:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:試析幼兒園教育評量之現象
書刊名:靜宜人文社會學報
作者:陳姿蘭 引用關係廖鳳瑞 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Tze-lanLiaw, Fong-ruey
出版日期:2012
卷期:6:1
頁次:頁151-176
主題關鍵詞:幼兒教育教育評量和諧華人文化Early childhood educationEducational assessmentHarmonyCultural value
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:407
  • 點閱點閱:215
本文彙整國內現行幼兒園實施教育評量的資料,針對幼兒園教育評量的運作現況加以分析。本研究發現國內幼兒教師在實施評量時的兩個現象,包括:(1) 偏重評量資料的收集,而較少分析與解釋;(2) 會考慮家長的感受與想法,而採用家長偏好的評量方式和內容、調高幼兒的評量等第。針對研究發現,本文提出教師的評量專業訓練不足及教師的和諧價值觀兩項因素以為解釋,並討論其對國內幼兒園教育評量師培及實務運作的啟示。
The study reviews the current practices of educational assessment in early childhood education programs in Taiwan. The results reveal two phenomena, including (1) preschool teachers practice more of collecting assessment information, less of analyze/interpreting assessment information. (2) preschool teachers tend to take parents’ feelings into account and give better ratings for children’s performance on the final report. Two factors -- lack of adequate training on assessment and teachers’ value of “harmony” -- are provided to explain the above findings. Implications of the results in the areas of teacher education and educational assessment practices are discussed.
期刊論文
1.Leung, K.、Koch, P. T.、Lu, L.(1993)。A dualistic model of harmony and its implications for conflict management in Asia。Asia Pacific Journal of Management,19,201-220。  new window
2.謝美慧(200708)。誰的幼兒教育品質?--多元觀點的探討。教育研究,160,30-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Brookhart, S. M.(1993)。Teachers grading practices: Meaning and values。Journal of Educational Measurement,30(2),123-142。  new window
4.Cross, L. H.、Frary, R. B.(1999)。Hodgepodge grading: Endorsed by students and teachers alike。Applied Measurement in Education,12(1),53-72。  new window
5.McMillan, J. H.、Myran, S.、Workman, D.(2002)。Elementary teachers’€™ classroom assessment and grading practices。The Journal of Educational Research,95(4),203-213。  new window
6.Shek, D. T. L.(2001)。Perceptions of happy families amongst Chinese adolescents and their parents: Implications for family therapy。Family Therapy,28,73-103。  new window
7.Stiggins, R. J.、Frisbie, D. A.、Griswold, P. A.(1989)。Inside high school grading practices: Building a research agenda。Education Measurement: Issues and Practice,8(2),5-14。  new window
8.Han, Kuei-Hsiang、Li, Mei-Chih、Hwang, Kwang-Kuo(2005)。Cognitive responses to favor requests from different social targets in a Confucian society。Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,22(2),283-294。  new window
9.江文慈(200407)。教學評量改革的難題分析--技術、文化、政治與後現代觀點。課程與教學,7(3),1-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.吳毓瑩(200303)。教學評量之信念探究--松竹梅三個個案詮釋暨啟示。國立臺北師範學院學報,16(1),137-161。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.呂翠夏(200006)。統整課程之評量:運用實作評量於幼稚園的實例。測驗與輔導,160,3357-3359。  延伸查詢new window
12.黃義良(200512)。幼教機構的行銷策略初探。幼兒教育年刊,17,35-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.廖鳳瑞(2005)。幼稚園的教學評鑑--以檔案為例。幼教簡訊,28,2-4。  延伸查詢new window
14.鄭婉妮(2002)。尋回臺灣本土價值的幼兒教育。幼教資訊,12,2-16。  延伸查詢new window
15.蕭玉佳、吳毓瑩(200612)。成長路上話成長:幼稚園學習歷程檔案建構之行動與省思。應用心理研究,32,217-244。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.孫立葳(20000200)。幼兒教師工作壓力之研究。新竹師院學報,13,265-279。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.黃淑苓(19951100)。幼兒教學評量。嘉義師院學報,9,667-694。  延伸查詢new window
18.Messick, S.(1995)。Validity of Psychological Assessment: Validation of Inferences from Persons' Responses and Performances as Scientific Inquiry into Score Meaning。American Psychologist,50(9),741-749。  new window
19.盧美貴(19990400)。幼稚園的真實性評量--常被忽略的家長參與。教師天地,99,46-53。  延伸查詢new window
20.吳宗祐、徐瑋伶、鄭伯壎(20021200)。怒不可遏或忍氣吞聲:華人企業主管威權領導與部屬憤怒反應。本土心理學研究,18,3-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Hwang, Kwang-Kuo(2000)。Chinese Relationalism: Theoretical Construction and Methodological Considerations。Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour,30(2),155-178。  new window
22.徐聯恩、彭志琦(20060700)。我國人口結構變化對幼教環境的影響及其因應之道。兒童及少年福利期刊,10,123-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.許錦雲(20080300)。幼兒園良好親師關係之探究。幼兒教保研究期刊,1,13-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.陳怡如(20041200)。我國國小教育及幼兒教育改革初探--行政干預與市場機制之比較觀點。新竹師院學報,19,89-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.劉慈惠(20060400)。學前幼兒被期待學些什麼?--以兩所幼稚園家長為例。師大學報. 教育類,51(1),131-158。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Hargreaves, A.、Earl, L.、Schmidt, M.(2002)。Perspectives on Alternative Assessment Reform。American Educational Research Journal,39(1),69-95。  new window
會議論文
1.林佩蓉(2009)。追求教學品質升級之幼稚園輔導。輔導學習、學習輔導-全國幼教輔導研討。  延伸查詢new window
2.廖鳳瑞、陳姿蘭、陳欣希(2006)。幼兒檔案評量的成效及其影響因素之研究。2006海峽兩岸幼兒園課程與評量學術交流研討會,信誼基金會 。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳珍梅(2007)。學校與家庭之互動:幼兒園親師衝突中性別與權力意涵之分析。高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.盧美貴(1998)。開放式幼稚園課程與學習評量之研究 (計畫編號:NSC87-2411-H133-001)。台北:行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.毛連塭、吳清山、林佩蓉、幸曼玲、劉春榮(1994)。當前幼稚園教育問題及意見之調查研究。臺北市:國立教育資料館。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.謝佩芳(2009)。園方推動幼兒學習檔案歷程之回溯研究--以一所實施高瞻課程的幼稚園為例(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李姿慧(2006)。幼稚園教師實施幼兒評量之現況調查研究--以桃園地區為例(碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.李嘉華(2005)。台北縣幼兒園教師對於教學評量的實施情況研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.張玉佩(2007)。園所建構幼兒學習檔案之行動研究(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳嘉露(2005)。解開''檔案''的秘密~一位幼教老師應用幼兒作品改進教學之行動研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
6.莊雯心(2002)。多元智能(MI)教學研究--光譜計畫在班級實施歷程分析(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
7.王正珠(2001)。幼稚園教師運用多元智能理論之歷程研究(碩士論文)。國立新竹師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳姿蘭(2002)。作品集在幼稚園的實施。幼兒表現評量--作品取樣系統。台北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Airasian, P. W.、Russell, M. K.(2008)。Classroom Assessment: Concepts and Applications。Boston, MA:McGraw-Hill Higher Education。  new window
3.McAfee, O.、Leong, D.(2007)。Assessing and Guiding Young Children’s Development and Learning。Boston:Pearson Allyn。  new window
4.Mindes, G.、Irenton, H.、Mardell-Czudnowski, C.(1996)。Assessing Young Children。New York:Delmar Publishers。  new window
5.National Association for the Education of Young Children and the National Association of Early Childhood Specialists in State Departments of Education(1992)。Guidelines for aapropriate curriculum content and assessment in programs serving children ages 3 through 8。Reaching Potentials: Appropriate Curriculum and Assessment for Young Children。Washington, DC:National Association for the Education of Young Children and the National Association of Early Child。  new window
6.Wortham, S. C.(2001)。Assessment in Early Childhood Education。Upper Saddle River, NJ:Merrill/Prentice Hall。  new window
7.胡應麟。詩藪(內篇卷一)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.Shepard, L., Kagan, S.,、Wurtz, E. (Eds).(1998)。Principles and recommendations for early childhood assessments。Washington, DC:National Education Goals Panel。  new window
9.教育部國民教育司(1987)。幼稚園課程標準。正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.黃政傑(1987)。課程評鑑。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
11.楊國樞(1993)。中國人的價值觀--社會科學觀點。臺北:桂冠。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.黃囇莉(2006)。人際和諧與衝突:本土化的理論與研究。揚智文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.臺北市政府社會局(2010)。臺北市99年度托育機構評鑑指標,http://www.dosw.taipei.gov.tw/i/i0300.asp?fix_code= 2703019&group_type=1&l1_code=27&l2_code=03, 20101101。  new window
圖書論文
1.Gao, G.、Ting-Toomey, S.、Gudykunst, W. B.(1996)。Chinese communication process。The Handbook of Chinese Psychology。Hong Kong:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Yang, K. S.(1995)。Chinese social orientation: An integrative analysis。Chinese societies and mental health。Hong Kong:New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE