參與校數及人數比例分析表。取自http://tepd.moe.gov.tw/chinese/05_download/01_list.php?fy=34
教師專業發展評鑑網（2011c）。各縣市辦理學校續辦情形分析表。取自 http://tepd.moe.gov.tw/chinese/05_download/01_list.php?fy=34
張芬芬（2007）。英國教師評鑑之背景、趨勢與啟示：胡蘿蔔與棒子下的英國教師。初等教育學刊，28，1-32。張春興（1991）。張氏心理學辭典。台北：東華。
張素偵（2003）。教師評鑑重要議題與推動策略之研究。現代教育論壇，10，232-246。張素偵、林和春（2006）。面對教師專業發展評鑑試辦計畫：提升中小學教師參與誘因之研究。中等教育，57（5），36-58。張舒涵（2011年4月6日）。教師:評鑑不客觀成白色恐怖。臺灣立報。取自http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/110405/131/2p98y.html
張新仁（2004）。中小學教師教學評鑑工具之發展編制。載於潘慧玲（主編），教育評鑑回顧與展望（91-130頁）。台北市：心理出版社。
張德銳（1992）。國民小學教師評鑑之研究。新竹市：國立新竹師範學院。張德銳（1996a）。美國教育改革中的重建學校運動。載於黃正傑（主編），各國教育改革動向（47-76頁）。台北市：師大書苑。
張德銳（1996b）。國小教師成績考核系統之研究。教育研究資訊，4（5），89-99。張德銳（1997）。教學評鑑。載於黃政傑（主編），教學原理（303-339頁）。台北市：師大書苑。
張德銳（2004）。專業發展導向教師評鑑與教學導師制度芻議。師說月刊，449，6-11。
張德銳、李俊達、高紅瑛（2003）。台北市中小學教學輔導教師制度第一年試辦實施成效評鑑研究。台北市立師範學院學報，34，41-62。張德銳、丁一顧、李俊達、蔡美錦（2004）。發展性教學輔導系統手冊簡易版。台北市：台北市立師範學院。
盛宜俊（2004）。桃園縣國民小學教育人員對實施教師評鑑態度之調查研究（未出版之碩士論文）。台北市立師範學院，台北市。
郭國禎、駱芳美（2004）。教師與教學評量。教育研究月刊，127，85-92。
郭諭陵（2007）。各國的教師組織概況及其政治性。新竹教育大學教育學報，24(1)，127-152。陳玉琨（2004）。教育評鑑學。台北市：五南。
陳世佳（2004）。以教師專業成長為目標之教師評鑑。教育研究月刊，127，33-44。陳志成（2003）。教師成績考核制度之探討。教育資料與研究，54，95-102。陳伯璋（2001）。新世紀教育發展的回顧與前瞻。高雄：復文。
陳明和（2007）。法國公立中小學教師評鑑制度對我國推動教師評鑑制度之啟示。國教新知，54(1)，74-79。
陳聖謨（1997）。國小教師對教師評鑑制度態度之研究。初等教育學報，10，417-441。陳聖謨（1998）。美國教師評鑑制度的發展及其對我國的啟示。教育研究，6，175-189。
陳曉端、閏福甜（2007）。當代美國教育改革六次浪潮及其啟示。陝西師範大學學報，36(6)， 95-99。取自http://se.snnu.edu.cn/upload/chengguotuijian/chenxiaoduan1.pdf
傅木龍（1998）。英國中小學教師評鑑制度研究及其對我國之啟示（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，台北市。黃政傑（1987）。課程評鑑。台北市：師大書苑。
黃政傑（1999）。課程改革。台北市：漢文。
黃政傑（2004）。建立教師專業評鑑制度。師友月刊，447，12-16。
黃德祥、劉欣虹（2010）。美國中小學教師評鑑之政策分析。教育研究月刊，192，101-115。黃德祥、薛秀宜（2004）。教師評鑑的模式與發展趨勢。教育研究月刊，127，18-32。楊思偉、沈珊珊（1996）。比較教育。台北縣：國立空中大學。
楊思偉（2007）。比較教育。台北市：心理。
湯家偉（譯）（2007）。教師專業評鑑（原作者：C. Danielson, & T. L. McGreal）。台北市: 高等教育。（原著出版年：2000）
湯誌龍（2001）。中小學教師評鑑度之研究－澳洲維多利亞省的實施經驗。比較教育，51，105-127頁。歐用生（1995）。教師成長與學習。台北縣：臺灣省國民學校教師研習會。
歐陽教、張德銳（1993）。教師評鑑模式之研究。教育研究通訊，19（2），90-100。劉美慧、黃嘉麗、康玉琳（2007）。台灣教師評鑑制度之分析。當代教育研究，15（3），33-68。鄭彩鳳（2003）。美國教師工會之發展：兼論對台灣教師組織工會之啟示。教育政策論壇，6（2），21-41。蔡清華（2003）。美國教師組織與教育專業權運作關係之研究。載於楊深坑（主編），各國教師組織與專業權發展（83-114頁）。台北市：高等教育。潘慧玲（2002）。方案評鑑的緣起與概念。教師天地，117，26-31 。
潘慧玲、張德銳、張新仁（2008）。台灣中小學教師評鑑／專業標準之建構：歷程篇。載於潘慧玲（主編），教師評鑑理論與實務（229-280頁）。台北市：師大教評中心。
潘慧玲、張新仁、張德銳（2008）。台灣中小學教師評鑑／專業標準之建構：成果篇。載於潘慧玲（主編），教師評鑑理論與實務（281-298頁）。台北市：師大教評中心。
潘慧玲、王麗雲、張素貞、吳俊憲、鄭淑惠、郭玟婷、張硯凱、林伯安、呂秉修、沈舒婷、林欣姿、陳穎琦（2010a）。試辦中小學教師專業發展評鑑之方案評鑑(Ⅱ)。教育部委託專題研究成果報告。台北市：教育部。取自http://140.111.34.34/docdb/files/dma7da06180e2b2a06c.pdf潘慧玲、張素貞、鄭淑惠、陳文彥、劉君雅、賴姿妤、林欣姿、沈舒婷（2010b）。教育部試辦中小學教師專業發展評鑑之後設評鑑諮詢輔導及執行計畫報告。教育部委託專題研究成果報告。台北市：教育部。取自http://140.111.34.34/docdb/files/dma7da0304100b0b07c.pdf
潘慧玲、王麗雲、簡茂發、孫志麟、張素貞、張錫勳、陳順和、陳淑敏、蔡濱如（2004）。發展國中小教師教學專業能力指標之研究。教育部委託專題研究成果報告（編號：0918）。台北市：教育部。薛荷玉（2011年4月28日）。國中小教師評鑑9成民眾贊成。聯合報，教育AA4版。
謝文全（1993）。教職員考績制度探討。教師天地雙月刊，64，32-36。
簡紅珠（1997）。專業導向的教師評鑑。北縣教育，16，18-22。
簡紅珠（2002）。建立教師評鑑的文化。師友月刊，426，11-15。
簡茂發、彭森明、李虎雄（1998）。中小學教師基本素質之分析與評量。教育部八十七年度專案研究計畫。台北市:國立臺灣師範大學。顏國樑（2003a）。從教師專業發展導向論實施教師評鑑的策略。教育資料集刊，28，259-286。
顏國樑（2003b）。教師評鑑的基本理念、問題及作法。教育研究月刊，112，62-77。羅清水（2000）。教學視導在教師專業發展的意義。研習資訊，17（2），1-9。
蘇再添（2005）。台北市國民小學實施教師評鑑之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台灣師範大學，台北市。
饒邦安（2005）。影響我國中小學教師評鑑制度實施的相關因素與推動策略。國立編輯館館刊， 33（2），16-29。
饒見維（2003）。教師專業發展—理論與實務。台北市：五南。
臺南縣政府（2009）。臺南縣政府98年2月26日府人考字第0980028729號函。取自www.cy.gov.tw/AP_Home/Upload/eDoc_t02.../附件3-98教正2.doc
二、英文
Advisory Conciliation and Arbitration Service (1986). Report of the
Appraisal and Training Working Group. In Department of Education and
Science (DES)(Ed.), School teacher appraisal: A national framework (pp. 25-58). London, England: HM.
American Federation of Teachers (2003). The Union Role in Assuring Teacher Quality . In AFT(Ed), What we stand :Teacher quality(pp. 3-10). Retrieved from http://www.aft.org/pdfs/teachers/wwsteacherquality0603.pdf
American Federation of Teachers, & National Education Association.(1998). Peer assistance and review: An AFT/NEA handbook. Washington, D.C.: American Federation of Teachers and National Education Association. Retrieved from ERIC database.(ED429978)
American Federation of Teachers.(2008). Peer Asisitance & Review: Toledo, Ohio. Retrieved May 21, 2009, from http://www.aft.org/topics/teacher-quality/par-toledo.htm
Anderson, L., & Pellicer, L.(2001). Teacher peer assisitance and review. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
Association of Teachers and Lecturers. (1993). Appraisal and you. London, England: ATL.
Bascia, N. (1994). Unions in teachers’ professional lives. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Benzley, J.(1985). Peer evaluation: an interview study of teachers evaluating teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association , Chicago, IL. Retrieved from ERIC database.(ED260099)
Bollington, R., Hopkins, D., & West, M.(1990). An introduction to teacher appraisal: A professional development approach. London, England：Cassell.
Bridges, E. M.(1986). The incompetent teacher: The challenge and the response. Philadelphia, PA: The Falmer Press.
Brown, D. R. (1993). An evaluation of the effects of a peer tutoring and assessment program on new teacher induction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.
Chase, R. (1997). Sleeping with the enemy. NEA Today, 15(6), 2.
Columbus Education Association(2010). Peer assistance and review. Retrieved from http://www.ceaohio.org/GD/Templates/Pages/cea/ceaPrimary.aspx?page=2&TopicRelationID=207
Curry, S., & Cruz, J.(2000). Porfolio-based teacher assessment. Thrust for Educational Leadership, 29(3), 34-37.
Danielson, C.(2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framewok for teaching!(2nd ed.) Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice. Alexanddria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Darling-Hammond, L.(1984). Taking the measure of excellence: The case against basing teacher evaluation on student test scores. American Educator, 8 (3), 26-29. Retrieved from ERIC database.( EJ306095）
Darling–Hammond, L.(1986). A proposal for evaluation in the teaching profession. The Elementary School Journal, 86(4), 530-551.
Darling–Hammond, L.(2000). Solving the dilemmas of teacher supply,demend,and standards: How we can ensure a competent,caring and qualified teacher for every child. New York, NY: National Commission on Teaching & America’s Future.
Darling–Hammond, L. Wise, A. & Pease,S.(1983). Teacher evaluation in the organizational context: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 53(3), 285-328.
Department of Education(1998). Promising practices: New ways to improve teacher quality. Washington , D.C.: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from ERIC database.( ED449117）
Department of Education(2000). Taking next bold step to America’s future: A national conference on teacher quality. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from ERIC database.(ED443778)
Department of Education(2011). Race to the top. Retrieved from website: http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/index.html
Dillon, S. (2008). Head of teachers’ union offers to talk on tenure and merit pay. New York Times, November 18. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/18/education/18teach.html.
Duncan, A. (2009). Interview with Wolf Blitzer, Transcript. The Situation Room. Retrieved from http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0903/10/sitroom.02.html.
Duke, D.(1993). Removing barriers to professional growth. Phi Delta Kappan, 74(9), 710-12.
Dwyer, C. A., & Stufflebeam, D. L.(1996). Teacher evaluation. In D. C. Berliner & R. C.Calfee(Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology(pp. 765-786). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Education Week(2001). Accountability. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/context/glossary/accountability.htm
Eisner, E. W. (1992). Educational reform and the ecology of schooling. Teachers Colledge Record, 93(4), 610-627.
Fiarman, S. E., Johnson, S. M., Munger, M. S., Papay, J. P., Qazilbash, E. K.(2009). Teachers Leading Teachers: The Experiences of Peer Assistance and Review Consulting Teachers. Retrieved from the Project on the Next Generation of Teachers at the Harvard Graduate School of Education website: http://www.gse.harvard.edu/~ngt/new_papers/SEF_AERA_2009.pdf
Fideler, E. & Haselkorn, D.(1999). Learning the ropes: Urban teacher induction programs and practices in the United States. Boston, MA: Recruiting New Teachers.
Finkel E.(2003).Adam Urbanski's approach: Have teachers review each other. Catalyst, 15(4), 8. Retrieved from http://www.catalyst-chicago.org/arch/12-03/1203urbanski.htm
Futernick, k.(2010). Incompetent teachers or dysfunctional systems? Retrieved from http://teachersnetwork.org/effectiveteachers/images/KenFuternicksPaper_021710.pdf
Goldstein, J.(2003). Teachers at the professional threshold: Distributing leadership responsbility for teacher evaluation( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Goldstein, J. (2007). Easy to dance to: Solving the problems of teacher evaluation with peer assistance and review. American Journal of Education, 113, 479-508.
Goldstein, J., & Noguera, P. A.(2006). A thoughtful approach to teacher evaluation. Improving Professional Practices, 63(6), 31-37.
Greene, J. E. (1971). School personnel administration. Radnor, PA: Chilton Book Company.
Hawley, R. C. (1982). Assessing teacher performance. Pelham, MA: Education
Research Associates.
Hertling, E.( 1999). Peer Review of Teachers. ERIC Digest, 126, 1-6. Retrieved from ERIC database.(ED429343)
Hewitt, D.(2000). The Cincinnati plan. In G. Bloom and J. Goldstein(Eds.), The peer assistance and review reader(pp. 115-121). Santa Cruz, CA: New Teacher Center University of California.
Iwanicki, E. (1990). Teacher evaluation for school improvement. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond(Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teacher (pp. 158- 174). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Iwanicki, E. (1998). Evaluation in supervision. In G. Firth and E. Pajak (Eds.), The handbook of research on school supervision. New York, NY: Macmillan Reference Library.
James, F. N., JR. & Linda, A. H.(2007). Teacher supervision & evaluation: Theory into practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Johnson, S. M. (2004). Paralysis or possibility: What do teacher unions and collective bargaining bring? In R.D. Henderson, W.J. Urban, & P. Wolman, (Eds.), Teacher unions and education policy: Retrenchment or reform? (pp. 33-50). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Johnson, S. M., Fiarman, S. E., Munger, M. S., Papay, J. P., Qazilbash, E. K., Wheeler, L.(2010). A user’s guide to peer assistance and review. Retrieved from the Project on the Next Generation of Teachers at the Harvard Graduate School of Education website: http://www.gse.harvard.edu/~ngt/par/resources/users_guide_to_par.pdf
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1988). The personnel evaluation standards: How to assess systems for evaluating educators. Newbury , CA: Corwin.
Jonse, R. D.（2004）. Bringing teacher assistance and evaluation up to PAR: First-year teachers’responces to supervision in peer assistance and review(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Kaboolian, L., & Beach, A.(2005). Quality service is still possible through labor-management cooperation. Retrieved from http://www.mayorsinnovation.org/pdf/briefing_book_012706/tge4.pdf
Kahlenberg (2006). The history of collective bargaining among teachers. In J. Hannaway & A. Rotherham, (Eds.), Collective bargaining in education: Negotiating change in today’s schools(pp. 7-25). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Karge, B. D., Sandlin, R. A., & Young, B. L. (1993). Analysis of beginning teacher concern data to restructure pre-service teacher education. Paper presented at the annual conference of Association of Teacher Educators, Atlanta, GA.
Kelly, P.(1998). A Comparative Analysis of Teacher Peer Review Program in Four Urban Districts: Professional Unionism in Action. San Diego, CA: Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED447088)
Kerchner, C., & Mitchell, D. (1983). The changing idea of a teachers’ union. New York, NY: The Falmer Press.
Kerchner, C. T., & Koppich, J. (1993). A union of professionals: Labor relations and educational reform. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Kenchner, C., Koppich, J., & Weeres, J.(1997). United mind workers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Knight, P. (1990). Teachers as leaders: A discriptive study of the peer assisitance and review consultan teacher leaders( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Koppich, J. (2004). Toward improving teacher quality: An evaluation of Peer Assistance and Review in Montgomery County Public Schools. Rockville, MD: Montgomery County Public Schools. Retrieved from www.mcps.k12.md.us/departments/development/documents/pgs/PAR_report_final.doc
Koppich, J. (2005). Addressing teacher quality through induction, professional compensation, and evaluation: The effects on labor-management relations. Educational Policy, 19(1), 90-111.
Kumrow, D., & Dahlen, B.( 2002). Is peer review an effective approach for evaluating teachers? The Clearing House, 75(5),238-241.
Lawrence, D.(2000). The Toledo Plan. Toledo, OH: Toledo Public School & Toledo Federation of Teachers.
Lieberman, M.(1988).Teachers evaluating teachers: peer review and new unionism. New Brunswick, NJ: Social Philosophy and Policy Center.
Lortie, D.C.(1975). School teacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Moo, G.(1999). Power grap. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing, Inc.
Munger, M. S., Johnson, S. M., Fiarman, S. E., Papay, J. P., Qazilbash, E K.(2009). Shared Responsibility for Teacher Quality: How Do Principals Respond to Peer Assistance and Review? Retrieved from the Project on the Next Generation of Teachers at the Harvard Graduate School of Education website: http://www.gse.harvard.edu/~ngt/new_papers/MSM_AERA_2009.pdf
Munson, B. R.(1998). Peers observing peers: The better way to observe teachers. Contemporary Education, 69(2), 108-100.
Murray, C. E.(1999). Rochester teachers struggle to take charge of their practice. In B. Perterson and M. Charney(Eds.), Transforming teacher unions(pp. 46-49). Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.
Murray, C. E., & Grant, G.(1998). Teacher peer review: Possibility or pipedream? Contemporary Education,69, 202-204.
National Board for Professional Teaching Standards(1999). What teachers should know and be able to do. Arlinton, VA: National Board for Professional Teaching Standards.
National Commission on Excellence in Education, U.S. Department of Education.(1983). A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America’s future. New York, NY: Author. Retrieved from http://nctaf.org/documents/WhatMattersMost.pdf.
National Education Association.(1998). An NEA discussion guide for local affiliates: Facilitating the dialogue on peer assistance and peer review. Washington, D.C: Author.
National Foundation for the Improvement of Education(1999).Creating a teacher mentoring a program. Washington, D.C. : Author. Retrieved from http://www.nfie.org/publication/mentoring.htm
Obama, B. (2009, March 26). White House “Open for Questions” Town Hall Transcript. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/26/us/politics/26text-obama.html?pagewanted=all.
Odell, S.(1986). Induction support of new teachers: A fuctional approach. Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 26-29.
Ohio Office of Budget and Management(2000). The State Government Book. Columbus, OH: Author.
Papay J. P., & Johnson S. M.(2011). Is PAR a Good Investment? Understanding the Costs and Benefits of Teacher Peer Assistance and Review Programs. Retrieved from Project on the Next Generation of Teachers at the Harvard Graduate School of Education website: http://www.gse.harvard.edu/~ngt/new_papers/PAR%20Costs%20and%20Benefits%20-%20January%202011.pdf
Papay, J. P, Johnson S. M., Fiarman S. E., Munger M. S., & Qazilbash E. K.(2009) . Beyond dollars and cents: The costs and benefits of teacher peer assistance and review. Retrieved from the Project on the Next Generation of Teachers at the Harvard Graduate School of Education website: http://www.gse.harvard.edu/~ngt/papers.htm#par_main
Peer assistance and review: Working models across the country (March 2000). Sacramento, CA: Office of the Secretary of Education, California Department of Education.
Peterson, K. D.（2000）. Teacher evaluation：A comprehensive guide to new directions and practices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Peterson, K. D.（2004）. Research on school teacher evaluation. NASSP Bulletin, 88(639), 60-79.
Qazilbash, E. K., Johnson, S. M., Fiarman, S. E., Munger, M. S., Papay, J. P.(2009) . Peer assistance and review: A cross-site study of labor-management collaboration required for program success. Retrieved from Project on the Next Generation of Teachers at the Harvard Graduate School of Education website: http://www.gse.harvard.edu/~ngt/new_papers/EKQ_AERA_2009.pdf
Ribas, W.(2005) Teacher evaluation that works: The educational, legal, public relation, and social-emotional standards and processes of effective supervision and evaluation (2nd ed.). Westwood, MA: Ribas Publications.
Rosenholtz, S. J. (1989). Workplace conditions that affect teacher quality and commitment: Implications for teacher induction programs. Elementary School Journal, 89 (4) , 421-439.
Sclan, E. M. (1994). Performance evaluation for experienced teachers: An overview of state policies. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education. Retrieved from ERIC database.(ED 373054).
Scriven, M. (1973). Educational evalution: Theory and practice. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Shieds, P. M., Esch, C. E., Humphrey, D. C., Young, V. M. & Hunt, H.(1999). The status of the teaching profession. Santa Cruz, CA: The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning.
Shinkfield, A. J.& Stufflebeam, D.(1995). Teacher evaluation: Guide to effective practice. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
Stake, R. E.(1989). The evaluation of teaching. In H. Simons & J. Elliott（Eds.）, Rethinking appraisal and assessment(pp.13-19). Bristol, PA: Open University Press.
Stiggins, R., & Duke, D. (1998). The case for commitment to teacher growth: Research on teacher evaluation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Stodolksy, S. (1990). Classroom observation. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond(Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers.(pp.175-190). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication.
Stronge, J.(1997). Improving schools through teacher evaluation. In J. Stronge（Ed.）, Evaluating teaching. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press,Inc.
Stronge, J. H. & Tucker, P. D.(2003). Handbook on teacher evaluation:Assessing and improving performance. Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education.
Stroot, S., Keil, V., Stedman, P., Lohr, L., Faust, R., Schincariol-Randall, L., Sullivan, A., Czerniak, G., Kuchcinski, J., Orel, N., & Richter, M.（1998）. Peer assistance and review guidebook. Columbus, OH: Ohio Department of Education.
Stufflebeam, D.L., Foley, W.J., Gephart, W.J., Guba, E.G., Hammond, R.L., Merriman, H.O., & Provus, M.M.(1971). Educational evaluation and decision making. Ithaca, IL: F.E.Peacock.
Teacher professional growth system handbook 2008-2009. Rockville, MD: Montgomery county public schools. Retrieved from website: http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/development/documents/TeacherPGS_handbook.pdf
The International Encyclopedia of Education (1985). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
The New Teacher Project( 2010). Teacher evaluation 2.0. Brooklyn, NY.: The New Teacher Project . Retrieved from http://tntp.org/publications/issue-analysis/teacher-evaluation-2.0/
Toch, T. & Rothman, R. (2008). Rush to judgment: Teacher evaluation in public education. Washington, D.C.: Education Sector. Retrieved from http://www.educationsector.org/usr_doc/RushToJudgment_ES_Jan08.pdf
Toledo Federation of Teacher (2010).The Toledo Plan. Retrieved from http://www.tft250.org/the_toledo_plan.htm
Tucker, P. D. (1997). Lake Wobegon: Where all teachers are competent (Or, have we come to terms with the problem of incompetent teachers?). Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 103-126.
Thomas, B. & Kiley, M. A. (1994). Concerns of beginning middle and secondary school teachers. Sarasota, FL: Eastern Educational Research Association. Retrieved from ERIC database.(ED373033).
van Lier, P.(2008). Learning from Ohio’s best teachers: A homegrown model to improve our schools. Retrieved from http://www.policymattersohio.org/LearningFromOhiosBest.htm
Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54(2), 143-178.
Ward, M. E. (1995). Teacher dismissal: The impact of tenure, administrator competence, and other factors. School Administrator, 52, 16-19.
Weisberg, D., Sexton, S., Mulhern, J., & Keeling, D.( 2009). The Widget Effect: Our national failuture to acknowledge and act on teacher differences. Brooklyn, NY.: The New Teacher Project . Retrieved from http://tntp.org/publications/reports/the-widget-effect/
Weiss, E. M. & Weiss, S. G. (1998). New directions in teacher evaluation. Retrieved from ERIC database.( ED429052)
Wildman, T. M., Niles, J. A., Magliaro, S. G., & McLaughlin, R. A. (1989). Teaching and learning to teach: The two roles of beginning teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 89(4), 471-493.