:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「中學生解釋型態量表」之編製
書刊名:測驗學刊
作者:王蕾雁陳美芳 引用關係曾文志 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Lei-yanChen, Mei-fangTseng, Wen-chih
出版日期:2013
卷期:60:1
頁次:頁43-65
主題關鍵詞:正向心理衡鑑解釋型態樂觀Explanatory styleOptimismPositive psychological assessment
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:53
  • 點閱點閱:153
樂觀是正向心理學訴求的重點之一,而樂觀的條件乃是架構於對事件的解釋型態,樂觀解釋型態能讓個體健康地檢視生活事件的原因,並保持前進的動力與希望。本研究以中學生表述之生活經驗為基底,編製「中學生解釋型態量表」;量表之解釋型態採多向度構念,包含正向事件永久普遍性/個別性,負向事件永久普遍性/個別性等四個分量尺,全量表共30題,作答方式採二選一強迫選擇題。參與本研究量表發展之樣本取自全國29所國高中職學生,其中264名為推導樣本,2,760名為複製樣本。本量表信效度方面,內部一致性係數介於.384~.587之間,驗證性因素分析顯示模型整體與概念模型適配度良好,因素負荷量均達顯著水準。
Optimism is one of the key points in positive psychology. The basic element of optimism is the reformulated explanatory style for events. The optimistic explanatory style can help people to view events healthily and keep the power to go forward. The purpose of this study is to develop Secondary School Students' Explanatory Style Questionnaire based on the experience of life with secondary school students. The concept of the explanatory style in the study is multi-dimensional. The explanatory styles of the questionnaire includes four subscales. The four subscales are "good events to permanent-pervasive cause", "good events to personal cause", "bad events to permanent- pervasive cause", and "bad events to personal cause". The questionnaire has 30 items, each of which consists of a hypothetical good or bad event and two possible causes of the event. Respondents pick the cause from the pair that better describes why the event occurred. The students selected as participants are from 29 secondary schools. The participants includes 264 derivation samples and 2,760 replication samples. Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the questionnaire range from .384 to .587. In the confirmatory factor analysis, the Goodness-of-Fit of the questionnaire is good. The factor loadings are significant.
期刊論文
1.Billingsley, K. D.、Waehler, C. A.、Hardin, S. I.(1993)。Stability of optimism and choice of coping strategy。Perceptual and Motor Skills,76,91-97。  new window
2.Camgoz, S. M.、Tektas, O. O.、Metin, I.(2008)。Academic attributional style, self-efficacy and gender: A cross-cultural comparison。Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal,36(1),97-114。  new window
3.Lewis, S. P.、Waschbusch, D. A.(2008)。Alternative approaches for conceptualizing children's attributional styles and their associations with depressive symptoms。Depression and Anxiety,25(9),37-46。  new window
4.Morris, H. J.(2001)。Happiness explained。U.S. News and World Report,131(8),46-55。  new window
5.Nolen-Hoeksema, S.、Girgus, J. S.、Seligman, M. E. P.(1992)。Predictors and consequences of childhood depressive symptom: A 5-year longitudinal study。Journal of Abnormal Psychology,101(3),405-422。  new window
6.Peterson, C.、Luborsky, L.、Seligman, M. E. P.(1983)。Attributional and depressive mood shifts: A case study using the symptom-context method。Journal of Abnormal Psy chology,92(1),96-103。  new window
7.Rand, K. L.(2009)。Hope and optimism: Latent structures and influences on grade expectancy and academic performance。Journal of Personality,77(1),231-260。  new window
8.Peterson, C.、Semmel, A.、Baeyer, C. V.、Abramson, L. Y.、Metalshy, G. I.、Seligman, M. E. P.(1982)。The Attributional Style Questionnaire。Cognitive Therapy and Research,6(3),287-300。  new window
9.吳相儀、林耀南、陳學志、邱發忠、徐芝君(20081200)。樂觀就不悲觀嗎?樂觀與悲觀的雙向度理論驗證及量表的發展。測驗學刊,55(3),559-589。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Abramson, L. Y.、Seligman, M. E. P.、Teasdale, J. D.(1978)。Learned Helplessness in Humans: Critique and Reformulation。Journal of Abnormal Psychology,87(1),49-74。  new window
11.Seligman, M. E. P.、Peterson, C.、Kaslow, N. J.、Tanenbaum, R. L.、Alloy, L. B.、Abramson, L. Y.(1984)。Attributional style and depressive symptoms among children。Journal of Abnormal Psychology,93(2),235-238。  new window
12.Peterson, C.(2000)。The future of optimism。American Psychologist,55(1),44-55。  new window
13.Seligman, Martin E. P.、Steen, Tracy A.、Park, Nansook、Peterson, Christopher(2005)。Positive Psychology Progress: Empirical Validation of Interventions。American Psychologist,60(5),410-421。  new window
14.Seligman, Martin E. P.、Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly(2000)。Positive psychology: An introduction。American Psychologist,55(1),5-14。  new window
15.曾文志(20071200)。大學生的樂觀、社會支持與幸福感的關聯:結構方程模式取向之研究。教育與心理研究,30(4),117-146。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Scheier, M. F.、Carver, C. S.(1985)。Optimism, coping, and health : Assessment and implicationsof generalized outcome experiences。Health Psychology,4,219-247。  new window
學位論文
1.侯雪香(2006)。國中資優生學業自我效能、解釋型態與學業成就之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳玫菁(2008)。減悲/增樂教學方案對國小高年級學童悲觀/樂觀信念、憂鬱及焦慮之影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉呈恩(2008)。雲林縣國中學生解釋風格、自我概念與憂鬱情緒之關係研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.高民凱(2001)。中學生解釋風格量表之編製及其效度研究(碩士論文)。彰化師範大學,彰化市。  延伸查詢new window
5.曾雪芳(2008)。樂觀創意教學對國小學童樂觀解釋型態影響之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.徐晉偉(2007)。國小高年級兒童依附關係、樂觀與生活適應之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.鄭芳怡(2004)。國小中、高年級學童解釋形態、領域知識及創意生活經驗與科技創造力之關係(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.葉真秀(2004)。高中生完美主義傾向、解釋風格與憂鬱程度之關係--以台中縣市六所高中為例(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
9.杜品儀(2007)。樂觀學習課程方案對國小六年級學童樂觀解釋型態及正向情緒之影響(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.丁明潔(2003)。國中生樂觀/悲觀傾向、課業壓力評估、課業壓力因應方式與學校生活適應之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.李乙明(1999)。高中數理資優班學生情緒智力之研究(博士論文)。彰化師範大學,彰化縣。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.李澄賢(2004)。大學生的情緒調節、調節焦點、樂觀與創造力之關係(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.M. E. P. Seligman、洪蘭(2002)。教孩子學習樂觀。臺北市:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
2.Snyder, C. R.、Lopez, S. J.(2007)。Positive psychology。Sage。  new window
3.張春興(2005)。教育心理學--三化取向的理論與實驗。台北市:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.常雅珍(2005)。國小情意教育課程--正向心理學取向。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Seligman, M. E. P.、洪蘭(2003)。真實的快樂。遠流。  延伸查詢new window
6.蕭文龍(2009)。多變量分析最佳入門實用書:SPSS+LISREL。臺北:碁峰資訊。  延伸查詢new window
7.邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式--LISREL的理論、技術與應用。雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Forster, J. R.(2003)。Focusing on strengths and optimism,http://www.dependablestrengths.com/assets/documents/archive/strengths_optimism.pdf。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE