:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:中共建政70週年閱兵活動的官方論述策略
書刊名:傳播研究與實踐
作者:顏瑞宏
作者(外文):Yen, Jui-hung
出版日期:2021
卷期:11:1
頁次:頁141-176
主題關鍵詞:閱兵論述策略批判論述分析論述歷史取徑意識形態ParadeDiscursive strategyCritical discourse analysisDiscourse-historical approachIdeology
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:158
  • 點閱點閱:1
期刊論文
1.李亞明(20060900)。中共「政黨居主」的政治體制改革策略。復興崗學報,87,121-145。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Wodak, Ruth(2012)。Language, power and identity。Language Teaching,45(2),215-233。  new window
3.林柏州(20090600)。中華民國政府遷臺初期國慶閱兵的政治意義--民國三十八年到五十三年(1949-1964)。史學彙刊,23,193-224。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.王孝勇(20120300)。Mikhail Bakhtin的對話主義及其對批判論述分析的再延伸:以白玫瑰運動為例。政治與社會哲學評論,40,149-202。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.倪炎元(20120100)。批判論述分析的定位爭議及其應用問題:以Norman Fairclough分析途徑為例的探討。新聞學研究,110,1-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.倪炎元(19991000)。批判論述分析與媒介研究之初探--兼論其在華文媒介上的應用。傳播管理學刊,1(1),205-233。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.王雅玄(20050600)。社會領域教科書的批判論述分析:方法論的重建。教育研究集刊,51(2),67-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.姚竹音(20160300)。揭開習以為常的認同與差異:「部落的呼喚」得獎作品之後殖民批判論述分析。人文社會科學研究. 教育類,10(1),60-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.吳明澤(20160100)。一帶一路、亞投行與人民幣國際化。經濟前瞻,163,79-84。  延伸查詢new window
10.王皓昱(19970300)。歐洲舊「法西斯主義」:政治福音與集體癡狂。東吳政治學報,7,105-131。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.王海洲(2009)。作為媒介景觀的政治儀式:國慶閱兵(1949-2009)的政治傳播學研究。新聞與傳播研究,16(4),53-60。  延伸查詢new window
12.王海洲(2010)。政治儀式中的權力宣展與合法性建構--中國社會變革與政治發展中的國慶大閱兵(1949-2009)。學海,2010(4),140-149。  延伸查詢new window
13.謝英傑、謝志淵(20180800)。對中共於「吉布地」設立首座海外軍事基地戰略意涵之研究。海軍學術雙月刊,52(4),121-139。  延伸查詢new window
14.蕭阿勤(19970300)。集體記憶理論的檢討:解剖者、拯救者、與一種民主觀點。思與言,35(1),247-296。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Goffman, E.(1957)。Alienation from interaction。Human Relations,10(1),47-60。  new window
16.顏慧欣(20190300)。近期美中貿易戰發展動向之研析。經濟前瞻,182,9-14。  延伸查詢new window
17.王智盛(2019)。《深度觀察》中共建政70週年與「十一大閱兵」。交流雜誌,167,21-24。  延伸查詢new window
18.李永峰(20191110)。人民幣3.0抗美元霸權,中國推動區塊鏈領先全球。亞洲週刊,33(44),26-30。  延伸查詢new window
19.李英明(20170900)。習近平思想:新的中共意識形態模式的興起。展望與探索,15(9),8-13。  延伸查詢new window
20.李美賢、闕河嘉(20180600)。臺灣「東南亞新二代」的形象建構。傳播文化與政治,7,133-174。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.李華君、竇聰穎、滕姍姍(2016)。抗戰勝利70週年閱兵儀式的象徵符號、閾限和國家認同建構。新聞大學,136,93-99+114。  延伸查詢new window
22.林竣達(2017)。川普會逆轉全球化嗎?。新社會政策,49,45-58。  延伸查詢new window
23.姜新立(20181100)。中國大陸「改革開放」40年評析。展望與探索,16(11),1-8。  延伸查詢new window
24.倪炎元(20171000)。2014年臺灣太陽花學運中的官方論述策略。傳播與社會學刊,42,23-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.原倩(2018)。薩繆爾森之憂、金德爾伯格陷阱與美國貿易保護主義。經濟學動態,2018(10),50-59。  延伸查詢new window
26.黃之棟、朱容萱(20190300)。你還是不懂我的明白--「大尾鱸鰻2」原住民族歧視風波的批判論述分析。臺灣民主季刊,16(1),89-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.黃健群(20180500)。「一帶一路」與中國大陸區域經濟發展:策略與挑戰。展望與探索,16(5),94-110。  延伸查詢new window
28.楊增崠、杜成敏(2018)。「金德爾伯格陷阱」的實質評析。思想教育研究,2018(7),75-79。  延伸查詢new window
29.樊水科(2011)。從「傳播的儀式觀」到「儀式傳播」:詹姆斯・凱瑞如何被誤讀。國際新聞界,33(11),32-36。  延伸查詢new window
30.劉建明、徐開彬(2015)。「儀式」作為傳播的隱喻之原因探析。湖北大學學報(哲學社會科學版),42(4),80-84。  延伸查詢new window
31.聶建中(20200500)。數位人民幣開啟數位貨幣暨電子支付金融之影響。展望與探索,18(5),1-9。  延伸查詢new window
32.Larsen, B. S.(2000)。Radio as ritual: An approach to everyday use of radio。Nordicom Review,21(2),259-274。  new window
學位論文
1.周暘展(2018)。川普上任後的美、中關係發展趨勢及其對台影響(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.紀乃淳(2013)。小說賽德克‧巴萊中族群意識形態之批判論述分析(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.Holzscheiter, A.(2005)。Power of discourse and power in discourse: An investigation of transformation and exclusion in the global discourse of childhood(博士論文)。Freie Universität Berlin。  new window
圖書
1.許農合(1999)。1949-1999國慶大閱兵。北京:中國青年出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.王海洲(2008)。合法性的爭奪--政治記憶的多重刻寫。南京:江蘇人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Weiss, G.、Wodak, R.(2003)。Critical discourse analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity。New York, NY:Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
4.Reisigl, Martin、Wodak, Ruth(2001)。Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism。Routledge。  new window
5.Schechner, Richard(2002)。Performance Studies: An Introduction。Routledge。  new window
6.Carey, J. W.(1992)。Communication as culture: Essays on media and society。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
7.Hobsbawm, Eric、Ranger, Terence O.(2012)。The Invention of Tradition。Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Rothenbuhler, Eric W.(1998)。Ritual Communication: From Everyday Conversation to Mediated Ceremony。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
9.Turner, Victor(1995)。The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure。New York:Aldine de Gruyter。  new window
10.巫和懋、夏珍(2002)。賽局高手:全方位策略與應用。臺北:時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
11.Nash, Kate、Scott, Alan(2001)。The Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology。Blackwell Publishing。  new window
12.倪炎元(20180000)。論述研究與傳播議題分析。臺北:五南圖書。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Osborne, Martin J.、Rubinstein, Ariel(1994)。A Course in Game Theory。MIT Press。  new window
14.Van Gennep, Arnold、Vizedom, M. B.、Caffee, G. L.(1961)。The Rites of Passage。Chicago, IL:Chicago University Press。  new window
15.辛灝年(2015)。中國命運與臺灣前途:辛灝年講演錄。博大。  延伸查詢new window
16.林東泰(20190000)。批判話語分析總論:理論架構、研究設計與實例解析。巨流圖書股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Bennett, B.(2012)。Logically fallacious: The ultimate collection of over 300 logical fallacies。eBooklt.com。  new window
18.Chang, H.-p.(1997)。Taiwan: Community of fate and cultural globalization。LIT Verlag。  new window
19.United States Department of Defense(2019)。The Department of Defense Indo-Pacific strategy report: Preparedness, partnerships, and promoting a networked region。Department of Defense。  new window
20.Trump, Donald J.(2017)。National Security Strategy of the United States of America (December 2017)。Washington, DC:The White House。  new window
其他
1.(20191101)。中共十九屆四中全會在京舉行。  延伸查詢new window
2.(20191002)。天安門廣場舉行盛大閱兵儀式和群眾遊行 習近平發表重要講話並檢閱受閱部隊。  延伸查詢new window
3.王堯,馮學知(20191219)。堅定推進祖國和平統一進程--訪中共中央臺辦、國務院臺辦主任劉結一。  延伸查詢new window
4.李宗憲(20190607)。臺灣新角色:貿易戰、軍售和印太戰略中的「臺灣牌」,https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/chinese-news-48555739。  延伸查詢new window
5.李銀祥(20150904)。戰略視界下的勝利日大閱兵。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳明杰(20190930)。【政軍杰論】內外交迫封城閱兵的習武帝,https://www.fountmedia.io/article/35732。  延伸查詢new window
7.孟祥夫(20190830)。系列活動共慶新中國七十華誕。  延伸查詢new window
8.曾復生(20181025)。川普槓中 引爆印太軍備競賽,https://www.chinatimes.com/opinion/20181025004163-262104?chdtv。  延伸查詢new window
9.湯惠芸(20190805)。香港反送中運動首次發起全面三罷 多區暴發警民衝突,https://www.voacantonese.com/a/hk-anti-extradition-to-china-gernal-strickes-live-qand-a-/5029210.html。  延伸查詢new window
10.葉駿(20191003)。建政與建國的糾結,https://www.chinatimes.com/opinion/20191003004319-262105?chdtv。  延伸查詢new window
11.劉致昕(20190725)。現代集中營--來自新疆「再教育營」的證言:電擊、老虎凳、監視性交的夫妻房,https://www.twreporter.org/a/xinjiang-re-education-camps-truth。  延伸查詢new window
12.Agence-France Presse(20200114)。China trade surplus with US dropped 8.5% to 296 bn in 2019,https://www.bangkokpost.com/business/1835484。  new window
13.Blanchard, B.(20190423)。China shows off new destroyer as Xi views naval parade,https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-military-anniversary/china-shows-off-new-destroyer-as-xi-views-naval-parade-idUSKCN1RZ0AA。  new window
14.Bondaz, A.,Delory, S.(20190924)。The military parade for the 70th anniversary of the PRC: A revealing example of Chinese strategic power,https://www.frstrategie.org/en/publications/strategic-imagery/military-parade-70th-anniversary-prc-revealing-example-chinese-strategic-power-2019。  new window
15.Bradsher, K.(20191017)。China's Economic Growth Slows as Challenges Mount: The U.S. trade war is only part of the problem, as Beijing grapples with weakening investment and falling car sales,https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/17/business/china-economic-growth.html。  new window
16.Chan, M.,Lau, S.,Ng, N.(20170630)。Hong Kong's PLA garrison stages biggest military parade in 20 years as Xi Jinping inspects troops,https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/2100671/chinese-president-xi-jinping-inspects-pla-troops-hongkong。  new window
17.Fisher, R.(20191001)。Arms racing with China: 70th Anniversary Military Parade, part 2: Intimidating Taiwan,https://www.theepochtimes.com/arms-racing-with-china-70th-anniversary-military-parade-part-2-intimidating-taiwan_3102313.html。  new window
18.Friedman, T. L.(20190827)。How Trump and Xi Can both win their trade war,https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/27/opinion/trump-china.html。  new window
19.Hornby, L.(20160403)。China reverts to 'grid management' to monitor citizens' lives,https://www.ft.com/content/bf6a67c6-940e-11e5-bd82-c1fb87bef7af。  new window
20.Scott, R. E.,Mokhiber, Z.(20181023)。The China toll deepens,https://www.epi.org/publication/the-china-toll-deepens-growth-in-the-bilateral-trade-deficit-between-2001-and-2017-cost-3-4-million-u-s-jobs-with-losses-in-every-state-and-congressional-district。  new window
21.Tao, I.(20190713)。Top US Officials meet with Hong Kong media tycoon critical of Beijing, much to China's ire,https://www.theepochtimes.com/hong-kong-media-tycoon-critical-of-beijing-meets-with-top-us-officials-much-to-chinas-ire_2997323.html。  new window
22.Taylor, A.(20171013)。Ditching deals has become Trump's main foreign policy,https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/10/13/ditching-deals-has-become-trumps-main-foreign-policy。  new window
圖書論文
1.Wodak, R.(2004)。Critical discourse analysis。Qualitative research practice。London:Sage。  new window
2.Wodak, Ruth(2001)。What CDA is about: A summary of its history, important concepts and its developments。Methods of critical discourse analysis。London:Sage。  new window
3.Wodak, Ruth、Meyer, Michael(2009)。Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology。Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis。Sage。  new window
4.Wodak, R.、Pelinka, A.(2002)。From Waldheim to Haider: an introduction。The Haider phenomenon。London:Transaction Publishers。  new window
5.Wodak, Ruth(2014)。Critical Discourse Analysis。The Routledge Companion to English Studies。London:Routledge。  new window
6.Reisigl, Martin、Wodak, Ruth(2009)。The discourse-historical approach (DHA)。Methods of critical discourse analysis。Sage。  new window
7.龔祥生、劉姝廷(2019)。習近平對臺措施與成效評估。2019中共政軍發展評估報告。財團法人國防安全研究院。  延伸查詢new window
8.Reisigl, M.、Wodak, R.(2016)。The discourse-historical approach (DHA)。Methods of critical discourse studies。Sage。  new window
9.Rimmer, P. J.、Ward, R. G.(2016)。The power of geography。Geography, power, strategy and defence policy: Essays in honour of Paul Dibb。Australian National University Press。  new window
10.Wodak, R.、Meyer, M.(2016)。Critical Discourse Studies: History, Agenda, Theory, and Methodology。Methods of Critical Discourse Studies。Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE