臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：民主態度的類型：臺灣民眾二次政黨輪替後的分析
書刊名：選舉研究
作者：黃信豪 引用關係
作者(外文)：Huang, Hsin-hao
出版日期：2011
卷期：18:1
頁次：頁1-34
主題關鍵詞：民主支持；民主滿意度；政黨輪替；選舉輸家；政治文化；Support for democracy；Satisfaction with democracy；Party alternation in power；Election loser；Political culture
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(12) 博士論文(4) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:240
  • 點閱點閱:120
本文摘要 從政治文化的角度來看，民眾的民主態度是一國民主政治體制得以維繫的重要條件。本研究嘗試結合過去廣受討論的「民主支持」與「民主滿意度」概念，建構一個民主態度的初探性類型，藉此探討台灣民眾經歷二次政黨輪替後對民主體制的態度與看法；同時，作者也從民主的內在傾向與工具傾向出發，以檢驗此類型的理論區辨度。研究結果顯示，台灣民眾在二次政黨輪替過後對民主體制表達絕對支持的比例僅約為半數，而滿意目前民主運作的比例也僅約略超過一半，屬「民主滿意者」的比例則約為三成左右，這表示仍有相當比例民眾對台灣民主體制情感或實踐上的支持仍存有疑慮。其次，我們也發現內在傾向與工具傾向能分別解釋民眾對民主的絕對支持與體制運作的評價，這表示本研究所建構的民主態度類型能彰顯背後的理論意義。值得注意的是，經由投票對象與統獨立場的檢視，本文發現2008 年總統選舉後台灣選民並沒有出現選舉輸家對民主態度衰退的現象。如何增強民眾對民主體制的支持與信心，不但在民主鞏固的過程相當重要，也是台灣民主未來走向深化的路途中應受到學界注意的關鍵議題。
本文摘要 從政治文化的角度來看，民眾的民主態度是一國民主政治體制得以維繫的重要條件。本研究嘗試結合過去廣受討論的「民主支持」與「民主滿意度」概念，建構一個民主態度的初探性類型，藉此探討台灣民眾經歷二次政黨輪替後對民主體制的態度與看法；同時，作者也從民主的內在傾向與工具傾向出發，以檢驗此類型的理論區辨度。研究結果顯示，台灣民眾在二次政黨輪替過後對民主體制表達絕對支持的比例僅約為半數，而滿意目前民主運作的比例也僅約略超過一半，屬「民主滿意者」的比例則約為三成左右，這表示仍有相當比例民眾對台灣民主體制情感或實踐上的支持仍存有疑慮。其次，我們也發現內在傾向與工具傾向能分別解釋民眾對民主的絕對支持與體制運作的評價，這表示本研究所建構的民主態度類型能彰顯背後的理論意義。值得注意的是，經由投票對象與統獨立場的檢視，本文發現2008 年總統選舉後台灣選民並沒有出現選舉輸家對民主態度衰退的現象。如何增強民眾對民主體制的支持與信心，不但在民主鞏固的過程相當重要，也是台灣民主未來走向深化的路途中應受到學界注意的關鍵議題。 應。 關鍵詞：民主支持、民主滿意度、政黨輪替、選舉輸家、政治文化 Abstract A democracy cannot be considered as consolidated without its institutions being supported by a majority of populace. Based upon the suggested concepts of “support for democracy” and “satisfaction with democracy”, this paper proposes an exploratory topology to probe the popular attitudes toward democracy in Taiwan, with the special focus on the time point after the second party alternation in 2008. Furthermore, the author checks the validity of this democratic topology via the intrinsic and instrumental dispositions, which are the two main origins of people’s democratic attitudes. The findings show that, firstly, slightly fewer less than half of Taiwanese approved of the democratic regime with the absolute manner, and also about half of them were satisfied with the current practice and performance of democracy after the second party alternation. The fact that only about 30 percent of citizens are categorized as “democratic satisfaction” means that a proportion of Taiwanese still have doubts about democracy on either the emotional or practical dimensions. Secondly, the intrinsic and instrumental dispositions can separately increase the desirability and satisfaction of democracy, thereby explain different types of democratic attitudes in Taiwan. Moreover, with other variables remaining constant, the election result of 2008 did not lead to the systematic effect of “election loser”; voters whose preferable candidate lost in the election did not become more likely to suspect the responsibility of the democratic system. Totally speaking, how to increase the popular support and confidence for democracy not only remains crucial to the process of democratic consolidation, but also should be regarded as a key issue for the future of democratic deepening in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.Lewis-Beck, Michael S.(1988)。Economics and the American Voter: Past, Present, Future。Political Behavior，10(1)，5-21。  new window
2.Moehler, Devra C.(2009)。Critical Citizens and Submissive Subjects: Election Losers and Winners in Africa。British Journal of Political Science，39(2)，345-366。  new window
3.Prothro, James W.、Grigg, Charles W.(1960)。Fundamental Principles of Democracy: Bases of Agreement and Disagreement。Journal of Politics，22(2)，276-294。  new window
4.Przeworski, Adam、Alvarez, Michael、Cheibub, José Antonio、Limongi, Fernando(1996)。What Makes Democracies Endure?。Journal of Democracy，7(1)，39-55。  new window
5.Bratton, Michael、Mattes, Robert(2001)。Support for Democracy in Africa: Intrinsic or Instrumental?。British Journal of Political Science，31(3)，447-474。  new window
6.王靖興、孫天龍(20050900)。臺灣民眾民主政治評價影響因素之分析。臺灣民主季刊，2(3)，55-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.林聰吉(20070500)。解析臺灣的民主政治：以民主支持度與滿意度為觀察指標。選舉研究，14(1)，61-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.蔡佳泓(20090400)。臺灣民眾的民主評價：2004年為例的驗證性因素分析。社會科學論叢，3(1)，152-184。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Canache, Demarys、Mondak, Jeffery J.、Seligson, Mitchell A.(2001)。Meaning and Measurement in Cross-National Research on Satisfaction with Democracy。The Public Opinion Quarterly，65(4)，506-528。  new window
10.Xie, Yu(1989)。Structural Equation Models for Ordinal Variables: An Analysis of Occupational Destination。Sociological Methods and Research，17(4)，325-352。  new window
11.Chang, Yu-tzung、Chu, Yun-han、Park, Chong-Min(2007)。Authoritarian Nostalgia in Asia。Journal of Democracy，18(3)，66-80。  new window
12.張佑宗(20090300)。選舉輸家與民主鞏固--臺灣2004年總統選舉落選陣營對民主的態度。臺灣民主季刊，6(1)，41-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.蕭阿勤(20050600)。世代認同與歷史敘事：臺灣一九七○年代「回歸現實」世代的形成。臺灣社會學，9，1-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.黃信豪(20051100)。臺灣民眾政治功效意識的持續與變遷：政黨輪替前後的分析。選舉研究，12(2)，111-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Eckstein, Harry(1988)。A Culturalist Theory of Political Change。American Political Science Review，82(3)，789-804。  new window
16.Easton, David(1975)。A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support。British Journal of Political Science，5(4)，435-457。  new window
17.徐火炎(1992)。民主轉型過程中政黨的重組：臺灣地區選民的民主價值取向、政黨偏好與黨派投票改變之研究。人文及社會科學集刊，5(1)，213-263。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Huntington, Samuel(1965)。Political Development and Political Decay。World Politics，17(3)，386-430。  new window
19.林瓊珠(20050500)。臺灣民眾的政治知識：1992-2000年的變動。選舉研究，12(1)，147-171。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.林聰吉(20071200)。政治支持與民主鞏固。政治科學論叢，34，71-103。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.盛治仁(20030500)。臺灣民眾民主價值及政治信任感研究--政黨輪替前後的比較。選舉研究，10(1)，115-169。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.吳重禮(20081100)。臺灣民眾威權懷舊的初探：蔣經國政府施政的比較評價。選舉研究，15(2)，119-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.陳陸輝(20021100)。政治信任感與臺灣地區選民投票行為。選舉研究，9(2)，65-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.林聰吉、楊湘齡(20080600)。臺灣社會資本的分佈及其民主效果。東吳政治學報，26(2)，39-81。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Ake, Claude(1993)。The Unique Case of African Democracy。International Affairs，69(2)，239-244。  new window
26.Miller, Arthur H.、Listhaug, Ola.(1990)。The Parties and Confidence in Government: A Comparison of Norway, Sweden and United States。British Journal of Political Science，20(3)，357-386。  new window
27.Nadeau, Richard、Andre Blais.(1993)。Accepting the Election Outcome: The Effect on Participation on Losers' Consent。British Journal of Political Science，23(4)，553-563。  new window
研究報告
1.Yu, Ching-hsin(2008)。2005年至2008年「台灣選舉與民主化調查」四年期研究計劃（IV）：民國九十七年總統選舉面訪案。台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Kaase, Max、Newton, Kenneth(1995)。Beliefs in Government。Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Long, J. Scott、Freese, Jeremy(2006)。Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata。Stata Press。  new window
3.Rose, Richard、Mishler, William、Haerpfer, Christian(1998)。Democracy and Its Alternatives: Understanding Post-Communist Societies。Baltimore, MD：Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
4.Chu, Yun-han、Diamond, Larry、Nathan, Andrew J.、Shin, Doh-chull(2008)。How East Asians View Democracy。New York, NY：Columbia University Press。  new window
5.Diamond, Larry Jay(1999)。Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation。The Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
6.Huntington, Samuel P.(1981)。American Politics: The Promise of Disharmony。Cambridge, Massachusetts：The Belkanp Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
7.Long, J. Scott(1997)。Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables。Sage Publications。  new window
8.Easton, David、Hess, R.(1965)。A System Analysis of Political Life。New York, NY：John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
9.Fuchs, Dieter、Klingemann, Hans-Dieter(1995)。Citizens and the State: A Changing Relationship。Oxford University Press。  new window
10.Almond, Gabriel A.、Verba, Sidney(1963)。The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations。Princeton, New Jersey：Princeton University Press。  new window
11.Inglehart, Ronald、Welzel, Christian(2005)。Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence。Cambridge University Press。  new window
12.Neuman, W. Russell(1986)。The Paradox of Mass Politics: Knowledge and Opinion in the American Electorate。Harvard University Press。  new window
13.Huntington, Samuel Phillips(1991)。The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century。University of Oklahoma Press。  new window
14.Przeworski, Adam(1991)。Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America。Cambridge University Press。  new window
15.Delli Carpini, Michael X.、Keeter, Scott(1996)。What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters。Yale University Press。  new window
16.Dalton, Russell J.(2004)。Democratic challenges, democratic choices: the erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies。Oxford University Press。  new window
17.Putnam, Robert D.、Leonardi, Robert、Nanetti, Raffaella Y.(1993)。Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy。Princeton University Press。  new window
18.Linz, Juan José、Stepan, Alfred C.(1996)。Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe。The Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
19.Wang, T. Y.(2008)。Democratic Commitment in Taiwan: An Analysis of Survey Data。Democratization in Taiwan: Challenges in Transformation。Vermont。  new window
20.Fuchs, Dieter、Guidorossi, Giovanna、Svensson, Palle.(1995)。Support for the Democratic System。Citizens and the State。Oxford。  new window
21.Ake, Claude(1996)。Democracy and Development in Africa。Brookings Institution Press。  new window
22.Listhaug, Ola.(1995)。The Dynamics of Trust in Politicians。Citizens and the State。Oxford。  new window
23.Miller, Arthur H.、Listhaug, Ola.(1999)。Political Performance and Institutional Trust。Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government。New York。  new window
24.Norris, Pippa.(1999)。Institutional Explanations for Political Support。Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government。New York。  new window
25.Stouffer, Samuel(1956)。Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties。New York：Doubleday。  new window
圖書論文
1.Dalton, Russell J.、Shin, Doh Chull(2006)。Citizens, Democracy, and Markets。Citizens, Democracy, and Markets around the Pacific Rim: Congruence Theory and Political Culture。Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Dalton, Russell J.(1999)。Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies。Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government。New York, NY：Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Klingemann, Hans-Dieter(1999)。Mapping Political Support in the 1990s: A Global Analysis。Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government。Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Chang, Yu-tzung、Chu, Yun-han(2008)。How citizens view Taiwan's new democracy。How East Asians view democracy。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
5.Norris, Pippa(1999)。Introduction: The Growth of Critical Citizens?。Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government。Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Elster, Jon(1993)。The Necessity and Impossibility of Simultaneous Economic and Political Reform。Constitutionalism and Democracy: Transitions in the Contemporary World。New York：Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：481（臺灣：467，外國：14） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1498098 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67303568
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上