臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：國中生參與服務學習課程方案歷程經驗、服務投入態度與學習成果之研究
書刊名：課程與教學
作者：劉若蘭 引用關係／李育齊
作者(外文)：Liu, Ruo-lan／Li, Yu-chi
出版日期：2018
卷期：21:2
頁次：頁141-168
主題關鍵詞：服務學習課程方案；歷程經驗；服務投入；學習成果；Service learning curriculum program；Experiences of process；Involvement of service；Learning outcomes
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:58
  • 點閱點閱:5
本研究目的為探討國中生參與服務學習課程方案歷程經驗、服務投入態度與學習成果之關係。研究樣本以2013年與2014年參與教育部補助國民中小學服務學習計畫的729名國中學生為對象，進行問卷調查。研究結果發現：（一）本研究編製的服務學習歷程經驗、服務投入態度與學習成果量表，運用驗證式因素分析，具有良好之信度與建構效度。（二）服務學習歷程經驗與服務投入態度高分組的學生，在各項學習成果的提升程度都顯著高於低分組的學生。（三）本研究建立的模式具有良好的適配度，且各變項間的影響路徑均為顯著，服務學習歷程經驗對於服務投入態度與學習成果有顯著直接影響，服務投入態度在服務學習歷程經驗及學習成果間具有中介效果。研究結果期能提供學校參考，規劃與國民教育的學習目標連結的服務學習課程方案與評量成果機制，增進學生多元能力的發展。
This study explored the influences of experiences in service learning curriculum programs, involvement of service on learning outcomes from junior high school students. The participants include 729 junior high school students in the learning curriculum and programs under a grant from Ministry of Education during the academic year of 2013. A developed scale measuring the service engagement, experiences of process, and service learning outcomes was used as the research tool. The results indicated: (a) based on the confirmatory factor analysis, the reliabilities and construct validities of the scale are good; (b) all learning outcomes in the high level group are higher than that of the low level group in the service-learning experience; (c) the fitness of model of this study is good and the direct effects among service engagement, program quality, and service learning outcomes are significant. The service engagement has the mediating effect on the impact of program quality to learning outcomes. The research could be a reference for schools to design effective programs to enable students becoming mature and to implement desired learning outcomes through other kinds of service learning.
期刊論文
1.Brody, S. M.、Wright, S. C.(2004)。Expanding the self through service-learning。Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning，11(1)，14-24。  new window
2.Ngai, S. S. Y.(2009)。The effects of program characteristics and psychological engagement on service-learning outcomes: A study of university students in Hong Kong。Adolescence，44(174)，375-389。  new window
3.吳怡儒、蔡文榮、李林滄(20120600)。彰化縣偏遠地區國中學生數學學習態度及其影響因素之研究。教育科學期刊，11(1)，25-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.汪慧玲、沈佳生(20130600)。合作學習教學策略對大專學生之學習成效與學習態度之影響：以兒童發展評量與輔導課程某單元為例。臺中教育大學學報. 教育類，27(1)，57-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.常雅珍、林奕宏(20140100)。以樂觀信念、正向意義及正向情緒融入服務學習課程之量化研究。課程與教學，17(1)，145-177。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Conway, J. M.、Amel, E. L.、Gerwien, D. P.(2009)。Teaching and learning in the social context: A meta-analysis of service learning's effects on academic, personal, social, and citizenship outcomes。Teaching of Psychology，36(4)，233-245。  new window
7.楊怡婷(20130100)。「服務學習」納入十二年國教超額比序之爭議與省思。臺灣教育評論月刊，2(1)，88-90。  延伸查詢new window
8.Duffy, Ryan D.、Raque-Bogdan, Trisha(2010)。The motivation to serve others: Exploring relations to career development。Journal of Career Assessment，18(3)，250-265。  new window
9.Levesque-Bristol, C.、Knapp, T. D.、Fisher, B. J.(2010)。The effectiveness of service-learning: It's not always what you think。Journal of Experiential Education，33(3)，208-224。  new window
10.王金國(20150100)。師資培育機構推動服務學習之行動與省思--以靜宜大學師資培育中心為例。臺灣教育評論月刊，4(1)，41-47。  延伸查詢new window
11.李育齊、劉若蘭(20161000)。投入社區的翻轉學習：大學生參與服務學習融入聯課活動之實施品質、學生投入及學習成果模式研究。課程與教學，19(4)，61-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.林文展(20100600)。讓學習與生活結合--中小學實施「服務學習」方案之可行作法。中等教育，61(2)，138-151。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.馮莉雅(2004)。服務學習融入我國國中課程可行性之研究。學生事務，42(1)，77-83。  延伸查詢new window
14.劉若蘭(20160700)。融入社會議題服務學習課程發展歷程與學習成果之研究。課程與教學，19(3)，113-138。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Celio, C. I.、Durlak, J.、Dymnicki, A.(2011)。A meta-analysis of the impact of service-learning on students。Journal of Experiential Education，34(2)，164-181。  new window
16.Chesbrough, R. D.(2011)。College students and service: A mixed methods exploration of motivations, choices, and learning outcomes。Journal of College Student Development，52(6)，687-705。  new window
17.Darby, A.、Longmire-Avital, B.、Chenault, J.、Haglund, M.(2013)。Students' motivation in academic service-learning over the course of the semester。College Student Journal，47(1)，185-191。  new window
18.Fitch, D.、Kaiser, M.、Parker-Barua, L.(2012)。Student, curricular and public agency needs: A focus on competency achievement。Systemic Practice and Action Research，25，417-439。  new window
19.Karaman, A. C.(2014)。Community service learning and the emergence of systems thinking: A teacher education project in an urban setting in Turkey。Systemic Practice and Action Research，27，485-497。  new window
20.Levesque, C.、Sell, G. R.、Zimmerman, J. A.(2006)。A theory-based integrative model for learning and motivation in higher education。To Improve the Academy，24，85-103。  new window
21.Liu, R. L.、Lin, P. Y.(2016)。Changes in multicultural experience: Action research on a service learning curriculum。Systemic Practice and Action Research，29，1-18。  new window
22.MacAdam, D.、Brandt, C.(2009)。Assessing the effects of voluntary youth service: The case of teach for America。Social Forces，88(2)，945-970。  new window
23.Nelson, J. A.、Eckstein, D.(2008)。A service-learning model for at-risk adolescents。Education and Treatment of Children，31(2)，223-237。  new window
24.Anderson, James C.、Gerbing, David W.(1988)。Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach。Psychological Bulletin，103(3)，411-423。  new window
25.Baron, Reuben M.、Kenny, David A.(1986)。The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，51(6)，1173-1182。  new window
26.Fornell, Claes、Larcker, David F.(1981)。Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error。Journal of Marketing Research，18(1)，39-50。  new window
學位論文
1.卓淑瑛(2009)。服務學習活動方案融入國中公民教學之行動研究--以台中縣光德國中為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉雅君(2008)。綜合活動學習領域課程實施成效之研究--以服務學習課程為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.蘇雅君(2003)。服務學習在國中童軍社團推動與學生學習效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.郭生玉(2003)。心理與教育測驗。臺北：精華書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.李美枝(2000)。社會心理學。臺北：大洋出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Youniss, J.、Yates, M.(1997)。Community service and social responsibility in youth。Chicago, IL：University of Chicago Press。  new window
4.Dunkin, M. J.、Biddle, B. J.(1974)。The study of teaching。New York, NY：Holt, Rinehart and Winston。  new window
5.邱皓政(2011)。量化研究法（三）：測驗原理與量表發展技術。台北：雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳芝儀(2004)。服務學習融入國民中小學課程之研究。臺北市：行政院青年輔導委員會。  延伸查詢new window
7.Jacoby, B.(2014)。Service-learning essentials: Questions, answers, and lesson learned。San Francisco, CA：Jossey-Bass。  new window
8.陳金定(20070000)。青少年發展與適應問題：理論與實務。臺北市：心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Cooksey, M. A.、Olivares, K. T.(2010)。Quick hits for service-learning: Successful strategies by award-winning teachers。Bloomington, IN：Indiana University Press。  new window
10.Eyler, J.、Giles, D. E.(1999)。Where's the learning in service-learning?。San Francisco, CA：Jossey-Bass。  new window
11.Fertman, Carl I.、White, George P.、White, Louis J.(1996)。Service learning in the middle school: Building a culture of service。National Middle School Association。  new window
12.Jacoby, Barbara(1996)。Service-Learning in Higher Education: Concept and Practice。San Francisco, CA：Jossey-Bass。  new window
13.教育部(2014)。教育部國教署補助國民中小學服務學習計畫。臺北市：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
14.Rhoads, R. A.、Howard J. P.(2001)。Academic service learning: A pedagogy of action and reflection。San Francisco, CA：Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
15.吳明隆(2009)。結構方程模式：AMOS的操作與應用。五南。  延伸查詢new window
16.黃芳銘(2004)。結構方程模式：理論與應用。五南。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Kendall, Jane C.(1990)。Combining service and learning: An introduction。Combining service and learning: A resource book of community and public service。Raleigh, NC：National Society for Internships and Experiential Education。  new window
2.Eyler, J.、Giles, D. E.(1997)。The importance of program quality in service-learning。Service-learning: Application fron the research。Mahwah, NJ：Erlbaum。  new window
3.徐明、楊昌裕、葉祥洵(2009)。臺灣服務學習的發展。從服務中學習：跨領域服務學習理論與實務。臺北市：洪葉。  延伸查詢new window
4.田耐青、張景媛、陳淑瓊(2016)。服務學習方案的規劃與實施原則。國民中小學服務學習教師手冊。臺北市：教育部國民及學前教育署。  延伸查詢new window
5.徐明、邱筱琪(2009)。服務--學習夥伴關係的發展。從服務中學習：跨領域服務學習理論與實務。臺北市：洪葉。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃玉、嚴秋蓮、劉若蘭(2016)。服務--學習理念與特質。國民中小學服務學習教師手冊。臺北市：教育部國民及學前教育署。  延伸查詢new window
7.Billig, S. H.(2009)。Does quality really matter: Testing the new K-12 service learning standards for quality practice。Advances in service-learning research (Vol. 9): Creating our identities in service-learning and community engagement。Greenwich, CT：Information Age。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：832（臺灣：831，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1951065 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67745277
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上