:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:中彰投地方教育財政評析比較
書刊名:教育理論與實踐學刊
作者:簡宗德
作者(外文):Chien, Tsung-te
出版日期:2016
卷期:34
頁次:頁91-114
主題關鍵詞:中彰投教育財政地方教育發展基金公平適足性Taichung-Changhua-Nantou areaEducation budgetLocal educational development fundFairnessCapital adequacy ratio
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:78
  • 點閱點閱:15
針對中彰投三縣市國民教育階段,103年度教育經費分配與使用進行「跨縣市」評析比較,尚待克服問題:1.財政困窘且縣市差異大;2.縣市教育經費「投入不足」與「分配不當」。彰投兩縣雖獲得較多公共財政來資助中小學教育,但學生所受教育質量很大因素受家庭資源多寡所決定,臺中市都會區由於家長社經地位較高,私人教育投資遠高於彰投。建議:1.縣市教學環境差異大,教育經費編列方式宜以「適足性」概念為基礎,並建立「績效」責任;2.應積極開拓自有財源,並要求修改《財政收支劃分法》以增加中央補助;3.要求將「教職員退休撫卹支出」另計於教育經費法定保障下限之外;4.營養午餐補助要適度並有排富條款;5.教育經費分配要兼顧水平公平、垂直公平、機會公平、財政中性;6.小型學校整併有助於紓解地方教育財政壓力但執行不易。
This study aims to analyze the development of the compulsory national education system of Taichung, Changhua and Nantou areas and examine the allocation of education budgets of the counties and cities in these areas in the fiscal year 2014. It identified two issues that remain unresolved. First, they have financial difficulties with significant differences among them. Second, their education programs were poorly funded and the distribution of their education funding was conducted improperly. Although Changhua and Nantou counties received more public finance to support their elementary and high school education, the quality of education that students received largely depended on the resources of the students' families. In urban districts of Taichung City where parents enjoy relatively high socioeconomic status, private spending on education far exceeds that of the Changhua and Nantou counties. This study offers the following suggestions. First of all, due to the vast disparity in teaching and learning environment among counties and cities, the allocation of education funding should obey the concept of Capital Adequacy Ratio and schools should take the responsibility to improve their own performance. Secondly, governments of the Taichung-Changhua-Nantou area should actively explore new sources of revenue and try to acquire more subsidies from the Central Government by seeking to modify the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures. Thirdly, governments of the Taichung-Changhua-Nantou area should request that the faculty pension fund be separated from the minimum education spending required in law. Fourthly, subsidy for students' lunches should be provided appropriately and students from richbackgrounds should be excluded. Then, the distribution of education funding must actualize the principles of horizontal fairness, vertical fairness, equal opportunity, and fiscal neutrality. Finally, the consolidation of small schools helps alleviate local governments' burdens in education financially-nonetheless, it is by no means an easy task.
期刊論文
1.曾巨威(2004)。地方教育財政與教育經費負擔之分攤機制。人文及社會科學集刊,16(2),197-239。  延伸查詢new window
2.Rice, J. K.(2004)。Equity and efficiency in school finance reform: Competing or complementary goods?。Peabody Journal of Education,79(2),134-151。  new window
3.陳麗珠(20061100)。從公平性邁向適足性:我國國民教育資源分配政策的現況與展望。教育政策論壇,9(4),101-117。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳麗珠(2009)。我國教育財政改革之回顧與展望:教育經費編列與管理法實施之檢視。教育學刊,33,1-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.呂生源(20041000)。地方教育財政新制評析。中等教育,55(5),136-155。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.詹盛如(20081200)。臺灣教育經費的現況分析。教育資料集刊,40,1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.教育部統計處(2016)。教育統計之中彰投國民中小學概況。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部統計處(2016)。教育統計之各級學校平均每生分攤經費。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳麗珠、鍾蔚起、周文賢(2002)。九十二年度地方政府教育經費基本需求試算。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.秦夢群(2013)。教育行政實務與應用。臺北市:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.徐偉初、歐俊男、謝文盛(2007)。財政學。臺北市:華泰。  延伸查詢new window
3.彰化縣政府(2014)。104年度彰總預算書。彰化縣:彰化縣政府。  延伸查詢new window
4.林天佑(2004)。教育政治學。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
5.蓋浙生(2008)。教育經濟與財政新論。台北:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
6.Stiglitz, J. E.(2000)。Economics of the public sector。New York, NY:W. W. Norton。  new window
7.吳清山、林天祐(2010)。教育e辭書。臺北:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳麗珠(20140000)。教育財政制度與改革。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.吳政達(2008)。教育政策分析:概念、方法與應用。臺北市:高等教育文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.行政院主計總處(20160201)。103年度直轄市及縣市總預算彙編,http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=4971 &CtUnit=756&BaseDSD=7。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院主計總處(20160201)。103年度地方財政評比指標評核結果,http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=37267&ctNode=4972&mp=l。  延伸查詢new window
3.財政部國庫署(20160201)。最新各級政府債務資訊,https://www.nta.gov.tw/web/ContentB/ContentB.aspx?cO=236。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.陳麗珠、陳世聰(2009)。地方政府財政能力與教育經費關係之探究:財政中性觀點。地方教育發展研究。台北:國立台灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE