東漢建初四年（79），章帝召開白虎觀會議；元代大德九年（1305），《白虎通》陡然問世，世人以此對質白虎觀會議，《白虎通》儼然成為白虎觀會議之卷帙文獻。然而，自清代莊述祖、劉師培與孫詒讓，相繼主張「正名」《白虎通》；至洪業則質疑《白虎通》，「疑其書非班固所撰」、「疑其非章帝所稱制臨決者」、「疑其為三國時作品」；《白虎通》卷帙與白虎觀會議事跡兩者之間，存在諸多不相應問題，懸而未決。三年前（2013），林聰舜教授出版《漢代儒學別裁：帝國意識形態的形成與發展》一書第八章〈帝國意識形態的重建—扮演「國憲」基礎的《白虎通》思想〉，堅持《白虎通》是「章帝親自主持、裁決的經學會議所得結論編撰而成之總結」之卷帙文獻，主張《白虎通》是扮演漢代帝國意識形態之「國憲」思想基礎，自成一套經學服務於政治之社會倫理學觀點。本文以「戰後臺灣《白虎通》研究商榷」為題，分析、評論林聰舜研究《白虎通》之成果與主張，標誌戰後臺灣現階段研究《白虎通》之時代意義。

Dong-han Zhang-di had convened Baihuguan meeting in Chien-chu fourth year(79), Yuan Dynasty Da-Te ninth year (1305), 《Baihutong》suddenly come out to confront the world as the voluminous literature of Baihuguan meetingting. However, since the Qing Zhuang, Shu-zu, Liu, Shi-pei and Sun, Yi-rang have advocated ＂rectification of names＂ of《Baihutong》, to Hong, Ye questioned the《Baihutong》, ＂suspect the book wasn't written by Ban,Gu＂, ＂suspect that wasn't Authorized by Zhang-di＂, ＂suspect the book published during San-guo＂; there are many non-relevant questions unresolved between 《Baihutong》and voluminous of Baihuguan meetingting. Three years ago (2013), Lin, Tsung-Shun publication of ＂Han Dynasty Confucianism pieh-tsai: Empire ideology formation and development,＂ chapter VIII 〈imperial ideology reconstruction - play the role as the basis of ＂national constitution＂ of《Baihutong》〉, still adhere to the《Baihutong》is the ＂Zhang-di personally presided over the meeting compiled from the summary of the conclusions＂ of the voluminous literature, further advocated 《Baihutong》is the ideological foundation of ＂national constitution＂ of the Han, ＂National Constitution＂ Han Dynasty imperial ideological foundation, self-contained point of view of social ethics that Classics services politics. This paper is based on the discussion of Lin, Tsung-Shun Elaborate 《Baihutong》, analyzing of the results of Professor Lin researching 《Baihutong》and as the era significance to research《Baihutong》of post-war Taiwan stage.