:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:知識表徵與概念學習之研究--以路徑蒐尋網路分析為評量工具
書刊名:教育與心理研究
作者:林曉芳 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Hsiao-fang
出版日期:2001
卷期:24(下)
頁次:頁229-258
主題關鍵詞:路徑蒐尋網路分析知識表徵概念學習Pathfinder network analysisKnowledge representationConcept learning
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:219
  • 點閱點閱:49
本文旨在測使用路徑蒐尋網路分析為評量工具超於現今傳統測驗使用工具之優勢,假設路徑蒐尋網路分析工具將提供教師更清楚學生學習狀況的訊息。本研究採用11位特殊教育學分班學生為研究樣本,來討論他們在課後的知識表徵和知識結構,研究結果指出本測量工具的二個重要性指數之值低於過去研究者所做的結果,本研究者推論此情形的發生乃可能源於研究樣本人數過少,且研究樣本本身同質性過所致。根據本研究,可得知透過具體圖形知道學習者的抽象知識表徵,將有助於明瞭學生的學習狀況。藉由此研究,鼓勵我們去做更多的調查來瞭解學生學會什麼,以及學生是如何進學習。
This paper examines the advantages of using the pathfinder network analysis assessment tool over the traditional methods now in use. It is assumed that the pathfinder network analysis tool will give clearer learning conditional information of students for teachers. To do this research applied the pathfinder network analysis technique to a special education class of 11 students. What follows is a discussion of their knowledge representation and knowledge structures. The results of this study in three crucial indices(GTD, PRX, PFC)are actually lower than those found by previous researchers. Researcher’s inference is that the sample size may be too small and the samples’ characteristics are similarly. According to the result, it shows that knowing learners’ abstract knowledge representation through concrete graph, it is helpful for instructor to know the learning situation of students. By this study, encouraging us to do more investigation in knowing what the students learning and how the students thinking.
期刊論文
1.徐綺穗(19950600)。概念教學模式之探討。初等教育學報,8,199-218。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.古明峰(19980500)。數學應用題的解題認知歷程之探討。教育研究資訊,6(3),63-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.朱孝利(19920800)。知識結構與教學。國民教育,32(11/12),7-11。  延伸查詢new window
4.Quillian, M. Ross、Collins, Allan M.(1969)。Retrieval time from semantic memory。Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,8(2),240-247。  new window
5.宋德忠、林世華、陳淑芬、張國恩(19981200)。知識結構的測量:徑路搜尋法與概念構圖法的比較。教育心理學報,30(2),123-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.邱守榕(1992)。關於數學學習研究。科學發展月刊,20(5),571-584。  延伸查詢new window
7.Goldsmith, T. E.、Johnson, P. J.、Acton, W. H.(1991)。Assessing structural knowledge。Journal of Educational Psychology,83(1),88-96。  new window
8.Robertson, W. C.(1990)。Detection of cognitive structure with protocol data: Predicting performance on physics transfer problems。Cognitive science,14,253-280。  new window
9.Collins, A. M.、Loftus, E. F.(1975)。A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing。Psychological Review,82(6),407-428。  new window
10.Hodson, D.(1988)。Toward a philosophically more valid science curriculum。Science Education,72(1),19-40。  new window
11.余民寧、陳嘉成、潘雅芳(19960100)。概念構圖法在測驗教學上的應用。測驗年刊,43,195-212。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.余民寧、潘雅芳、林偉文(19961200)。概念構圖法:合作學習抑個別學習。教育與心理研究,19,93-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Bower, G. H.、Anderson, J. R.(1972)。Recognition and retrieval process in free recall。Psychological Review,79,97-123。  new window
14.阮小芳(2000)。公民大學-知識與資訊的對立:記公民大學教學研討會。人本教育札記,134,64-65。  延伸查詢new window
15.張鳳燕(1991)。教導心理學微觀-從概念學習談國小數學教育。師友,284,24-29。  延伸查詢new window
16.Davis, R.、Shorbe, H.、Szolovits, P.(1993)。What is knowledge representation?。AI Magazine,Spring,17-33。  new window
17.李盛祖(1997)。國小數學乘法系列診斷測驗題庫的建立與應用研究。網際先鋒。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Mandker, J.(1983)。Stories: The function of structure。Anaheim, CA。  new window
研究報告
1.余民寧(1999)。國小數學學習障礙學生的知識結構評量與數學學習障礙診斷測驗編制之研究( I )。臺北市:國立政治大學教育學系。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林曉芳(1999)。數學低成就國中生在代數概念學習之評量研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡佳燕(2000)。國小學生數學學科知識結構評量之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.江淑卿(1997)。知識結構的重要特性之分析暨促進知識結構教學策略之實驗研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳嘉成(1997)。以概念構圖為學習策略之教學對小學生自然科學習之成效結果(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
5.何俊青(1995)。國民小學數學概念教學實驗研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Stillings, N. A.(1995)。Cognitive Psychology。Cambridge, MA:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
2.Anderson, John R.(1983)。The Architecture of Cognition。Hillsdale, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
3.Klausmeier, H. J.、Frayer, D. A.、Ghatala, E. S.(1974)。Conceptual Learning and Development: A Cognitive View。New York。  new window
4.Jonassen, D. H.、Beissner, K.、Yacci, M.(1993)。Structural knowledge: Techniques for representing, conveying, and acquiring structural knowledge。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
5.Davenport, Thomas H.、Prusak, Laurence、胡瑋珊(1999)。知識管理:企業組織如何有效運用知識。臺北:聯經出版事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.Schvaneveldt, R. W.(1990)。Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization。Ablex。  new window
7.余民寧(19970000)。有意義的學習:概念構圖之研究。臺北:商鼎文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Nicholl, Malcolm J.、Rose, Colin(1999)。學習地圖:21世紀加速學習革命。學習地圖:21世紀加速學習革命。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
9.Colin, R.、Malcolm, J. N.(1999)。Accelerated learning for the 21st century: the six-step plan to unlock your master-mind。Accelerated learning for the 21st century: the six-step plan to unlock your master-mind。NY。  new window
10.Minsky, Marvin(1975)。A framework for representating knowledge。The Psychology of Computer Vision。New York, NY。  new window
圖書論文
1.Schvaneveldt, R. W.(1990)。Proximities, networks, and schemata。Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization。Norwood, NJ:Ablex。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE