:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:受暴婦女充權歷程之研究
作者:吳敏欣 引用關係
作者(外文):Min-Hsin Wu
校院名稱:東海大學
系所名稱:社會工作學系
指導教授:彭懷真
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2010
主題關鍵詞:受暴婦女敘事充權充權歷程battered womennarrativesempowermentempowerment process
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:73
自1970年代以來,充權、優勢觀點的理念漸漸被廣泛討論,社會工作實務工作者面對服務使用者時,應保持尊重、接納及正向的態度,協助服務使用者將內在資源與力量發揮出來,協助尋找阻礙功能運作的障礙並將外部資源連結起來。
以充權的觀點來看待受暴婦女,除了將焦點放在受暴婦女如何因應暴力以及找到自我的價值與力量之外,更進一步可以探究受暴婦女如何將力量延伸出去幫助其他人、幫助整個社會,這是充權概念由個人、人際乃至政治層次的發揮。由受暴婦女成為助人者的角色,可以說是由弱勢者成為擁有權力者的展現,由角色的變化可以理解受暴婦女是如何由無權的弱者成為有權的強者。
本研究的目的有三:第一,期待研究中看到受暴婦女內在心理動力的變化、內在力量的轉化與行動;第二,藉由「助人工作」的契機將自我的力量轉化為幫助他人或社會的行動;第三,期待研究結果能夠發展出充權歷程的模式,進而應用到實務工作的服務之中。
本研究是採用敘事方法作為資料收集與分析的方式,透過受訪者的敘說陳述,能了解其內心種種的認知、想法、感受,藉此獲得對充權歷程的認識;受訪者是九位從事助人工作且受到婚姻暴力的婦女。
由受訪者生命故事的呈現以及敘說故事的分析,本研究的發現可由婚姻的起點、婚姻的變調、生命的沈澱、生命的躍起及充權力量的延伸來說明。
1.婚姻的起點-期待與現實的落差,被打入無權的辛酸:受訪者對婚姻與現實生活期待的落差衍生對婚姻看法的改變,因此經歷這段暴力婚姻,現在對當時的處境也已經有不同的看法,而外遇是暴力行動的重要因子、性是配偶宰制受暴婦女的工具與意念,都使得受暴婦女在婚姻生活當中承受相當大的壓力與痛苦。
2.婚姻的變調-權力的失去,對人生有諸多體會:受訪者在暴力經驗中找到擺放自我的方式,如認命或樂觀面對,因而受訪者在承受暴力時,也以不同的方式摸索與暴力應對的方法;此外,暴力因素使得受訪者失去生理心理能量,健康出現問題、目睹暴力子女受到暴力的波及、受訪者以不同角度思考留在婚姻或離開婚姻則是重要的議題。
3.生命的沈澱-權力的獲得,重整人生故事:對受訪者而言,非正式資源給予力量,使得受訪者找到往前進的動力,但是正式資源難以發揮功能,尤其是對於新移民的協助更是難以使力,娘家卻是個矛盾的支持系統,而自助團體則是能夠產生充權的力量。
4.生命的躍起-為自己充權:在助人之前,個人需要沈澱與修復,經過一段時間的思考與冷靜,才能再重新開始,而改變自己則是躍起的轉折點。
5.充權力量的延伸-協助別人充權:「希望別人不再受同樣的苦」是助人的關鍵點,而發揮影響力是充權的最高層次的表現。
本研究由以上的發現整理出充權歷程的變化圖,同時也建構出充權歷程模式。由充權歷程模式中各向量的變化,可以看到支持與阻礙受暴婦女充權的各項力量的影響力,正充權可說是人生歷程中有不斷往上拉的力量,而充權歷程就是向上的正向力量與向下的負向力量互相抵消與疊加的動態過程。
關鍵字:受暴婦女、敘事、充權、充權歷程
Since 1970, empowerment and strength perspectives are gradually discussed and adopted. When social work practitioners face services users, they should keep respect, acceptance and positive attitudes and help them develop the inner strengths and power and find out the barriers that impede personal functions and connect the outside resources.
With the empowerment perspectives of battered women, the focus is not only on how women deal with the violence and find out the self values and power, but also how women expand the power to help others and societies. It’s the exertion of empowerment that the concept is from the individual, interpersonal to political levels. From battered women’s role as helping others can be said the expression of the one who are disadvantaged becomes having power. As the changes of the roles, we can realize how the women become the powerless to the powerful.
There are three purposes of this research. First, we expect to see the changes of the inner psychological dynamics of battered women and the transitions of inner power and actions. Second, we expect to see that the turning point of helping works can make the inner power to transform to the actions. Third, we expect to develop the empowerment process model and apply it to the practice services.
The researcher uses narrative methods to collect and analyze data. As the interviewees tell their stories, we can realize their cognition, thinking and feeling, and we can gain the knowledge of empowerment process. The interviewees are 9 marital battered women who are engaged in helping works.
As the presentations of the life stories of interviewees and the analysis of narrative stories, the research findings are discussed into five parts: the beginning of the marriage, the changing of the marriage, the subsidence of life, the leap of life and the extending of empowerment power.
1.The beginning of the marriage--the drops of expectations and realities: the drops of expectations and realities of the marriage produce the changes of thinking to their marriages of interviewees. As they pass through the violent marriages, they have different opinions about their situations at that time. The affair is the important factor in violent actions and sex is the tool that a spouse dominates the battered the woman. The two factors make the battered women pressure heavy stress and sufferings.
2.The changing of the marriage--losing power: interviewees find the ways to settle themselves in the violent experiences, ex. resigned to fate or confrontation with optimism. When the interviewees endure the violence, they explore the different ways to deal with the violence. Besides, violence makes the interviewees lose the physical and psychological strengths. There are some other important issues, ex. the troubles in health, the children who witness violence are battered, interviewees think about staying or leaving marriages in different ways.
3.The subsidence of life--gaining power: for interviewees, the informal resources give them power and keep them moving. The formal resources have troubles to exert functions, especially for new migrations. The maiden home is a contradictory support system, and self-help group can bring empowered strengths.
4.The leap of life--empowering self: before helping others, women have to subside and recover. After they think and calm down for a period of time, women can begin their life again. And changing self is the turning point of leap.
5.The extending of empowerment power--helping others to be empowered: the key point of helping others is “Do not sustain the same sufferings”. Exerting one’s influence is the best expression of empowerment.
From the findings, the researcher arranges the empowerment process change chart, and conducts the empowerment process model. With the changes of the vectors in the empowerment process model, we can see the influence of the power that supports and impedes battered women’ empowerment. Empowerment could be said the positive power that pulls you up in the life time. Empowerment process is the dynamic process that the positive power and the negative power counteracts and accumulates mutually.
Key Words: battered women、narratives、empowerment、empowerment process
中央研究院歐美圖書館(2009)。http://www.ea.sinica.edu.tw/Blog/listall.php?cs=8。2009年5月7日查詢。
內政部(2007)。中華民國95年婦女生活狀況調查報告。台北:內政部。
王金永等譯,Padgett, D. K.原著(2000)。質化研究與社會工作(Qualitative methods in social work research: challenges and rewards)。台北:洪葉文化。
王美文(2001)。「增權」觀點之婦女學習。社會教育學刊,30,25-45。
王佳煌等譯,Neuman, W. L. 原著(2002)。當代社會研究法:質化與量化途徑(Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches)。台北:學富文化。
王增勇(2006)。充權的理念與應用-以醫院就業輔導員為例。護理雜誌,53(2),18-22。new window
朱儀羚等譯,Crossley, M. L. 原著(2004)。敘事心理與研究:自我、創傷與意義的建構(Introducing Narrative Psychology: Self, Trauma and the Construction of Meaning)。嘉義市:濤石文化。
危芷芬、陳瑞雲譯,Bernice, 原著(1996)。女性心理學(Women’s lives: themes and variations in gender learning)。台北:五南。
沙依仁(1998)。人類行為與社會環境。台北:五南。
李美枝(2000)。社會心理學:理論研究與應用。台北:大洋出版社。
李開敏、陳淑芬(2006)。受暴婦女的充權:社工復原力訓練及督導之整合模式。應用心理研究,32,183-206。new window
宋月瑜(2004)。婚姻暴力受虐婦女離婚後的生活適應之研究。台中:東海大學社會工作學系碩士班碩士論文。
李芬芳譯,Gilligan, J. 原著(1997)。暴力失樂園(初版)。台北:時報文化。
宋麗玉(2006)。增強權能量表之發展與驗證。社會政策與社會工作學刊,10(2),49-86。new window
宋麗玉(2008)。增強權能策略與方法:台灣本土經驗之探索。社會政策與社會工作學刊,12(2),123-194。new window
吳芝儀譯,Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T.原著 (2008)。敘事分析:閱讀、分析與詮釋(Narrative research: reading, analysis, and interpretation)。 嘉義市:濤石文化。
吳芝儀、李奉儒譯,Patton, M. Q. 原著(1995)。質的評鑑與研究(Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods)。台北:桂冠。
吳柳嬌(2005)。婚姻暴力的成因與處遇之研究。高雄:中山大學中山學術研究所博士論文。new window
吳麗敏(2006)。授權賦能於組織之運用。護理雜誌,53(6),53-58。new window
沈瓊桃(2008)。婚暴併兒虐服務整合的挑戰與模式初探。社會政策與社會工作學刊,12(1),51-90。new window
余漢儀(2001)。精障病友家屬團體與專業之權力互動-兼論社工之介入策略。台大社工學刊,5,1-51。new window
易之新譯,Freedman, J., & Combs, G. 原著(2000)。敘事治療:解構並重寫生命的故事(Narrative therapy)。台北:張老師文化。
林芳玫(1996)。自由主義女性主義:自由、理性與平等的追求。載於顧燕羚(主編),女性主義:理論與流派(1-26頁)。台北:女書文化。new window
林秀英(2004)。婦女參與志願服務動機與工作滿足之研究-以花蓮地區祥和計畫志工為例。台北:師範大學人類發展與家庭研究所碩士論文。
林義男譯,Light, D. Jr. & Keller, S. 原著(1987)。社會學(Sociology)。台北:巨流。
周美惠(2004)。諮商義工服務經驗對中年婦女生命歷程之影響-以台北市生命線為例。台北:世新大學社會發展研究所碩士論文。
俞彥娟(2005)。女性主義對母親角色研究的影響。女學學誌:婦女與性別研究,20,1-40。
柯永河(1980)。心理衛生學。台北:大洋出版社。new window
柯麗評、王珮玲、張錦麗(2005)。家庭暴力:理論政策與實務。台北:巨流。
胡幼慧(2003)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流。
洪素珍、張潔瑩(2002)。目睹暴力兒童與戲劇治療。中華團體心理治療,8(2),14-21。new window
洪櫻純(2005)。增能取向之婦女教育方案規劃與實例評析。成人及終身教育學刊,5,169-194。new window
秦安琪(2005)。敘事治療:與你夥伴共行的旅程。載於尤卓慧等主編,探索敘事治療實踐(165-196頁)。台北:心理。
袁方(2002)。社會研究方法。台北:五南。
徐宗國譯,Strauss, A., & Corbin, J.原著(1997)。質性研究概論(Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques)。台北:巨流。
畢恆達(2001)。社會研究的研究者與倫理。載於嚴祥鷥主編,危險與秘密:研究倫理(31-84頁)。台北:三民。new window
孫碧霞、劉曉春、邱方晞、曾華源譯,Garvin, C. D.原著(2000)。社會團體工作(Contemporary group work) (3rd ed) 。台北:洪葉文化。
夏曉鵑等(2006)。不要叫我外籍新娘。新店市:左岸文化出版,遠足文化發行。new window
粘容慈(2004)。重新發現力量∼高齡志工參與志願服務的充權經驗。國立政治大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
張秀玉(2005)。從增強權能觀點探討身心障礙嬰幼兒其家庭之處遇方法。社區發展季刊,109,486-499。new window
張婉如(2008)。新移民女性增能培力之探究-以「南洋台灣姐妹會」成員為例。高雄:國立高雄師範大學性別教育研究所。
張麗春、李怡娟(2004)。賦權概念分析。護理雜誌,51(2),84-90。new window
張麗春、黃淑貞(2003)。巨觀與微觀-充能與自我效能之概念分析。醫護科技學刊,5(3),194-207。new window
張翰璧(2007)。東南亞女性移民與台灣客家社會。台北市:中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心亞太區域研究專題中心。new window
黃一秀(2000)。婚姻暴力之受虐婦女求助歷程之探討。台中:東海大學社會工作學系碩士論文。
黃怡瑾(2001)。婚暴中的權力控制──個人自覺與社會結構的互動歷程。婦女與兩性學刊,12,95-137。new window
陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。台北:五南。new window
陳怡潔譯,Berger, R. J., McBree, J. T., & Rifkin, M. J. 原著(1998)。人類行為與社會環境。台北:揚智文化。
陳宜鋒(2008)。增強權能取向實務對受暴婦女之改變歷程影響。南投:暨南大學社會政策與社會工作研究所碩士論文。
陳秋山、王玉馨、郭慧琳譯,Shaw, I., & Gould, N. 原著(2008)。社工質性研究(Qualitative research in social work)。台北:華都文化。(原版2001出版)
陳冠旭、周煌智(2006)。一位曾受家庭暴力與性侵害個案之心理治療過程。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,2(2),19-34。new window
陳婷蕙(1996)。婚姻暴力中受虐婦女對脫離受虐關係的因應行為之研究。台中:東海大學社會工作學系碩士論文。
陳淑芬(2003)。「大陸新娘」的擇偶、受虐與求助歷程-兼論服務提供者對「大陸新娘」的假設及其對服務提供的影響。社區發展,101,182-199。new window
陳琇芬譯,Godin, S.原著(2008)。低谷-贏家與輸家之間的距離(The dip: a little book that teaches you when to quit)。台北:商周文化
許碧珊(2001)。以充權觀點檢視更年期自助團體成員之經驗歷程。國立台灣大學衛生政策與管理研究碩士論文。
許維素(2002)。賦能導向的諮商-以焦點解決短期諮商為例(上)。諮商與輔導,198,18-22。
許維素(2002)。賦能導向的諮商-以焦點解決短期諮商為例(下)。諮商與輔導,199,36-39。
許義忠、李幸蓉(2004)。三位空巢期女性的工作、休閒與家庭意識形態:自覺與賦權的過程。女學學誌:婦女與性別研究,17,159-200。new window
張宇樑、吳樎椒譯,Creswell, J. W.原著(2007)。研究設計:質化、量化及混合方法取向(Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches)。台北:學富文化。
張宏哲等譯,許臨高主編,Hepworth, D. H., Rooney, R. H. & Larsen, J. A.原著(1999)。社會工作直接服務:理論與技巧(Direct social work practice: theory and skills) (5th ed.)。台北:洪葉。
張芬芬譯(2005)。Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. 原著。質性研究資料分析(Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook)(2nd ed.)。台北:雙葉書廊。
張妙如(2006)。婚姻暴力受虐婦女復原力的展現。台北:東吳大學社會工作學系碩士論文。
許翠紋(2001)。婚姻暴力調解措施之研究。台北:中央警察大學犯罪防治研究所博士論文。
許義忠、李幸蓉(2004)。三位空巢期女性的工作、休閒與家庭意識型態。女學學誌:婦女與性別研究,17,159-200。
郭玲妃、馬小萍(2002)。雙重家鎖:受虐婦女的母職經驗。女學學誌:婦女與性別研究,13,47-90。new window
郭貴蘭(2006)。苗栗縣客家籍受虐婦女復元之初探--優勢觀點團體工作之運用。南投:暨南大學社會政策及社會工作學系碩士論文。
陶蕃瀛(2004)。行動研究:一種增強權能的助人工作方法。應用心理研究,23,33-48。new window
莊慧秋(1990)。男歡女愛的禁忌。載於張老師月刊編輯部(主編),「中國人的心理」系列中國人的婚戀觀-允諾與嫁娶(26-30頁)。台北:張老師出版社。
曾月娥(2008)。優勢觀點團體工作運用於暴力循環中婦女復元之研究。南投:暨南大學社會政策及社會工作學系碩士論文。
傅立葉(2002)。婦女福利服務。載於呂寶靜主編,社會工作與台灣社會(266-305頁)。台北:巨流。
彭淑華等合譯,Kemp, A.原著(1999)。家庭暴力(Abuse in the family)。台北:洪葉文化。
曾華源、黃俐婷(2005)。心理暨社會派、生態系統觀及增強權能觀對「人在情境中」詮釋之比較。東吳社會工作學報,14,63-89。new window
曾進勤(2003)。從充權的觀點談高齡人力資源開發運用-以高雄市長青人力資源中心為例。社區發展季刊,103,261-274。new window
楊秀華(2007)。籠中鳥的飛越-家暴奮戰者的自我敘說。台北:輔仁大學社會工作學系研究所。
楊雅婷、顏詩怡、司馬學文、林育如譯,Davis, K., Evans, M., & Lorber, J. 原著(2009)。性別與女性研究手冊(Handbook of gender and women’s studies)台北:韋伯文化(原版為2006年)。
趙善如(1999)。「增強力量」觀點之社會工作實務要素與處遇策略。台大社工學刊,1,231-262。new window
趙善如(2003)。台灣婦女志工充權。載於趙雨龍、黃昌榮、趙維(主編),充權-新社會工作視野(341-359頁)。台北:五南。
趙維生(2003)。充權工作的文化政治考量。載於趙雨龍、黃昌榮、趙維(主編),充權-新社會工作視野(73-84頁)。台北:五南。
廖宮凰(2004)。婦女志工服務學習經驗之研究。嘉義:中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文。
蔡敏玲、余曉雯譯,Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M.(原著)(2000)。敘說探究:質性研究中的經驗與故事(Narrative inquiry: experience and story in qualitative research)。台北:心理。
蔡峰如(2007)。老人充權團體之方案行動與分析。國立暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作研究所碩士論文。
劉秀娟譯,Gelles, R. J., & Cornell, C. P. 原著(1996),家庭暴力(Intimate violence in families)。台北:揚智文化。
劉珠利(2005)。對天然災害受災女性之社會工作-一個增強權能的角度。社區發展季刊,109,444-458。new window
劉珠利譯,Segal, E. A., Gerdes, K., & Steiner, S.原著(2007)。社會工作概論-成為一位改變者(曾華源、高迪理主編)(In introduction to the profession of social work : becoming a change agent)(2nd ed)(128-153頁)。台北:湯姆生。
劉梅君(1997)。建構「性別敏感」的公民權:從女性照顧者工作本質之探析出發。載於劉毓秀主編,女性、國家、照顧工作(185-223頁)。台北:女書文化。new window
劉婌齡(2003)。公部門婦女保護服務社工之協助效益—從受暴婦女角度探討。台中:東海大學社會工作學系碩士論文。
劉惠琴(2000)。性別專業與性別實踐。應用心理研究,13,45-72。
劉焜輝(2007)。"心理師"-"助人工作者"的動機與基本態度。諮商與輔導,263,c2-c2。
鄭麗真(2002)。增強權能理論與倡導。載於宋麗玉、曾華源、施教裕、鄭麗珍(合著),社會工作理論-處遇模式與案例分析(初版)(407-440頁)。台北:洪葉。
鍾宜利(2000)。建構婚姻暴力合併兒少保護家庭處遇模式研討會方案執行成果與經驗整理。台北:台北市婦女救援基金會。
戴明鳳(2007)。過去與現代女性科學家所面臨的困境和現況—從女性諾貝爾獎得主談起。物理雙月刊,29(2), 546-562。
簡春安(1991)。外遇的分析與處置。台北:張老師文化。
簡春安、鄒平儀(2004)。社會工作研究法。台北:巨流。new window
鍾瑞麗譯,Egan, G.原著(2004)。助人歷程與技巧:有效能的助人者(The skilled helper: a problem-management and opportunity-development approach to helping)(7th ed)。台北:湯姆生。
藍采風(1996)。婚姻與家庭。台北:幼獅。
藍毓仁譯,Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. 原著(2008)。質性研究方法(qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers)。台北:巨流。
蘇麗瓊(2004)。以充權觀點探討高雄市低收入戶第二代希望工程脫貧方案效益。台灣社會工作學刊,2,89+91-122。new window
蘇芊玲(2009)。女性主義與婦女運動,http://www.mcu.edu.tw/department/genedu/2echelon/92report/a03/0807_08.htm。2009年5月7日查詢。
饒志堅、蔡惠華、賴秀玲、王玉珍(2003)。我國性別統計及婦女生活地位之國際比較研究。台北:行政院主計處。

英文書目
Adams, R. (2003). Social work and empowerment (3rd ed). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Andersen,C. (1997). Practical guidelines. In L. Østergaard (ed.), Gender and development: a practical guide. New York: Routledge.
Barker, R. L. (1999). The social work dictionary (4th ed.). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
Baruch, G. K., & Barnett, R. C. (1986). Role quality, multiple role involvement, and psychological well-being in midlife women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 578-585.
Bell, M. (2003). Working with families where there is domestic violence. In M. Bell & K. Wilson (ed.). The practitioner’s guide to working with families (pp 188-208). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bent-Goodley, T. B. (2004). Perceptions of domestic violence: a dialogue with African Amercian women. Health and Social Work, 29, 307-316.
Bent-Goodley, T. B. (2009). A black experience-based approach to gender-based violence. Social Work, 54(3), 262-269 .
Beresfor, P. & Croft, S. (1993). Citizen involvement: a practical guide for change. London: Macmillan.
Bettman, C. (2009). Patrarichy: the predominant discourse and fount of domestic violence. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 30(1), 15-28.
Breton, M. (1990). Learning from social group work traditions. Social Work with Groups, 13(3), 21-34.
Breton, M. (2004). An empowerment perspective. In C. D. Garvin, L. M. Gutiérrez, & M. J. Galinsky (Eds.), Handbook of social work with groups (pp 58-75). New York: Guilford Press.
Burke, B., & Harrison, P. (2002). Anti-oppressive practice, In R. Adams, L. Dominelli, & M. Payne (Ed.), Social work : themes, issues and critical debates (2nd ed) (pp 227-236). New York: Palgrave.
Caplan, G.(1964)。Principles of preventive psychiatry. New York: Basic books.
Chronister, K. M., & McWhirter, E. H. (2003). Applying social cognitive career theory to the empowerment of battered women. Journal of Counseling & Development, 81, 418-425.
Condon, S. (2005). Violence against women in France and issues of ethnicity. In S. Wilma & M. Marijke (Eds.), Family violence and police response: learning from research, policy and practice in European countries (pp. 59-82). Hampshire, England: Ashgate.
Corrin, C. (1996). Introduction: feminist campaigning and networking, In C. Corrin (ed.). Women in a violent world: feminist analyses and resistance across Europe. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Dahl, R. A. (1957)。 The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2, 201-215.
Dalrymple, J., & Burke, B. (2006). Anti-oppressive practice: social care and the law. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.
De la Ray, C. (2003). South African women leaders in higher education: professional development needs in a changing context. Journal of Education, 38(3), 407-420.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The logic of naturalistic inquiry in sociological methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
DeVault, M. L. (1990). Talking and listening from women’s standpoint: feminist strategies for interviewing and analysis. Social Problems, 37(1), 96-116.
Dominelli, L., & McLeod, E. (1989). Feminist social work. London: Macmillan-now Palgrave.
Douglas, T. (2000). Basic groupwork (2nd ed ). London: Routledge.
Emerson (1962)。Power-dependence relations. American sociological review, 27, 31-40.
Everett, J. E., Homstead, K., & Drisko, J. (2007). Frontline worker perceptions of the empowerment process in Community-based agencies. Social Work, 52(2), 161-170.
Fadford, J., & Stanko, E. A. (1996). Violence against women and children: the contradictions of crime control under patriarchy. In M. Hester., L. Kelly., & Radford. J. (Eds.), Women, violence and male power (pp. 65-80). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Finch, J. (1984). It’s great to have someone to talk to : the ethics and politics of interviewing women. In C. Bell and H. Roberts (Edss), Social Researching. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Freire, P. (1971). Pedagogy of the oppressed. NY: The continuum Publishing Company.
French, J. R., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Eds.), Studies in social power (pp 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
Gardner, M. (1999). Cultural explanations for domestic violence, in L. Gerdes (Eds.), Battered women (pp. 23-26). San Diego: Greenhaven.
Gelles, R. J. (1993). Through a sociological lens: social structure and family violence. In R. J. Gelles, & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp 31-62). CA: Sage.
GlenMaye, L. (1998). Empower of women. In L. M. Gutiérrez, R. J. Parson , & E. O. Cox (Eds.), Empowerment in social work practice: a sourcebook. US: Brooks/Cole.
Gopalan, P. (2001). Empowerment from below: self-education and empowerment of grassroots women’s collectives. In K. M. Ranjani (Eds.), Building women’s capacities: interventions in gender transformation. New Delhi: SAGE.
Graham, H. (1984). Surviving through stories. In C. Bell and H. Roberts (Eds.), Social Researching. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Green, J. W. (1995). Cultural awareness in human services: a multi-ethic approach (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Gutiérrez, L. M., Parson, R. J., & Cox, E. O. (1998). Creating opportunities for empowerment-oriented programs. In L. M. Gutiérrez, R. J. Parson , & E. O. Cox (Eds.), Empowerment in social work practice: a sourcebook. US: Brooks/Cole.
Hall, C. M. (1992). Women and empowerment: strategies for increasing autonomy. US: HPC.
Hanmer, J., & Griffith, S. (2000). Policing domestic violence. London: Home Office.
Hanmer, J., Radford, J., & Stanko, E. A. (1989). Women, policing and male violence. London: Routledge.
Hargood, C., Millard, D.E., & Weal, M. J. (2009). Investigating a themastic approach to narrative generation. Published in International Workshop on Dynamic and Adaptive Hypertext: Generic Framworks, Approaches and Techniques.
Healy, K. (2005). Social work theories in context: creating frameworks for practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
H-L, Che., M-Y, Yeh., & S-M, Wu. (2006). The self-empowerment process of primary caregivers: a study of caring for elder with dementia. Journal of Nursing Research, 14(3), 209-218.
Holmes, J. (1997). Story-telling in New Zealand women’s and men’s talk. In R. Wodak (Ed.), Gender and discourse (pp. 263-293). London: SAGE.
Holmes, T., & Rache(1967). The social readjustment rating scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213-218.
Hur, M. H. (2006). Empowerment in terms of theoretical perspectives: exploring a typology of the process and components across disciplines. Journal of Community Psychology, 34(5), 523-540.
Hunt, S. C., & Martin, A. M. (2001). Pregnant women, violent men: what midwives need to know. Oxford: BFM/Books for Midwives.
Kearney, M. (2001). Enduring love: a grounded formal theory for women’s experience of domestic violence. Research in Nurse and Health, 24, 270-282.
Keith, H. (1998). Can Addiction-Related Self-Help/Mutual Aid Groups Lower Demand for Professional Substance Abuse Treatment? Social Policy, 29(2), 13-17.
Kipps, S.(2005)。Sexual health needs of women in violent relationships. Primary health care, 15(8), 27-32.
Kirkwood, C. (1993). Leaving abusive partners: from the scars of survival to the wisdom for change. London: SAGE.
Koren, P. E., DeChillo, N., & Friesen, B. J. (1992). Measuring empowerment in families whose children have emotional disabilities: a brief questionnaire. Rehabilitation Psychology, 37, 305-321.
Kornberg, J., & Datta, R. (2002). Introduction: empowerment and disempowerment. In R. Datta & J. Kornberg (Eds.), Women in developing countries: assessing strategies for empowerment (pp. 1-10). Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Labov, W. (1972). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In W. Labov (Ed.), Language in the inner city: studies in the Black English vernacular ( pp. 354-396). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, W. (1997). Some further steps in narrative analysis. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 395-415.
Laitinen, I., Ettorre, E., & Sutton, C. (2006). Empowering depressed women: changes in ‘individual’ and ‘social’ feelings in guided ‘self-help’ groups in Finland. European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counseling, 8(3), 305-320.
Leadbetter, M. (2002). Empowerment and advocacy. In A. Robert, & D. Lena (Eds.), Social work : themes, issues and critical debates (2nd ed). New York: Palgrave.
Levinson, D. J. (1978). The seasons of a man’s life. NY: Alfred Knopf.
Lindström, P. (2005). Violence against women in the Swedish context. In S, Wilma & M, Marijke (Eds), Family violence and police response: learning from research, policy and practice in European countries (pp. 105-125), Hampshire, England: Ashgate.
Loring, M. T. (1994). Emotional abuse. NY: Lexington Books.
Martin-Baró, I. (1994). Writings for a liberation psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Martin, E. P., & Martin, J. M. (1995). Social work and the black experience. Washington DC: NASW press.
McWhirter, E. H. (1991). Empowerment in counseling. Journal of Counseling & Development, 69, 222-227.
Mc Whirter, E. H. (1994). Conuseling for empowerment. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
Michalski, J. (2004). Making sociological sense out of trends in intimate partner violence. Violence against Women, 10(6), 652-675.
Mignon, S. I., Larson, C. J., & Holmes, W. M. (2002). Family abuse: consequences, theories, and responses. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Milner, J. M. (2001). Women and social work: narrative approaches. New York: Palgrave.
Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research interviewing: context and narrative. US: Harvard College.
Murray, M. (2000). Levels of narrative analysis in health psychology. Journal of Health Psychology, 5, 337-348.
Murthy, R. K. (2001). Lessons in capacity building for women’s empowerment. In K. M. Ranjani (Eds.), Building women’s capacities: interventions in gender transformation. New Delhi: SAGE.
Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Oke, M. (2008). Remaking self after domestic violence: Mongolian and Australian women’s narratives of recovery. ANZJFT, 29(3), 148-155.
Ollus, N., & Nevala, S. (2005). Challenges of surveying violence against women: development of research methods. In S, Wilma & M, Marijke (Eds.), Family violence and police response: learning from research, policy and practice in European countries (pp. 9-33), Hampshire, England: Ashgate.
Parson, R. J., Gutiérrez, L. M., & Cox, E. O. (1998). A model for empowerment practice. In L. M. Gutiérrez, R. J. Parson , & E. O. Cox (Eds.), Empowerment in social work practice: a sourcebook. US: Brooks/Cole.
Pillari, V.(2002). Social work practice: theories and skills. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Pleck, J. H. (2004). Men’s power with women, other men, and society: a men’s movement analysis. In P. F. Murphy (Eds.), Feminism & masculinities (pp. 57-68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Raven, B. H., Centers, R., & Rodrignes, A. (1975). The bases of conjugal power. In R. E. Cromwell & D. H. Olson (Eds.). Power in families (pp 217-232). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/examples of prevention: toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15(2), 121-145.
Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park Sage Publications.
Roberts, A. R., Burman, S. (2007). National survey on empowerment strategies, crisis intervention, and cognitive problem-solving therapy with battered women. In A. R. Robers (Eds.), Battered women and their families (3rd). New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Roberts, A. R. (2009). Domestic Violence. Encyclopedia Americana. Retrieved December 7, 2009, from Grolier Online http://libsw.lib.pu.edu.tw:2070/article?id=0432120-00
Robinson, L. (2002). Social work through the life course. In R. Adams, L. Dominelli, & M. Payne (Eds.), Social work : themes, issues and critical debates (2nd ed). New York: Palgrave.
Rowlands, J. (1997). Questioning empowerment: working with women in Honduras. UK: Oxfam.
Runyan, W. M. C. (1984). Life histories and psychobiography: explorations in theory and method. New York: Oxford University Press.
Seith, C. (2005). (Un)Organised responses to domestic violence: challenges and changes in Switzerland. In S. Wilma & M. Marijke (Eds.), Family violence and police response: learning from research, policy and practice in European countries (pp. 165-189), Hampshire, England: Ashgate.
Sieber, J. E. (1992). Planning ethically responsible research: a guide for students and internal review boards. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Solomon, B. (1976). Black empowerment: Social work in oppressed community. New York: Columbic University Press.
Stalans, L. J., & Lurigio, A. J. (1999). Two perspectives on domestic violence. In L. Gerdes (Eds.), Battered women (pp. 14-22), San Diego: Greenhaven.
Stoltenberg, J. (2004). Toward gender justice. In P. F. Murphy (Eds.), Feminism & masculinities (pp. 41-49). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. California: Sage.
Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J., & Steinmetz, S. (1980). Behind closed doors: violence in the American family. New York: Doubleday.
Strube, M. J. (1988). The decision to leave an abusive relationship: empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 236-250.
Sullivan, C. M. (1991). Battered women as active helpseekers. Violence Update, 1, 1,8,10.
Sullivan, C. M., & Bybee, D. I. (1999). Reducing violence using community-based advocacy for women with abusive partners. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 43-53.
Taket, A. et al. (2003). Routinely asking women about domestic violence in health settings. British Medical Journal, 327(7416), 673-675.
Tannen, D. (1994). The sex-class linked framing of talk at work. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and discourse (pp. 195-221). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thyer, B. A. (2001). The handbook of social work research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Turró, C., & Krause, M. (2009). Beyond survival: tracing individual empowerment processes in a poor Chilean settlement. Journal of Community Psychology, 37(3), 381-403.
United Nations (1993). Declaration on the elimination of violence against women. 取自http://www.unhchr.ch/huridocda/huridoca.nsf/(Symbol)/A.RES.48.104.En, 2009年12月5日參閱.
Vos, T., Astbury, J., Piers, L. S., Magnus, A., Heenan, M., Stanley, L, Walker, L., & Webster, K. (2006). Measuring the impact of intimate partner violence on the health of woman in Victoria, Australia. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 84, 739-744.
Walker, L. (1999). The battered woman syndrome defense. In L. Gerdes (Eds.), Battered women (pp. 82-86), San Diego: Greenhaven.
Walters, N., Lygo-Baker, S., & Strkljevic, S. (2001). Empowerment indicators: combating social exclusion in Europe. UK: The Policy Press.
Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1993). Spousal homicide risk and estrangement. Violence and Victims, 8(1), 3-16.
Wuest, J., & Merritt-Gray, M. M. (2001). Beyond survival: reclaiming self after leaving an abusive partner. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 32, 79-94.
Yeh, M-Y., Che, H-L., Lee, L-W., & Horng, F-F. (2008). An empowerment process: successful recovery from alcohol dependence. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17, 921-292.
Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment : issues and illustration. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 581-599.
Zimmerman, M. A., & Rappaport, J. (1988). Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 725-750.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE