:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Jayne Fleener後現代課程理論的啟示
書刊名:課程研究
作者:鍾鴻銘 引用關係單文經 引用關係
作者(外文):Jong, Horng-mingShan, Wen-jing
出版日期:2006
卷期:1:2
頁次:頁69-96
主題關鍵詞:弗莉娜後現代課程理論Jayne FleenerPostmodernismCurriculum theory
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:67
  • 點閱點閱:67
本文旨在透過Fleener後現代課程理論的探究,以省思其對課程研究與改革可能的啟示。Fleener認為,現代主義數學化實體觀背後潛藏著一種支配性的邏輯,她主張以後現代的關係、系統、意義三種邏輯觀取而代之。奠基於此三種邏輯觀之上,Fleener認為課程應是一種機體中心的課程,此種課程強調關係、合作、整全的面向,課程因而不再是一種物件,而是機體/環境的複合體。此外,受學習型組織理念的影響,Fleener主張將學校、課程轉化為學習型組織,以強化其創造力及適應社會變遷的能力。本文最後則是根據Fleener的後現代課程理論,省思其對吾人的啟示。
The paper aims at analyzing the postmodern curriculum theory based on her recent writings on the related topics. Fleener points out that the dominant logic of mathematic reality of modernism should be replaced by relation, system, and meaning of postmodernism. She considers curriculum as a compound of organism-environment that emphasizes connectedness, cooperation, and well-round development, but not as single objects. She also proposes that schools should be transformed into learning organizations to strengthen their capacity of creativity and adaptation. It is hoped that the implications of her theory would give some hints to the future development of curriculum research and curriculum reform.
期刊論文
1.李雅婷(2002)。論課程的後現代樣貌。中等教育,53(2),16-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.羅麗新(2004)。論威廉姆.多爾的四R理論--一封給姊姊的信。全球教育展望,33(1),22-29。  延伸查詢new window
3.Fleener, M. J.(1996)。Scientific world building on the edge of chaos: High school students'beliefs about mathematics and science。School Science & Mathematics,96(6),312-320。  new window
4.Fleener, M. J.(1999)。Toward a poststructural mathematics curriculum: Expanding discursive possibilities。Journal of Curriculum Theorizing,15(2),89-105。  new window
5.Fleener, M. J.、Carter, A.、Reeder, S.(2004)。Language games in the mathematics classroom: Teaching a way of life。Journal of Curriculum Studies,36(4),445-468。  new window
6.Fleener, M. J.、Dupree, G. N.(2002)。Autobiosophy through Gynocritical inquiry: Exploring woman's ideas about Mathematics, power, and community。Journal of Curriculum Theorizing,2002(Spring),65-76。  new window
7.Fleener, M. J.、Rodgers, D. B.(1999)。A systems approach: To understanding transformation in learning communities。Journal of Thought,1999(Spring),9-22。  new window
8.Kliebard, H. M.(1994)。“That evil genius of the Negro race”: Thomas Jesse Jones and educational reform。Journal of Curriculum Studies,10(1),5-20。  new window
9.王紅宇(19951200)。新的知識觀與課程觀。臺海兩岸,1995(冬),159-164。  延伸查詢new window
10.周珮儀(20021000)。後現代課程取向的萬花筒。教育研究,102,40-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Schwab, Joseph J.(1973)。The Practical 3: Translation into Curriculum。The School Review,81(4),501-522。  new window
12.Huebner, D.(1976)。The moribund curriculum field: Its wake and our work。Curriculum Inquiry,6(2),153-176。  new window
13.單文經(20021000)。現代與後現代課程論爭之平議。師大學報. 教育類,47(2),123-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Fleener, M. J.(1995)。Dissipative structures and educational contexts: Transforming schooling for the 21st century。The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association,1-16。  new window
2.Fleener, M. J.(2000)。Dewey's logic and social autopoiesis: Creative forces for/of social(r)evolution。Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association。  new window
學位論文
1.游皓麟(2001)。多爾的後現代課程觀(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.鍾鴻銘(2005)。William Doll後現代課程觀之探析(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.吳彤(2005)。多維融貫--系統分析與哲學思維方法。昆明:雲南人民。  延伸查詢new window
2.汪霞(2003)。課程研究:現代與後現代。上海:上海科技教育。  延伸查詢new window
3.郝德永(2002)。課程與文化:一個後現代的檢視。北京:教育科學。  延伸查詢new window
4.Fleener, M. J.(2002)。Curriculum dynamics: Recreating heart。New York:Peter Lang。  new window
5.Pinar, W. F.(1994)。Autobiography, politics and sexuality: Essays in curriculum theory, 1972-1992。New York:Peter Lang。  new window
6.Cherryholmes, C. H.(1988)。Power and Criticism: Poststructural Investigations in Education。New York:Teachers College Press。  new window
7.張華、石偉平、馬慶發(2000)。課程流派研究。濟南:山東教育。  延伸查詢new window
8.Doll, W. E. Jr.(1993)。A post-modern perspective on curriculum。New York:Teachers College, Columbia University。  new window
9.黃永和(2001)。後現代課程理論之研究 : 一種有機典範的課程觀。臺北:師大書苑有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Slattery, C. P.(1995)。Curriculum Development in the Postmodern Era。Garland。  new window
11.Kliebard, H. M.(1986)。The struggle for the American curriculum, 1893-1958。Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
12.高宣揚(1998)。當代社會理論。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.Senge, Peter M.(1994)。The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization。New York:Doubleday Currency。  new window
14.Beck, Ulrich、Ritter, Mark(1992)。Risk society: Towards a new modernity。Sage Publication。  new window
圖書論文
1.Schwab, J. J.(1975)。The practical: A language for curriculum。Curriculum, school and society。Atlantic Highlands, NJ:Humanities Press。  new window
2.周珮儀(1997)。後現代的課程理論。新世紀的教育發展。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
3.Bohm, D.(1988)。Postmodern science and a postmodern world。The reenchantment of science。New York:State University of New York Press。  new window
4.Doll, W. E. Jr.(1990)。Teaching a post-modern curriculum。Teaching and thinking about curriculum: Critical inquiries。New York:Teachers College Press。  new window
5.Fleener, M. J.(2002)。Logical foundations for an organocentric curriculum: Dewey's logic and complexity sciences。Curriculum visions。New York:Peter Lang。  new window
6.Fleener, M. J.(2005)。Introduction: Chaos, complexity, curriculum, and culture。Chaos, complexity, curriculum, and culture: A conversation。New York:Peter Lang。  new window
7.Doll, W. E. Jr.(2002)。Ghosts and the curriculum。Curriculum visions。New York, NY:Peter Lang Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE