:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:越南胡志明市高級中學校長分布式領導、教師知覺組織支持與教師組織公民行為關係之研究
作者:胡士雄
作者(外文):Ho, Sy Hung
校院名稱:國立政治大學
系所名稱:教育學系
指導教授:秦夢群
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2015
主題關鍵詞:公立高級中學分布式領導知覺組織支持組織公民行為Public high schoolDistributed leadershipPerceived organizational supportOrganizational citizenship behavior
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:118
本研究指在探討校長分布式領導、教師知覺組織支持與教師組織公民行為的關係。研究方法採問卷調查法,以越南胡志明市公立高級中學教師為研究對象。在預試階段,寄發300份問卷,回收有效問卷共有275份,據以檢視研究工具之信效度。在正式調查階段,寄發960份問卷,回收有效問卷共908份。在資料處理方面,本研究分別以描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、積差相關分析及結構方程模式取向之路徑分析等統計方法進行分析。本研究獲得以下結論:
一、越南胡志明市公立高級中學校長分布式領導、教師知覺組織支持與教師組織公民行為的現況大致良好。
二、教師對校長分布式領導的知覺,會因教師之年齡、服務年資、學歷、學校所在地、學校規模與校長於本校服務年資之不同而有顯著差異。
三、教師對組織支持的知覺,會因教師之年齡、學校所在地與學校規模之不同而有顯著差異。
四、教師對教師組織公民行為的知覺,會因學校所在地、學校規模與校長於本校服務年資之不同而有顯著差異。
五、校長分布式領導、教師知覺組織支持與教師組織公民行為之間兩兩具有正向相關。
六、校長分布式領導、教師知覺組織支持與教師組織公民行為三者之間具有顯著影響關係。
七、校長分布式領導可透過教師知覺組織支持的部分中介效果,間接影響教師組織公民行為。
八、校長分布式領導、教師知覺組織支持與教師組織公民行為的結構方程模式適配度良好。
基於上述之研究結果,本研究提出一些建議,作為主管教育行政機關、學校校長、教師及未來研究之參考。
The study aims to investigate the relationships among distributed leadership, perceived organizational support, and organizational citizenship behavior. The study population is all in-service teachers at public high schools in Ho Chi Minh city. The questionnaires are used to collect data. In the pretest stage, data collected from a sample of 275 teachers at 20 public high schools, and was used to test the validity and reliability of the research instruments by using the exploratory factor analysis. In the formal survey, data collected from a sample of 908 teachers at 64 public high schools. Then the descriptive analysis, t-test and one-way ANOVA, correlation analysis and SEM approach’s path analysis were used to analyze the data. The findings indicated that:
1. The teachers’ perception of distributed leadership, perceived organizational support, and organizational citizenship behavior is good.
2. Six demographic variables, including teachers’ age, year of experience, level of education, school location, school size, and years as principal at current school, showed significant differences in distributed leadership.
3. Three demographic variables, including teachers’ age, school location, school size, showed significant differences in perceived organizational support.
4. Three demographic variables, including school location, school size, and years as principal at current school, showed significant differences in organizational citizenship behavior.
5. There is a significant positive correlation between the variables of distributed leadership, perceived organizational support, and organizational citizenship behavior.
6. Both distributed leadership and perceived organizational support showed a positive direct effect on organizational citizenship behavior.
7. Perceived organizational support partially mediated the effect of distributed leadership on organizational citizenship behavior.
8. The SEM constructed for the distributed leadership, perceived organizational support, and organizational citizenship behavior showed a goodness of fit.
Based on these results, there are many applications proposed to education authority, school principals, and teachers and some recommendations provided for further research.
丁一顧、張德銳(2005)。中小學校長參與及其與教育品質的關係。教育研究月刊,135,81-91。
丁英哲(2008)。國民小學校長轉型領導與教師組織公民行為關係之研究:以臺灣北部地區三縣市為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所,臺北市。
丁錦義(2013)。人格特質與知覺組織支持對憂鬱程度心理賦能與工作適應性之影響性研究-以全省工程材料實驗室從業人員為研究對象(未出版之碩士論文)。南臺科技大學企業管理系,臺南市。
方秉中(2014)。轉換型領導、領導者與部屬交換關係及工作滿意之關係-以知覺組織支持為中介變數(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北大學企業管理學系,新北市。
方啟陽(2007)。國民小學教師知覺校長道德領導與教師組織公民行為之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所,嘉義市。
方榕吟(2008)。補校教師知覺組織支持、角色模糊、授權增能與創新教學結構關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育所,嘉義縣。
方慶林(2010)。臺北縣國民小學分散式領導對學生學習態度影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班,臺北市。
王秉皓(2010)。屏東縣國中校長領導行為與教師組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學教育研究所,高雄市。
王娜玲(2008)。臺北市國小校長領導行為與教師組織公民行為之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所碩士班,臺北市。new window
王舜慧(2010)。派外人員的情緒智力、跨文化適應與職涯資本之研究—以知覺組織支持為調節變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學勞工所,嘉義縣。
王環鈴(2011)。臺中市國民小學分布式領導與學校創新經營之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。東海大學教育研究所,臺中市。
王瓊滿(2010)。國民小學校長分佈式領導、教師組織公民行為對學生學習表現影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學人資處教育行政碩士專班,新竹市。new window
王麗雅(2011)。國民小學校長分散式領導與教師服務士氣之研究:以教師內外控信念為調節變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學教育經營與管理研究所,臺南市。
田維仁(2011)。國民小學分布式領導與教師組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。逢甲大學公共政策所,臺中市。
向家逸(2010)。分佈式領導、教師組織公民行為與教師集體效能感關係之研究-以桃園縣國小為例(未出版之碩士論文)。中原大學教育研究所,桃園縣。
朱勝欽(2013)。知覺組織支持對國中教師工作態度影響之研究-以嘉義縣市公立國中教師為例(未出版之碩士論文)。南華大學教育社會學研究所,嘉義縣。
朱嘉芳(2008)。高雄縣國民中學校長轉型領導、教師組織公民行為與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學教育研究所,高雄市。
江志軒(2011)。苗栗縣國民小學校長分布式領導、教師組織公民行為與教師工作滿意度關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學教育行政與政策研究所,臺北市。
江淑瑰(2010)。校長領導風格與教師組織公民行為對學校效能影響之研究--以宜蘭縣國小為例(未出版之碩士論文)。佛光大學管理學系,宜蘭縣。
何建霖(2009)。國民小學學校分佈式領導、教師同僚專業互享與學生學習表現之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學教育學研究所,嘉義縣。
余民寧(1994)。試題反應理論的介紹(十五) ——IRT的其他應用課題。研習資訊,11(2),7-10。
余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式:SIMPLIS的應用。臺北市:高等教育。
吳育新(2010)。雲林縣國民小學校長轉型領導與教師組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學教育學研究所,嘉義縣。
吳宗立(2007)。教育品質: 學校經營的挑戰。教育研究月刊,160,17-29。new window
吳宜真(2010)。難纏顧客行為對服務人員情緒勞務影響之研究:知覺組織支持之干擾效果(未出版之碩士論文)。大葉大學管理學院,彰化縣。
吳帛諭(2014)。第一線員工角色壓力與工作倦怠之研究-以社會支持與知覺組織支持為干擾變數(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通管理研究所,高雄市。
吳政達(2006a)。高級中等學校教育發展指標系統之研究。研習資訊,23(1),13-18。
吳政達(2006b)。心理契約、組織公平、組織信任與組織公民行為之關連性研究:以臺灣地區國民中小學學校組織為例。行政院國家科學委員會專案研究報告(編號:NSC 94-2413-H-004-00),未出版,臺北市。
吳政達(2011)。教師組織公民行為前置變項之跨層次模式分析:一個新的分析架構。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(編號:NSC 99-2410-H-004-027),未出版,臺北市。new window
吳政達、湯家偉、羅清水(2007)。心理契約,組織公平,組織信任與組織公民行為結構關係之驗證: 以臺北地區國民中學學校組織為例。教育政策論壇,10(1),133-159。new window
吳國賢(2013)。組織支持程度對組織承諾與服務導向公民行為之影響-以公立就業服務機構之派遣人員為例(未出版之碩士論文)。南臺科技大學人力資源管理研究所,臺南市。
吳婉瑜(2011)。知覺組織支持、幸福感與工作績效之關聯-以工作態度為調節變項(未出版之碩士論文)。臺灣大學商學研究所,臺北市。
吳清山、林天祐(2010)。教育E辭書(第二版)。臺北市:高等教育。
吳清山、林天祐(2014)。教師U辭書。臺北市:高等教育。
吳雅萍(2010)。輪班人員的情緒智力、工作家庭雙衝突與工作投入之研究-以知覺組織支持為調節變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學勞工所,嘉義縣。
吳慧君(2010)。大學行政人員知覺組織支持、組織創新、工作活力與工作績效關係之研究-以獲教學卓越計畫大學為例(未出版之博士論文)。高雄師範大學成人教育研究所,高雄市。new window
呂俊宏、陳成宏(2015)。花蓮縣國民小學校長分布式領導與學校效能之研究。學校行政,95,1-26。
呂詩琦(2011)。國民中學教師覺知校長服務領導、學校組織氣氛與教師組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班,臺北市。
李玉美(2010)。新竹地區國民中學學校創新經營、教師組織公民行為與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班,臺北市。
李安明(2009)。發展「賦權當責」與「群眾外包」的教學領導團隊。教育研究月刊,181,29-41。new window
李自勇(2008)。屏東縣國民小學組織文化、教師組織承諾與組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學教育研究所,高雄市。
李佳怡(2000)。知覺組織支持對員工工作態度影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所,高雄市。
李宜璇(2007)。國民小學校長倫理領導與教師組織公民行為之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所,屏東縣。new window
李明昭(2011)。高職校長轉型領導、教師組織承諾與教師組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系,彰化縣。new window
李姵蓉(2013)。工作不安全感對服務品質的影響:心理資本與知覺組織支持所扮演角色(未出版之碩士論文)。國立東華大學管理學院高階經營管理碩士在職專班,花蓮縣。
李美瑤(2012)。醫療機構員工工作焦慮對工作滿足與離職傾向之影響:知覺組織支持的干擾效果分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所,高雄市。
李貞儀(2011)。國民小學校長變革領導、教師組織信任、教師組織公民行為與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立中正大學教育研究所,嘉義縣。new window
李重毅(2013)。校長分布式領導、教師專業社群運作與學校創新經營效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學教育學系,臺北市。new window
李香蓉(2011)。高績效工作系統與觀光旅館服務人員組織承諾關係之研究:知覺組織支持的中介效果(未出版之碩士論文)。中國科技大學運籌管理研究所,臺北市。
李清燕(2009)。轉換型領導、主管部屬交換關係對退卻行為之影響-以知覺組織支持為調節變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學勞工所,嘉義縣。
李雯智(2008)。教師組織公民行為研究之評析。學校行政,56,95-106。
李豪朕(2011)。國民小學校長分佈式領導、學校知識創新與ICT運用關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學人資處學校行政碩士班,新竹市。
杜炳倫(譯)(2010)。解讀統計與研究:教你讀懂、判斷和書寫有統計資料的研究報告(原作者:Schuyler W. Huck)。臺北市:心理。
沈崇源(2011)。派遣員工組織報酬、主管支持、程序公平與組織承諾關係之研究-以知覺組織支持為中介變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄應用科技大學人力資源發展系,高雄市。
幸澤林(2008)。領導者與成員關係品質與組織公民行為之關聯性-知覺組織支持的調節效果(未出版之碩士論文)。國防大學國防管理學院後勤管理研究所,桃園縣。
林天祐(1997)。學校經營與教育品質。教育資料與研究,19,28-32。new window
林文律(1999)。從校長必備能力看校長培育。現代教育論壇,5,168-178。new window
林忠仁(2010)。國民小學校長分佈領導,灰猩猩效應與教師專業學習社群關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所,臺北市。new window
林明達(2010)。知覺組織支持、團隊自主性與專業團隊績效關係之研究-以臺灣各縣市體育會為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄大學高階經營管理碩士在職專班(EMBA),高雄市。
林俊瑩(2011)。教師組織公民行為的跨教育階段比較分析:學前教師的特殊性與其影響機制。教育政策論壇,14(3),155-188。new window
林俊賢(2012)。知覺組織支持與組織公民行為關係之研究探討志工參與的調節效果-以稅捐稽徵處為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所,高雄市。
林淑姬(1992)。薪酬公平、程序公正與組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學企業管理研究所,臺北市。new window
林慧真(2009)。內部行銷、知覺組織支持、組織創新氣候對員工創新行為之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立勤益科技大學流通管理系,臺中市。
林麗華(2013)。國小教師知覺組織支持、組織承諾與職業倦怠關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。大葉大學管理學院碩士在職專班,彰化縣。
邱國隆(2007)。新竹縣、市國民小學學校組織氣候、教師組織承諾與教師組織公民行為之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學人資處教育行政碩士專班,新竹市。
邱皓政(2010)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS(PASW)資料分析範例解析(第五版)。臺北市:五南。
邱皓政(2011)。結構方程模式-LISREL/SIMPLIS原理與應用(第二版)。臺北市:雙葉書廊。
施秋萍(2011)。派遣員工成就動機與角色認同對工作績效影響之研究:以知覺組織支持為調節變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄應用科技大學人力資源發展系,高雄市。
洪玉慧(2012)。轉換型領導對員工知覺組織支持的影響-以領導者與部屬交換關係為中介變數(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北大學企業管理學系,新北市。
洪淑絹(2014)。政府機構主(會)計人員角色壓力、因應策略、知覺組織支持與組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。僑光科技大學企業管理研究所,臺中市。
洪碩伶(2012)。臺北市國民小學校長知識領導與教師組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所,臺北市。
胡雅棠(2008)。教師覺知校長服務領導與教師組織公民行為的關係研究-以台南市國民中學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學教管所學校經營與管理教學,台南市。
孫行易(2010)。臺北縣國民小學組織結構與教師組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所,臺北市。
徐吉春(2014)。分散式領導理論內涵之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺南大學教育學系教育經營與管理,臺南市。
益西曲珍(2009)。知覺組織支持、組織認同、工作滿意對組織公民行為之影響─以知識工作者為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣科技大學管理學院MBA,臺北市。
秦夢群(2010)。教育領導理論與應用。臺北市:五南。
秦夢群(2011a)。教育行政實務與應用。臺北市:五南。
秦夢群(2011b)。教育行政理論與模式。臺北市:五南。
高仕杰(2008)。桃園縣國民小學教師組織公民行為與學校效能之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所教育行政碩士學位在職,臺北市。
高俊卿(2009)。校長魅力領導與教師組織公民行為之關係研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班,臺北市。
高家斌、蘇玲慧(2013)。國民中小學教師組織公民行為研究之後設分析。教育理論與實踐學刊,27,73-107。new window
高珮育(2007)。知覺組織支持與工作場所心理壓力對派外調適與工作滿意之影響研究(未出版之碩士論文)。東吳大學國際貿易學系,臺北市。
崔念祖(2011)。國民小學教師組織公民行為與學校創新經營關係之研究---以學習型學校為調節變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學教育經營與管理研究所碩士班,臺南市。new window
張天德(2009)。知覺組織支持、問題解決能力與職涯滿足關係之研究:以因應策略為中介變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄應用科技大學人力資源發展系,高雄市。
張明輝(1991)。巴納德組織理論與教育行政。臺北市:五南。
張明輝(2005)。永續領導與學校經營。臺灣教育,635,8-12。
張奕華(2009)。分散式領導、教師學術樂觀與學生學習成就關係之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號:NSC 98-2410-H-004-011),未出版,臺北市。
張奕華、顏弘欽(2012)。學校分散式領導構面之探析: 領導者,追隨者與情境三元互動之檢證。教育實踐與研究,25(2),225-254。new window
張珈禎(2014)。高科技產業員工主動性人格特質、工作熱情與職涯滿意之相關研究-以知覺組織支持為調節變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所,高雄市。
張秋波(2009)。組織成員之主動人格特質、知覺組織支持與職涯滿足關係之研究:以生涯自我管理為中介變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄應用科技大學人力資源發展系,高雄市。
張美倫(2003)。臺灣中等學校教職員之組織支持知覺對其組織承諾與變革認知影響之探討(未出版之碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學企業管理系碩士班,臺中市。
張祝芬(2009)。高中課程領導之研究:分佈式領導取向(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系,臺北市。new window
張素花(2012)。國民小學校長分布式領導、教師情緒勞務對教師教學效能影響之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學教育經營與管理學系,臺北市。new window
張婉君(2009)。國民小學校長第五級領導、教師組織公民行為及學校效能關係之研究:以桃園縣為例(未出版之碩士論文)。中原大學教育研究所,桃園縣。
張添唐(2010)。高中校長服務領導、教師組織公民行為與教師工作滿意度關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班,臺北市。
張瑋芩(2013)。員工沉默行為與工作績效之關聯性-知覺組織支持的調節效果(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學科技應用與人力資源發展學系,臺北市。
莫素雲(2008)。校長家長式領導、教師信任對教師組織公民行為影響之研究-以桃竹苗四縣市高級中學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。中原大學教育研究所,桃園縣。
許毓真(2012)。國中兼任行政教師組織公民行為與工作壓力、角色衝突關聯性之研究-以高雄市為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學人力與知識管理研究所,高雄市。
許聰顯(2014)。國民小學校長分布式領導、學校組織公平與教師組織公民行為之關係(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學教育學系,臺北市。new window
速春玲(2011)。國民小學分布式領導與教師工作滿意度關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。逢甲大學公共政策所,臺中市。
郭鑑緯(2012)。調職類型與調職人員對原單位之偏差行為意圖關聯性之研究-知覺組織支持與調職措施之調節效果(未出版之碩士論文)。國防大學管理學院資源管理及決策研究所,桃園縣。
陳心瑩(2013)。基隆市國民小學學校組織公平、教師組織公民行為與教師工作投入關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班,臺北市。
陳玉端(2013)。臺北市國小教師之組織公民行為調查研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學課程與教學研究所,臺北市。
陳如明(2010)。屏東縣國民小學校長服務領導、教師組織公民行為與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所,高雄市。
陳長華(2013)。高雄市國小代課教師知覺組織支持與留職意願關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學教育學系,高雄市。
陳俞余(2013)。行政的追隨者,還是教師的領頭羊—學年主任工作經驗之建制民族誌研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立中正大學教育學研究所,嘉義縣。new window
陳建志、鐘巧如(2014)。當代分布式領導在教育領導之發展與應用。教育研究與發展期刊,10(3),1-24。new window
陳啟東(2005)。高級職業學校校長領導型態對教師組織公民行為與學校組織績效影響之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系,彰化縣。new window
陳國清(2012)。宜蘭縣國民小學校長分布式領導與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學教育經營與管理學系,臺北市。
陳嘉碩(2013)。國民中學校長華人領導行為、教師工作士氣、教師組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立嘉義大學教育學系,嘉義市。new window
陳慧芳(2015)。桃竹苗地區國民小學代理代課教師知覺組織支持、心理契約與組織公民行為之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學教育學系碩士班,新竹市。
陸蓉菁(2009)。人格特質、知覺組織支持與職涯滿足關係之研究:以因應策略為中介變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄應用科技大學人力資源發展系,高雄市。
彭聲聞(2013)。高雄市國民小學校長服務領導、教師組織公民行為與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學教育學系,高雄市。
曾妤珮(2011)。知覺組織支持與服務導向組織公民行為-高績效人力資源實務之調節效果(未出版之碩士論文)。大葉大學人力資源暨公共關係學系,彰化縣。new window
曾欽鴻(2015)。國際觀光旅館服務人員知覺組織支持、工作雕琢與工作敬業關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。大葉大學國際企業管理學系碩士班,彰化縣。
曾進發(2004)。臺北縣國民小學校長轉型領導、互易領導與教師組織公民行為之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。輔仁大學教育領導與發展研究所,新北市。
游曉郁(2005)。領導行為與員工效能:知覺組織支持及知覺主管支持的中介效果(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學心理學所,嘉義縣。
湯家偉(2010)。教師組織公民行為前置因素跨層次模式之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學教育學系,臺北市。new window
馮大鳴(譯)(2012)。分布式領導-不同的視角(原作者:A. Harris)。上海:上海教育出版社。
黃于真(2013)。領導風格、知覺組織支持與工作敬業心關係之研究─傳統製造業為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄應用科技大學人力資源發展系碩士班,高雄市。
黃玉貞(2013)。國民小學分布式領導、教師組織承諾與學校創新經營效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學教育學系,臺北市。new window
黃佳莉(2015)。國小教師知覺組織支持與服務導向組織公民行為關係之研究 - 以組織承諾為中介變項(未出版之碩士論文)。亞洲大學經營管理學系碩士在職專班,臺中市。
黃宗顯(2008)。學校領導:新理論與實踐。臺北市:五南。
黃柏勳(2004)。國民中小學校長轉型領導、學校組織氣候與教師組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學教育學系,高雄市。
黃敏榮(2013)。高級中等學校分布式領導、學校創新經營與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學教育學系,臺北市。new window
黃雅蘭(2014)。在工作態度為中介變項下,探討知覺組織支持、幸福感與工作績效之關聯-以彰化縣國小教師為例(未出版之碩士論文)。康寧大學企業管理研究所,臺南市。
葉霖蓉(2010)。屏東縣國民小學校長教學領導與教師組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所,屏東縣。
廖大偉(2005)。桃園縣國小校長轉型領導與教師組織公民行為之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所,臺北市。
廖介敏(2014)。桃園縣國民中學教師學術樂觀與組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班,臺北市。
廖雅蘭(2011)。國民中學分布式領導與學校組織健康關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。逢甲大學公共政策所,臺中市。
趙梓琪(2009)。臺灣壽險業務人員逆境商數、情緒勞務、員工知覺組織支持與業務績效關聯模式之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。長榮大學經營管理研究所,臺南市。
趙廣林(2011)。國民小學分享領導、教師領導與學校組織文化關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學教育經營與管理學系,臺北市。new window
劉文章(2009)。臺北縣國民小學分散式領導對教師學術樂觀影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學學校行政在職專班,臺北市。
劉春城(2009)。彰化縣國民小學校長轉型領導與教師組織公民行為之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學商業教育學系,彰化縣。
劉瑞珠(2010)。新竹縣、市國民小學分布式領導與教師組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學人資處教育行政專班,新竹市。
蔡玲玲(2014)。私立高中職學校校長分布式領導、學校組織健康與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學教育學系,臺北市。new window
鄭燿男(2002)。國中小教師的組織公民行為及其影響因素之研究--學校組織公民行為模型初構(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學教育學系,高雄市。new window
蕭呈隆(2014)。組織精簡後留任人員的知覺組織支持對組織承諾與公民行為之關聯性研究(未出版之碩士論文)。佛光大學管理學系,宜蘭縣。
賴志峰(2008a)。分佈式領導理論之探究— 學校領導者、追隨者和情境的交互作用。國民教育研究學報,20,87-113。new window
賴志峰(2008b)。分布式領導的意義、構面與主張。教育研究月刊,171,28-40。new window
賴志峰(2009)。中小學分佈式領導風格量表之檢證。初等教育學刊,34,25-52。new window
賴志峰、秦夢群(2014)。國民中小學分布式領導層面之建構與驗證。中正教育研究,13(2),27-70。new window
賴慧芬(2011)。國民小學兼行政人員情緒勞務、知覺組織支持與工作滿意關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。高雄師範大學教育學系,高雄市。
錢偉慈(2010)。國民小學校長家長式領導與教師組織公民行為相關之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學人資處教育行政,新竹市。
薛承祐(2010)。國民中學校長家長式領導層面、學校組織健康與教師組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學教育行政與政策研究所,臺北市。
薛雅文、賴志峰(2013)。國民小學分布式領導與學校組織文化之關係研究。學校行政,86,20-42。
謝為任(2009)。國民小學組織溝通與教師組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所,嘉義市。
謝勝宇(2007)。高雄縣國民中學組織文化、教師組織公民行為與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學教育研究所,高雄市。
謝琬琪(2012)。轉型領導、正向心理資本、知覺組織支持對變革承諾之跨層次分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學企業管理研究所,桃園縣。
謝傳崇(譯)(2009)。變革時代卓越的校長領導:國際觀點(原作者:C. Day與K. Leithwood)。臺北市:心理。
謝傳崇、王瓊滿(2011)。國民小學校長分佈式領導、教師組織公民行為對學生學習表現影響之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報,28(1),35-66。new window
謝豐宇(2012)。國民中學校長服務領導、教師組織公民行為與教師教學效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。逢甲大學公共政策所,臺中市。
謝豐宇、賴志峰(2012)。國民中學校長服務領導、教師組織公民行為與教師教學效能關係之研究。學校行政,82,47-69。
簡世川(2009)。高雄縣國小校長服務領導與教師組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。高雄師範大學教育學系,高雄市。
藍光炤(2006)。高雄市國民小學校長領導特質、教師組織公民行為與組織效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學教育學系,高雄市。
顏弘欽(2012)。教師知覺組織支持、組織承諾與組織公民行為之關聯性。教育行政與評鑑學刊,13,59-90。new window
顏弘欽(2014)。國民小學教師組織政治知覺、印象管理動機與組織公民行為之關聯性:多層次模型的分析(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學教育學系,臺北市。new window
羅淑慧(2009)。國小校長轉型領導、教師互動與教師組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學人力資源發展研究所,新竹市。
蘇碧虹(2008)。工作特性與角色壓力對醫院資訊人員工作滿足之研究:以知覺組織支持為干擾效果(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學資訊管理所,嘉義縣。
蘇澤宸(2010)。高雄市國中教師知覺組織支持、專業承諾與教學效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。高雄師範大學教育學系,高雄市。
鐘啟哲(2014)。國民中學校長分布式領導、教師組織公民行為與學校創新經營效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班,臺北市。
鐘晨芳(2008)。國民小學校長教學領導與教師組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學教育學系,新竹市。
Ahmed, I., Ismail, W. K. W., Amin, S. M., & Islam, T. (2014). Role of perceived organizational support in teachers’ responsiveness and students’ outcomes: Evidence from a public sector University of Pakistan. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(2), 246-256.
Ali, U., & Waqar, S. (2013). Teachers’ organizational citizenship behavior working under different leadership styles. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 28(2), 297-316.
Allen, D., Shore, L., & Griffeth, R. (1999). A model of perceived organizational support. Unpublished manuscript, University of Memphis and Georgia State University.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
Angelle, P. S. (2010). An organizational perspective of distributed leadership: A portrait of a middle school. RMLE Online: Research in Middle Level Education, 33(5), 1-16.
Aquino, K., & Griffeth, R. W. (1999). An exploration of the antecedents and consequences of perceived organizational support: A longitudinal study. Unpublished manuscript, University of Delaware, Newark.
Armeli, S., Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Lynch, P. (1998). Perceived organizational support and police performance: the moderating influence of socioemotional needs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 288-297.
Asgari, A., Silong, A. D., Ahmad, A., & Samah, B. A. (2008). The relationship between transformational leadership behaviors, organizational justice, leader-member exchange, perceived organizational support, trust in management and organizational citizenship behaviors. European Journal of Scientific Research, 23(2), 227-242.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Phillips, L. W. (1982). Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(3), 459-489.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
Barry, D. (1991). Managing the bossless team: Lessons in distributed leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 20(1), 31-47.
Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee “citizenship”. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 587-595.
Bennett, N., Wise, C., Woods, P., & Harvey, J. (2003). Distributed leadership: summary report. Nottingham, UK: National College for School Leadership.
Bernard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Beycioglu, K., Ozer, N., & Ugurlu, C. T. (2012). Distributed leadership and organizational trust: the case of elementary schools. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3316-3319.
Blanchard, G. A. (2012). Communication satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior and the relationship to student achievement in high schools. (Unpublished dortoral dissertation), Northern Arizona University, AZ.
Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Bogler, R., & Nir, A. E. (2012). The importance of teachers' perceived organizational support to job satisfaction: What's empowerment got to do with it? Journal of Educational Administration, 50(3), 287-306.
Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 277-289.
Carey, S. V. (2012). Teachers leading in formal roles: positions, responsibilities and training. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Washington State University, WA.
Christ, O., Van Dick, R., Wagner, U., & Stellmacher, J. (2003). When teachers go the extra mile: Foci of organisational identification as determinants of different forms of organisational citizenship behaviour among schoolteachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(3), 329-341.
Clift, R. T., & Thurston, P. W. (1995). Distributed leadership: school improvement through collaboration (Vol. 4 of Advances in educational administration). Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.
Cody, A. (2012). How the war on teachers is changing the profession. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/post/how-the-war-on-teachers-is-changing-the-profession/2012/01/27/gIQAbKyLWQ_blog.html
Coleman, V. I., & Borman, W. C. (2000). Investigating the underlying structure of the citizenship performance domain. Human Resource Management Review, 10(1), 25-44.
CPV. (1979). Nghị quyết số 14/NQ/TW về cải cách giáo dục. (Resolution No.14/NQ/TW, dated January 11, 1979, on Education Reform). Hanoi: The Communist Party of Vietnam. Retrieved from http://dangcongsan.vn/cpv/Modules/News/NewsDetail.aspx?co_id=28340670&cn_id=494597.
CPV. (1993). Nghị quyết số 04-NQ/HNTW về tiếp tục đổi mới sự nghiệp giáo dục và đào tạo. (Resolution No. 04-NQ/HNTW, dated 14th January 1993, on the Continuation of Education Innovation). Hanoi: The Communist Party of Vietnam. Retrieved from http://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Giao-duc/Nghi-quyet-04-NQ-HNTW-tiep-tuc-doi-moi-su-nghiep-giao-duc-va-dao-tao/127647/noi-dung.aspx.
CPV. (2004). Chỉ thị số 40/2004/CT-TW về việc xây dựng, nâng cao chất lượng đội ngũ nhà giáo và cán bộ quản lý giáo dục. (Instruction No. 40/2004/CT-TW, dated June 15, 2004, on the construction and enhancement of quality in teachers and educational administrators). Hanoi: the Executive Secretariat Committee - Communist Party of Vietnam. Retrieved from http://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Giao-duc/Chi-thi-40-2004-CT-TW-xay-dung-nang-cao-chat-luong-doi-ngu-nha-giao-can-bo-quan-ly-giao-duc-6054.aspx.
CPV. (2013). Nghị quyết số29-NQ/TW về đổi mới căn bản, toàn diện giáo dục và đào tạo. (Resolution No. 29-NQ/TW dated November 4, 2013 on fundamental and comprehensive Innovation in Education and Training). Hanoi: The Communist Party of Vietnam. Retrieved from http://dangcongsan.vn/cpv/Modules/News/NewsDetail.aspx?co_id=30106&cn_id=618598.
Cropanzano, R., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 317-372). Oxford, England: Wiley.
Cropanzano, R., Howes, J. C., Grandey, A. A., & Toth, P. (1997). The relationship of organizational politics and support to work behaviors, attitudes, and stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(2), 159-180.
Dạ, T. (2013). Nâng cao chất lượng giáo viên: Việc cần làm ngay (improving the quality of teachers: an immediate task) . Một Thế Giới. Retrieved from http://motthegioi.vn/the-gioi-hoc/nang-cao-chat-luong-giao-vien-viec-phai-lam-ngay-8088.html.
DiPaola, M., & Hoy, W. (2005). Organizational citizenship of faculty and achievement of high school students. The High School Journal, 88(3), 35-44.
DiPaola, M., & Mendes da Costa Neves, P. M. (2009). Organizational citizenship behaviors in American and Portuguese public schools: Measuring the construct across cultures. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(4), 490-507.
DiPaola, M., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2001). Organizational citizenship behavior in schools and its relationship to school climate. Journal of School Leadership, 11(5), 424-447.
Đỗ, T. H. (2013). Thực trạng công tác quản lí đội ngũ giáo viên các trường trung học phổ thông tỉnh Bà Rịa–Vũng Tàu(the current status of the management of teachers at the high schools in Ba Ria – Vung Tau). Tạp Chí Khoa Học ĐHSP TPHCM, 45, 78-87.
Đỗ, T. T. H., & Trần, T. B. L. (2013). Phân cấp quản lí tài chính đối với giáo dục phổ thông ở Việt Nam - Một nghiên cứu tình huống tại Hà Nội (Decentralization of financial management for high school in Vietnam - A case study in Hanoi). Tạp Chí Khoa Học ĐHQGHN, 29(1), 14-26.
Dussault, M. (2006). Teachers' self-efficacy and organizational citizenship behaviors. Psychological Reports, 98(2), 427-432.
Eder, P., & Eisenberger, R. (2008). Perceived organizational support: Reducing the negative influence of coworker withdrawal behavior. Journal of Management, 34(1), 55-68.
Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 42-51.
Eisenberger, R., Cummings, J., Armeli, S., & Lynch, P. (1997). Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(5), 812-820.
Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 51-59.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500-507.
Eisenberger, R., Rhoades, L., & Cameron, J. (1999). Does pay for performance increase or decrease perceived self-determination and intrinsic motivation?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 1026-1040.
Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhodes, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565-573.
Elmore, R. F. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute.
Farh, J.-L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S.-C. (1997). Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 421-444.
Farh, J.-L., Hackett, R. D., & Liang, J. (2007). Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support–employee outcome relationships in China: Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 715-729.
Firestone, W. A., & Martinez, C. M. (2007). Districts, teacher leaders, and distributed leadership: Changing instructional practice. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 3-35.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Frick, T. W. (2012). Dimensions of educational quality. Retrieved from http://educology.indiana.edu/Frick/Dimensions%20of%20Educational%20Quality.pdf
Frick, T. W., Chadha, R., Watson, C., & Zlatkovska, E. (2010). Improving course evaluations to improve instruction and complex learning in higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 115-136.
Fuller, B. (1985). Raising school quality in developing countries: What investments boost learning? Washington, DC: World Bank.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 11.0 update (4 ed.). Boston, USA: Allyn & Bacon.
George, J. M., Reed, T. F., Ballard, K. A., Colin, J., & Fielding, J. (1993). Contact with AIDS patients as a source of work-related distress: Effects of organizational and social support. Academy of Management Journal, 36(1), 157-171.
Gibbs, G. (2010). Dimensions of quality. Heslington York, UK: Higher Education Academy.
Gordon, Z. V. (2005). The effect of distributed leadership on student achievement. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT.
Graham, J. W. (1991). An essay on organizational citizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4(4), 249-270.
Graham, J. W. (1995). Leadership, moral development, and citizenship behavior. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(1), 43-54.
Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399-432.
Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties a new architecture for leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 28(3), 317-338.
Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership. In K. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.), Second International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 653-696). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer.
Gronn, P. (2008). The future of distributed leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 141-158.
Guzzo, R. A., Noonan, K. A., & Elron, E. (1994). Expatriate managers and the psychological contract. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 617-626.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6): Upper Saddle River, NJ : Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329-352.
Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Harris, A. (2005). Teacher leadership: More than just a feel-good factor? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 201-219.
Harris, A. (2008a). Distributed school leadership: Developing tomorrow's leaders. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Harris, A. (2008b). Distributed leadership: According to the evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 172-188.
Harris, A. (2012). Distributed leadership: Implications for the role of the principal. Journal of Management Development, 31(1), 7-17.
Harris, A. (Ed.) (2009). Distributed leadership: Different perspectives (Vol. 7): Springer Science & Business Media.
Harris, A., & Chapman, C. (2002). Democratic leadership for school improvement in challenging contexts. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 6(9). http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/75099/1/75099.pdf Retrieved from http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/75099/1/75099.pdf
Hassan, S., & Hassan, M. (2015). Testing the mediating role of perceived organizational support between leadership styles, organizational justice and employees’ behavioral outcomes. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 9(1), 131-158.
HayGroup. (2004). The five pillars of distributed leadership in schools. Nottingham, UK: NCSL.
HCMDoET. (2014). Online statistical data. Retrieved from: http://113.161.68.177/PhoCap/DonVi/DonVi.aspx
HCMSO. (2011). Statistical yearbook of Hochiminh city 2011. Retrieved from: http://www.pso.hochiminhcity.gov.vn/web/guest/niengiamthongke-nam2011
Hoàng, T. (2008). Educational crisis in Vietnam: reasons and solutions in globalization challenges. Paper presented at the CIECER Conference on Comparative Education, HCMC University of Pedagogy.
Hulpia, H., & Devos, G. (2010). How distributed leadership can make a difference in teachers' organizational commitment? A qualitative study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 565-575.
Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Keer, V. (2009). The influence of distributed leadership on teachers’ organizational commitment: A multilevel approach. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(1), 40-52.
Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Rosseel, Y. (2009). Development and validation of scores on the distributed leadership inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(6), 1013-1034.
Hulpia, H., Devos, G., Rosseel, Y., & Vlerick, P. (2012). Dimensions of distributed leadership and the impact on teachers' organizational commitment: a study in secondary education. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(7), 1745-1784.
Jain, A. K., Giga, S. I., & Cooper, C. L. (2013). Perceived organizational support as a moderator in the relationship between organisational stressors and organizational citizenship behaviors. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 21(3), 313-334.
Jimmieson, N. L., Hannam, R. L., & Yeo, G. B. (2010). Teacher organizational citizenship behaviours and job efficacy: Implications for student quality of school life. British Journal of Psychology, 101(3), 453-479.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
Kaplan, M., Ilhan, I., Ogut, E., & Attar, M. (2013). The effect of perceived organizational support on employee’s organizational citizenship behavior: A study of hotel employees in Turkey. African Journal of Business Management, 7(34), 3281-3286.
Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9(2), 131-146. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830090206
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
Khalid, S. A., Jusoff, H. K., Othman, M., Ismail, M., & Rahman, N. A. (2010). Organizational citizenship behavior as a predictor of student academic achievement. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2(1), 65-71.
Khasawneh, S. (2011). Shared leadership and organizational citizenship behaviour in Jordanian public universities: Developing a global workforce for the 21st Century. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(5), 621-634.
Kılınç, A. Ç. (2014). A quantitative study of the relationship between distributed leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: perceptions of Turkish primary school teachers. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 3(2), 69-78.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Kottke, J. L., & Sharafinski, C. E. (1988). Measuring perceived supervisory and organizational support. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48(4), 1075-1079.
Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2015). Perceived organizational support a meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management, Published online before print, March 12, 2015, doi: 10.1177/0149206315575554, 1-31. Retrieved from http://classweb.uh.edu/eisenberger/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2015/04/Kurtessis-2015.pdf
Lam, T. L. (2011). The impact of Vietnam's globalization on national education policies and teacher training programs for teachers of English as an international language: a case study of the university of pedagogy in Ho Chi Minh city. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Alliant International University, San Diego, CA.
Lê, D. (1982). Báo cáo chính trị của Tổng bí thư Ban chấp hành Trung Ương Đảng. In Communist Party of Vietnam (Ed.), Văn kiện đại hội đại biểu toàn quốc lần thứ V (Vol. 1, pp. 19-181). Hà Nội: NXB Sự Thật. (Le, D. (1982). Political Report of General Secretary of Party Central Committee. In Communist Party of Vietnam (Ed.), The Papers of the 5th National Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam.( Vol. 1, pp. 19-181). Hanoi: National Political Publishing House.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1998). Distributed leadership and student engagement in school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., & Strauss, T. (2009a). New perspective on an old idea- A short history of the old idea. In K. Leithwood, B. Mascall, & T. Strauss (Eds.), Distributed leadership according to the evidence (pp. 1-14). New York, NY: Routledge.
Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., & Strauss, T. (2009b). Distributed leadership according to the evidence. New York, NY: Routledge.
Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., Strauss, T., Sacks, R., Memon, N., & Yashkina, A. (2007). Distributing leadership to make schools smarter: Taking the ego out of the system. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 37-67.
Levinson, H. (1965). Reciprocation: The relationship between man and organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 9(4), 370-390.
Lucia, R. T. (2004). Distributed leadership: An exploratory study. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL.
Lynch, P. D., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (1999). Perceived organizational support: Inferior versus superior performance by wary employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4), 467-483.
MacBeath, J. (2003). The alphabet soup of leadership. Cambridge, UK: : Faculty Of Education, University Of Cambridge Press.
MacBeath, J., & McGlynn, A. (2002). Self-evaluation: What's in it for Schools? London, UK: Routledge.
MacBeath, J., Oduro, G., & Waterhouse, J. (2004). Distributed leadership. Nottingham, UK: National College of School Leadership.
Mascall, B., Leithwood, K., Straus, T., & Sacks, R. (2008). The relationship between distributed leadership and teachers' academic optimism. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 214-228.
Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality (Second ed.). New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
Mauseth, K. B. (2008). The influence of perceived organizational support and school culture on positive workplace outcomes for teachers in private schools. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Seattle Pacific University, WA: Seattle.
Miao, R. T. (2011). Perceived organizational support, job satisfaction, task performance and organizational citizenship behavior in China. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 12(2), 105-127.
Misner, H. P. (2008). The effect of school communication on student achievement: The need for organizational citizenship behavior. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Northern Arizona University, AZ.
MOET. (2007). Quyết định số 05/2007/QĐ-BGDĐT quy định về chuẩn nghề nghiệp giáo viên tiểu học. (Decision No. 30/2007/TT-BGDĐT, dated 8 March 2007, approving the primary professional teacher standards). Hanoi, Vietnam: Ministry of Education and Training. Retrieved from http://moj.gov.vn/vbpq/Lists/Vn%20bn%20php%20lut/View_Detail.aspx?ItemID=13980.
MOET. (2009). Thông tư số30/2009/TT-BGDĐT quy định chuẩn nghề nghiệp giáo viên trung học cơ sở, giáo viên trung học phổ thông. (Circular No. 30/2009/TT-BGDĐT, dated 22 October 2009, approving the upper secondary professional teacher standards). Hanoi, Vietnam: Ministry of Education and Training. Retrieved from http://www.moj.gov.vn/vbpq/Lists/Vn%20bn%20php%20lut/View_Detail.aspx?ItemID=23710.
MOET. (2010). Công văn số 660/BGDĐT-NGCBQLGD hướng dẫn đánh giá, xếp loại giáo viên trung học (Letter No. 660/BGDĐT-NGCBQLGD, dated 9 February 2010, providing guidelines on assessment and ranking upper secondary teachers according to professional standards). Hanoi, Vietnam: Ministry of Education and Training. Retrieved from http://www.moet.gov.vn/?page=1.29&view=2018.
Mortimore, P. (1998). The road to improvement: Reflections on school effectiveness. Abingdon Oxon, U.K: Taylor & Francis.
National Assembly of Vietnam. (2005). Education Law. Hanoi: National Assembly of Vietnam. Retrieved from http://www.moj.gov.vn/vbpq/Lists/Vn%20bn%20php%20lut/View_Detail.aspx?ItemID=18148.
Nguyễn, T. B. (2013). Nghiên cứu đề xuất các giải pháp cải cách công tác đào tạo, bồi dưỡng giáo viên phổ thông (A study on reform solutions for training and fostering secondary teachers). Báo cáo tổng kết đề tài độc lập cấp Nhà nước (Mã số 01/2010), Hà Nội. Retrieved from http://123.30.31.218/opac/WShowDetail.aspx?intItemID=28000.
Nguyễn, T. H. T. (2010). Các giải pháp tăng cường năng lực quản lý của hiệu trưởng trường THPT một số tỉnh phía Nam (Some solutions to reinforce high school principals’ management capacity in some Southern provinces). Tạp Chí Khoa Học ĐHSP TP.HCM, 19, 51-64.
Nguyễn, T. M. L. (2010). Đào tạo giáo viên chất lượng cao trong thời đại hiện nay (Training high qualified teachers in the recent society). Tạp chí Khoa học ĐHQGHN, 26, 46-52.
Nguyễn, T. N. (2006). Thực trạng đội ngũ nhà giáo và cán bộ quản lý giáo dục(the current status of teachers and education administrators). Paper presented at the National Assembly of Vietnam, Hanoi. http://vietnamnet.vn/giaoduc/2006/11/630752/
Nisar, Q. A., Marwa, A., Ahmad, U., & Ahmad, S. (2014). Impact of perceived organizational support on organizational citizenship behavior: empirical evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Research, 1(5), 231-240.
Noruzy, A., Shatery, K., Rezazadeh, A., & Hatami-Shirkouhi, L. (2011). Investigation the relationship between organizational justice, and organizational citizenship behavior: The mediating role of perceived organizational support. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 4(7), 842-847.
Nye, L. G., & Witt, L. A. (1993). Dimensionality and construct validity of the perceptions of organizational politics scale (POPS). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 821-829.
O'Driscoll, M. P., & Randall, D. M. (1999). Perceived organisational support, satisfaction with rewards, and employee job involvement and organisational commitment. Applied Psychology, 48(2), 197-209.
Onukwugha, P. I. (2013). Distributed leadership in schools, teacher practices, and student learning. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Grand Canyon University, Phoenix, Arizona.
Oplatka, I. (2006). Going beyond role expectations: Toward an understanding of the determinants and components of teacher organizational citizenship behavior. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(3), 385-423. doi:10.1177/0013161X05285987
Oplatka, I. (2009). Organizational citizenship behavior in teaching: The consequences for teachers, pupils, and the school. International Journal of Educational Management, 23(5), 375-389.
Oplatka, I., & Stundi, M. (2011). The components and determinants of preschool teacher organisational citizenship behaviour. International Journal of Educational Management, 25(3), 223-236.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Organ, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 775-802.
Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Parker Ayers, J. (2010). Job satisfaction, job involvement, and perceived organizational support as predictors of organizational commitment. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Walden University, Minneapolis, MN.
Parrish, D., & Lefoe, G. (2008). The green report: growing• reflecting• enabling• engaging• networking. A report on the development of leadership capacity in higher education. Wollongong: University of Wollongong & ALTC.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107-142.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563.
Rabindarang, S., Bing, K. W., & Yin, K. Y. (2014). The influence of distributed leadership on job stress in technical and vocational education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(1), 490-499.
Raines-Eudy, R. (2000). Using structural equation modeling to test for differential reliability and validity: An empirical demonstration. Structural Equation Modeling, 7(1), 124-141.
Randall, M. L., Cropanzano, R., Bormann, C. A., & Birjulin, A. (1999). Organizational politics and organizational support as predictors of work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(2), 159-174.
Reynolds, D., & Cuttance, P. (1992). School effectiveness: Research, policy and practice. London: Cassell.
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698-714.
Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: the contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 825-836.
Riggle, R. J., Edmondson, D. R., & Hansen, J. D. (2009). A meta-analysis of the relationship between perceived organizational support and job outcomes: 20 years of research. Journal of Business Research, 62(10), 1027-1030.
Robbins, P. S. (2005). Organizational behavior (11 ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Robblee, M. A. (1998). Confronting the threat of organizational downsizing: coping and health. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. (1995). Psychological contracts and OCB: The effect of unfulfilled obligations on civic virtue behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(3), 289-298.
Sallis, E. (2002). Total quality management in education (3th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Schoenfeld, R. S. (2013). Leadership and sustainability: continually making a difference as an educational leader over time in challenging contexts and changing times. State University of New York, Buffalo.
Scribner, J. P., Sawyer, R. K., Watson, S. T., & Myers, V. L. (2007). Teacher teams and distributed leadership: A study of group discourse and collaboration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(1), 67-100.
Settoon, R. P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R. C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader–member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), 219-227.
Shanock, L. R., & Eisenberger, R. (2006). When supervisors feel supported: relationships with subordinates' perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 689-695.
Shober, A. F. (2012). From teacher education to student progress: Teacher quality since NCLB. Teacher quality 2.0. Special report 1 (ERIC Number: ED534357). Retrieved from ERIC Number: ED534357:
Shore, L. M., & Shore, T. H. (1995). Perceived organizational support and organizational justice. In R. S. Cropanzano & K. M. Kacmar (Eds.), Organizational politics, justice, and support: Managing the social climate of the workplace (pp. 149-164). Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Shore, L. M., & Tetrick, L. E. (1991). A construct validity study of the Survey of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5), 637-643.
Smith, C., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653-663.
Somech, A., & Bogler, R. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of teacher organizational and professional commitment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(4), 555-577.
Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2000). Understanding extra-role behavior in schools: The relationships between job satisfaction, sense of efficacy, and teachers’ extra-role behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5), 649-659.
Somech, A., & Ron, I. (2007). Promoting organizational citizenship behavior in schools: The impact of individual and organizational characteristics. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(1), 38-66.
Spillane, J. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Spillane, J., & Diamond, J. (2007). Distributed leadership in practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Spillane, J., & Healey, K. (2010). Conceptualizing school leadership and management from a distributed perspective: An exploration of some study operations and measures. The Elementary School Journal, 111(2), 253-281.
Spillane, J., Hallett, T., & Diamond, J. (2003). Forms of capital and the construction of leadership: Instructional leadership in urban elementary schools. Sociology of Education, 76(1), 1-17.
Spillane, J., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23-28.
SRV. (2001). Decision No. 201/2001/QD-TTg of December 28, 2001 approving the 2001-2010 educational development strategy. Hanoi: The Socialist Republic of Vietnam. Retrieved from http://www.moj.gov.vn/vbpq/en/Lists/Vn%20bn%20php%20lut/View_Detail.aspx?ItemID=10345.
SRV. (2014). Nghị Quyết số 44 NQ/CP về chương trình hành động của chính phủ thực hiện nghị quyết số 29-NQ/TW.(Resolution No. 44/NQ-CP, dated June 09, 2014, the government’s program of action in furtherance of Resolution No. 29-NQ/TW on fundamental and comprehensive innovation in education and training). Hanoi: The Socialist Republic of Vietnam. Retrieved from http://chinhphu.vn/portal/page/portal/chinhphu/hethongvanban?class_id=509&mode=detail&document_id=174363.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th Ed.). Needhan Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Thai, Q. T. (1982). The fifth congress of the Vietnamese Communist Party. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 4(2), 236-245.
Timperley, H. S. (2005). Distributed leadership: Developing theory from practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(4), 395-420.
Tongur, A. (2011). Organizational support, organizational citizenship behavior, and perceived performance: Analysis of crime scene investigation units of Turkish national police. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida.
Venkatachalam, M. (1995). Personal hardiness and perceived organizational support as links in the role stress-outcome relationship: A person-environment fit model. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82-111.
West Chester University. (2004). An introduction to distributed leadership. Retrieved from https://www.wcupa.edu/nfo/documents/B.5-IntoductiontoDistributedLeadership.pdf.
Wilcox, R. R. (1998). How many discoveries have been lost by ignoring modern statistical methods? American Psychologist, 53(3), 300-314.
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617.
Witt, L. A. (1991). Exchange ideology as a moderator of job attitudes‐organizational citizenship behaviors relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21(18), 1490-1501.
Witt, L. A., & Nye, L. G. (1992). Organizational goal congruence and job attitudes revisited. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aviation Medicine.
Wu, P. L., Wu, H. J., & Wu, P. C. (2013). Incremental validity of the distributed leadership scale. Asian Journal of Management Sciences and Education, 2(1), 5-18.
Yukl, G. A. (2002). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE