:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國中生知覺體育教師教學風格偏好與學科教學知識之研究
書刊名:臺灣運動教育學報
作者:林書安曾季秀楊明蓁王文宜
作者(外文):Lin, Shu-anTseng, Chi-hsiuYang, Ming-chenWang, Wen-yi
出版日期:2013
卷期:8:1
頁次:頁31-44
主題關鍵詞:國中學生教學風格學科教學知識Junior high school studentsTeaching stylePedagogical content knowledge
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:74
  • 點閱點閱:234
本研究目的為探討不同背景變項的國中學生知覺體育教師教學風格偏好與學科教學知識之差異情形,以及體育教師教學風格偏好、體育教師學科教學知識的知覺對學生喜愛體育課程度之預測能力。本研究透過問卷調查法,以「學生知覺體育教師教學風格偏好量表」及「學生知覺體育教師學科教學知識量表」為研究工具調查臺北市 816位國中學生對體育教師教學風格偏好與學科教學知識之研究。所得數據以描述性統計、獨立樣本 t檢定、單因子變異數分析與多元逐步迴歸等統計方式進行分析。不同背景變項之國中學生在知覺教師教學風格偏好與教師學科教學知識上有所差異,且體育教師教學風格偏好與學科教學知識之「鼓勵學生參與」、「教師主導」能有效預測學生喜好體育課程度,而「小組引導」為負向影響。因此,教師可藉由學生的知覺來省思自身的教學,學生知覺不同的教師教學風格偏好與學科教學知識會有不同的學習感受。本研究建議教師應了解學生對自身教學風格的偏好及學科教學知識的知覺為何,以期在體育課程及教學計與實施上,更能有效的展現出體育教師的專業能力。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences perceptions of students with different background on different kind of teaching style preference and pedagogical content knowledge among PE teachers of junior high school. The questionnaires were administered to a sample of 816 students who were purposeful sampled from four junior high schools of Taipei city. The study tools included “The pupils’ perception scale of PE teacher’s teaching style preference” and “The pupils’ perception scale of PE teacher’s PCK”. The data was analyzed through descriptive statistics, independent-sample t test, one-way ANOVA, and multiple regression analysis. There was a significant difference between junior high school students of different background variables on PE teachers teaching style preference and pedagogical content knowledge, and the encouraging participation, leading of teacher of PE teachers teaching style preference and pedagogical content knowledge can forecast the student's degree of liking on physical education, but there was a negative influence on conduct of team. Teachers can introspect their teaching by perception of students, different perception of students on PE teacher’s teaching style and PCK will have different learning feelings. This study suggested teachers should comprehend the feelings of their students on teaching style and PCK for their teaching design in the future, to demonstrate the professional of PE teachers. Future studies can investigate the correlation of the preference of teaching style, PCK, and the learning of students.
期刊論文
1.張靜儀、戴翠華(2003)。「國小學童知覺自然老師PCK量表」之效化研究。國立臺北師範學院學報,16,187-212。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Baek, S.G.、Choi, H J.(2002)。The relationship between students'€™ perceptions of classroom environment and their academic achievement in Korea。Asia Pacific Education,3(1),125-135。  new window
3.Gouda, M.、Biddle S.、Fox K.、Underwood M.(1995)。It ain’t what you do, it’s the way you do it! Teaching style affects children’s motivation in track and field lessons。The Sport Psychologist,9,254-264。  new window
4.JeongAe, Y.(2011)。Portraying Physical Education-Pedagogical Content Knowledge for the professional Learning of Physical Educator。The Physical Educator,68(2),98-112。  new window
5.Koushki, P. A.、Kuhn, H. A.(1982)。How reliable are student evaluations of teachers?。Engineering Education,72,362-367。  new window
6.Kulinna, P. H.、Cothran, D. J.(2003)。Physical education teachers'€™ self-reported use and perceptions of various teaching styles。Learning and Instruction,13(6),597-609。  new window
7.Rayneri, L. J.、Gerber, B. L.、Wiley, L. P.(2003)。Gifted achievers and underachievers: The impact of learning style preferences in the classroom。The Journal of secondary Gifted Education,14(4),197-204。  new window
8.Treffinger, D. J.(1975)。Teaching for self directed learning: A priority for the gifted and talented。Gifted Child Quarterly,19(1),46-59。  new window
9.王珩(20051200)。國小英語教師學習與教學風格之研究。臺中教育大學學報. 人文藝術類,19(2),71-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Henze, I.、Van Driel, J. H.、Verloop, N.(2008)。Development of experienced science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of models of the solar system and the universe。International Journal of Science Education,30(10),1321-1342。  new window
11.Van Driel, J.H.、De Jong, O.、Verloop, N.(2002)。The development of preservice chemistry teachers' PCK。Science Education,86,572-590。  new window
12.陳春蓮(20020400)。以觀察工具促進體育教師教學行為之反省。大專體育,59,81-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Heimlich, J. E.、Norland, E.(2002)。Teaching Style: Where Are We Now?。New directions for adult and continuing education,93,17-25。  new window
14.段曉林、王國華、張惠博(19980600)。學生對教師之學科教學知覺問卷之發展。科學教育學刊,6(2),129-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.鄭英耀、莊雪華、顏嘉玲(20080300)。揭開創意教材的神秘面紗。師大學報. 科學教育類,53(1),61-85。  延伸查詢new window
16.謝甫佩、洪振方(20050300)。國小學童對自然科教師學科教學之知覺調查研究。科學教育研究與發展季刊,38,1-16。  延伸查詢new window
17.林國凍(20090300)。日本的Lesson Study如何引發教師專業發展之探究。教育研究與發展期刊,5(1),165-184。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Shulman, Lee S.(1987)。Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform。Harvard Educational Review,57(1),1-23。  new window
19.周宏室、劉照金(20040200)。影響臺灣地區學生體育態度之關鍵因素研究。大專體育學刊,6(1),1-15。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.張世忠、管世應、謝幸芬(2009)。大學生知覺新進教師PCK 之個案研究。數理學科教學知能,2009(1),1-20。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Chang, C. Y.(2004)。The study of designing “Pupils’ Perceptions of Science Teachers’ PCK” Instrument。the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching。Vancouver, BC。  new window
2.Yang, M. C.、Shin, K. T.、Hsueh, M. C.、Tseng, C. H.(201203)。The study of physical education teachers' teaching preference and pedagogical content knowledge。2012 AAHPERD National convention & exposition, in Boston, MA。Boston, MA。  new window
學位論文
1.陳佩瑩(2009)。國小學童對自然科教師教學風格偏好模式之研究(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義縣。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳莉君(2009)。台北縣新移民子女知覺教師教學風格對學生學習適應之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.謝麗珍(2006)。資優兒童學習風格與其對教師教學風格偏好之研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳美如(2004)。國小高年級學生對教師數學學科教學之知覺(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE