:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:後結構文本的課程論述、批判及跨越
書刊名:課程與教學
作者:蔡宗河
作者(外文):Tsai, Tsung-ho
出版日期:2008
卷期:11:2
頁次:頁127-154
主題關鍵詞:課程理論課程研究後結構主義Curriculum theoryCurriculum researchPost-structuralism
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:672
  • 點閱點閱:113
自從Schwab和Pinar於70年代對強調效率導向的課程提出批判後,課程理論及研究產生很大的轉變。Pinar(1995)等人提出「課程再概念」,引進不同的理論來了解課程的複雜面向;其後,他運用「文本」(text)來擴大課程的意義。後結構主義主要是法國部分學者如Foucault及Derrida為反對結構主義所提出,後來部分美國課程學者引用其觀點,做為課程論述的方式,以擴大課程研究的層面,延伸教學理解的視野,有助於我們從不同的面向理解課程的意義。有鑑於此,本文將從後結構的角度,了解課程論述的內涵,並對這些論述提出批判,最後試圖進一步跨越後結構文本課程論述的侷限,希望能對課程理論及研究有所助益。
After Schwab and Pinar in 1970's seriously criticized the efficiency-oriented curriculum research, curriculum theory and research have made a drastic change. In 1975, to help understand the complicated facets of a curriculum, Pinar et al. raised the concept of "curriculum reconceptualization", which includes various theories. From then on, Pinar used the term "text" to extend the very meaning of curriculum. Historically speaking, the prevalence of post-structuralism mainly came from French scholars such as Foucault and Derrida, who argued against structuralism. Years later, numerous American curriculum theorists incorporated their viewpoints and developed the method to gain insight into the curriculum research. Functionally, it enlarged the scope of curriculum research, broadened the horizon of pedagogical understanding, and facilitated the realization of curriculum significance from diverse viewpoints. Based on the viewpoints of post-structuralism text, this paper aims firstly to ascertain the intention of curriculum discourse in a tone of criticism and then to further this research beyond its limit.
期刊論文
1.陳美如(20050700)。從文本的概念看課程。教育研究,135,頁127-133。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.黃騰(20051200)。從「角色」到「自我」--論教師改變的歷史困境與可能。教育研究集刊,51(4),89-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.范信賢(20011100)。「文本」:後現代思潮下對「教材」概念的省思。國教學報,13,169-183。  延伸查詢new window
4.周珮儀(20021000)。後現代課程取向的萬花筒。教育研究,102,40-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.姚人多(20000200)。論傅柯的「主體與權力」--一個批判性的導讀。當代,32=150,126-133。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳依萍(20010400)。後結構主義與後現代主義在教育行政上的應用。中等教育,52(2),170-178。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Anyon, J.(1994)。The retreat of Marxism and socialist feminism: Postmodern and Poststructural theories in education。Curriculum Inquiry,24(2),115-133。  new window
8.歐用生(19980600)。後現代社會的課程改革。國民教育,38(5),3-11。  延伸查詢new window
9.姚人多(20000300)。論傅柯的「主體與權力」--一個批判性的導讀。當代,33=151,108-133。  延伸查詢new window
10.Doll, W. E. Jr.(1989)。Foundations for a post-modern curriculum。Journal of Curriculum Studies,21(3),243-253。  new window
11.莊明貞(20021000)。後現代思潮的課程研究及其本土實踐之評析。教育研究,102,27-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.卯靜儒(20040300)。從新馬克思主義到後結構主義--課程社會學研究的再概念化。教育研究集刊,50(1),119-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.周珮儀(20030900)。後現代課程取向的理論探究。國立臺北師範學院學報. 教育類,16(2),111-138。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.單文經(20021000)。現代與後現代課程論爭之平議。師大學報. 教育類,47(2),123-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Schwab, J. J.(1969)。The Practical: A Language for Curriculum。School Review,78(1),1-23。  new window
16.Wraga, W. G.、Hlebowitsh, P. S.(2003)。Toward a Renaissance in Curriculum Theory and Development in USA。Journal of Curriculum Studies,35(4),425-437。  new window
17.蔡宗河(2004)。教科書開放引發的問題及解決的方法。國教世紀,210,99-110。  延伸查詢new window
18.Cherryholmes, C. H.(1988)。An Exploration of Meaning and the Dialogue between Textbooks and Teaching。Journal of Curriculum,20(1),1-21。  new window
19.張佳琳(2004)。當教學作為一種自由遊戲-Derrida解構思想的啟示。課程與教學,7(4),13-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.卯靜儒(1999)。臺灣近十年課程改革之政治社會學分析。第一屆臺灣教育社會學論壇,中正大學主辦 。嘉義縣。1-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.歐用生(2005)。課程再概念化:系譜和風貌。基隆市。15-40。  延伸查詢new window
3.周淑卿(2005)。課程解構或理論建構?後現代課程論之再思。後現代課程--實踐與評鑑研討會。基隆市。71-82。  延伸查詢new window
4.蘇永明(1998)。傅柯的規訓權力與現代教育的興起。0。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳惠敏(2001)。知識、權力、課程--以Foucault權力/知識論述(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.洪詠善(2000)。國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要決策過程之研究(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃文定(2000)。Michel Foucault主體觀之教育蘊義(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃俊儒(2003)。傳柯主體觀對課程理論之啟示,0。  延伸查詢new window
5.王恭志(2007)。傅柯的生存美學及其對教師課程意識的啟發與蘊義,0。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Grumet, M. R.(1992)。Existential and phenomenological foundations of autobiographical methods。Understanding curriculum as phenomenological and deconstructed text。New York:Teachers College, Columbia University。  new window
2.Coulby, D.(2000)。Beyond the national curriculum: Curricular centralism and cultural diversity in Europe and the USA。Routledge Falmer。  new window
3.Pinar, William F.(1975)。Curriculum Theorizing: The Reconceptualists。Berkeley, California:McCutchan Publishing Corporation。  new window
4.Gibson, R.(1984)。Structuralism and education。London:Hodder and Stoughton。  new window
5.Pinar, W. F.(1988)。Contemporary curriculum discourses。Scottsdale, Arizona:Gorsuch Scarisbrick。  new window
6.Blase, J.、Anderson, G.(1995)。The Micropolitics of Educational Leadership: from Control to Empowerment。New York:Columbia University Press。  new window
7.夏光(2003)。後結構主義思潮與後現代社會理論。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.Sheridan, A.、Foucault, M.(1977)。Discipline and punish: The birth of prison。Random House。  new window
9.Pinar, W. F.、Reynolds, W. M.、Slattery, P.、Taubman, P. M.(1995)。Understandingcurriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourse。York, NY:Peter Lang。  new window
10.Derrida, Jacques、張寧(2004)。書寫與差異。臺北:麥田出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.甄曉蘭(2004)。課程理論與實務--解構理論與重建。臺北市:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
12.Kliebard, H. M.(1986)。The struggle for the American curriculum。Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
13.Norris, Christopher、劉自荃(1995)。解構批評:理論與應用。台北:駱駝出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.喬納森.卡勒、張景智(1992)。索緒爾。臺北:桂冠圖書股份公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.Kelly, A. V.(1999)。The curriculum: Theory and practice。London:Paul Chapman:A Sage Publishing Company。  new window
16.Popkewitz, T. S.(1991)。A political sociology of education reform: Power/knowledge in teaching, teacher education, and research。New York:Teachers College Press:Columbia University。  new window
17.Doll, W. E. Jr.(1993)。A post-modern perspective on curriculum。New York:Teachers College, Columbia University。  new window
18.Eisner, Elliot W.(1994)。The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs。New York:Macmillan College Publishing Company。  new window
19.Giroux, H. A.(1994)。Disturbing pleasure: learning popular politics of education。London, UK。  new window
20.Marsh, Colin J.(1997)。Planning, Management and Ideology: Key Concepts for Understanding Curriculum。London:Falmer Press。  new window
21.喬納森‧卡勒爾、方謙(1994)。羅蘭.巴特。台北:桂冠出版社。  延伸查詢new window
22.Ornstein, A. C.、Hunkins, F. P.(1998)。Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues。Boston, Massachusetts:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
23.Derrida, Jacques、楊恆達、劉北成(1998)。立場。臺北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
24.沈清松(1990)。現代哲學論衡。臺北:黎明文化事業股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.蘇永明(2006)。主體的爭議與教育--以現代和後現代哲學為範圍。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Dreyfus, Hubert L.、Rabinow, Paul、錢俊(1995)。傅柯:超越結構主義與詮釋學。臺北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
27.米歇爾.傅柯、尚衡(1990)。性意識史 (第一卷) : 導論。臺北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
28.Apple, Michael W.(1979)。Ideology and Curriculum。New York:Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
29.Aronowitz, Stanley、Giroux, Henry A.(1985)。Education under Siege: The Conservative, Liberal and Radical Debate over Schooling。South Hadley, Massachusetts:Bergin & Garvey。  new window
30.楊大春(1995)。德希達。台北:生智出版社。  延伸查詢new window
31.Giroux, Henry A.(1992)。Border Crossings: Cultural Workers and the Politics of Education。New York:Routledge。  new window
32.Derrida, Jacques、Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty(1976)。Of Grammatology。Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
33.Slattery, C. P.(1995)。Curriculum Development in the Postmodern Era。Garland。  new window
34.周珮儀(19990000)。從社會批判到後現代:季胡課程理論之研究。臺北市:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.Stanley, W. B.(1992)。Curriculum for Utopia--Social Reconstructionism and Critical Pedagogy in the Postmodern Era。State University of New York Press。  new window
36.孟樊(20010000)。後現代的認同政治。臺北:揚智文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.Foucault, Michel、劉北成、楊遠嬰(1992)。規訓與懲罰:監獄的誕生。桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
38.Tyler, Ralph Winfred(1949)。Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction。University of Chicago Press。  new window
39.Foucault, Michel、王德威(1993)。知識的考掘。麥田出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
40.高宣揚(19990000)。後現代論。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.黃嘉雄(2002)。九年一貫課程改革的省思與實踐。台北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
42.Huebner, D.(1975)。Curriculum as Concern for Man's Temporality。Curriculum Theorizing: The Reconceptualists。California。  new window
43.Gibson, Rex(1995)。結構主義與教育。結構主義與教育。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
44.蘇永明(2000)。垂直多元與水平多元的思考模式。文化、多元文化與教育。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
45.Foucault, Michel(1976)。The History of Sexuality: An Introduction。The History of Sexuality: An Introduction。New York, NY。  new window
46.Doll, William E.(1997)。後現代課程觀。後現代課程觀。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
47.Rorty, Richard(1998)。偶然、反諷及團結。偶然、反諷及團結。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
48.Deleuze, Gilles(2000)。德勒茲論傳柯。德勒茲論傳柯。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
49.Davidson, A. I.(1986)。Archaeology, Geneaology, Ethics。Foucault: A Critical Reader。New York, NY。  new window
50.Foucault, M.(1980)。Questions on Geography。Power/knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977。New York, NY。  new window
51.Pinar, W. F.(2004)。"Possibly Being So": Curriculum as Complicated Conversation。What is Curriculum Theory?。Mahwah, NJ。  new window
52.Lather, P.(1999)。Ideology and Methodological Attitude。Contemporary Curriculum Discourses。New York, NY。  new window
53.Morris, M.(1996)。Toward a Ludic Pedagogy。Contemporary Curriculum Discourses。New York, NY。  new window
54.(1992)。Understanding Curriculum as Phenomenological and Deconstructed Text。Understanding Curriculum as Phenomenological and Deconstructed Text。New York, NY。  new window
55.Cherryholmes, C. H.(1988)。Power and Criticism。Power and Criticism。New York, NY。  new window
56.Taubman, P. M.(1992)。Achieving the Right Distance。Understanding Curriculum as Phenomenological and Deconstructed Text。New York, NY。  new window
57.Jagodzinski, J.(1992)。Curriculum as Felt through Six Layers of an Aesthetically Embodied Skin: The Arch-writing on the Body。Understanding Curriculum as Phenomenological and Deconstructed Text。New York, NY。  new window
58.Martusewicz, R. A.(1992)。Mapping the Terrain of the Post-modern Subject: Post-structuralism and the Education Woman。Understanding Curriculum as Phenomenological and Deconstructed Text。New York, NY。  new window
59.蘇峰山(1996)。傅柯對權力的分析。歐洲社會理論。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
60.Best, Steven、Kellner, Douglas(1994)。後現代論:批判的質疑。後現代論:批判的質疑。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
61.李猛(2005)。傅柯的權力分析。再見傅柯:傳柯晚期思想新論。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
62.王瑞賢(2003)。教育改革下教室言談模式變化與日常言談關係之研究。市場、國家與教育。嘉義縣大林鎮。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Hargreaves, A.、Goodson, I. F.(1996)。Teacher's Professional Lives: Aspirations and Actualities。Teacher's Professional Lives。London:Falmer Press。  new window
2.Kliebard, H. M.(1975)。Bureaucracy and curriculum theory。Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists。Washington, DC:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
3.Schwab, J. J.(1971)。The practical 2: Arts of eclectic。Science, curriculum, and liberal education: Selected essays。Chicago:University of Chicago。  new window
4.Greene, M.(1975)。Curriculum and consciousness。Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists。Berkeley, CA:McCutchan。  new window
5.Foucault, Michel(1980)。Two Lectures。Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977。New York:Pantheon。  new window
6.Foucault, M.(1980)。Truth and power。Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977。New York:Pantheon Books。  new window
7.Vallance, E.(1991)。Aesthetic inquiry: Art criticism。Forms of Curriculum Inquiry。Albany, New York:State University of New York Press。  new window
8.Popkewitz, T. S.、Brennan, M.(1998)。Restructuring of Social and Political Theory in Education: Foucault and a Social Epistemology of School Practices。Foucault's Challenge: Discourse, Knowledge, and Power in Education。New York:Teachers College Press。  new window
9.Foucault, Michel(1982)。The subject and power。Michael Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics。Chicago:Chicago University Press。  new window
10.Grove, R. W.、Short, E. C.(1991)。Theoretical inquiry: Components and structure。Forms of curriculum inquiry。Albany, New York:State University of New York。  new window
11.楊凱麟(20050000)。自我的去作品化:主體性與問題化場域的傅柯難題。再見傅柯:傅柯晚期思想新論。臺北:松慧。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Sumara, D. J.、Davis, B.(1998)。Unskinning curriculum。Curriculum: Toward new identities。New York:Garland。  new window
13.蘇永明(20030000)。新實用主義的教育哲學--羅逖。當代教育哲學。臺北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Aoki, T. T.(1999)。Toward a dialectic between the conceptual world and the lived world: transcending instrumentalism in curriculum orientation。Contemporary curriculum discourses。Scottsdale, AZ:Corsuch Scarissbrick。  new window
15.Gough, A.(1998)。Beyond Eurocentrism in Science Education: Promises and Problematics from a Feminist Poststructuralist Perspective。Curriculum: Toward New Identities。New York, NY:Garland。  new window
16.Daignault, J.(1992)。Traces at Work from Different Places。Understanding Curriculum as Phenomenological and Deconstructed Text。New York, NY:Teacher College, Columbia University。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE