:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:跨越工程研發與市場需求間死亡之谷的個案研究-焦點團體的情境激活研究方法
作者:林儀
作者(外文):Yi Lin
校院名稱:國立臺北科技大學
系所名稱:工商管理研究所
指導教授:邱垂昱
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2014
主題關鍵詞:死亡之谷焦點團體調查最佳化激活心理學Valley of deathfocus group interviewingoptimizationactivation of learning motivation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:13
本研究以歸納詮釋焦點團體的情境激活研究方法(Activation of learning motivation)為基礎,透過六大研究個案,嘗試建置跨越工程研發與市場需求間的死亡之谷(Valley of death)的研究方法;首先,本研究以知識工作者、一般受訪者及委託單位利用三角測定法(triangulation)進行深入訪談、個案研究及田野調查,分析焦點團體室的流程分為破冰(warm-up)、融化(melting)、整合(fusion)三部份,各有其功能面、效應面及效益面,研究發現建置一個以激活心理學為基礎的焦點團體訪談標準流程的重要性,並於2013年10月21日取得產業專利,可供企業界實務執行焦點團體法的參考與建議,同時驗證本研究議題一:導入激活心理學於商品設計開發階段,知識工作者更為有創意以及驗證研究議題二:建置焦點團體破冰室於商品開發設計階段,知識工作者的商品設計更為接近市場。本研究實個案一,利用ANSYS/LS-DYNA最佳化軟體模擬微針穿透皮膚之動態分析,結果顯示數值模擬可以有效預測皮膚的形變與破壞與微針陣列的壓力分佈情形,並應用個案二:AAO模板做為模具在塑膠薄膜上以奈米壓印製造奈米結構的最佳化處理,發現最重要的製程參數分別為壓印溫度與脫模溫度,再以個案三:以情境為例,完整田口實驗需要9組製程參數組合(每組5次)共45次的實驗分析,透過BPN對製程參數與產出(微透鏡高度)間關係的有效模擬,與GA對於建構出之BPN最佳解的搜尋,有減少實驗次數的潛力;除此之外,本研究所提之方法與田口方法相比,理論上能更廣泛的應用在連續空間之求解;本研究透過以上三項研發商品的個案驗證議題三:利用最佳化製程設計於商品設計製造,可以滿足商品上市之時效性。本文第五章研究個案四,導入單供應商多買家的整合系統,共同補貨週期與混合批量運輸政策,首先建構了隔離模式,之後進一步結合成為整合模式,研究驗證議題四:探討最佳化存貨整合系統於商品供應鏈過程,達成商品上市之可行性。本研究第六章應用灰色系統理論之灰關聯來探討個案五,以三十家企業找出企業中,發現以X10企業的服務過程最為符合,灰關聯值最高,所提供的服務模式為最佳化經驗模式,驗證議題五: 應用最佳化技術於產品服務經驗,驗證產業服務最佳化模式。最後,本研究第七章顯示,應用最佳化技術探索不同企業的產業技術轉移因子,研究個案六結果顯示,影響模具業競爭力最重要之因子為小型模具試模天數及小型模具交貨天數,建議傳統模具產業技術轉移模式最重要待開發的因子為研發人員人數,歐美國際訂單比例,驗證議題六:尋找最佳化技術於萃取企業技術轉型的關鍵因子,嘗試幫助企業越過死亡之谷。
This study aims to probe into the case study research and development in the technology industry by way of six issues in an attempt to cross the valley of death to be based on the induction and interpretation of the activation of learning motivation theory. A method of triangulation involving knowledge workers, common interviewees, and commissioned units was used to conduct in-depth talks, case studies, and field investigations. The process in the focus group interviewing was divided into the three parts of warm-up, melting, and fusion, each with its aspects of function, effect, and benefit, leading to a discovery of the importance of establishing a standard procedure for focus group interviews to be based on the activation of learning motivation theory. A patent of this invention was obtained on October 21, 2013, which can be used as reference by the businesses in practicing focus group studies.The research findings are applied to test and verify the first issue of introducing the said theory to the design and development stage of commercial products, ending up with constant innovation occurring on the part of knowledge workers. The second issue is concerned with the use of the theory in the warm-up of the design and development stage of commercial products, resulting in making the design by knowledge workers much closer to market needs..;At the same time, this study testifies the use of an ansys/s-dyna optimized software to conduct a dynamic analysis of micro-needle skin rollers, indicating an effective prediction of the skin transformation, lesion destruction, and the distribution of pressure of the micro-needle matrix. It also proves that the AAO pattern plate can be used to optimize the manufacturing of nanostructure through nano-imprinting on the plastic film of the mold and reveals that the most important parameters of the manufacturing process are imprinting temperature and de-molding temperature. Taking a scenario for example, a complete Taguchi experiment needs nine sets of the manufacturing process parameters for a total of 45 experiments (five times for each set), a development that shows a potential for reducing the number of experiments when running a valid simulation of the correlation between the manufacturing process parameter and output through BPN and the search for the best resolution of BPN through GA. In addition, compared with that introduced by Taguchi, the solution worked out by this study can be more broadly applied, in theory at least, to the understanding of the concessive space. By use of the three developed commercial products mentioned above, researchers of this study find that the application of an optimization for the design of a manufacturing process is able to meet the timeliness of commercial products on the market. The fifth chapter of this study exams the single-vendor multi-buyer integrated system and the common replenishment cycle with mixed batch shipment policy, establishing an isolation model and later an integrated model to test and verify the fourth issue, namely the possibility of putting up commercial products on the market through the application of an optimized inventory integrated system to the supply chain. The seventh chapter of this study employs the grey correlation in the grey theory to offer a better service model, finding that among the 30 businesses selected the service process of X10 achieves the highest grey relational grade, which refers to the optimized experience model. Finally, the sixth chapter of this study indicates that when using the technique of optimization to test the technology transfer factor in different industries, one finds that the most influential factors affecting competition of the mold industry are the days for small mold testing and those for small mold delivering. It is suggested, however, that the most important factors to be taken into account are the number of personnel in research and development as well as the ratio for European and American orders. The sixth issue is to look for an optimized skill to extract the key factor in technology transfer so as to help the industry cross the valley of death.
參考文獻

1.Fritz Machlup, The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States, Princeton University Press, 1962, pp.44-50.
2.OECD, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 1999: Benchmarking Knowledge-Based Economies, Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1999.
3.Chen, S.H. and M.C. Liu, “Taiwan’s transition from an industrializing economy towards a knowledge-based economy,” The Emerging Network Economy and East Asian Market Integration Workshop, Tokyo: Normura Research Institute, 2001.
4.Ehlers, V., Unlocking Our Future: Toward a New National Science Policy, Washington, D.C., Committee on Science U.S. House of Representatives One Hundred Fifth Congress, 1998, pp.38-46.
5.OECD, The knowledge-based economy report, Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1996.
6.Powell, W.W., Snellman, K., The knowledge economy, Annual Review of Sociology, 2004, Vol.30, pp. 199-220.
7.Abramovitz M, David PA., Technological change and the rise of intangible investments: The U.S. economy’s growth-path in the twentieth Century, Employment and Growth in the Knowledge-Based Economy, Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1996, pp. 35–60.
8.Cowan R. and G. van de Paal, Innovation Policy in a Knowledge-based Economy. Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities, 2000.
9.The World Bank, Building Knowledge Economies: Advanced Strategies for Development, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 2007.
10.Lundvall, B. and B. Johnson, The Learning Economy, Journal of Industry Studies, 1994, Vol. 1, No. 2.
11.National Research Council, Management of Technology:The Hidden Competitive Advantage, Report of the Task Force on Management of Technology, National Academy of Press, 1997, pp. 9.
12.Cory, J. P., Strategic Planning Process and Technology Management, Int. International Journal of Technology Management, 4(6), 1989, pp. 613-624.
13.Twiss, B. C., and Gooddridge, M., Managing Technology for Competitive Advantage, Pitman Publishing, London, 1989.
14.Collins, G., Gardiner, P., Heaton, A., Macrosson, K., Tait, J., The management of technology: An essential part of training for engineers and scientists, International Journal of Technology Management, 1991, Vol.6, pp. 568-593.
15.Price, R. M., Technology and strategic advantage, California Management Review, 1996, 38(3), pp. 38-56.
16.Khalil, T. M., Management of Technology: The Key to Competitiveness and Wealth Creation, McGraw-Hill, New York, U.S.A., 2000.
17.陳秋雅,探討以無形資產辦理銀行融資之可行性-以銀行角度,碩士,東吳大學,台北市,2011。
18.吳宏志,人力資本彈性與組織資本對組織創新績效的影響─以知識產業為例,碩士,國立中山大學,高雄市,2007。
19.歐斐生,台灣生技產業經營環境與經營分析模式之應用探討,碩士,國立成功大學,台南市,2002。
20.J. Schumpeter, Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1934.
21.W. B. Brown and N. Karagozoglu, A Systems Model of Technological Innovation, IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, Vol.36, No.1, 1989, pp.5-16.
22.M. E. Porter, The Competitive Advantage of Nations, The Free Press, New York, 1990.
23.F. Damanpour, Organizational innovation: a meta analysis of effects of determinants and moderators, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.34, No.3, 1991, pp.555-590.
24.J. M. Higgins, Innovation: The Core Competence, Planning Review, Vol.23, No.6, 1995, pp.32-35.
25.M. A. West and N. R. Anderson, Innovation in top management teams, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.81, No.6, 1996, pp.680-693.
26.J. Clark and K. Guy, Innovation and Competitiveness, Technology Analysis &; Strategic Management, Vol.10, No.3, 1998, pp.363-395.
27.V. K. Narayanan, Managing technology and innovation for competitive advantage, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2001.
28.P. F. Drucker, The Discipline of Innovation, Harvard Business Review, Vol.80, 2002, pp.95-104.

29.K. Laursen and A. Salter, Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms, Strategic management journal, Vol.27, No.2, 2006, pp.131-150.
30.Afuah, Innovation management: Strategies, implementation and profits, 1998.
31.梁雅雯,跨組織創新研發社群發展之探討-以中部精密機械創新研發社群為例,碩士,東海大學,台中市,2006。
32.R. S. Kaplan, Strategy maps: Converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Harvard Business Press, 2004.
33.G. Van Der Panne, C. van Beers, and A. Kleinknecht, Success and Failure of Innovation: A Literature Review, International Journal of Innovation Management, Vol.7, No.3, 2003, pp.309-338.
34.D. Hesmondhalgh, 廖珮君譯, 文化產業, 台北: 韋伯文化, 2006.
35.D. Throsby, Determining the value of cultural goods: How much (or how little) does contingent valuation tell us, Journal of Cultural Economics, Vol.27, No.3-4, 2003, pp.275-285.
36.黃仟文,中小企業創新研發補助政策績效評估,博士,國立中山大學,高雄市,2010。
37.楊海莉,研發管理型態對創新績效之影響─以台灣高科技產業為例,碩士,立德大學,台南市,2008。
38.顧乃桓,研發管理關鍵績效指標之研究—以機械業為例,碩士,逢甲大學,台中市,2007。
39.伍錦輝,研發管理強度對研發人員工作滿足之影響研究-以信任為干擾變數,碩士,國立台灣科技大學,台北市,2006。
40.朴銀河,韓國三星集團創新策略與研發管理之探討,碩士,國立中山大學,高雄市,2005。
41.韓學銘,台灣高科技企業研發管理效能衡量模式建構之研究,碩士,立德管理學院,台南市,2005。
42.黃衣莉,製造業科技管理人才能力內涵之研究,碩士,國立彰化師範大學,彰化市,2003。
43.R. E. Caves, Creative industries: Contracts between art and commerce, Harvard University Press, 2000.
44.UNESCO, Cultural Industries, United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2005, www.unesco.org/bpi/pdf/memobpi25_culturalindustries_en.pdf&;#8206;.
45.D. Throsby, Determining the value of cultural goods: How much (or how little) does contingent valuation tell us, Journal of Cultural Economics, Vol.27, No.3-4, 2003, pp.275-285.
46.UNESCO (United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization), adopted from: http://portal.unesco.org, 2013.
47.王修彥,文化創意設計-台北故宮隨身碟產品個案研究,碩士論文,國立交通大學,新竹市,2010。
48.郭家瑋,台灣文化創意設計之新思維研究:以台北市文化元素為例,大同大學,碩士論文,台北市,2010。
49.謝易&;#29641;,『六堆鬧熱季』六堆客家文化創意設計,碩士論文,高雄師範大學,高雄市,2009。
50.許玲華,傳統蝙蝠圖紋應用於文化創意設計之研究,碩士論文,南華大學,2006。
51.李志林(1998),「物元模型在股市預測中的應用」,系統工程理論與實踐,第一期,頁121-124。
52.余尚武、盧靜怡(2000),「企業經營績效排名之預測—灰色關聯分析與類神經網路之應用」,管理研究學報,第二卷第一期,頁21-54。new window
53.李家同(2002),幕永不落下,台北:聯經出版股份有限公司。
54.呂鋒、劉翔、劉泉(2000),「七種灰色系統關聯度的比較研究」,武漢工業大學學報,第二十二卷第二期。
55.張祥唐,陳家豪(2002),「結合可拓方法與TRIZ方法在產品創新設計上的應用」,第十九屆機械工程研討會,頁101-108。
56.陳啟斌,林進財(2002),「多重品質特性之製程最佳化」,科技管理學刊,第七卷第一期,頁19-36。new window
57.楊敏里、陳榮方(1997),「灰色關聯分析於商業銀行服務品質評估之研究」,第十二屆全國技術及職業教育研討會,商業類Ⅰ,頁311-316。
58.趙慕芬(2003),「灰預測模型評估結構性失業之應用研究」,人力資源學報,第三卷第一期,頁113-127。
59.蔡文(1998),「可拓學概述」,系統工程理論與實踐,第一期,頁76-84。
60.鄧聚龍(2000),灰色系統理論與應用,台北:高立圖書有限公司,頁67-124。
61.鄧聚龍(2002),灰理論中的灰信息包,台北:高立圖書有限公司,頁77-114。
62.Deng, J.(1989)“Introduction to Grey System Theory”, The Journal of Grey System, Vol. 1, pp.1-24.
63.吳秩策,「以個案研究法分析營造廠管理e化之選商與議約」,中華大學營建管理研究所碩士論文,民國92年
64.游政達,「應用焦點團體探討使用者需求脈絡之研究」,台北科技大學創新設計研究所碩士論文,民國91年
65.楊明昌,「策略性彈性的探討─運用個案研究法」,東海大學企業管理學系碩士論文,民國94年
66.洪雪貞,「以焦點團體法探討病患在醫院門診的醫療照護服務需求─以某區域教學醫院為例」,國立雲林科技大學工業工程與管理碩士班碩士論文,民國91年
67.楊家驥,「以內容分析法改進網站內容之探討─以自助旅遊為例」,暨南國際大學資訊管理學系碩士論文,民國88年
68.邱啟文,「溫泉水權總量管制之個案研究─以烏來地區為例」,台北科技大學環境規劃與管理研究所碩士論文,民國93年
69.David W. Stewart, Prem N. Shamdasani著,「焦點團體:理論與實務」,弘智文化,1999
70.王文科、王智弘譯,「焦點團體訪談─教育與心理學適用」,五南出版社,1999
71.高博詮,「教育研究法:焦點團體訪談法」,教育學術新知
72.潘明宏翻譯,「社會科學研究方法(上冊)」,韋伯文化事業出版社,1999
73.張英陣翻譯,「質化研究與社會工作」,洪葉文化事業有限公司,2000
74.馮朝霖、簡楚瑛主編,「質性研究:理論與實作對話」,五南出版社,2001
75.潘淑滿,「質性研究:理論與應用」,心理出版社,2003
76.陳向明,「社會科學質的研究」,台北市:五南,2002
77.Strauss A. and Cobin J. 著,「質性研究入門:紮根理論研究方法」,嘉義市:濤石文化,2001
78.徐宗國譯,「質性研究概論」,台北市:巨流出版社,1997
79.劉作揖著,「個案研究理論與實務」,黎明文化出版,2001
80.楊國樞,「社會及行為科學研究法」下冊,東華書局,1988
81.郭靜晃,「心理學」,台北市:揚智文化,1994
82.劉焜輝、段秀玲編,「個案研究-理論、實務、案例」,天馬文化,1990
83.Robert K. Yin 著;尚榮安 譯,「個案研究法」,尚智文化,2001
84.張馨華,「餐飲業服務疏失關鍵因素之探討─紮根理論主軸轉譯方法之探討」,大葉大學人力資源暨公共關係學系碩士在職專班碩士論文,民國94年
85.范克勤,「台灣英語學習價值觀之心理建構:紮根理論研究方法」,元智大學應用外語學系碩士論文,民國94年
86.陳俊名,「保健食品消費者購買決策因素之研究—方法目的鏈之應用」,國立東華大學企業管理學系碩士論文,民國94年
87.曾子文,「消費者網路競標之研究-MEC途徑(方法目的鏈)」,國立文化大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文,民國93年
88.Alvin C. Burns and Ronald F. Bush, Marketing Research, Pearson Education
89.J. C. Jones, Design Methods, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1970
90.W. L. Neuman, Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Allyn and Bacon,1997
91.G. A. Churchill, Marketing Research-Methodological Foundations, Fifth Edition, 1991, pp.136-142.
92.R. A. Krueger and M. A. Casey, Focus Groups: A Practical Guide For Applied Research, Third Edition, Sage, 2000.
93.Fern, E. F, 1983, Focus group: a review of some contradictory evidence, implications, and suggestion for future research. Advances in Consumer, Research, 10: 121-126.
94.Khan ME., Manderson L, 1992, Focus Groups in tropical diseases research. Health Policy and planning,7:56-66.
95.Kitzinger J, 1995, Qualitayive Research:Introduction focus groups. BMJ,311:299-302
96.Morgan, D. L. 1997. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
97.Roger D. Wimmer &; Joseph R. Dominick,Mass Media Research--An Introduction ,1991
98.Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods . London: Sage Publications.
99.鄧聚龍,1999,灰色系統理論與應用。
100.溫坤禮,2003,灰關聯模型方法與應用。
101.張祥唐,2004,整合TRIZ 與可拓方法之綠色創新設計研究。
102.陳孟成,2004,求解有限制條件的多目標最佳化問題的演化策略法。
103.吳心怡,2006,運用多目標模擬最佳化演算法求解生產控制與庫存管理問題。
104.張祥唐,2004,整合TRIZ 與可拓方法之綠色創新設計研究。
105.林源泰,2006,利用可拓理論與類神經網路設計類比調變型態辨識器。
106.郭明洲,電信服務業基本資料台灣經濟研究院產經資料庫,2006年。
107.鄧聚龍,灰色系統理論與應用,1999年。
108.溫坤禮,灰關聯模型方法與應用,2003年。
109.林源泰,利用可拓理論與類神經網路設計類比調變型態辨識器,2006年。
110.張祥唐,整合TRIZ 與可拓方法之綠色創新設計研究,2004年。
111.張燕宗,以類神經網路與灰色理論預測掩埋場添加灰燼氣體產量之研究,2007年。
112.吳皇榮,運用「環境、策略、組織」觀點探討電信業者之經營邏輯—以中華電信公司與台灣電信集團為例,2003年。
113.陳家慧,網際網路的興起對電信產業的影響,2005年。
114.陳孟成,求解有限制條件的多目標最佳化問題的演化策略法,2004年。
115.翁一銘,海洋放流管之敏感度分析與最佳化設計,2006年。
116.曾光華,行銷管理 理論解析與實務應用,P72~74,2006年。
117.吳明清,教育研究—基本觀念與方法分析,台北:五南,1998年。
118.王玉民,社會科學研究方法原理,台北市:洪葉文化;P250~253;1994年。
119.王文科,教育研究法;P421~435;1995年。
120.王梅玲,美國圖書資訊學網路教學調查研究(網路教學與圖書資訊學應用研討會論文集),2002年。
121.鄧振源、曾國雄,管理與商業心理學,1989年。
122.林儀,應用灰色理論及可拓工程於模具產業技術轉移因素分析,2007年。
123.張祥唐,整合TRIZ 與可拓方法之綠色創新設計研究,2004年。
124.林源泰,利用可拓理論與類神經網路設計類比調變型態辨識器,2006年
125.Bogaschewsky, R. W., U. D. Buscher and G. Lindner (2001), “Optimizing multi-stage production with constant lot size and varying number of unequal sized batches,” Omega, 29, pp.183-191.
126.Goldratt, E., (1988), “Computerized Shop Floor Scheduling,” International Journal of Production Research, No. 26, pp. 443-455.
127.Goyal, S. K., (1977a), &;quot;Economic Batch Quantity in A Multi-stage Production System,&;quot; International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 16, pp. 267-273.
128.Goyal, S. K., (1977b), &;quot;Dtermination of Optimum Production Quantity for A Two-stage Production System,&;quot; Operational Research Quarterly, Vol. 28, pp. 865-870.
129.Hsiao, Y. C., (2004), &;quot;Optimal Multi-Stage Logistic and Inventory Policies with Production bottleneck in a Serial Supply Chain&;quot;. (working paper)
130.Lee, H. L. and C. Billington, (1993), “Material Management in Decentralized Supply Chain,” Operations Research, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 835-847.
131.Pan, C. H. and Y. C. Hsiao, (2002), &;quot;Optimal Multi-Stage Production and Inventory Policies in a Serial Supply Chain&;quot;, 12th International Symposium on Inventories – Budapest, Hungary. (working paper)
132.Szendrovits, A. Z. and Z. Drezner, (1980), &;quot;Optimizing Multi-stage Production with Constant Lot Size and Varying Numbers of Batches,&;quot; Omega, Vol. 8, pp. 623-629.


 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE