:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:重看Ralph Tyler的課程思想
書刊名:教育研究與發展期刊
作者:宋明娟
作者(外文):Sung, Min-chuan
出版日期:2007
卷期:3:2
頁次:頁83-112
主題關鍵詞:泰勒泰勒原理課程思想TylerTyler rationaleCurriculum ideas
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:34
  • 點閱點閱:191
  學界對Ralph Tyler的課程思想評價不一,本文縷析批判與辯護立場的原委並重新審視之;首先探討以Kiebard為主的批判聲浪,而繼而梳理Hlebowitsh有鑑於當代Tyler原理遭受批評而對批評論調所作的回應,並再予綜合討論。文中輔以Tyler談其自身實際從事課程工作的的文章、其經典原著、訪談與問答紀錄,以及後輩與之互動的紀念文章等作為為討論素材,透過更為貼近其人本身的文獻,再探討較不為人所提及的想法。本文結論以為,課程領域宜拓廣視野,理解對Tyler課程思想的貶抑或頌揚,乃源自相異的解讀理路與意圖;片面的評斷並不足以含括所有理解的全貌。
  Ralph Tyler’s curriculum ideas have been assessed by some scholars who held different kinds of viewpoints. To revisit the situation, this article aimed at analyzing mainly the criticism made by Herbert M. Kliebard and the defensive responses spoken from Peter S. Hlebowitsh. In addition, Tyler’s works, his classic writings, minutes on his curriculum practices, interviews and dialogues, and communications written by other curriculum scholars were analyzed. The author concluded that broader views should be taken in order to understand that various comments actually originated from different interpretations, and the whole picture of one thing could not be captured by partial points.
期刊論文
1.王秀玲(20060200)。課程理論的先驅:R. W. Tyler《課程與教學的基本原理》。中等教育,57(1),130-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Tyler, Ralph W.(1986)。The Five Most Significant Curriculum Events in the Twentieth Century。Educational Leadership,44(4),36-38。  new window
3.Hlebowitsh, P. S.(1995)。Interpretations of the Tyler Rationale: A reply to Kliebard。Journal of Curriculum Studies,27(1),89-94。  new window
4.黃嘉雄(20040300)。釐清泰勒的課程評鑑觀。國立臺北師範學院學報. 教育類,17(1),27-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.黃俊儒(20050700)。Ralph W. Tyler模式之批判、澄清與建議。課程與教學,8(3),91-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.單文經(20021000)。現代與後現代課程論爭之平議。師大學報. 教育類,47(2),123-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Goodlad, J. I.(1995)。Ralph Tyler: The educators’ educator。Educational Policy,29(1),75-81。  new window
8.Hlebowitsh, P. S.(1992)。Amid behavioural and behavioristic objectives: Reappraising appraisals of the Tyler Rationale。Journal of Curriculum Studies,24(6),533-547。  new window
9.Kliebard, H. M.(1995)。The Tyler Rationale revisited。Journal of Curriculum Studies,27(1),81-88。  new window
10.Nowakowski, J. R.(1983)。On educational evaluation: A conversation with Ralph Tyler。Educational Leadership,40(8),24-29。  new window
11.Wright, H. K.(2005)。Does Hlebowitsh improve on curriculum history? Reading a rereading for its political purpose and implications。Curriculum Inquiry,35(1),103-117。  new window
會議論文
1.Rice, T., Rice, C.,、Tyler(1989)。The Eight-Year Study at East High School, Denver, Colorado。Lanham, MD。204-212。  new window
2.Tyler, R. W.(1989)。Recollections of fifty years of work in curriculum。Lanham, MD。172-177。  new window
3.Tyler, R. W.(1989)。Reflecting on the Eight-Year Study。Lanham, MD。193-203。  new window
圖書
1.Cohen, S.(1999)。Challenging Orthodoxies--Toward a New Cultural History of Education。New York, NY:Peter Lang。  new window
2.Dewey, J.(1990)。The School and Society and the Children and the Education。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。  new window
3.Pinar, W. F.(1988)。Contemporary curriculum discourses。Scottsdale, Arizona:Gorsuch Scarisbrick。  new window
4.甄曉蘭(2004)。課程理論與實務--解構理論與重建。臺北市:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
5.Tyler, R. W.、黃炳煌(1981)。課程與教學的基本原理。臺北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
6.Kliebard, H. M.(1986)。The struggle for the American curriculum。Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
7.Foucault, Michel、Howard, Richard(1973)。Madness and Civilization : A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason。New York, NY:Vintage/Random House。  new window
8.歐用生(1989)。課程與教學:概念、理論與實際。臺北:文景出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.Apple, Michael W.(1979)。Ideology and Curriculum。New York:Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
10.黃光雄、蔡清田(1999)。課程設計:理論與實際。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
11.Hlebowitsh, P. S.(1993)。Radical curriculum theory reconsidered: A historical approach。New York, NY:Teachers College Press。  new window
12.Foucault, Michel、Sheridan-Smith, Alan M.(1972)。The Archaeology of Knowledge。Pantheon Books。  new window
13.Lawton, D.(1989)。Education, culture and the National Curriculum。London:Hodder & Stoughton。  new window
14.Tyler, Ralph Winfred(1949)。Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction。University of Chicago Press。  new window
15.黃政傑(1991)。課程設計。臺北:東華。  延伸查詢new window
16.方德隆(譯)、A. C. Ornstein、F. P. Hunkins(原作者)(2004)。課程基礎理論(Curriculum foundations, principles, and issuesⅠ)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
17.蔡清田(2005)。泰勒的課程思想。課程思想。台北。  延伸查詢new window
18.Kliebard, H. M.(1977)。The Tyler rationale。Curriculum and evaluation。Berkeley, CA。  new window
19.Kliebard, H. M.(1992)。The Tyler Rationale(1970)。Forging the American curriculum: Assays in curriculum and theory。New York。  new window
20.Krathwohl, D. R.(1996)。Lessons learned from Ralph W. Tyle。Teachers and mentors: Profiles of distinguished twentieth-century professors of education。New York。  new window
21.Marsden, W. E.(2000)。Historical approaches to curriculum study。History of education vol. 3。London。  new window
22.Nowakowski, J. R.(1981)。An interview with Ralph Tyler。Kalamazoo, MI。  new window
23.U.S. Department of Education(1974)。Report of the Committee of Ten on Secondary School Studies (From Report of the Commissioner of Education for the Year 1892-1893, vol. 2, 1415-17, 1420, 1422-24, 1438-46。Education in the United States: A documentary history (vol.3)。New York。  new window
圖書論文
1.Jackson, P. W.(1992)。Concepts of curriculum and curriculum specialists。Handbook of research on curriculum。New York:Macmillan。  new window
2.Kliebard, H. M.(1975)。Reappraisal: The Tyler Rationale。Curriculum Theorizing: The Reconceptualists。Berkeley, California:McCutchan Publishing Corporation。  new window
3.Tyle, Ralph W.(1975)。Specific approaches to curriculum development。Strategies for curriculum development。Berkeley, California:McCutchan。  new window
4.Pagano, J. A.(1999)。The curriculum field: Emergence of a discipline。Contemporary curriculum discourses: Twenty years of JCT。New York:Peter Lang。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE