:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:心理劇中「替身經驗」現象的探究
書刊名:中華輔導與諮商學報
作者:游淑瑜 引用關係蔡瑋芸
作者(外文):You, Shu-yuTsai, Wei-yun
出版日期:2019
卷期:54
頁次:頁159-190
主題關鍵詞:心理劇身體經驗替身詮釋現象學Bodily feelingsDoublingHermeneutic phenomenologyPsychodrama
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:241
  • 點閱點閱:4
本文的目的在於以詮釋現象學的方法,嘗試揭露心理劇中替身經驗的結構內涵。本研究透過公開招募的方式,招募具有人際議題,並想透過心理劇替身技巧幫助其解決人際議題的成員5位,其中研究者會邀請5位受過250小時以上心理劇治療訓練的成員擔任替身5位,邀請5位受過三年以上心理劇治療訓練的成員擔任輔角。本文的臨床操作是在心理劇治療場境,透過替身場景進行暖身,促進主角與替身的對話。替身場景約進行約30-60分鐘。本研究於替身完後,即請替身撰寫替身經驗描述文,有關經驗描述文本的分析,則遵循著李維倫與賴憶嫺(2009)提出之現象學分析方法五步驟進行資料分析。本研究結果發現替身經驗普遍結構的二個行為向度:一是橫向聯繫作用:人際語言、非語言行動。替身會傾聽主角、輔角互動的口語語言與非口語語言,引發身體感受,進入主角的經驗脈絡;一是縱向聯繫作用:話語-身體感受。替身在替身場景中,替身經驗到身體、心理的感受,進入主角經驗脈絡,理解主角的置身所在,因而說出替身話語。同時也發現自發性替身經驗歷程,替身卡住經驗歷程與替身脫卡經驗歷程。透過本研究,解明替身經驗的現象,藉以擴大並充實替身經驗的理論,並提供對同理能力訓練的參考。
This study aims at revealing the experiential structure of doubling in psychodrama using a phenomenological method. Five participants with the interpersonal issues were chosen and invited to be the protagnists. Five auxiliaries and five doubles were invited to attend the double-training workshop. In the workshop, the researcher designed a doubling scene to warm up the protagnists. The doubling scene included the protagonist, the auxiliary (who played the person and had interpersonal issue with the protagonist), and the double (who sat beside the protagonist). The director facilitated verbal dialogue between the protagonist, the auxiliary and the double. And the dialogue lasted for 30-60 minutes. The researcher collected the experience-describing of the doubles. Phenomenological analysis (Lee & Lai, 2009) was applied to the descriptions of experience. The experiential structure of doubling in psychodrama consisted of two dimensions of behaviors. One was the horizontal dimension, indicating the interpersonal verbal and nonverbal communication. The double listened to the verbal and nonverbal behavior of the protagonist and the auxiliary, listened to the interaction between the protagonist and he auxiliary. The double arouse bodily feelings and doubled for the protagonist. The other was the vertical dimension, indicating the words-bodily feelings connection. By role-playing or by interacting with the protagonist or the auxiliary, the double experienced the inner and bodily feelings, the double understood the protagonists' experience and was in the role of the double and doubled for the protagonist. There are five experiential themes in the experiential structure of doubling in psychodrama. The first experiential theme was that the double was in the role of the double by role-playing. The second experiential theme was that the double was to reveal the protagonist's inner experience. The double played the role of the protagonist, listened to the verbal and nonverbal behavior of the protagonist and the auxiliary, and listened to the interaction between the protagonist and the auxiliary. The double arouse bodily feelings and was in the role of the double, with an aim to understand protagonists' experience. The double revealed the protagonist's inner experience. The third experiential themewas that the double facilitated the protagonist's inner dialogue. The double listened to the verbal and nonverbal behavior of the protagonist and the auxiliary, and listened to the interaction between the protagonist and the auxiliary. The double arouse bodily feelings and was in the role of the double and doubled the protagonists. The double facilitated the protagonist's inner dialogue. The fourth experiential theme was that the double empowered the protagonists by bodily movement. The double listened to the verbal and nonverbal behavior of the protagonist and the auxiliary, listened to the interaction between the protagonist and the auxiliary. The double empowered the protagonists by bodily movement. The last experiential theme was that the double kept the spontaneous doubling process. The spontaneous doubling experience was that the double listened to the verbal and nonverbal behavior of the protagonist and the auxiliary. The double listened to the interaction between the protagonist and the auxiliary. The double arouse bodily feelings and keep being in the role of the double and doubled the protagonists. The double revealed the protagonist's inner experience, facilitated the protagonist's inner dialogue, and empowered the protagonists by bodily movement. The spontaneous doubling process kept going. The researcher reveals the experiential process which the double is stuck and out of stuck. The researcher revealed two situatedness of the double. One situatedness was that the double was isolated with the protagonists' experience. The other situatedness was that the double was refused by the protagonist and the auxiliary. By being doubled by the director, the double was out of stuck and keep the process of doubling. Based on the results of the study, various significant features regarding the experience of doubling in psychodrama were clarified.
期刊論文
1.孫頌賢(20080300)。諮商師的成熟發展歷程--視框焦點的移動。輔導季刊,44(1),65-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.洪雅琴、李維倫(20070800)。一位犯罪少女的置身所在:家的錯落與回返。本土心理學研究,28,141-196。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林耀盛、李弘毅(20160600)。朝向疾病的療癒:血液透析者心理經驗之詮釋。本土心理學研究,45,129-174。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Kipper, D. A.、Ben-Ely, Z.(1979)。The effectiveness of the psychodramatic double method, the reflection method, and lecturing in the training of empathy。Journal of Clinical Psychology,35(2),370-375。  new window
5.Goldstein, J. A.(1967)。The effects of doubling in involvement in group psychotherapy as measured by number and duration of patient utterances。Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice,4,57-60。  new window
6.Sachnoff, E. A.(1991)。Brief report: Why and when to use "hit and run" doubling。Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama & Sociometry,44(1),41-43。  new window
7.Toeman, Z.(1946)。Clinical Psychodrama: Auxiliary Ego Double and Mirror Techniques。Sociometry,9(2),178-183。  new window
8.李維倫、賴憶嫺(20090300)。現象學方法論:存在行動的投入。中華輔導與諮商學報,25,275-321。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.游淑瑜、李維倫(20121200)。心理劇中的自發性:以輔角經驗為對象的定性研究。中華輔導與諮商學報,34,83-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.李維倫(20040600)。以置身所在做為心理學研究的目標現象及其相關之方法論。應用心理研究,22,157-200。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Kipper, D. A.(2002)。The Cognitive Double: Integrating Cognitive and Action Techniques。Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama & Sociometry,55(2/3),93-106。  new window
學位論文
1.林育民(2009)。心理劇中主角的替身之內隱訊息探究(碩士論文)。中國文化大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳郁姍(2004)。變遷社會諮商員專業能力建構之探索研究(碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學,南投。  延伸查詢new window
3.王璧華(2016)。女同性戀者在基督教信仰中追求自我認同的經驗歷程--以心理劇歷程分析為例(碩士論文)。臺北市立大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.洪雅琴(2005)。受保護管束犯罪少年心理分析治療的詮釋現象學研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Karp, Marcia、Holmes, Paul、Tauvon, Kate Bradshaw、陳鏡如(2002)。心理劇入門手冊。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.游麗嘉(1983)。心理劇入門。臺北:大洋出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hare, A. Paul、Hare, June Rabson、胡茉玲(2004)。心理劇創始人--莫雷諾。臺北:生命潛能。  延伸查詢new window
4.Kipper, D. A.(1986)。Psychotherapy through clinical role playing。Brunner/Mazel Inc.。  new window
5.Merleau-Ponty, Maurice(1962)。Phenomenology of perception。London:Routlege。  new window
6.Gendlin, E. T.(1962)。Experiencing and the reaction of meaning。New York, NY:Free Press of Glencoe。  new window
7.Nolte, John(2014)。The philosophy, theory and methods of J. L. Moreno: The man who tried to become God。Routledge。  new window
8.Hill, Clara E.、田秀蘭、林美珠(2017)。助人技巧--探索、洞察與行動的催化。學富文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.Blatner, Adam、吳錦鳳、洪千惠、胡嘉琪、夏敏、程小蘋、鄒繼礎(2002)。心靈的演出:心理劇方法的實際應用。學富文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.Corey, G.、修慧蘭、鄭玄藏、余振民、王淳弘(2013)。諮商與心理治療--理論與實務。臺北:雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳珠璋、吳就君(1985)。由演劇到領悟--心理演劇方法之實際運用。臺北:張老師。  延伸查詢new window
12.Blatner, A.(1973)。Acting in。New York, NY:Springer。  new window
13.Darwin, C.(1872)。The expression of the emotions in man and animals。London:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
14.Husserl, E.(1973)。Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology。Heidelberg:Springer Netherlands。  new window
15.Moreno, Z. T.、Blomkvist, L. D.、Rützel, T.(2000)。Psychodrama, surplus reality and the art of healing。Routledge。  new window
16.Moreno, J. L.、Moreno, Z. T.(1975)。Psychodrama (III): Action therapy & principles of practice。New York, NY:Beacon。  new window
17.Tomasulo, D. J.(1998)。Action methods in group psychotherapy: Practical aspects。Philadelphia, Pennsylvania:Accelerated Development。  new window
18.龔卓軍(20060000)。身體部署:梅洛龐蒂與現象學之後。臺北:心靈工坊。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Heidegger, Martin、Macquarrie, John、Robinson, Edward S.(1962)。Being and Time。Harper & Row。  new window
20.Leveton, Eva、林瑞華、蔡艾如、張貴傑(2004)。心理劇臨床手冊。臺北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.李維倫(2007)。心理治療的倫理現場:說話作為倫理照顧技術之探討。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Gendlin, E. T.(1964)。A theory of personality change。Personality change。New York, NY:Wiley。  new window
2.Gendlin, E. T.(1974)。Client-centered and experiential psychotherapy。Innovations in client-centered therapy。New York, NY:Wiley。  new window
3.Angus, L. E.、Lewin, J.、Bouffard, B.、Rotindi-Trevusan, D.(2004)。What's the story? Working with narrative in experiential psychotherapy。The handbook of narrative and psychotherapy: Practice, theory, and research。Thousand Oaks, California:Sage publications, Inc.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE