:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:偏遠地區老人照顧跨部門治理研究--以臺東縣池上鄉為例
書刊名:國家與社會
作者:劉麗娟 引用關係
作者(外文):Liu, Li-chuan
出版日期:2017
卷期:19
頁次:頁161-212
主題關鍵詞:偏遠地區老人照顧跨部門治理臺東縣池上鄉Remote areasElderly careCross-sector governanceChihshang TownshipTaitung County
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:271
  • 點閱點閱:73
隨著外在環境發展與變遷,高齡化是近年來多數國家面臨的問題,此問題涵蓋產業經濟、社會文化、醫療照顧及勞動人口等層面,且在偏鄉地區更為嚴重。長久以往,相關社會福利議題多以政府為主導,然現今全球環境複雜、經濟情況變遷及公民意識提升影響下,治理問題已非政府獨力能解決,需依靠跨部門治理,整合政府、企業與非營利組織資源,共同承擔責任,避免在有限資源下,公共資源的重覆投入形成浪費。至2015年止,臺東縣池上鄉老年人口比例已高達19.51%,為因應在地老人需求,其結合政府、企業及非營利組織,獲得豐富的活動及成果。本研究以池上鄉為案例,採取Emerson, Nabatchi & Balogh提出的「協力治理整合架構」及十項命題為研究架構;以老人照顧提供者為研究對象,透過深度訪談,探討其如何透過跨部門治理,不僅滿足在地老人照顧需求,更進一步提升老人價值與福祉。透過此研究發現,池上鄉長期以來建立的非正式人際網絡為跨部門治理奠定良好基礎,且老人照顧以非營利組織扮演重要的領導角色,政府、企業與地方組織積極參與,形成良好的跨部門治理模式,透過持續的治理成果讓老人照顧的服務範圍大幅擴展,並引進更多外界資源。
The developments of and changes in external environments have recently rendered population aging a problem in many countries. The problem of population aging comprises several dimensions, namely industrial economics, social culture, medical care, and labor force, and the problem is more severe in remote areas. Matters relevant to social welfare have been primarily managed by the Taiwanese government. However, under the current effects engendered by the complexity of the global environment, changes in economic conditions, and the rise in civic awareness, the governance of relevant matters can no longer be solely assumed by the government, thus necessitating cross-sector governance. In such governance, shared responsibility can be implemented through the integration of government, corporate, and nonprofit organization resources. The proportion of the elderly population in Chihshang Township, Taitung County, had reached as much as 19.51% by 2015. To respond to the needs of the local older adults, the government, enterprises, and nonprofit organizations cooperate to convene numerous activities and obtain outcomes. Moreover, the integrative framework for collaborative governance proposed by Emerson, Nabatchi, and Balogh (2012) was adopted, and 10 propositions were developed for the research framework. Providers of elderly care were recruited as the research participants. Through in-depth interviews, this study investigated how cross-sector governance can satisfy the needs of local elderly care and elevate the value and welfare of older adults. This study determined that the informal interpersonal network that has been developed in Chihshang Township for the long term serves as a favorable basis for cross-sector governance; moreover, nonprofit organizations play critical leading roles in elderly care, and the active participation of the government, enterprises, and local organizations form a favorable cross-sector governance model. The outcomes of continuous cross-sector governance can substantially expand the service area for elderly care and introduce more external resources.
期刊論文
1.Schiller, D.(2011)。Institutions and practice in cross-sector research collaboration: conceptual considerations with empirical illustrations from the German science sector。Science and Public Policy,38(2),109-121。  new window
2.McGuire, Michael(2002)。Managing Networks: Propositions on What Managers Do and Why They Do It。Public Administration Review,62(5),599-609。  new window
3.陳定銘(20060200)。政府與第三部門協力關係探討。研習論壇,62,1-11。  延伸查詢new window
4.Rein, M.、Stott, L.(2009)。Working together: Critical perspectives on six cross-sector partnerships in Southern Africa。Journal of Business Ethics,90(1),79-89。  new window
5.Austin, J. E.、Seitanidi, M. M.(2012)。Collaborative Value Creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses: Part I. Value creation spectrum and collaboration stages。Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,41(5),726-758。  new window
6.夏黎明(20021200)。國家支配、個人遭逢與池上平原三個外省榮民的地方認同。東臺灣研究,7,45-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Selsky, J. W.、Parker, B.(2005)。Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice。Journal of Management,31(6),849-873。  new window
8.李柏諭(20110900)。跨部門治理的理論與實踐:以蓮潭國際文教會館的委外經驗為例。公共行政學報,40,41-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.江明修、曾冠球(20090300)。政府再造:跨部門治理的觀點。國家菁英,5(1),97-122。  延伸查詢new window
10.Lowndes, Vivien、Skelcher, Chris(1998)。The dynamics of multi-organizational partnerships: An analysis of changing modes of governance。Public Administration,76(2),313-333。  new window
11.Gazley, B.(2008)。Beyond the Contract: The Scope and Nature of Informal Government-Nonprofit Partnerships。Public Administration Review,68(1),141-154。  new window
12.Emerson, Kirk、Nabatchi, Tina、Balogh, Stephen(2012)。An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,22(1),1-29。  new window
13.Lynn, L. E. Jr.、Heinrich, C. J.、Hill, C. J.(2000)。Studying Governance and Public Management: Challenges and Prospects。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,10(2),233-261。  new window
14.Bryson, John M.、Crosby, Barbara C.、Stone, Melissa Middleton(2006)。The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature。Public Administration Review,66(Suppl. 1),44-55。  new window
15.Fernández-Esquinas, M.、Ramos-Vielba, I.(2011)。Emerging forms of cross-sector collaboration in the Spanish innovation system。Science & Public Policy,38(2),135-146。  new window
16.Hamann, R.、Kambalame, D.、De Cleene, S.、Ndlovu, N.(2008)。Towards collective business action and cross-sector collaboration in responsible competitiveness clusters in southern Africa。Development Southern Africa,25(1),99-118。  new window
17.Simo, G.、Bies, A. L.(2007)。The Role of Nonprofits in Disaster Response: An Expanded Model of Cross-Sector Collaboration。Public Administration Review,67,125-142。  new window
18.Simpson, D. D.、Lefroy, K. K.、Tsarenko, Y. Y.(2011)。Together and apart: Exploring structure of the corporate-NPO relationship。Journal of business ethics,101(2),297-311。  new window
19.李台京、吳秀月(20050600)。新竹市政府與老人福利團體2001-2004互動關係之研究。中華行政學報,2,75-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Turpin, T.、Garrett-Jones, S.、Woolley, R.(2011)。Cross-sector research collaboration in Australia: the Cooperative Research Centres Program at the crossroads。Science & Public Policy,38(2),87-97。  new window
21.夏黎明(19991200)。池上平原文化景觀的空間過程--土地、社群與國家的論述。東臺灣研究,4,159-191。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.林豐瑞、徐俊麟、吳菁菁(2011)。遊憩動機與整體意象影響遊憩滿意度及重遊意願之研究:以臺東池上鄉有機廊道遊客為例。農業推廣文彙,56,187-203。  延伸查詢new window
23.陳定銘、陳樺潔、游靖宇(20120600)。政府與客家社團協力指標之析探。行政暨政策學報,54,41-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.許耿銘、林淑娟(20150600)。公私協力推動環境犯罪防治之研究--大臺南環檢警結盟之個案分析。中國行政評論,21(2),75-105。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.梁炳琨(20091100)。資源社區的產業轉型:臺灣地區的四個個案分析。地理研究,51,1-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.劉麗娟(20150200)。老人福利之供給分析初探:跨部門治理觀點。福祉科技與服務管理學刊,3(1),115-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.陳秋政(2008)。跨部門治理之內涵與研究啟示。府際關係研究通訊,4,29-31。  延伸查詢new window
28.Amirkhanyan, A. A.(2010)。Monitoring across Sectors: Examining the Effect of Nonprofit and For-Profit Contractor Ownership on Performance Monitoring in State and Local Contracts。Public Administration Review,70(5),742-755。  new window
29.Gelissen, J. P. T. M.(2001)。Worlds of Welfare, Worlds of Consent?。Public Opinion on the Welfare State,20(4),333-349。  new window
30.Kelman, S.、Hong, S.、Turbitt, I.(2012)。Are There Managerial Practices Associated with the Outcomes of an Interagency Service Delivery Collaboration? Evidence from British Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnerships。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,23(3),609-630。  new window
31.O'Leary, R.、Gerard, C.、Bingham, L. B.(2006)。Introduction to the Symposium on Collaborative Public Management。Public Administration Review,66(Supplement 1),6-9。  new window
32.Najam, Adil(2000)。The Four C's of Government Third Sector Government Relations。Nonprofit Management and Leadership,10(4),375-396。  new window
33.趙永茂(20030600)。臺灣府際關係與跨域管理:文獻回顧與策略途徑初探。政治科學論叢,18,53-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.林萬億(20020600)。臺灣的家庭變遷與家庭政策。臺大社會工作學刊,6,35+37-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.林淑馨(20061200)。日本地方政府的非營利組織政策:以三重縣與神奈川縣為例。公共行政學報,21,39-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.Provan, Keith G.、Kenis, Patrick(2008)。Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,18(2),229-252。  new window
37.王仕圖(20130600)。非營利組織在社區照顧服務的協調合作:以社區照顧關懷據點為例。臺大社會工作學刊,27,185-228。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.Ansell, Chris、Gash, Alison(2008)。Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,18(4),543-571。  new window
39.Klijn, Erik-Hans、Koppenjan, Joop F. M.(2000)。Public management and policy networks: Foundations of a network approach to governance。Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory,2(2),135-158。  new window
會議論文
1.鄭讚源(2004)。社會產業:典範移轉與跨部門整合。非營利事業管理研討會,(會議日期: 2004/04/11)。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.江明修(2006)。地方政府跨域管理機制與互動模式之研究:跨部門治理觀點 (計畫編號:NSC94-2414-H004-022)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Newman, J.(2001)。Modernising Governance: New Labor, Policy and Society。London:Sage。  new window
2.林水波、李長晏(20050000)。跨域治理。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.池上鄉誌篡修委員會(2011)。池上鄉志。臺東:池上鄉公所。  延伸查詢new window
4.林佳瑩、陳雅琪、吳永明、方欹葳(2015)。社會科學研究法:理解人類社會的工具書。臺北:雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
5.Lynn, Laurence E. Jr.、Heinrich, Carolyn J.、Hill, Carolyn J.(2001)。Improving Governance: A New Logic for Empirical Research。Washington, DC:Georgetown University Press。  new window
6.Agranoff, Robert、McGuire, Michael(2003)。Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Governments。Georgetown University Press。  new window
7.Ostrom, Elinor(1990)。Governing The Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action。Cambridge University Press。  new window
其他
1.中華民國統計資訊網(2016)。各縣市老年人口比例,http://statdb.dgbas.gov.tw/pxweb/dialog/statfile9.asp。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳宏聲(2014)。池上樂齡學習中心獲教育奉獻團體獎,http://www.ksnews.com.tw/newsdetail_ex.php7n_id=0000669857&level2_id=108。  延伸查詢new window
3.詹火生,林慧芬(2004)。臺灣社會福利過去、現在與未來,http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/SS/092/SS-B-092-018.htm。  延伸查詢new window
4.Hogg, Kenneth(2000)。Making A Difference: Effective Implementation of Cross-Cutting Policy, A Scottish Executive Policy Unit Review,http://www.gov.scot/Resource/Doc/158621/0043026.pdf, 。  new window
圖書論文
1.史美強(2010)。公私協力:建構公私協力夥伴關係--如何推動臺東縣池上米地方產業發展。地方政府公共管理個案選輯。行政院人事行政局地方行政研習中心。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE